What's new

New Zealand (264/8) defeat Pakistan (221) by 43 runs in the third ODI to accomplish the series whitewash by 3-0

Mariu is typical 'tulla' (minimal front foot movement) that are so successful in modern day cricket.

Meanwhile our 'fans' call batsmen like Usman Khan and M Harris all sorts of names.
 
Saud shakeel should replace him in next series
Saud will have a tough time from now on for calling the PCB Chairman as a super failure for couldn’t have a permanent coach. He said this on tv with Yahya hussaini. Will be ousted from test side too where he has a permanent place to teach a lesson for speaking the truth lol.
 
Will be interesting to see Sufyan's bowling today. Pakistani bowlers these days rarely perform consistently. NZ's approach against him will be worth watching.
 
Mariu is typical 'tulla' (minimal front foot movement) that are so successful in modern day cricket.

Meanwhile our 'fans' call batsmen like Usman Khan and M Harris all sorts of names.
lol. He is a proper batsman. Minimal footwork doesn't mean he is a tulla. He has organized defense. Averaging 60 in first class. Usman khan is the definition of hack.
 
Will be interesting to see Sufyan's bowling today. Pakistani bowlers these days rarely perform consistently. NZ's approach against him will be worth watching.
Yes I’m also interested only in this. Rest assured that this team is not enough to bat 50 overs , even if they tuk tuk lol
 
Akif is good talent ....need to be polish
He was good in T20 , but given chance in ODIs
With PCB the logic is

Good in ODIs , give chance in T20s

Not good in Tests , remove from ODIs

Not good in T20s , remove from Tests and ODIs

Same **** every day /year. Never ending vicious cycle from such a corrupted board.
 
Sufyan has bright future. Modern LOI batsmen with shody techniques struggle against an accurate spinner who can turn both ways while bowling around 100 kph. We've been missing a bowler like this since Afridi retired.
 
Sufi varying his pace beautifully. Won't be easy for tulla Seifert.
All they need to do is see him off lol, he's just one guy. Everyone else is harmless. They can easily go at 3 to 4 an over from him and target everyone else for 8 to 9 and in faheem's case 13 to 15 🤣
 
Sufi varying his pace beautifully. Won't be easy for tulla Seifert.
You guys overuse the word tulla way too much. Seifert is not an A list cricketer but he's a solid t20 cricketer and has a good and compact technique.

Technique wise he's way better then someone like Abdullah shafique who's technique sucks due to his rubbish stance
 
You guys overuse the word tulla way too much. Seifert is not an A list cricketer but he's a solid t20 cricketer and has a good and compact technique.

Technique wise he's way better then someone like Abdullah shafique who's technique sucks due to his rubbish stance
I use this term for exactly that reason. To mock people who think that Seifert is 'proper batsman' while Hassan Nawaz or Usman Khan are tulla. They have similar techniques. The same lot also think Abdullah has great technique.

There is nothing wrong in being tulla (player who relies more on hand eye coordination) in modern day LOIs.
 
Wasim is bowling with good pace. Consistently over 140ks.

He should definitely be ahead of Shaheen the wingless eagle.
 
I use this term for exactly that reason. To mock people who think that Seifert is 'proper batsman' while Hassan Nawaz or Usman Khan are tulla. They have similar techniques. The same lot also think Abdullah has great technique.

There is nothing wrong in being tulla (player who relies more on hand eye coordination) in modern day LOIs.
There is nothing wrong in being tulla (player who relies more on hand eye coordination) in modern day LOIs.

That is not what a tulla is🤣🤣🤣. Tulla means hack, aka players without proper techniques who just hack and slash at everything like Muhammad haris or hasan nawaz typically do. Playing aggressive cricket like Travis head does doesn't qualify someone like Travis or seifert to be hacks.

Now about your point on hand eye coordination, their very few cricketers like Ponting, Lara, Sachin, Saeed who look pleasing to the eye and are orthodox.

However that's cause they prefer to just play traditional orthodox strokes, but that does not mean that players who don't are tullas.

Steve Smith has to be one of the ugliest batters I've ever seen, plays drives with backfoots, mistimes alot, his footwork is all over the place when advancing down against spin and he literally turns 180 degrees everytime he pulls which just looks ugly. However he's easily the best test batter I've ever seen. Atm he's slightly > Sachin as well.

Similarly Viv Richards wasn't aesthetically pleasing, he was pure hand eye coordination.

Majority batters try to be effective, a boundary is a boundary and a six is a six and runs are runs no matter how they come.

Which NZ batter is aesthetically pleasing in the dugout excluding Williamson? Rachin shots all remind me of gully mohala cricket shots aka solid compact stance but funny shots, siefert has a baseball stance, early Mitchell is perpetually stuck on the backfoot. But it doesn't matter,

You don't need to be Hashim Amla to be Steve Smith.
 
Dead rubbers are always boring in any format.
He's referring to SR, tbf it's boring atm thanks to darly Mitchell, I was enjoying the batting before he came on, this type of batting would be unacceptable even in the one ball era. 21 of 39 striking at just over 50 when only 13 overs are left is unacceptable.
 
There is nothing wrong in being tulla (player who relies more on hand eye coordination) in modern day LOIs.

That is not what a tulla is🤣🤣🤣. Tulla means hack, aka players without proper techniques who just hack and slash at everything like Muhammad haris or hasan nawaz typically do. Playing aggressive cricket like Travis head does doesn't qualify someone like Travis or seifert to be hacks.

Now about your point on hand eye coordination, their very few cricketers like Ponting, Lara, Sachin, Saeed who look pleasing to the eye and are orthodox.

However that's cause they prefer to just play traditional orthodox strokes, but that does not mean that players who don't are tullas.

Steve Smith has to be one of the ugliest batters I've ever seen, plays drives with backfoots, mistimes alot, his footwork is all over the place when advancing down against spin and he literally turns 180 degrees everytime he pulls which just looks ugly. However he's easily the best test batter I've ever seen. Atm he's slightly > Sachin as well.

Similarly Viv Richards wasn't aesthetically pleasing, he was pure hand eye coordination.

Majority batters try to be effective, a boundary is a boundary and a six is a six and runs are runs no matter how they come.

Which NZ batter is aesthetically pleasing in the dugout excluding Williamson? Rachin shots all remind me of gully mohala cricket shots aka solid compact stance but funny shots, siefert has a baseball stance, early Mitchell is perpetually stuck on the backfoot. But it doesn't matter,

You don't need to be Hashim Amla to be Steve Smith.
Watch closely how Mitchell and Seifert are batting and you will see the difference between a tulla and someone who is not.

What is the technical difference between Seifert and Hassan Nawaz ?

I know that tulla is usually a word used for someone who goes for blind slogs and that doesn't literally apply to Seifert but technically he is not different than Hassan. And he gets out in a slog as I type...
 
Back
Top