Kohli The King of Chase
Local Club Captain
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2017
- Runs
- 2,572
Good comeback by the kid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No comparison. Both are young and new to International Cricket. Let them play for at least a year.
No offense but to be honest some big jokes are going on as comparison threads.
Now every new left arm bowler who is yet to take wicket of any respectable batsman is gonna be compared with Shaheen?
Problem is Khaleel might not even play that many matches to be compared unless he improves as he cant stay in the team with such performances for very long.
Khaleel is surely nipy but not fast, cant move the ball in the air or off the surface much and lacks variations for LOIs. Good raw prosoect to have but he isnt gonna feature in many games with such deficiencies. He can surely imorove.
Whike Shaheen atm is considered good enough to play regular international cricket by Pak management and they are not wrong. Guy is 6.6, delivered a ball at almost 148 kph in the last match, seams the ball decently, got a slower ball, has got control of reverse swing and bowls a good yorker.
Needs to work a lot on bouncer though. But he is good enough to play international cricket and will develop further within international circuit.
So Shaheen is already an untouchable legend?
So Shaheen is already an untouchable legend?
Both good prospects with shaheen getting an edge, but common none of them are earth shattering or mouth watering prospects. Nasim Shah is what we call mouth watering and earth shattering prospect.
Mitchel starc, Rabada, Vernon Philander, they all started with a bang and still are great bowlersEarth shattering is a big word.
Who was the last earth shattering bowling prospect from any nation?
I like Khalil a lot but i must say merely looking at both i get the feeling that Shaheen has it in him to become one of the greats. He looks class apart.
Having said that i thought the same about Umar Akmal 10 years ago.
Mitchel starc, Rabada, Vernon Philander, they all started with a bang and still are great bowlers
To be honest the guy is going to be very famous in pak in near future.
Pak have a better culture of grooming pacers, but even Khaleel has some potential.
Advantage for SA is, he'll be thrown in the ocean and asked to swim(just like how we keep throwing batsmen). I won't be shocked if he's in the test squad against South Africa. Whereas, KA won't get many chances. Once Pandya returns we'll go back to Pandya, Bhuvi and Bumrah.
But, surely these two should look to outperform each other.
Better than being a spray gun.Khaleel is a complete trundler.
If Khaleel can increase his pace by at least 5kph it would be a really good competition between these two.
I think he's deliberately bowling slower and focussing on swing and control
Initially in the series he was fast but not effective
Still a work in progress but so far impressed
He bowls a heavy ball and is quite accurate. Even a 136 kph delivery of his thudded into the splice of Pollard's bat, surprising him. Don't just look at speed guns.
Like I said previously, you won't even know who Khaleel is after 3-4 years.
Will be a no name in world cricket.
Even though he has some good ingredients, but he's not in a fast bowling team.
Dont know why but I am not very sold on Khaleel yet. Yes, he did well against WI but wont read much into it. I would still play BBS in world cup.
BBS = Bhuvi-Bumrah-Shami
May be, but, he can't get away with these speeds on flat pitches.
But yes, finally some real seamer we've found after so many trundlers like Srans, Thakurs, Kauls, Sharmas, Unadkats, and the list goes on...
Isn't Bumrah world No.1?
Wasn't BK, Shami great too in the start?
Wait n watch.
Bumrah has been a top bowler for India in all three formats. When he missed out due to injury in England, he still came back to bowl brilliantly in the Tests. His is surely one of the best pacers in the white ball format. Shami yes, but Bhuvi's golden run only lasted about a year in ODI's. Shami got injured after the WC and with Bumrah coming through, he hasn't played much for India in ODI's but continues to be India's top Test pacer.
Wasn't BK, Shami great too in the start?
Wait n watch.
Aren't these the flattest pitches u'll ever see?
This post will hunt you after a decadeKhaleel = Starc
Shaheen = Rahat
![]()
Dont know why but I am not very sold on Khaleel yet. Yes, he did well against WI but wont read much into it. I would still play BBS in world cup.
BBS = Bhuvi-Bumrah-Shami
Bhuvi has been struggling for a while now .Khaleel has done better in matches they play together
Plus he offers left arm variety
Only thing Bhuvi has is batting
Wasn't BK, Shami great too in the start?
Wait n watch.
Both are good. Afridi has genetic advantage.