Romali_rotti said:
Listen to me very carefully: FOR THE 10 BILLIONTH TIME, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT WHO HAS LED WHO TO VICTORY, JUST INDIVIDUAL BOWLING PERFORMANCES AGAINST AUS, ZAHEER VS SHOIB..
Or should I try and explain this in another language ?
The point i made also applies to individual performances as well. If memory serves me right, Shoaib had a forgetable tour of Australia in 1999 where he only picked up 6 wickets. But in the 2002 tour of Australia Akhtar picked up 9 wickets in 2 tests and believe me those were the worst lifeless pitches ever. After that came the 2004-05 series where Akhtar ended up with 11 wickets.
How did the Pak batting do in these series? Well in 1999 we got out for 367 and 250 plus runs in the first test, then we got out for 222 and 391 runs, final test 153 and 270 plus runs. The Australians in return 500 plus runs and 60/0 in first test. 250 runs and 369/6 second test. 500 runs in third test.
In 2002, Pak made 279 and 270 runs in first test while Aus made 450 and 127 runs (we still lost), 2nd test Pak 53 and 59 all out (Pak lost), Aus 400 plus runs, third test Australia 400 plus runs Pak 200 each innings (Pak lost).
In 2005 Pak made 179 and 74 runs in first test while Aus made 381. In Second test Pak made 350 plus, Aus made 350 plus but in return Pak got out for 150 and Aus scored 130/1. Final test Pak scored 303, Australia scored 562 and Pak scored 326 in return and Aus 64/1.
So clearly Pak's batting has been extremely unreliable and there is very little any bowler can do let alone Akhtar if the batters dont give him enough runs to create any sort of pressure what so ever.