See above from [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION]. Fast bowlers targeting each other with bouncers isn’t supposed to be morally allowed. Traditionally it was considered against the unwritten code of a cricketer’s professional ethics. Sort of like Mankading still is. But things clearly have changed.
Yes. I totally agree. shouldnt be bouncing tail enders.
We've copped it i guess much more than other nations. A lot of our tailender spinners have copped it and they cant fight back.
You can lay some portoin of the blame on the 1994 aus vs wi tour, where glenn mcgrath bounced walsh, ambrose a lot....
u could say that was one watershed tour when it became apparent anyone and everyone with protective gear on , is fair game.
As far as mankading goes, i wish it would be renamed as bowlers run out or back up runout or some other fancy jargon.
A batsman who takes a head start before the ball is bowled is blatantly cheating and getting an unfair advantage.
Vinoo Mankad warned bill brown of aus in a tour game and DIDNT run him out
Bill brown did it again in a test match and vinoo mankad ran him out.
The travesty is that his name, Mankad proved to be catchy enough for the headline writers to tag this form of dismissal as mankaded.
It should actually be called 'Browned'.
Its a travesty, to the fair name of mankad, 2 generations of those who served Indian cricket both domestically and internationally with the typical indian attributes of restraint in victory and dignity in defeat.
Don bradman himself was against naming this as 'Mankaded'.
my 5 c 's worth...