What's new

[PICTURE] Ravi Ashwin mankads Jos Buttler without a warning

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mankading with a dance and a smile <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#cricket</a> <a href="https://t.co/hmY7hpfPux">pic.twitter.com/hmY7hpfPux</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1111214602921168897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
I am amused to see so many Pakistani supporters who love their bowlers don't support this 'Mankad' rule. People are so quick to hand out character certificate. :facepalm:

There is a guy who dances on a pitch to deteriorate the pitch and leave teeth mark on the ball, but the crowd goes LALA LALA. but here we have a bowler, who is setting an example of fair game and people jump on their guns.
Explain his pause then?

I would actually support it and call it a tactical play but this was beyond premeditated, he attempted to create the moment Buttler got out of the crease from where he whipped the bails.
 
Explain his pause then?

I would actually support it and call it a tactical play but this was beyond premeditated, he attempted to create the moment Buttler got out of the crease from where he whipped the bails.

How do you Mankad someone without a pause? You can't Mankad someone if you don't have an intention to trick them. 'Technically' Jos is not out because at the time where Ashwin was about to ball he was in the crease, but Ashwin paused to make sure he is out of the crease, that's what bowlers do before they mankad someone. In Ashwin's case he paused longer. In some cases it's instantenous. Had Jos been watching Ashwin or waited for ball to get released, Ashwin attempting to run him out would have looked silly. But Jos basically fell in to trap due to his habit of taking a start while he is at non striker.

I am against that habit and think this is an advantage to batters. Compare to bowlers, who are checked again and again and umpires make sure that they didn't cross their lines of no balls. Even players are called back if they find it's no ball.
 
As the debate surrounding the justification or otherwise for employing the 'Mankad' as a mode of dismissal raged on, Cricket Australia Chief Executive Kevin Roberts made it clear the practice would not be condoned under his watch.

Opinions have been sharply divided among players (past and present), commentators and cricket fans the world over in the days since India's Ravi Ashwin used the ploy to run out England international Jos Buttler this week.

The incident, which took place in an Indian Premier League fixture between Ashwin's Kings XI Punjab and Buttler's Rajasthan Royals, is permitted under cricket's laws but resides in an ethical grey area given it often straddles the line between acceptable and poor sportsmanship.

But in the wake of the sandpaper controversy that tarnished the reputation of Australia's men's team in South Africa a year ago, Roberts has no doubts as to which side of that divide he occupies.

And he reaffirmed that, should an Australia player find themselves in the situation faced by Ashwin - with ball in hand and removing the bails as a non-striker walks out of his crease – then they have made the wrong decision.

Speaking to the Melbourne Press Club yesterday, Roberts faced a hypothetical scenario whereby an Australia bowler (in this instance, spinner Adam Zampa) executed a Mankad-style dismissal of a high-profile rival (for example, Virat Kohli) in a match played in India.

Roberts responded that he could not see a circumstance in which any match situation trumped the guiding principle to which Cricket Australia has subscribed since the Cape Town controversy last March.

And which is now formally enshrined in a players' pact that was ratified last October, amid the cultural review conducted by the Sydney-based Ethics Centre into CA and the game it overseas.

"We're very clear about what we stand for now," Roberts said, when asked to share his views on the prospect of a member of the national men's team reprising Ashwin's polarising actions.

"The players stand for making Australians proud, so if you run it (the 'Mankad') through that lens, it's pretty clear that something like that doesn't make Australians proud.

"If we talk about on and off the field, we talk about our commitment to cricket communities and bringing them together, and for the players and others to inspire them.

"Would that have done that? No way.

"We've got two very clear mechanisms now.

"Two very clear decision-making guides that would have made it quite easy to address an issue like that, whereas a year ago that wouldn't have been so easy for us because we didn’t have those principles in place."

In the aftermath of this week's furore, Australia fast bowlers Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins both expressed their unease at the practice, with Hazlewood going so far as to suggest that the opportunistic mode of dismissal be removed from the game's laws.

Roberts did not a venture a view on how such an issue would be dealt with on the field, and within the administration, should a player make the dubious call in the heat of the moment.

However, any Australia cricketer who finds themselves stopped in their delivery stride and contemplating their next move as an opposition batter leaves the safety of their crease might also pause to consider his succinct views on running out a non-striker in Mankad fashion.

"Not a fan," was the CEO's blunt assessment.

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/rav...ia-kevin-roberts-hazlewood-cummins/2019-03-29
 
I am sorry but it was not mankad, it was pure blatant cheating by Ashwin. I am as biased Indian cricket fan as they come but you cant really defend this. He made sure i will never watch any Kings X1 match this season.
 
Joe Root calls for clarity over 'Mankad' dismissals

Joe Root fears a rise in 'Mankad' dismissals unless the International Cricket Council clarifies the laws of the game.

Root's England team-mate Jos Buttler was run out by bowler Ravi Ashwin during an Indian Premier League match between Kings XI Punjab and Rajasthan Royals on Monday.

Ashwin removed the bails after he pulled out of a delivery as Buttler backed up and although the bowler acted within the rules, it is not considered to be within the spirit of the game.

"I think you know some people might be looking to do that now," reflected Test skipper Root. "I think umpires being really clear on what is out and what is not out is going to be crucial.

"Making sure everyone is on the same page with it so that there's no inconsistencies is going to be really important and having the clarity there for everyone playing the game.

"I know it's not a straightforward rule, but as much as possible, there's a way of working out what is out and what is not."

That type of dismissal is known as a 'Mankad; after the former India all-rounder Vinoo Mankad did it in a Test match against Australia in 1947.

"It's not something that I'd like to be involved in, I wasn't too impressed personally," Root said. "But it's within the laws of the game, as a lot of people have said, and one Jos has to take on the chin unfortunately."

The World Cup is scheduled to start at the end of May and will be hosted in England and Wales - and you can watch every game live on Sky Sports.

When asked if the International Cricket Council needed to hold a meeting over the issue, Root added: "I wouldn't say it was a full meeting.

"By nature you stay in your crease as (the bowler) is running up. I think it's a good warning now and I'm glad it's not happened to us in the World Cup final for example, or a World Cup game.

https://www.skysports.com/cricket/n...root-calls-for-clarity-over-mankad-dismissals
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So here’s a mankad suggestion. &#55356;&#57295; <br>Why not get the 3rd umpire to check the front foot for no balls, if he/she notices a batter leaving their ground prior to delivery he/she can then issue either a warning, or 5 penalty runs. If the batter continues, mankad comes in no worries.</p>— Dale Steyn (@DaleSteyn62) <a href="https://twitter.com/DaleSteyn62/status/1111983593369288704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Buttler calls for Mankad overhaul

Jos Buttler has vowed he will never be dismissed by a Mankad again after he was out in the controversial manner during this year's IPL tournament for the second time in his career, and called for the Law around the dismissal to be tightened.

Rajasthan Royals wicketkeeper-batsman Buttler was run out while backing up by Kings XI Punjab captain Ravi Ashwin during an IPL match last week, with the dismissal dividing the cricket world.

It proved a match-turning dismissal as Rajasthan folded in their run chase, and Buttler admits the fallout distracted him in his next two innings, where he just scored 5 and 6.

"At the time, I was really disappointed with it. I didn't like the style of it," Buttler said as he did a round of interviews with British media.

"What was more disappointing is that suddenly over the next two games I found myself being really conscious of it and it is quite distracting.

"That is why it was nice to get some runs in the win (earlier this week, when he scored 59) and get back to thinking about batting and not worrying about how I back up at the non-striker's end."

The bitter taste of the Mankad still lingers for the England international, who had previously been out to a Mankad in an ODI against Sri Lanka at Edgbaston in 2014.

Buttler's dismissal by Ashwin was legal according to the letter of Law 41.6, but ambiguity arose about the way Ashwin went out it.

The wording of the Law states: "If the non-striker is out of his/her ground at any time from the moment the ball comes into play until the instant when the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball, the non-striker is liable to be run out."

That 'expected release' is what caused the controversy, with Ashwin pausing in his delivery stride to wait for Buttler to back up out of his crease before running him out.

The MCC, custodian of the game's Laws, said while the run out was legal, in their view Ashwin's pause was not in keeping with the spirit of the game.

"Of course a Mankading has to be in the Laws of the game because a batsman can't just run halfway down the pitch trying to get a head start," Buttler said.

"But I do think, the way the law is written, there is a bit of a grey area in that saying 'when a bowler is expected to release the ball'. That is a bit of a wishy-washy statement.

"I think if you look at the footage, probably the wrong decision was made because at the time he was expected to release the ball I was in my crease.

"I didn't like what happened and I didn't agree with it, but what can you do?

"I must be the only person to get out twice in that way as well. I'll make sure it never happens again."

Buttler is not the first man to be dismissed twice in this fashion – Australian Bill Brown was twice run out backing up at the non-striker's end by Vinoo Mankad, after whom the dismissal is now known, in 1947-48.

Buttler, who said he does "generally walk" rather than wait for an umpire's decision, said he worried about the example set by the dismissal.

"I just thought it was a bad precedent at the start of the tournament," Buttler said.

"I'd hope, whether it was a written thing or not, that players – as custodians of the game, role models to young kids and professional people – would carry themselves in a certain way and play the game hard and competitive but play in what I perceive to be the right way, which is in a good spirit. Play hard but fair."

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/jos...law-change-role-models-distracting/2019-04-04
 
I don't do anything that is illegal, have no regrets on Mankading Jos Buttler: R Ashwin

Ravichandran Ashwin has absolutely “no regrets” having ‘Mankaded’ Jos Buttler in an IPL game and he will certainly not be surprised if he finds England pacer James Anderson, who ‘virtually’ ripped him to shreds, doing the same in near future.

“Today Jimmy Anderson might feel that whatever I did was wrong. Maybe, tomorrow he might end up doing (Mankading) it. Who knows, it is all a question of perception of right and wrong. I don’t think in this case it is necessary because it is in the law and I did,” Ashwin told India Today.

The senior India off-spinner is clear that what he did was within the purview of the playing conditions.

“Everybody who know me, it is very clear (to them) that I don’t do anything that is illegal. Even my team has stood behind me since then. A lot many players have come to me and said whatever I did was absolutely right,” Ashwin said.

The ‘Mankading’ controversy evoked mixed reactions in the cricketing community with custodians of the game MCC also doing a flip-flop.

Asked if the controversy has affected him, Ashwin answered in negative.

“Not really, it hasn’t affected me one bit at all. I am very happy for the fact that they (former and current England players) are standing up for their fellow countryman. I definitely do think that my countrymen have also stood up for me. And it is only fair that your peers stand up for you,” he said.

The MCC after initially stating that Ashwin was right, did a U-Turn, stating that the “bowler paused in his delivery stride and waited for the batsman to leave the crease before running him out”.

Ashwin said that the debates can continue “till cows come home”.

“There have even been debates about whether I waited for him to walk out of the crease. But, what people don’t understand is that I hadn’t even reached the crease and he started walking away. Once your action is complete, you cannot go down and hit the stumps,” he said.

“I just feel by the whole criticism, the way people have reacted, some experts who have been bang-on too – that it is just going to throw chills down the spine of a lot of bowlers about not wanting to do it again,” he opined.

The 32-year-old, who has 342 Test wickets and 150 ODI scalps, also doesn’t understand the fuss about the ‘Spirit of the Game’.

“There are people who have been speaking about the incident over and over again. People have nicked the ball and actually debated about taking a DRS. As a batsman when I nick the ball, I know I have nicked it so there is no question of deliberating or taking a DRS,” Ashwin tried to point at how some of the critics have changed their positions conveniently.

Just like Buttler, Ashwin also feels that the authorities should decide what is permissible as per rules of the game.

“I actually think that if you bring in the ‘Spirit of the Game’ into this and keep on talking about it again and again, it is up to the authorities to decide that whether you want to continue this as a rule of the game or not.”

He then sarcastically pointed how the bowlers are expected to follow all the norms while it is different for the batsmen.

“I have to inform which side of the wicket I am bowling from, I have to bowl from behind the crease, the line belongs to the umpire, the line sometimes belongs to the batsman the inner half of it, he can stand right-handed and hit me left-handed, he can make a switch hit and he can actually walk down the pitch and hit me too,” Ashwin said.

“What about the spirit of the game when it comes to bowler’s psyche? To me, as I said, it is all about my conscience,” he said.

https://www.cricketcountry.com/news...rets-on-mankading-jos-buttler-r-ashwin-824216
 
What a dheet insaan!

Him drawing a comparison with what batsmen can do just tells you how he tries too hard to come across as a smart individual.

He clearly paused and waited for buttler to stray out before hitting the stumps. He knows it but will never accept.
 
Ashwin copped a lot of flak for his Mankad dismissal of Jos Buttler in the IPL 2019 last week, but the India off-spinner has said he has no regrets.

Buttler was run out at the non-strikers' end by Ashwin, sparking a 'spirit of cricket' debate. That Ashwin chose not to warn the England wicket-keeper batsman before effecting the dismissal didn't help matters, but the 32-year-old was least concerned, and was happy that his team-mates stood by him.

"Everybody who know me, it is very clear [to them] that I didn't do anything that is illegal," Ashwin told India Today. "Even my team has stood behind me since then. A lot many players have come to me and said whatever I did was absolutely right.

"It hasn’t affected me one bit at all. I am very happy for the fact that they [former and current England players] are standing up for their fellow countryman. I definitely do think that my countrymen have also stood up for me. And it is only fair that your peers stand up for you."

According to the law, if the non-striker is outside the crease at the point the bowler would "normally" be expected to release the ball, then it is within the rules to run him out. Buttler, however, believes that the Mankading law is a bit 'wishy-washy' and asked for it to be clarified. Ashwin, for his part, said he played by the book, and defended his decision.

"There have even been debates about whether I waited for him to walk out of the crease," he said. "But what people don’t understand is that I hadn’t even reached the crease and he started walking away. Once your action is complete, you cannot go down and hit the stumps. I have to wait and then flick the stumps off.

"We can keep on arguing about the same case again and again but I just feel by the whole criticism, the way people have reacted, some experts – who have been bang-on too – that it is just going to throw chills down the spine of a lot of bowlers about not wanting to do it again."

He also believes debating about the 'spirit of cricket' is pointless, and asked the authorities to make a decision on the law. "I actually think that if you bring in the ‘spirit of the game’ into this and keep on talking about it again and again, it is up to the authorities to decide that whether you want to continue this as a rule of the game or not," he said.

"I think you can debate till the cows come home about whether what I did was right [or] wrong, and it is up to people's perception what they believe it is. To me, as I said, it is all about my conscience.

"About 10 years ago, there was probably a rule, or it used to be said, that you warn somebody and then do it again. That was for a 50-over game and this is a T20 format, so even the warning space is lesser

"What about the spirit of the game when it comes to bowler’s psyche? To me, as I said, it is all about my conscience."

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1168991
 
IPL 2019: Jos Buttler ends ‘Mankad’ row with Ashwin

England’s Jos Buttler has declared an end to his showdown with Indian spinner Ravichandran Ashwin after being dismissed by a “Mankad” runout in the Indian Premier League.

The Rajasthan Royals star had a heated exchange with the captain of Kings XI Punjab after being run out at the non-striker’s end while backing up in an incident that sparked an international debate on the “spirit of cricket”.

Buttler told the Times of India he had looked at replays and was sure he should not have been given out, “But it’s all done now and I have moved on.”

The dismissal, named after former India player Vinoo Mankad, is legal but is seen by many as unsporting unless the batsman has been warned first.

Buttler said he did speak with Ashwin after the March 25 runout which even brought disapproval from the MCC, the arbiter of the game’s rules.

“I just asked him if he really wishes to play the game that way. Whether he thought it was the right thing to do,” Buttler said.

“And he obviously thought it was, in his opinion.”

Ashwin, who has been unrepentant of his act, seemed to have waited for Buttler to leave his crease before clipping off the bails.

Buttler, who was a victim of a Mankad dismissal by Sri Lanka’s Sachithra Senanayake in 2014, said he “will make sure it doesn’t happen again”.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...with-ashwin/story-ZMpAYJIthEu8w7D9Av3UPN.html
 
Former International Cricket Council (ICC) umpire Simon Taufel on Saturday came out in support of Ravichandran Ashwin, saying the Kings XI Punjab skipper’s decision to ‘Mankad’ Jos Buttler during the ongoing Indian Premier League (IPL) has nothing to do with the spirit of cricket.

“My view on this particular issue is that it has nothing to do with the spirit of cricket. During our discussion, we spoke at length about Law 41.16. The intent of the law is that the non-striker should not leave their ground at the bowler’s end before the ball is delivered. This is why the ICC has stipulated within their regulations and interpretations that the bowler can dismiss the non-striker run out up until the bowler’s arm reaches the top of the delivery swing,” ESPN Cricinfo quoted Taufel as saying.

“What I did say to the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) was that maybe we could help people understand that this incident had nothing to do with the spirit of cricket, but rather everything to do with the run-out rule (Law 38) by repositioning this clause about unfair advantage under that Law in future,” he added.

Ashwin’s run-out of Jos Buttler in the match between Kings XI Punjab and Rajasthan Royals in the ongoing edition of Indian Premier League (IPL) was a major talking point. The player had said it was very instinctive but the MCC opined differently, saying the Indian player’s act hurt the spirit of cricket and his actions were deliberate.

“All Ashwin did was appealed to the umpire for a run-out dismissal. He stopped short of delivering the ball and did not go through with his delivery swing. For him to be subject to adverse commentary that amounted to character assassination regarding his supposed contravention of the spirit of the game, is incredibly unfair in the way the Laws are written and the way they are to be applied,” Taufel said.

“Both the on-field umpire and the third umpire did not feel he deceived the non-striker by waiting too long before breaking the stumps within dealing with the appeal - the ball was deemed by them to be still within play,” he added.

Taufel also played down the talks of Ashwin’s pre-meditation of doing the ‘Mankad’. He said, bowlers try everything in their disposal to get the batsmen out and send them back to the pavilion. He even backed the umpires and said it’s a situation beyond the on-field umpires control and that is why the decision had to be referred to the third umpire.

“People also accused Ashwin of pre-meditation. My response to that would be: Well, so what? Bowlers attempt to get batsmen out LBW, bowled, caught, or by any other form of dismissal. Aren’t all these premeditated? So I don’t see how that is a relevant argument at all,” Taufel said.

“From an umpire’s perspective, it is a situation that is almost impossible to manage on their own, which is probably why Buttler run-out was referred to the third umpire. It is interesting that it was referred, given that the on-field umpire didn’t necessarily think the ball was dead, and at no stage did Ashwin actually get to the point of vertical delivery. It is subjective as to whether or not he actually got to the normal point of release. So it is very understandable that Buttler was given out run out,” he added.

Taufel even said that he had a word with Ashwin after Mankading controversy. “I was in India and spoke to Ashwin soon after the incident. I reaffirmed to him that it was unfair and not appropriate for various people to pull him up for breaching the spirit of cricket. I made contact with him to make sure he was fine and not affected by the comments and to support him on a human level. I told him he was within his rights to appeal and to attempt to run out the non-striker,” he said.

Taufel was earlier the member of ICC elite umpire panel, winning five consecutive ICC Umpire of the Year awards between 2004 and 2008. He announced his retirement from international cricket on September 26, 2012, after the ICC World Twenty20 final. He subsequently worked as the ICC’s Umpire Performance and Training Manager until October 2015.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...year-winner/story-ADXUGxDvqi0KWBjaLRKNWI.html
 
Well said Simon Taufel, one of the most respected umpires ever.
 
A question for us all......

If your side are in a World Cup final and the opposition are 9 down needing a handful of runs to win and the opportunity arises for your bowler to Mankad one of the opposing players and win the World Cup would you want him to do it? (Basically what West Indies Under-19s did to Zim under 19s a few years ago albeit that wasn’t a final).
 
After Ashwin incident every goddamn batsman makes sure they don't get a head start. If they had got the head start they could have won or taken match to super over. CSK runner was out by few inches. He was well within the crease when the ball was released. Now everybody is following it.
 
A question for us all......

If your side are in a World Cup final and the opposition are 9 down needing a handful of runs to win and the opportunity arises for your bowler to Mankad one of the opposing players and win the World Cup would you want him to do it? (Basically what West Indies Under-19s did to Zim under 19s a few years ago albeit that wasn’t a final).

Yes

and if the reverse happens,I'll blame my batsman and not bowler
 
After Ashwin incident every goddamn batsman makes sure they don't get a head start. If they had got the head start they could have won or taken match to super over. CSK runner was out by few inches. He was well within the crease when the ball was released. Now everybody is following it.
Ashwin is such a champ. Was a leading light against chucking and now this!
 
So did Mohammad Hafeez try that on Joe Root?

D6ybcbbW4AAg7k6.jpg:large
 
Hafeez didn't try it. He gave Root a warning. Hafeez easily could have if he wanted to.
Hafeez is man enough not to do such childish things unlike Ashwin.
 
Hafeez didn't try it. He gave Root a warning. Hafeez easily could have if he wanted to.
Hafeez is man enough not to do such childish things unlike Ashwin.

Hafeez wasn't trying it, he pulled out of his run up because he was going to overstep massively. Added to that Root wouldn't have been out of his crease when he would have released the ball.
 
Ravichandran Ashwin, who had received mixed reactions for mankading Jos Buttler in the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2019, has said that he will mankad "anyone that goes out of the crease" in the upcoming season. Ashwin, who was traded to Delhi Capitals from Kings XI Punjab (KXIP), made his intentions clear during an interactive session with his fans on Twitter. After one of his fans asked, "Who are the potential batsmen you can Mankad this IPL?", Ashwin responded by saying, "Anyone that goes out of the crease".

In the previous edition of the lucrative tournament, Ashwin mankaded Buttler after the England batsman had given Rajasthan Royals a flying start in their chase of 185 runs.

Ashwin had also exchanged a few words with Buttler, who was clearly out of the crease. The spinner paused before delivering the ball and took the bails off, which later led to the third umpire declaring the England batsman out.

KXIP went on to register a 14-run win over Rajasthan Royals, who were restricted to 170 for nine in the chase.

Under the captaincy of Ashwin, KXIP showed a lot of promise in the first half of the past two seasons before losing momentum in the second half. They finished seventh in 2018 and sixth in 2019.

Ashwin will join the likes of Ajinkya Rahane, Shimron Hetmyer, Marcus Stoinis, Alex Carey, Jason Roy and Chris Woakes at the Delhi Capitals.

https://sports.ndtv.com/ipl-2020/ra...at-goes-out-of-the-crease-in-ipl-2020-2156544
 
Ravichandran Ashwin, India's senior spin bowler, has recently been quite active on social media. With cricketers in the country undergoing a forced break due to the coronavirus threat, Ashwin shared a hilarious tweet that was sent to him by a fan. In the post shared by Ashwin he says, "Hahaha, somebody sent me this and told me that it's exactly been one year since this run out happened. As the nation goes into lockdown, this a good reminder to my citizens. Don't wander out. Stay inside, stay safe! #21DayLockdown".

The "Mankading" incident took place last year in which the then King's XI Punjab captain Ravichandran Ashwin and Rajasthan Royals batsman Jos Buttler were involved. The incident had left cricket fans divided as some thought that the incident was against the spirit of cricket. The other half thought that it was completely fine as according to the rule, which gives a bowler the right to run the non-striker batsman out if he is standing outside his crease by dislodging the bails before bowling the ball.

Ashwin was released by King's XI Punjab after which KL Rahul was appointed the captain of the side. The Indian off-spinner will now be seen donning the Delhi Capitals jersey as he looks to begin his first stint with the side in the upcoming edition of the IPL.

The Indian Premier League 2020 was scheduled to begin from March 29 but BCCI decided to postpone the cash-rich league to April 15 as a precautionary measure in the battle against the coronavirus pandemic.

https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/cor...inside-stay-safe-2200386?pfrom=home-sshowcase
 
As stylish he was with the blade in hand, David Gower also possessed the power of breathing life into matches with his unique voice. His England career lasted close to 15 years and his commentary stint even more. After being on top of the game for most parts of four decades, Gower now walks into the sunset, packing his microphone with his bat that he put away in 1992. But according to the 117-Test veteran, he 'knew it was coming'. (More Cricket News)

"I've had 20 fantastic years with Sky and loved every moment of it. My broadcasting career started, with the BBC home. But then 20 years at Sky started with the 1999 World Cup and it was pretty good," Gower told IANS on the sidelines of Q20, a unique initiative by GloFans to bring sporting stars close to their fans.

"The one thing I've just got to say is that as a former player, once you get into commentary, you stay with a game that you love, you stay involved, you stay with the people that you're friends.

"And so for instance in that Sky commentary box, the likes of, in both of them, you know, who's a colleague from the first hour when you play Test cricket to likes of Michael Holding who was an adversary. So it is a fantastic way to keep an involvement with the game going," the former England captain added.

India is now a cricketing superpower and is also the home of one of the most popular T20 leagues in the world -- Indian Premier League. Like at one point cricketers around the world travelled to England for county cricket, India has now become a preferred destination for players to rub shoulders with the best in the shortest format.

When so many great players are put together in such close quarters, sparks are expected to fly and something similar happened between India spinner Ravichandran Ashwin and England batsman Jos Buttler during an IPL game in 2019 when the Rajasthan Royals batsman was Mankaded by the then Kings XI Punjab skipper.

"I was in India at the time when all of this happened. I saw all the coverage. So all the media coverage, all the newspapers, the reactions, it caused a storm as well. It might and I looked at it very closely because people were asking me for my opinion as well. Now I looked at that footage thinking how far Jos Buttler has gone down the pitch. And the answer is virtually nowhere," Gower said.

Ashwin subsequently took off the bails at the non-striker's end and Buttler had to be given out as it's not against the rules.

"I personally think Jos could have assumed that Ravi was going to let the ball go at that moment and the ball would be delivered and we saw what happened next. I think Ashwin would have been in contemplating and trying Mankading," the Englishman said.

"I think it's a good thing to make a point as a bowler. If you think someone's about to steal ground or has already stolen ground, make your point first time. And if they do it again, then I think you're entirely entitled to get on with the Mankading. I just thought at the time, but it was a misjudgement.

"For me, my advice to anyone of any age whether they be 15, 18, 20, 25, 35, 40 whatever it is, give that warning! Because it just feels so much better. It still makes the point, still gives you the chance to carry it later if that is required, but give that warning! That's my advice," he said.

The most satisfying thing for Gower is that before he walked away from the game entirely, he got to see his beloved nation break their World Cup jinx at home, something which he tried while being on the field in 1983. His team came up against Kapil Dev's history-makers in Manchester and were dealt with a six-wicket defeat in the semi-final.

"I have to say we as a team, and we're playing very well. I as an individual was having a really good tournament and we were very confident going into that semi-final against India at the Old Trafford," Gower said.

"And dare I say it; it was not the sort of pitch that we would have chosen if we'd been given that choice. It was low. It was slow. It was to be fair and this might sound like an excuse, but it was slightly more suited to India on the day and the Indian bowling.

"It didn't really come onto the bat. I remember going out to bat, not really finding form, such not getting the time and nicked one behind. It just went wrong. And that's sometimes, of course, what happens in semi-finals. So India played the best on the day and they got it right in both departments, kept it nice and tight and deservedly got through to that final where of course they beat the West Indies to take the World Cup for the first time," Gower recalled.

"And might I say it. That was a brilliant, brilliant moment, of course because up until then, I thought up until that tournament, one day cricket had been something of a mystery in India and they hadn't quite got the hang of it. So winning the World Cup obviously gave it and gave India an enormous boost."

https://www.outlookindia.com/websit...ects-on-ravichandran-ashwins-mankading/353235
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just hope that technology will see if a batsmen is backing up before the bowler bowls a ball and disallow the runs of that ball every time the batter does so!!Thus, parity will be restored as far as the front line is concerned. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/noball?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#noball</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/dontbackup?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#dontbackup</a></p>— Ashwin 🇮🇳 (@ashwinravi99) <a href="https://twitter.com/ashwinravi99/status/1287988455557849088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 28, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
He's a great lad Ravj Ashwin. One of our most professional and well spoken cricketers. I think he has the making of a terrific English speaking commentator in future, very intellectual guy.

The hate people have for him for being a home bullly and being outspoken is unjustified.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just hope that technology will see if a batsmen is backing up before the bowler bowls a ball and disallow the runs of that ball every time the batter does so!!Thus, parity will be restored as far as the front line is concerned. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/noball?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#noball</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/dontbackup?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#dontbackup</a></p>— Ashwin &#55356;&#56814;&#55356;&#56819; (@ashwinravi99) <a href="https://twitter.com/ashwinravi99/status/1287988455557849088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 28, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

For an educated person he isn't very bright, is he?

Backing up has equal advantages and disadvantages. E.g. a run out chance will also be higher if the non-striker has to turn back at any point since he's travelled too far down the pitch. Backing up works both ways and it is as old as the game itself.

Mankading was invented by an Indian bowler (why am I not surprised :)) ) and is not in the spirit of the game at all. Imagine seeing multiple wickets fall to mankading. Would be one hell of a frustrating game to watch.

Ashwin should grow up and back his bowling skills rather than his mankading skills.
 
Ravichandran Ashwin's mankading of Jos Buttler last Indian Premier League (IPL) during a Kings XI Punjab-Rajasthan Royals match had reopened the debate on spirit of the game. But Ricky Ponting, the head coach of IPL franchise Delhi Capitals, has said he will have a conversation with Ashwin about the controversial mode of dismissal ahead of the upcoming season in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

“I’ll be having a chat with him about [mankad], that’s the first thing I’ll do,” Ponting was quoted as saying by The Grade Cricketer Podcast.

“Obviously, he [Ashwin] wasn’t in our squad last year, he’s one of our players that we tried to afford to bring in this year. Look, he’s a terrific bowler, and he’s done a great job in the IPL for a long period of time now, but I must admit watching that last season, as soon as it happened and he did that, I actually sat our boys down and said ‘Look, I know he’s done it, there’ll be others around the tournament who’ll think about doing this well but that’s not going to be the way that we play our cricket. We won’t be doing that’.”

Ashwin, who was bought by the Delhi Capitals at the IPL 2020 auction, had defended his decision to run out Buttler, saying his 'conscience was clear'. However, Ponting is confident Ashwin will take the advice in his stride.

“So, that’s going to be a conversation and that’s going to be a hard conversation I will have to have with him, but I’m pretty sure he’ll take it on the chin. I think, even him, looking back now, probably he’d say it was within the rules and he’s right to do it, but this is not within the spirit of the game, not in the way I want, at least with the Delhi Capitals anyway.”

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...apitals-ricky-ponting-uae/article32393483.ece
 
Forget the mode of dismissal (which I believe is totally fair, but am happy to respect the opposite POV).

For Ponting to specifically call out Ashwin publicly like this, is very interesting to me. Especially when Ponting could have been diplomatic in public but delivered just as hard a message in private.

But the Australian legend chose to make a public statement. On someone someone who's an international.

To say that a 'hard conversation' will be had, this is not how we play our cricket, well that sounds disrespectful. I may be the only one, of course, but I do confess I would love to know what Ashwin's thinking!
 
I hope Ashwin does it again just to spite Ponting and the moral police.

If you think its against the spirit of the game just abolish the rule. Its ridiculous how much Ashwin has been blackballed just for doing something that falls within the confines of the game.
 
Oh shut up Ponting.

I really hope Ashwin actually does it now just so he can express authority. Ponting is a legendary cricketer but spare Ashwin the moral policing.

You are just a coach here.

I hope someone in the Delhi Daredevils management has a strict word with Ponting over this. He's not just challenging an Indian test cricket superstar but trying to exert himself as a decision maker and an enforcer in this case. You don't do that to your star players.

If I was Ashwin, I would confront Ponting on this, publicly and in front of management
 
Ahswin paused and waited for Buttler to walk out. Buttler wasn't backing up.

Ahswin exploited the rule. Not in the spirit of the game. I'd go as far to say it was cheating. End of story.
 
Ahswin is one of the most annoying characters out there. He thinks of himself as this genius guy who has more cricketing acumen than anyone else. Just hearing him speak is nauseating.

With all his overthinking, he's actually stalled his own career.
 
Ahswin paused and waited for Buttler to walk out. Buttler wasn't backing up.

Ahswin exploited the rule. Not in the spirit of the game. I'd go as far to say it was cheating. End of story.

This is why he got the backlash and it was deserved.

If Buttler was stealing lots of ground, then I am sure there would have been more sympathy.

But, Buttler only moved out of his crease when Ashwin was about to bowl, which made his actions unjust.
 
This is why he got the backlash and it was deserved.

If Buttler was stealing lots of ground, then I am sure there would have been more sympathy.

But, Buttler only moved out of his crease when Ashwin was about to bowl, which made his actions unjust.

Exactly. The whole point of the rule is so that the batsman does not gain an unfair advantage. Buttler was in no way doing so. Again, Ahswin tried to be too clever for his own good and was rightly slammed.
 
I hope Ashwin does it again just to spite Ponting and the moral police.

If you think its against the spirit of the game just abolish the rule. Its ridiculous how much Ashwin has been blackballed just for doing something that falls within the confines of the game.
This. The rule is there for a reason. If someone flout it, they should pay the penalty.
 
Why do I have the feeling that Ponting and Ashwin are trolling the other players. Now they will step out without any doubts and Ashwin can Mankad them at a crucial time
 
This is why he got the backlash and it was deserved.

If Buttler was stealing lots of ground, then I am sure there would have been more sympathy.

But, Buttler only moved out of his crease when Ashwin was about to bowl, which made his actions unjust.

Ashwin said in the press conference that it was instinctive and not planned at all. It might have something to do with Ashwin's previous deliveries.
 
Ponting is the coach and the coaches makes the game plan and needs to be respected to what he preaches

Ponting is taking his coaching job serious here and not just there to make a quick buck and return back to australia.

Good statment shows hes comitted with his team
 
Ricky Ponting says he won’t allow Ashwin to use ‘Mankading’ for Delhi Capitals

IPL 2020: Delhi capitals head coach Ponting says he will have the "hard conversation" with Ravichandran Ashwin, who will play for them this season, to convince him that 'Mankading' is not the way they play the game.

https://indianexpress.com/article/s...dran-ashwin-mankading-delhi-capitals-6561559/

Good on Punter. Hope he knock some sense in Ashwin.


Why ? Did Ashwin do something wrong ? Something against the rules of the game ?

There's absolutely nothing wrong with mankading as far I'm concerned and as far as the MCC rule book is concerned. Why should the non-striker get a leeway when he's clearly trying to gain an unfair advantage before the ball is bowled? .
 
Ravichandran Ashwin's mankading of Jos Buttler last Indian Premier League (IPL) during a Kings XI Punjab-Rajasthan Royals match had reopened the debate on spirit of the game. But Ricky Ponting, the head coach of IPL franchise Delhi Capitals, has said he will have a conversation with Ashwin about the controversial mode of dismissal ahead of the upcoming season in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

“I’ll be having a chat with him about [mankad], that’s the first thing I’ll do,” Ponting was quoted as saying by The Grade Cricketer Podcast.

“Obviously, he [Ashwin] wasn’t in our squad last year, he’s one of our players that we tried to afford to bring in this year. Look, he’s a terrific bowler, and he’s done a great job in the IPL for a long period of time now, but I must admit watching that last season, as soon as it happened and he did that, I actually sat our boys down and said ‘Look, I know he’s done it, there’ll be others around the tournament who’ll think about doing this well but that’s not going to be the way that we play our cricket. We won’t be doing that’.”

Ashwin, who was bought by the Delhi Capitals at the IPL 2020 auction, had defended his decision to run out Buttler, saying his 'conscience was clear'. However, Ponting is confident Ashwin will take the advice in his stride.

“So, that’s going to be a conversation and that’s going to be a hard conversation I will have to have with him, but I’m pretty sure he’ll take it on the chin. I think, even him, looking back now, probably he’d say it was within the rules and he’s right to do it, but this is not within the spirit of the game, not in the way I want, at least with the Delhi Capitals anyway.”

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...apitals-ricky-ponting-uae/article32393483.ece
[MENTION=152021]Rajdeep[/MENTION]
 
Why ? Did Ashwin do something wrong ? Something against the rules of the game ?

There's absolutely nothing wrong with mankading as far I'm concerned and as far as the MCC rule book is concerned. Why should the non-striker get a leeway when he's clearly trying to gain an unfair advantage before the ball is bowled? .

Except, Ashwin's style of mankanding is not what prescribed in MCC rule book. He paused in his delivery stride, waited for Butler to leave the crease and then took the bails off :)) :ashwin:
 
Except, Ashwin's style of mankanding is not what prescribed in MCC rule book. He paused in his delivery stride, waited for Butler to leave the crease and then took the bails off :)) :ashwin:


And what's wrong in that ? Butler should have been proactive.

If a wicket keeper can wait for the batsman to leave the crease to stump him out, why can't the bowlers ? :dhoni
 
Dinesh Karthik has said a bowler should be allowed to 'Mankad' a non-striker without being subjected to criticism invoking 'so called spirit of cricket'.

Talking to Cricketnext as part of the Laws of Cricket Challenge, the Kolkata Knight Riders captain said the rule should be 'watertight and black or white' with no scope for grey areas like subjective use of spirit of cricket.

"I think every time a batsman crosses (the line before ball is delivered), the bowler should be allowed to create a run out. I don't think there is any spirit of cricket question that is there in that. Because I feel if a batsman nicks a ball and he doesn't walk, where is the spirit then?" he told Cricketnext.

"I think you need to be fair. You should take it out of the bowler's hand and the umpire's hand. It is either out or a not out, that's all. There is no question of asking the captain, asking the referee and those kind of things.

"I think a batsman at the point of delivery should definitely stay within the crease, as simple as that. If the batsman goes out, then the bowler can dislodge the bails and there should be no question about that.

"Because that means every time the batsman does that, and people feel the bowler, by creating a run out is cheating, then every time a batsman taking 2 metres is cheating again. So why nobody complains about the batsman backing up? That's always been my view."

Karthik said it's unfair to judge bowlers who 'Mankad' batsmen as the rule applies to both sides.

"And I also feel rules need to be watertight and there is no question of... it's either black or white, it's as simple as that. There should be no grey areas for people to use a loophole and find out. Spirit of cricket I feel is a massive grey area that people tend to use whenever they're not comfortable with something that they're doing," he said.

"Then they get a little too personal, they get into the player's personality, start judging people on what they've done. I think that's a bit unfair. I think the rules need to be very clear. It should be out or not out. If it's out or not out, the bowler and the fielding team have the ability to do it every time. As simple as that. If the rule applies to the bowling team, I'm sure when they start to bat the opponent can also do it. It needs to be very simple and clear."

The Mankad - an unofficial term for a dismissal where in the bowler runs out the non-striker before delivering the ball - has been in the news once again with Delhi Capitals head coach Ricky Ponting saying he wouldn't allow his bowler R Ashwin to use it in IPL 2020, like he did to Jos Buttler in 2019.

Law 41.16 of MCC, which deals with 'Non-striker leaving his/her ground early', clearly states that a bowler is allowed to run out a non-striker leaving his ground early.

Following the Ashwin-Buttler incident, the custodians of Laws of Cricket MCC also clarified that the dismissal is not against the spirit of cricket.

"To clarify, it has never been in the Laws that a warning should be given to the non-striker and nor is it against the Spirit of Cricket to run out a non-striker who is seeking to gain an advantage by leaving his/her ground early," the MCC had said.

Karthik also suggested an alternative to stop batsmen from crossing the crease in case 'so-called pundits' felt the dismissal was against 'spirit of cricket'.

"Or if you want to take it out of the bowler's hands, and create a so called spirit of cricket, then like having a camera for a no ball, you need to just observe through that camera if the batsman is in the crease at the time of delivery," he explained.

"If he is not, then whatever happens in that ball - disallow it except a wicket falling. That's the best way to go about it because once that happens, batsmen will be far more cautious and there will be more equality between batting and bowling, and more so between bowlers and so called pundits who are not happy with what the bowlers are doing."

Interestingly, Karthik said he would not allow his bowler to 'Mankad' a batsman but stressed he wouldn't judge any bowler or captain who supports the dismissal.

"I keep saying this. As a captain, I wouldn't allow my bowler. If my bowler does it, I won't accept it as a dismissal. Because I feel that it's okay, it's not necessary, our bowlers have the skill levels to do a proper dismissal," he said.

"But once the rule is in place that it is a run out, then it takes the question out of me deciding or not. It is a run out, that's all. The bowler has done it, that's all, it is fair play. As a captain I wouldn't allow or accept that as a dismissal if it is left to my hands because I feel my bowlers have the skill to take a wicket. As simple as that, I would leave it at that. But I wouldn't judge another captain if he accepts that as a run out. It's fine. That is a form of dismissal and please go ahead with it.

"What should be made clear is the fact that the batsmen should stay in his crease at the point of delivery, that's it."

https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/...-to-judge-bowlers-dinesh-karthik-2810169.html
 
I am fine with Ashwin mankading but why is Ashwin himself missing the main reason why he has been criticized. It's not the mankading but the way he approached it. He literally paused for Buttler to get out of the crease and whipped the bails off.

Warning is not important, it's just that Ashwin tricked Butler which is why such the outroar and everyone defending Ashwin need to answer this first and not whether mankading is right or nkt
 
Sanjay Manjrekar weighs in on ‘Mankading’, says he agrees ‘100%’ with Dinesh Karthik’s views

As the build-up continues towards the much anticipated Indian Premier League (IPL), which starts from September 19th in the UAE, one of the most hotly debated topics, apart from that of the teams reaching UAE, is that of ‘Mankading’. In IPL’s last season, a big controversy broke out after Kings XI Punjab’s Ravichandran Ashwin ‘mankaded’ Rajasthan Royals’ Jos Buttler.

Opinions were divided as some thought it was within the rules of cricket and that is why it’s allowed, while many felt it was against the ‘spirit of the game’. The issue came into the limelight recently as Delhi Capitals’ coach Ricky Ponting said he would ask his team, which includes Ashwin, who was traded to DC, not to use this mode of dismissal.

Ashwin has given his take on the issue and so has Kolkata Knight Riders captain Dinesh Karthik. Karthik in a conversation with Cricketnext gave his opinion on the issue.

“There are two issues I have with this ‘Mankad’ run out. First is the implementation of it. Second is the name ‘Mankad’ run out,” he said.

“First let’s come down to the implementation. All the way from Don Bradman to Sunil Gavaskar, everyone has said it’s completely within the rules. The ICC and MCC have also taken a stand that it is okay. So I don’t see the reason why bowlers or any team that does it is looked at in a negative way.

“Two, the name of it. The person who did it first time was Vinoo Mankad. Interestingly, he was alert enough to do that dismissal. But more importantly, nobody remembers the batsman who got run out. It was Bill Brown.

“If Mankad was the first person who did that run out, Bill Brown was the first person who got run out for being silly and walking out of the crease. Why is it that people remember Mankad and not Brown? Why can’t it be called anything to do with Bill Brown? He (Mankad) followed the rules and did it.

“He (Brown) was even given a warning. Giving a warning to the batter is accepted as spirit of cricket. But I don’t see a bowler tactically giving a warning to get a batsman bowled or caught, why should a warning be given for a run out?

“The ICC and MCC call it a run out. So the name Mankad shouldn’t be used in a negative connotation,” the KKR captain opined.

He then took to Twitter and asked the likes of eminent cricket commentator Harsha Bhogle and former India batsman and commentator Sanjay Manjrekar for their views on the issue.

Manjrekar responded by stating, “Agree 100%. Also, let’s start a trend of looking at batsmen leaving the crease before ball is released in a negative way.

This definitely isn’t the last that we have heard on the issue. It will be interesting to see if Ashwin or any other bowler employs the tactic during this season of the IPL or not.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...n-tendulkar/story-xTha1nZnCwxqQO0QauOwPK.html
 
It seems Ravichandran Ashwin has managed to get Delhi Capitals head coach Ricky Ponting on the same page as him on the issue of ‘mankad’. Ponting who had initially said that he wouldn’t allow anyone in his team, which includes Ashwin, to use the ‘mankad’ mode of dismissal, it seems has mellowed his stance on the matter.

Ponting said that Ashwin spoke to him and the Australian found logic in the off spinner’s thoughts.

“He (Ashwin) made me get on a podcast with him when I first arrived here to have a good open chat about it,” Ponting told ‘Cricket.com.au’.

“I think we’re both on the same page. He feels he did everything in the rules and laws of the game and he’s absolutely right,” Ponting said.

Ashwin presented a scenario which Ponting hasn’t been able to look beyond and that it seems has managed to get the former Australia captain’s attention.

“He’s saying, ‘What if it’s the last ball of the IPL, what if I’m bowling and the batting team needs two runs to win and the non-striker is charging halfway down the wicket?

What do you expect me to do’?

“There’s an argument there as well, but as I said to him, I would expect that he would hold on to the ball and not Mankad and tell the batsman to stay in his crease next time and see if he’s good enough to try and close the game out for us.”


Ponting reiterated that batsmen backing up too far are actually cheating and this matter needs to be dealt with by those who govern the sport.

“It shouldn’t get to that stage anyway, batsmen shouldn’t be cheating. That’s what batsmen are doing, batsmen are actually cheating by trying to steal a yard or two here or there. It’s something that needs to be addressed.

“I think something has to happen with the laws of the game to make sure batsmen can’t cheat and there certainly shouldn’t be the ........ rule the way it is,” he said.

He further suggested that a run penalty could act as a deterrent for batsmen to stop getting out of their crease.

“I think if you bring in some sort of run penalty for the batsman if they’re deliberately leaving their crease and pinching ground that might be the way to go about it.

“I’m sure those discussions are happening at the moment because I don’t think it’s a good look on the game.

“I think something is going to have to change,” Ponting signed off.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...ding-mankad/story-1shsPPtDyddELxuGmzYfBL.html
 
Ashwin the intellectual convinces Ponting with a thoughtful arguement and by doing that he's win respect of many fans who had earlier asked to show the finger to Ponting instead and continue mankading anyway.
 
Ashwin the intellectual convinces Ponting with a thoughtful arguement and by doing that he's win respect of many fans who had earlier asked to show the finger to Ponting instead and continue mankading anyway.

Except Ponting's not actually changed what he thinks at all...?
 
Ashwin had a chance to mankad Aaron Finch, but this time he doesn't do it!

<a href="https://ibb.co/ctChQ82"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/QnCvMHY/da0b21d4-73fb-4280-9935-04f9b5ae7993.jpg" alt="da0b21d4-73fb-4280-9935-04f9b5ae7993" border="0"></a>
 
No one is okay with batsmen stealing ground and gaining unfair advantage. In such a case, mankad makes perfect sense.

However, this entire debate started with the Jos incident. In that case, the batsman was NOT stealing ground and it was ashwin who had paused and waited for Jos to stroll out of the crease. It was premeditated from Ashwin and was a petty move bordering on cheating. Umpires should not have given it out.

But with the recent incident, looks like better sense has finally prevailed for Ashwin
 
Should have done it.Was more out than Buttler

Yet to see a logical argument against mankad.Or why batsmen deserve a 'warning'
 
His reaction.

pjimage_-_2020-10-05T221820.759.jpg

Lol on Ashwin though if you notice how far he is, and if any batsman on a song and he does this I would fault even Sachin or Dravid if they didn’t get them out!

Aussies cannot make rules here..
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Let’s make it clear !! First and final warning for 2020. I am making it official and don’t blame me later on. <a href="https://twitter.com/RickyPonting?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RickyPonting</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/runout?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#runout</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/nonstriker?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#nonstriker</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronFinch5?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AaronFinch5</a> and I are good buddies btw.&#55357;&#56834;&#55357;&#56834; <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IPL2020?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IPL2020</a></p>— Ashwin &#55356;&#56814;&#55356;&#56819; (@ashwinravi99) <a href="https://twitter.com/ashwinravi99/status/1313199583959289856?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/465196211" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<p><a href="https://vimeo.com/465196211"></a><a href="></a> on <a href="https://vimeo.com"></a></p>
 
Last edited:
Fair play to Ashwin, although I won't have blamed him in the slightest if he had run Finch out. All the brouhaha surrounding the mankad is absolute nonsense.
 
Delhi Capitals' spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has floated an idea of penalising the batting team 10 runs for backing up too far at the non-striker's end and head coach Ricky Ponting is already in talks with the International Cricket Council (ICC) for the same. Spinner Ashwin on Wednesday said that former Australian skipper and Delhi Capitals' head coach Ponting is in talks with the ICC's cricket committee for having a penalty if a batsman backs up too far at the non-striker's end.

"When we played (against RCB), one side of the ground was big, I knew someone would back up because scoring boundaries was not that easy. They had guys who could convert twos. So I knew it would happen. I went into my jump while delivering the ball and a gold helmet floated past. I stopped and thought, he was still outside the crease, just staring," said Ashwin in his YouTube show Hello Dubaiahh.

"He has been a good friend since we played together for KXIP. So I let it slide as a final warning. Punishment should be severe, dock 10 runs for backing up. Nobody will do that. Getting batsmen like this is not a skill. But no options for the bowler either," he added.

"I will say this. Can't stop thefts till thieves repent. I cannot be police forever. I tagged Ponting in the tweet. He said he would have asked me to run him out. He said ''a wrong is a wrong''. He's talking to the ICC committee about a penalty. He is really trying hard to keep his promise," Ashwin further said.

In the match against RCB on Monday, Ashwin gave Royal Challengers Bangalore's opening batsman Finch a warning for leaving his crease at the non-striker's end while the spinner was on course to deliver the ball.

In fact, he later took to Twitter to announce that this was the final warning, and next time he would run out any batsman found outside the crease.
 
Not surprised with the commies siding with ashwin

No surprise what dollars can do to an opinion
 
Brad Hogg tweeted this image from yesterday I supposed..

EzZx76vVgAEqDBa
 
The Mankad's are a fine two generation of cricketers who represented India at the highest level and also Saurashtra in Ranji trophy and FC levels.
They were known for their dignity in defeat, restraint and humility in victory, something a large generation of indian cricketers who wore the blue cap with pride, will attest to, as well will several gen o fans, viewers and bloggers....that was our way since we started playing.
(A pity that this is being hijacked by the aggro and the ugly chest thumping posturing of the current lot...any ways, I digresss from the main topic....)
On the 1947 tour of Australia, in a FC fixture against the touring Indian team, Aus batsman Bill Brown had attempted to get an unfair head start by leaving the crease, only to be warned by the bowler Vinoo Mankad.

Bill Brown did this again, this time in a test match. Vinoo Mankad whipped off the bails and the batsman was deemed to be run out.
Since his last name was so catchy - Mankad, the term Mankaded was added to the cricketing lexicon.

UNFAIRLY!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Brown_(cricketer)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ricket#Instances_of_Mankading_in_Test_cricket

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinoo_Mankad

Please note that he had warned the batsmen in advance that he was getting an unfair advantage.
Please also check the links and Sir D G Bradman also supported Shri Vinoo Mankad in this.

Its a travesty that a the fair name of the Mankad's who have contributed so much to the rich tapestry that is the Indian cricket ethos, has its connection with something that has the connotations of being unsporting, when it is not.
In fact, it should be called 'Browned' as Bill Brown was the batsman who tried to gain an unfair advantage, on both occasions.
Imagine if on the occasion if the bowler was an Ahmed or a De Silva or a zazai or a jones/taylor/smith.....would it be fair to term it as 'Ahmeded / De Silvad/ zazaid or jonesed/tailored/...etc...?"

Please stop calling it 'Mankaded' when a batsman leaves the crease at the non striking end before the bowler delivers and is run out and call it ' backup runout' 'bowlers runout' or any other fancy jargon, surely we can do better than mankaded.

Please stop tarnishing what is a fantastic legacy on our noble sport with such a family of sporting giants, by usage of this term.

I'm Indian but I'd say the same thing about the naming of this dismissal even if the person involved were from pak, sa, saf, wi, eng, aus any country....our sport is above this.

The Mankad's were a family of Champions, are champons, will forever remain Champions!
 
Last edited:
Kulkarni-run.jpg



How fair is mankading? The question has been a huge debate among cricketers for years. After R Ashwin was slammed for dismissing Jos Buttler in this 'debatable' manner in the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2019, a number of incidents have popped up where the non-strikers have taken undue advantage by leaving their crease ahead of time. In the IPL 2019 match between Mumbai Indians and Chennai Super Kings on Saturday, the same happened.

On the last delivery of the match, MI had required 2 runs of the final ball to win the match. While Kieron Pollard was facing Lungi Ngidi, Dhawal Kulkarni was at the non-striker's end. Pollard guided Ngidi's ball towards the long-on region and attempted a quick double. While Pollard himself was struggling to complete the double in time, it was Kulkarni who was running at the danger end (the non-striker's end).

Kulkarni reached in time, helping Mumbai Indians win the contest on the last delivery of the match. However, certain visuals that surfaced after the match, have got people questioning the 'spirit of the game'.

From certain pictures that were shared on social media, it has been found out that Kulkarni left his crease well before Ngidi had released the ball.

Former Australia cricketer Brad Hogg took to Twitter to share the same, as he tweeted: “Sorry again for my harp. Last night last ball 2 runs needed and the non-striker again taking advantage. Is this in the spirit of the game?”

https://www.timesnownews.com/sports...h-triggers-spirit-of-cricket-questions/751843
 
Not surprised with the commies siding with ashwin

No surprise what dollars can do to an opinion

Critics of mankading amaze me. It completely defies common sense and logic.

How is running out a batsman who is out of his crease before the ball is delivered is against the spirit of the game?

In fact, it is the opposite. Leaving your crease before the ball is delivered gives unfair advantage to the batsman because the extra yard or two can often be the difference between a run out and a single.

A batsman leaving his crease must be penalized and mankading must be encouraged so that the batsmen are discouraged from doing this nonsense.
 
Ravichandran Ashwin Suggests "Free Ball" For Bowlers Every Time Batsman Leaves Non-Striker's End Early

Ravichandran Ashwin suggested ''free ball'' for the bowlers every time a batsman leaves the non-striker's end before the ball is bowled.

Former India batsman Sanjay Manjrekar has called for the removal of free hit from the game but India off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin disagrees saying it is a "great marketing tool and has captured the imagination of the fans". The veteran off-spinner however, suggested ''free ball'' be added for the bowlers every time a batsman leaves the non-striker's end early before the ball is bowled.

Taking to Twitter, Ashwin wrote: "Come on [MENTION=149090]sanjay[/MENTION]manjrekar, free hit is a great marketing tool and has captured the imagination of all the fans. Let's add a free ball for the bowlers every time a batter leaves the non strikers end early, a wicket of that ball will reduce 10 runs of the bowlers analysis and total."

In another tweet he added: "Remember: "you are supposed to leave the crease only after the ball leaves the hand."

Remember: "you are supposed to leave the crease only after the ball leaves the hand"
— Mask up and take your vaccine (@ashwinravi99) May 28, 2021
This after Manjrekar had shared the link of his column where he proposed the removal of free hit.

The tweet read: "Hi guys, tell me what you think about some aspects of the game mentioned in this column that have me peeved a little bit. Also let me know what rule changes you would make to better your viewing experience. Will retweet the interesting ones."

Ashwin is currently undergoing quarantine with the rest of the India's Test squad in Mumbai ahead of the England tour.


The team will first play the World Test Championship final against New Zealand before taking on England in a five-match Test series.

The men's and women's team will take a charter on June 2 as the women's team will clash with England across all three formats.
 
A batsman must be penalised if he leaves his crease before the bowl is left from a bowlers hand.

But the problem in Ashwin's case on that day was that he pulled out of his action and at that time Buttler was still on crease. That didn't looked good at least on camera, more so without any earlier warning from Ashwin, which is why he got so much hate from social media that day.

However, from a general perspective, it is really unfair play from a batsman as they do leave the crease a lot of times before the bowl is being left from a bowlers hand.
 
Nowt wrong with Ashwin's view on mankading. Any batsman looking to steal a yard or two deserves to be run out.
 
Ashwin - cheeky! Watch for Buttler reaction too

<blockquote class="imgur-embed-pub" lang="en" data-id="AV1nHJw"><a href="https://imgur.com/AV1nHJw">View post on imgur.com</a></blockquote><script async src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
During a pre-match show ahead of Rajasthan Royals' second match of the season against Punjab Kings, Chris Gayle spoke about Ashwin in detail and also namedropped ‘Mankad’, adding that batters need to be careful around the spinner.

“Ashwin has had a lot of success against the top-order. He's very experienced, he can bowl the carrom ball. It's not like he can only bowl the off-spin. He has very good variations, he is a very tricky bowler. He can Mankad as well. So, you have to be careful! You got to take all these things into perspective when you're facing someone like Ashwin,” Gayle said on JioCinema.

To this, former New Zealand all-rounder Scott Styris had a rather interesting remark. “You can't use that word over here!” the former cricketer said sheepishly.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...umble-s-reaction-is-gold-101680704078974.html
 
Mankading without a warning is a cheap thing to do.

There should be a warning first. If batter does it again, mankading is justified.
 
Mankading without a warning is a cheap thing to do.

There should be a warning first. If batter does it again, mankading is justified.

And that warning should be for the whole batting side
One warning for the entire team.
 
Back
Top