NDTV Censors News that ‘Compromises National Security’

Professor

Local Club Captain
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Runs
2,347
The Indian soldiers who attacked terror targets in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir may have returned home without any fatalities on their side but there is one casualty that the surgical strike did cause on our side of the border: Indian journalism has been left grievously injured.

Marching right behind the special forces who crossed the Line of Control to deliver “five slaps” on Pakistan – to use defence minister Manohar Parrikar’s phrase – most news channels have crossed the line that separates journalism from PR and worse.

If one channel is trying to get its anchors to end their bulletins with a ‘Jai Hind’ sign-off, another has created a ‘war room’ for its staff to play soldier – complete with an anchor wearing an imitation ‘flak jacket’ to shield him from enemy fire as he plans his own surgical strikes on Pakistan.

Even before the army operation, NewsX declared via its editor-in-chief that the channel would no longer be referring to Pakistan as ‘Pakistan’ on its prime time show but as ‘Terror State of Pakistan’. On its part, Times Now has led the charge against the presence of Pakistani artistes in India and has even demanded that diplomatic relations with Islamabad be downgraded.

It’s too early to tell what this surge of nationalist reporting has done for the ratings of these channels but the aggressive manner in which they have led the charge against analysts and opposition politicians who suggested the government provide more information on the surgical strikes has drawn praise from Amit Shah, president of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

The BJP’s position is that it was the army which decided to go public with the news about the strikes and that asking for more information would lower the morale of the army and undermine national security.

As a news organisation that always kept its head when others around them lost theirs, NDTV was one of the few channels willing to discuss the strikes rationally –with several of its studio guests making a case for the government to release more information. But in a dramatic turnaround which suggests the channel has bought into the BJP’s arguments about the danger of asking questions, NDTV has now declared that it would no longer air “any remarks that risk security for political advantage.”

On October 6, the channel decided not to telecast an interview with Congress leader P. Chidambaram – who as a former home minister and finance minister was a member of Manmohan Singh’s cabinet committee on security for a decade – because he was critical of the Modi government’s political handling of the surgical strikes the Indian army had conducted across the Line of Control in Kashmir last week.

In extracts that played out on the channel on Thursday morning, Chidambaram criticised statements made by defence minister Manohar Parrikar in the aftermath of the September 29 surgical strikes and noted that even Prime Minister Narendra Modi had since cautioned his ministers against thumping their chests on the issue.

The full interview, which Chidambaram had recorded with NDTV’s star anchor Barkha Dutt, would be broadcast in the evening, viewers were told. Except that it wasn’t.

Dropping Chidambaram’s interview wasn’t the only act of censorship at the channel that day. Editors were instructed that Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi’s statement in Uttar Pradesh about Modi trading in the blood of Indian soldiers was not to be run on the channel either.

http://thewire.in/71640/ndtv-censor-news-compromises-national-security/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Isn't freedom of press an essential part of democracy? Strange to see such things happening in the world's largest democracy.
 
Without going into specific issues...

In general, freedom of press isn't greater than national security.

Just like freedom of speech doesn't mean you can get away with defamation.

Holds true for all countries.
 
Without going into specific issues...

In general, freedom of press isn't greater than national security.

Just like freedom of speech doesn't mean you can get away with defamation.

Holds true for all countries.
However isn't freedom of press what apparently differentiate India, the worlds biggest democracy and all that shmazz, from restrictive establishment run societies? That's all we keep hearing though we both know that that's never been the case. But atleast earlier Indians used to pretend that that was the case

You can't have the cake and eat it too
 
Without going into specific issues...

In general, freedom of press isn't greater than national security.

Just like freedom of speech doesn't mean you can get away with defamation.

Holds true for all countries.

Well talking about this specific issue, apparently the minister whose interview got censored, criticized the government and the handling of the supposed surgical strikes. Do you think that warrants censorship?
 
Basically, Modi lied and in a desperate to keep the political fall out from making him and his lackeys looking like complain tools, they play the oldest trick in the book- national security.
 
However isn't freedom of press what apparently differentiate India, the worlds biggest democracy and all that shmazz, from restrictive establishment run societies? That's all we keep hearing though we both know that that's never been the case. But atleast earlier Indians used to pretend that that was the case

You can't have the cake and eat it too

Huh?

The world's super power USA has supreme freedom of expression. But if someone talks smack about any business (on personally owned websites and blogs mind you...not even print or TV media) and they file a lawsuit and win, that person gets buried financially. I know people who got buried.

False equivalence if you are speaking in the general sense.

Well talking about this specific issue, apparently the minister whose interview got censored, criticized the government and the handling of the supposed surgical strikes. Do you think that warrants censorship?

As long as specific national defense data is not revealed by unauthorized persons, then censorship is not right.

I am not under what terms does asking for proof of surgical strikes comes under but the government does need to give the public more data.

How much can be given without undermining the national security is something I am not sure of (due to my lack of knowledge in this reg) but public is questioning something, you have to present something solid.
 
Last edited:
In extracts that played out on the channel on Thursday morning, Chidambaram criticised statements made by defence minister Manohar Parrikar in the aftermath of the September 29 surgical strikes and noted that even Prime Minister Narendra Modi had since cautioned his ministers against thumping their chests on the issue.

The full interview, which Chidambaram had recorded with NDTV’s star anchor Barkha Dutt, would be broadcast in the evening, viewers were told. Except that it wasn’t.

Dropping Chidambaram’s interview wasn’t the only act of censorship at the channel that day. Editors were instructed that Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi’s statement in Uttar Pradesh about Modi trading in the blood of Indian soldiers was not to be run on the channel either.

Just read these parts.

This is clearly violating freedom of expression.

As if Chidambaram from outside could give data about a specific operation that would undermine national security.

And why was Rahul's political comment deleted? Its standard stuff that all politicians say.

Ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
Just read these parts.

This is clearly violating freedom of expression.

As if Chidambaram from outside could give data about a specific operation that would undermine national security.

And why was Rahul's political comment deleted? Its standard stuff that all politicians say.

Ridiculous.

1.Wire.in isnt the most credible organisation.

2.NDTV is a Congress run channel so i would not be surprised if congress stopped the broadcast to control damage.They have been facing brickbats because of Pappu and some other congi leaders.

3.I suspect these because the RG comment was played repeatedly by all media channels so dont think anyone censored that.
 
Exactly why shouldn't ndtv do what's in national interests?

Now if we ever considered ndtv to be a factual reporter in the first place then I guess we can think again
 
Last edited:
And now NDTV are in trouble for their reporting of the Pathankot attacks. They did exactly the same thing when the Mumbai attacks happened.

The Information and Broadcasting ministry’s inter-ministerial committee has recommended that news channel NDTV India be taken off air for 24 hours for allegedly revealing “strategically-sensitive information” during the course of its coverage of the anti-terror operations at the Pathankot airbase earlier this year. The first-of-its-kind order has imposed a blackout prohibiting “the transmission or re-transmission of NDTV India channel for one day on any platform throughout India with effect from 00:01 hrs on 9th November 9 to 00:01 hrs of 10th November”.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...tv-india-proposed-for-its-pathankot-coverage/
 
MUMBAI: The Supreme court while confirming the death of the alone Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Kasab, have pulled the media for its role and have hinted that there should be some regularatory should come within themselves.

From the transcripts, especially those from Taj Hotel and Nariman House, it is evident that the terrorists who were entrenched at those places and more than them, their collaborators across the border were watching the full show on TV.

In the transcripts there are many references to the media reports and the visuals being shown on the TV screen.

http://m.timesofindia.com/city/mumb...e-Court-for-its-role/articleshow/16054201.cms
 
Indian Govt Bans NDTV for revealing “strategically sensitive” details during Pathankot attack

New Delhi: The government has ordered that the Hindi channel NDTV India be shut down for a day for allegedly revealing “strategically sensitive” details during its coverage of the Pathankot attacks in January.
The order follows the recommendation of an inter-ministerial committee instituted by the Information and Broadcasting ministry.

http://thewire.in/77748/government-orders-ndtv-india-go-off-air-day-pathankot-reportage/
 
Govt asks NDTV India to go off air for a day over Pathankot coverage

A leading Hindi news channel was today ordered by the government to be taken off air for a day after an inter-ministerial panel constituted by the I&B ministry recommended this action over the broadcaster’s coverage of the Pathankot terror attack in January.
An inter-ministerial panel had concluded that the channel ‘NDTV India’ had revealed crucial and “strategically sensitive” information when the terror attack on an IAF base was being carried out, official sources said.

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/govt-may-ask-ndtv-india-to-go-off-air-for-a-day-over-pathankot-coverage-3735423/
 
This actaully makes Pakistan's goverment seem mature. Pakistan may not be the "world's largest democracy" but at least they don't ban news outlet that they disagree with (Just look at Dawn news)
 
What "sensitive information",the same that the govt. shared with ISI when Modi invited them over.
This govt. is such a jhoothi,makkar and vindictive govt whether it be lies about OROP or fake encounter of SIMI undertrials and now this.
 
This actaully makes Pakistan's goverment seem mature. Pakistan may not be the "world's largest democracy" but at least they don't ban news outlet that they disagree with (Just look at Dawn news)
India has become a banana republic under Modi whether it be the cold blooded murder of Muslims disguised as fake encounters or muzzling of independent journalist voices like Ravish Kumar by banning his channel NDTV hindi only.

Modi ,in his ahankar, is slowly poisoning all the democratic institutions in India.
 
Baghon me bahar hai, the only question that should be asked to mandh budhi bhakts and their equally duffer govt, jinhe sawalon se darr laghta hai:91::91:
 
Baghon me bahar hai, the only question that should be asked to mandh budhi bhakts and their equally duffer govt, jinhe sawalon se darr laghta hai:91::91:

This is not a ban. Just a punishment for a day. Indian media needs a watchdog who punishes them for a day when they cross the line. Nation comes first.
 
The current government has been using Pakistan and national security as a facade to quell any voice that is raised against their governance.

Unfortunately for Modi, this wont work long. And if the ban on NDTV goes through, that will be a suicidal move from BJP, he was elected because India was fed up of Congress' corruption but if he so much as tries to restrict freedom of press or try and play around with India's democratic system, this will prove very costly to him.
 
This is not a ban. Just a punishment for a day. Indian media needs a watchdog who punishes them for a day when they cross the line. Nation comes first.

And government shouldn't have the power to decide what is wrong or right. We have a strong judicial system for that.

Government or the press governing body should have reported them and supreme court should have made a call.
 
And government shouldn't have the power to decide what is wrong or right. We have a strong judicial system for that.

Government or the press governing body should have reported them and supreme court should have made a call.

lol at strong judicial system. where even the most high profile cases take couple of years to be resolved and where the judiciary is neck deep in corruption. lol again at strong judicial system.

and lol max at government shouldnt have power to decide what is right or wrong. the legislature always decides what is right and wrong, and the executive only executes it.
 
lol at strong judicial system. where even the most high profile cases take couple of years to be resolved and where the judiciary is neck deep in corruption. lol again at strong judicial system.

and lol max at government shouldnt have power to decide what is right or wrong. the legislature always decides what is right and wrong, and the executive only executes it.

Glad to have made you laugh so much but whether or not you think how India's judicial system is doesn't matter. It is still the highest authority in India. Period.

Banning media is a very grave step and what NDTV did has been done many channels, during Kargil, 26/11. However this time around clearly the motto seems different, and it is not being viewed as a standalone incident.

Any voice that has been raised against the governance of this GOI has been shut down, the person is called anti national and even asked to move away to Pakistan.

Clearly this government is getting more and more intolerant towards any sort of criticism and this URI and surgical strike incident have given them a kind of ego where they think they can get away with dictating whatever they see fit onto people without giving due consideration to democratic process of this country. If they do think so, they are in for a shock and it will show soon. People wont let BJP play around with India's democracy.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top