What's new

Notable players who were not picked for PSL 3

Ahson8

ODI Debutant
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Runs
12,041
Locals:

Azhar Ali
Taj Wali
Aizaz Cheema
Zeeshan Malik
Ahsan Ali
Nauman Anwar
Mukhtar Ahmed
Gauhar Ali
Imran Khan
Imran Khan Jr.

Foreigners:

Dawid Malan
Chris Gayle
Kyle Abbott

Have I missed anyone ?
 
Azhar Ali in a t20 league? You can't be serious. Chris Gayle was rightly dropped after being a flop so far.
 
Dwayne Smith would have been available throughout and has played some big knocks.
 
Still one of our most prolific players, you;d expect him to get picked.

He was picked in the last two seasons. Didn't amount to much. Imagine yourself as a franchise owner, would you pick him? I won't. There are plenty of other players worth selecting but weren't selected.
 
Zeeshan, Nauman, Ehtesham, Sadaf

I think Sami could also make a side considering some of those who are selected.
 
On top of my head i can think of the following players;

Kamran Ghulam
Zeeshan Malik
Nauman anwar
Ehtesham
Umair Maqsood (Didn't play a match last season and now not in the squad)
Gohar Ali
 
Thanks to the sixth team this year many good players got a team. Editions before the situation used to be worse with a lot of talents and u-19 players missing out.

Now maybe 3/4 good talents missed out but before that it used to be 10-15 players.
 
On top of my head i can think of the following players;

Kamran Ghulam
Zeeshan Malik
Nauman anwar
Ehtesham
Umair Maqsood (Didn't play a match last season and now not in the squad)
Gohar Ali

Nauman Anwar has a bad reputation after his KK stint. Kamran Ghulam was a big surprise for me as well.
 
Of all players,

Awais Zia deserved to be picked up. He has been the most entertaining T20 cricketer since 2008 for any seasons.
Extremely shameful the way he is being treated. KAmran Ghulam, Gauhar Ali, Mukhtar Ahmed, Nauman Anwar
Hope PSL draft does'nt affect the National T20 tournament which it will.

Thought PSL suppose to be beneficial for local Pakistani talent but franchisees esp. Islamabad United filled its squad with foreign players plus retentions.

Was ecstatic to see names of Sohail Akhtar [FATA] and Rameez Raja Jr., but ignoring Awais Zia made draft look pathetically foreign-oriented. Zia for what he has done on local scene for T20 should've been inducted somehow. Hope Awais Zia uses National T20 to hit the most and gets into contention again.
 
Last edited:
Malan is nothing special and he'll be with England in Australia and New Zealand around this time anyway.
 
Thank god we have been spared Riffat chacha's batting exhibitions.
 
kamran Ghulam
Nauman ANwar
AWAIs ZIA
AHMAD BASHIR
IMAM UL HAQ
ZESHAN MALIK
GOHAR ALI
 
Not notable but frustrating not to see Shahzaib Ahmed there; the spinner.

Poor Sadaf Hussain has probably given up by now.
 
I feel emerging quote is being misused here. Ideally, it should have been from fresh faces, preferably U20 players and only for one time. Here, what is happening that they are putting lots of youngsters in emerging quota for 12 spots (that too slashed by half because of retention) and filling up the squad with undeserving oldies. Players like Saud, Sameen, Farhan, Jaahid, Khusdil, Talat, Mudassar, Hasan Khan ... should't be considered in emerging category, rather they should be in main draw. What is happening that these young players are already established in domestics, many of them even have represented PAK - but they are competing for 12 spots and real emerging players (basically those who have been just out of U19 in last 2 years) like Zeeshan, Umair Masood, Imam ... are missing out. This year, there was one more franchise which allowed few more players, but still I feel PSL's average age needs to go down. I don't think there is any quota in IPL and their player pool is much larger for 8 franchise, still players like Samson, Chand, Iyer, Sandeep and few others are making/made starting XI and they were given key roles in bating or bowling.

Still, may be emerging quota at least giving some opportunity for youngsters, otherwise may be those 12 spots could also have gone to 30+ brigade.
 
I feel emerging quote is being misused here. Ideally, it should have been from fresh faces, preferably U20 players and only for one time. Here, what is happening that they are putting lots of youngsters in emerging quota for 12 spots (that too slashed by half because of retention) and filling up the squad with undeserving oldies. Players like Saud, Sameen, Farhan, Jaahid, Khusdil, Talat, Mudassar, Hasan Khan ... should't be considered in emerging category, rather they should be in main draw. What is happening that these young players are already established in domestics, many of them even have represented PAK - but they are competing for 12 spots and real emerging players (basically those who have been just out of U19 in last 2 years) like Zeeshan, Umair Masood, Imam ... are missing out. This year, there was one more franchise which allowed few more players, but still I feel PSL's average age needs to go down. I don't think there is any quota in IPL and their player pool is much larger for 8 franchise, still players like Samson, Chand, Iyer, Sandeep and few others are making/made starting XI and they were given key roles in bating or bowling.

Still, may be emerging quota at least giving some opportunity for youngsters, otherwise may be those 12 spots could also have gone to 30+ brigade.

The names you have taken none of them have represented Pakistan. Also this tournument is for those emerging who are young (U 23 is fine) and are yet to be considered for selection. This tournument basically filters them out.

The kind of talent you are talking about is to be tested in domestic cricket first.
Even some guys here like Shaheen Shah, Ghulam Mudassar are yet to play a handful matches in domestic cricket. So that is as raw a talent as you can see in frnachise cricket.

I dont think other leagues having even emerging player rule so its pretty good whatever it is. Also the kind of unknown faces you are talking ahout, I havent seen them in any other leagues i.e someone no one has ever seen or has played any cricket
 
The names you have taken none of them have represented Pakistan. Also this tournument is for those emerging who are young (U 23 is fine) and are yet to be considered for selection. This tournument basically filters them out.

The kind of talent you are talking about is to be tested in domestic cricket first.
Even some guys here like Shaheen Shah, Ghulam Mudassar are yet to play a handful matches in domestic cricket. So that is as raw a talent as you can see in frnachise cricket.

I dont think other leagues having even emerging player rule so its pretty good whatever it is. Also the kind of unknown faces you are talking ahout, I havent seen them in any other leagues i.e someone no one has ever seen or has played any cricket

It was a typo, meant for PAK A.
 
I feel emerging quote is being misused here. Ideally, it should have been from fresh faces, preferably U20 players and only for one time. Here, what is happening that they are putting lots of youngsters in emerging quota for 12 spots (that too slashed by half because of retention) and filling up the squad with undeserving oldies. Players like Saud, Sameen, Farhan, Jaahid, Khusdil, Talat, Mudassar, Hasan Khan ... should't be considered in emerging category, rather they should be in main draw. What is happening that these young players are already established in domestics, many of them even have represented PAK - but they are competing for 12 spots and real emerging players (basically those who have been just out of U19 in last 2 years) like Zeeshan, Umair Masood, Imam ... are missing out. This year, there was one more franchise which allowed few more players, but still I feel PSL's average age needs to go down. I don't think there is any quota in IPL and their player pool is much larger for 8 franchise, still players like Samson, Chand, Iyer, Sandeep and few others are making/made starting XI and they were given key roles in bating or bowling.

Still, may be emerging quota at least giving some opportunity for youngsters, otherwise may be those 12 spots could also have gone to 30+ brigade.

While I agree that Zeeshan and Umair should have been selected but franchises need to see their combinations and who they think will fit in better.
 
Umair could have definitely be selected over Gulraiz and Saifullah Bangash but I guess they must have got some hitting talent or something some team managements were looking for. Undoubtedly, Bangash and Gulraiz are one of the best glovesman around.
 
The goal is to win now.

Most of these teams don't care if a guy is 31-32 as long as they win in 2018.
 
Not exactly surprised or a notable player yet but I was hoping Jofra Archer would get picked up.
 
Naved Malik should have been picked.

He can really belt the ball and hit it a mile.

A real shame, slugs like shafiq are even ahead of him.
 
Umair could have definitely be selected over Gulraiz and Saifullah Bangash but I guess they must have got some hitting talent or something some team managements were looking for. Undoubtedly, Bangash and Gulraiz are one of the best glovesman around.

Gulraiz is a decent pinch hitter, his keeping is ordinary though. Bangash is the opposite, top gloveman..very ordinary with the willow
 
Zeeshan Malik is the most obvious one. It is absolutely criminal he hasn't been selected as an EP by one of the franchises.

A few names who play domestic cricket and deserve PSL contracts:

Nasir Nawaz
Mukhtar Ahmed
Imam Ul Haq
Umair Masood
Agha Salman
Ahmed Bashir
Kamran Ghulam

A few players who haven't broken into domestic cricket but deserve PSL contracts:

Ehtisham Sultan
Ameer Hamza
Mamoon Ur Riaz
Ashiq Ali
Afraz Khoso

Even though they didn't do well in the T20 Cup I would also like to see Ahsan Ali, Nauman Anwar and Naved Malik given a chance in the PSL.
 
Agree with most of the names mentioned

Surprised Peshawar didn’t go for Malan over Andre Fletcher, Malan played a massive role in them winning the PSL, Andre Fletcher yet to play a game and has partial availability.

Surprising no one went for Wayne Parnell. Would have been ideal for Karachi Kings, a good replacement for Pollard. Him and Amir at the top would have been lethal
 
John Hastings, considering he has retired from international matches and will be available for the whole tournament.
 
I just hope this guy Sadaf Hussain gets his one or two matches so that this obsession with him can be silenced once and for all, so we can see if he truly deserved to be a Pakistan player or not.

Getting sick and tired of seeing his name in every other thread
 
Mukhtar Ahmad seems to have revived his career. Looks like the guy has an ex factor about him.
 
Locals:

Azhar Ali
Taj Wali
Aizaz Cheema
Zeeshan Malik
Ahsan Ali
Nauman Anwar
Mukhtar Ahmed
Gauhar Ali
Imran Khan
Imran Khan Jr.

Foreigners:

Dawid Malan
Chris Gayle
Kyle Abbott

Have I missed anyone ?

Parnell (He even said dil dil pakistan in PSL 3 promo :(
Holder (Not sure who he doesn't get picked up in these leagues)
Prera (SL T20 captain)
Dwayne Smith (Did two great seasons with IU not sure why they released him)
 
Apart from Imran khan jnr all these players have missed out on the extended players list as well
 
I was hoping Mukhtar would pick up by LQ with a non existent middle order but they ended up selecting 2 more bowlers!
 
The goal is to win now.

Most of these teams don't care if a guy is 31-32 as long as they win in 2018.

And right too.

Cricket should be treated with respect. Winning is the point. If someone is the best player they should play. Not some perpetual training progamme for future players (and then after 5 years you bench those guys for younger ones).

Why should a 31 or even 41 year old guy not be selected if he is the best option.
 
And right too.

Cricket should be treated with respect. Winning is the point. If someone is the best player they should play. Not some perpetual training progamme for future players (and then after 5 years you bench those guys for younger ones).

Why should a 31 or even 41 year old guy not be selected if he is the best option.

I think if the franchises feel that someone like Shan Masood is crucial for their title hopes then so be it!
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Disappointed & gutted at not being part of any PSL franchise after becoming the best bowler of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NationalT20?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NationalT20</a> & best all rounder of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/QEATrophy?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#QEATrophy</a> but I AM NOT BROKEN. I have worked hard and crossed many obstacles to achieve what I have. & i will work harder to achieve more. Allah k</p>— Umaid Asif (@Oomad_A) <a href="https://twitter.com/Oomad_A/status/947125292648337408?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
And right too.

Cricket should be treated with respect. Winning is the point. If someone is the best player they should play. Not some perpetual training progamme for future players (and then after 5 years you bench those guys for younger ones).

Why should a 31 or even 41 year old guy not be selected if he is the best option.

First, 31 and 41 are two entirely different situations- very different

Secondly, no one benches a guy in his 30s after they have invested 5+ years in him and the player is performing.
When people talk about preferring young players, it’s because young players improve where older players often don’t.
I would take a 31 year old performer over a 21 year old unproven player any day. But it makes total sense to invest in a young player over someone who has matured if neither one of them is proven. This has nothing to do with “respect for cricket” its just common sense
 
First, 31 and 41 are two entirely different situations- very different

Secondly, no one benches a guy in his 30s after they have invested 5+ years in him and the player is performing.
When people talk about preferring young players, it’s because young players improve where older players often don’t.
I would take a 31 year old performer over a 21 year old unproven player any day. But it makes total sense to invest in a young player over someone who has matured if neither one of them is proven. This has nothing to do with “respect for cricket” its just common sense

I don't know what the word 'proven' means for you.

If it means already performed at a top level, what you are saying is absurd. Basically claiming that anyone who doesn't make it to PSL or Pakistan in that age bracket should give up.

That's absurd for many reasons. 1) It will mean domestic structure will collapse if all good old players leave because they will never be picked. 2) They might be very good despite not being proven. In Pakistan of all places, the fact that you haven't played at high level doesn't mean you aren't very good.

This whole idea of investment and development makes what should be organic process into an artificial one. You should pick the best XI based on performance whether old or young. Young players will naturally rise to the top if they have 'talent'. That's in fact what used to happen in Australia, before their emphasis on 'youth' has weakened their structures because they randomly decided that even if old guys like Klinger and Hodge were the best in Australia guys who were not even half as good should be given chances because 'investment'.

Once you start doing all this rubbish, you short-circuit the natural incentive mechanism to perform and you devalue the competition itself.

What is beautiful about PSL and privately-owned franchises is that the owners respect the cricket. By which I mean, the PSL is an end in itself for them, it is not a way to train someone or give them a chance. Private owners are the ones who care about merit more than anyone else, and that's why by and large selections especially in First XI will make a lot of sense.

And the best training and development actually happens when you respect the cricket itself and the game itself is the central point, rather than the game being a glorified selection trial or net session.
 
Back
Top