What's new

Pakistan v South Africa | 4th ODI | Abu Dhabi | 8/11/2013 | Pakistani Innings

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure what Akmal is doing, you should just target a sub 40 total for the last 4 and this game is done.
 
match is done & dusted . nite :)

Don't think so at all, Umar Akmal appears a little flustered and his batting has conveyed across an inability to concentrate and maintain a clear mindset during his so far short innings - if he falls, only Shahid Afridi remains who as all posters must be aware of, isn't renowned for his predictability or his ability to think clearly/adapt his game depending upon the nature of the game's situation.
 
:facepalm: Akmal miscalculating completely - he's gone for a shot a ball and now he's under big pressure to get a boundary off the last.
 
single ... direct hit and he would have been gone.... 39 from 24 balls... this is pressure situation.
 
2 runs in this over. 39 required in 24 balls umar again on strike :13:
 
what the hell are they doing just 2 runs from this over its getting difficult
 
Very silly batting by Akmal there, he doesn't understand the time frame of an ODI after all these matches. That was the over to set yourself up for the launch.
 
Umar trying to hit every ball as it is galli cricket if we lose from here his 4 dots will be the reason just dab it for singles
 
Chill maro guys, this game is in the bag. 5 wickets in hand still RRR doesn't mean jack in last 4-5 overs
 
LOL at people saying Akmal always does this, historically he has been the one winning these kinds of matches. Let's watch and wait. 2 sixes in the last 4 overs with a single a ball is all we really need.
 
Akmal displaying Afridi's chickenhearted temperament. Prove me wrong, man
 
So Umar Akmal will be adding to his long list of dedicated threads on PP tonight.
 
Umar Akmal has lost it, shouldn't have had too many high hopes for him, he is after all Kamran's brother
 
Always said Umar shouldn't bat as a finisher. That's what happens when u send him in at 7.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top