What's new

India vs South Africa | 3rd Test | Nagpur | Nov 25-29, 2015 | Match Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe like for no ball...if the leg is in the air but some part is behind the line, its not out.

Not sure about the rule but for no ball its like that. doesn't have to be grounded.

For stumping it is different imo.
Your feet need to be grounded.
 
Maybe like for no ball...if the leg is in the air but some part is behind the line, its not out.

Not sure about the rule but for no ball its like that. doesn't have to be grounded.

Nopes ,, I am sure for the not-outs this is not the case .It has to be grounded behind the line .
 
Turns at times and goes straight at times.

Doesn't have the high deceptive quotient.

If he is bowling around the wicket and into the rough, then it turns more.

Hmmm. Thanks. Guess he was better off bowling the faster and straighter one to Tahir instead of the carrom ball
 
I don't think NWM is a good idea- it just defers a regular batsman down. Amla should have come at 3.
 
Big pre lunch session coming up tomorrow. This session will dictate the course of this match.
 
S.A are really pathetic in these conditions, i think my prediction of 120 all out will pretty much be right.
 
SA will be happy, they're essentially 1 wicket down with AB, Faf, JP still to come
 
Ishant is opening :facepalm:
Kohli is such a fool!

And this is why we never have proper fast bowlers. Too many narrow minded people focused on one match and one innings instead of trying to develop fast bowlers who can practice on ALL wickets. If a fast bowler cannot bowl with new ball when can he bowl?

Attitude like this is why we never had a good fast bowler
 
Day 2 - close of play Prediction

S.A 120 All out
Indian 140/4
 
And this is why we never have proper fast bowlers. Too many narrow minded people focused on one match and one innings instead of trying to develop fast bowlers who can practice on ALL wickets. If a fast bowler cannot bowl with new ball when can he bowl?

Attitude like this is why we never had a good fast bowler

Match should be played with the intent of winning every moment. The test match is not the ideal time for experimenting with fast bowlers. If pitches are spin friendly, then you play spin whenever you can. If pacers cost you extra 50 runs, a low scoring match like this may go the other way.
 
Match should be played with the intent of winning every moment. The test match is not the ideal time for experimenting with fast bowlers. If pitches are spin friendly, then you play spin whenever you can. If pacers cost you extra 50 runs, a low scoring match like this may go the other way.
then, why not play five spinners? . it is not mandatory to play a fast bowler.
 
Good day for us.Jaddu is showing hes a very good option on these pitches.Batting has been surprising good too
 
And this is why we never have proper fast bowlers. Too many narrow minded people focused on one match and one innings instead of trying to develop fast bowlers who can practice on ALL wickets. If a fast bowler cannot bowl with new ball when can he bowl?

Attitude like this is why we never had a good fast bowler

Should have played 3 pacers then
 
Still counts as a 5 day test. RSA still need 5 runs to avoid follow-on though. Lets see if they make it.

I think India have a lead of 90-100 runs on 1st inns, Apart from AB the S.A batsmen dont know which end of the bat to hold in these conditions.
 
then, why not play five spinners? . it is not mandatory to play a fast bowler.

Pacer will be handy at times. You never know - conditions can suddenly turn pacer friendly. They will also get reverse swing when the ball gets old. Going without a single pacer can be a very risky strategy though you need not bowl the pacer if the conditions don't favour them. With three very good spinners for home conditions, India can afford this extra dummy pacer.
 
The pitch is really a mine field , but still Indian batsmen are getting some runs , that has been difference.
 
The standard of spin playing capability is probably lowest of my experience - the pair isn't even turning the ball that much. Ashwin's 1st wicket of the day is a classic example of that. AB gone..............
 
The standard of spin playing capability is probably lowest of my experience - the pair isn't even turning the ball that much. Ashwin's 1st wicket of the day is a classic example of that. AB gone..............

All in the mind! They need to get the previous deliveries off their head. Batting 101
 
The standard of spin playing capability is probably lowest of my experience - the pair isn't even turning the ball that much. Ashwin's 1st wicket of the day is a classic example of that. AB gone..............

That is true. Gambhir could play better against spin than some of these Indian and Saffer batsmen, let alone the Fab 4 or the other international legends.
 
All in the mind! They need to get the previous deliveries off their head. Batting 101

This is the side effect of easy SIX - you can stand with dead stuck feet & solg swing - 60 metres boundary 'll carry even the top edges. Don't want to disrespect anyone, but I watched Mongia (Nayan) scoring 150+ in 11 hours at Delhi dust bowl - his foot-work was better than AB or Amla..........
 
These pitches have been becoming more common in Ranji matches to make the upcoming Indian batsmen better players of spin.
 
This is the side effect of easy SIX - you can stand with dead stuck feet & solg swing - 60 metres boundary 'll carry even the top edges. Don't want to disrespect anyone, but I watched Mongia (Nayan) scoring 150+ in 11 hours at Delhi dust bowl - his foot-work was better than AB or Amla..........

Indian batsmen, with the exception of Pujara and Vijay are no better!
 
AB is likely going to lose his number 1 ranking to KW or Smith.
 
South Africa's mental issues being exposed here. Faf didn't need to do this at all. :out
 
I remember the days SA used to bowl out teams for less than 50 runs.

012+turn+tables.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 002+Two+Bullets.jpg
    002+Two+Bullets.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 124
These pitches have been becoming more common in Ranji matches to make the upcoming Indian batsmen better players of spin.

These pitches 'll never make batsmen better - I can prove that.

In the history of the game, 50% top batsmen has come from 5/6 "home grounds" - SCG, Adelaide, Barbados, Oval, Mumbai, Jo'burg & may be Lahore/Karachi (PAK players don't have any home ground, I take Gaddafi/NCS as PAK's home track), may be we can add SSC at Colombo which is home ground of Sanga, Mahela, Roy Dias & Hari De - all these wickets has 3 common characteristics - true & even bounce, firm base, consistent pace on wicket - batsmen can get value for their shots. Batting is not about slogging 35 on a mine field; neither put dead bat like Cook at Abu Dhabi (That wicket demanded that) - it takes only one mistake to get a batsman out - batting is all about error-less stay on wicket & score on anything loose.

On a good wicket with true pace & bounce, batsmen can back on their technique & temperament - they can plan the innings, it 'll take a good ball or catch to get them out. These type of wickets in domestics 'll make lots of Afridi, Umar or Azhar Ali - either mad slogger or strokeless stone waller - no back lift, not much foot work & no shot on the rise; unless its a rank loose ball, Azhar's SR 'll remain in 30s & even against clubs, Umar can get 300 in a session, but 'll hardly be able to bat 3 sessions.

6 down - look at FaF's feet, even Jesus wasn't dead stuck on the cross like his feet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top