What's new

[PICTURES] Is Virat Kohli the greatest ODI run chaser in history?

He will chase whatever target is set by opposition whether its under or over 300.

Well he didn't have to do it in this series so I don't see a justification for invoking this thread at this moment. It's well understood (or at least it should be) that the two spinners were the key difference between the two sides.
 
Well he didn't have to do it in this series so I don't see a justification for invoking this thread at this moment. It's well understood (or at least it should be) that the two spinners were the key difference between the two sides.

What you mean by “he didnt have to do in this series”? Are you implying he should’ve just surrendered and wave white flag cause target set by SA were below par?
I didnt deny that spinners were real MVP in this series, however India would still required to chase that target, and the way India’s middle order have been it would’ve made a mockery of the chase if Kohli wasn’t available. Remember this team is all about Top 3.
 
Agreed, Holding really not enjoyed ODI series as India was doing good. Holding, Pommi and Heysman all were trying to praise India, but no one was convincing. Small passage of good play from SA was hailed and much bigger achievements from India were non events for them :facepalm:

Agree. Don't know about Pommi but certainly noticed, from the little I watched, that Holding and Haysman weren't enjoying it.
 
I found Pollock to be a very good commentator. He's very balanced, enthusiastic and knowledgeable about the game, and has a good sense of humor, too.
 
Virat Kohli in his last 13 innings in ODIs

92
28
21
39
121
29
113
112
46*
160*
75
36
129*

Inns - 13
Runs - 1001
Average - 100.1
100s - 5
50s - 2
SR - 96.34

Link: http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...an;template=results;type=batting;view=innings

1k runs in just 13 innings, and just 5 months!

Thoughts?

He has incredible ability to pace his innings under pressure

Kohli's SR in chases
Overs 0-20 82.5
Overs 20-30 101.8
Overs 30-40 122.5
Overs 40-50 166.0

He has taken India home 27 times in Chase without having to face a ball in the last over unlike Dhoni who has won India 8 matches in the last over.
 
320+ chase

Scintillating hundred, leading from the front. What a guy!
 
Is anyone even close, let alone equally good ..... let alone better?
 
There is hardly any competition left for Kohli when it comes greatness in ODIs, but chasing? He has redefined the art. No batsman in history of ODI cricket is in the same league - cricket has had batsmen who could set platforms and batsmen who could finish, but Kohli is the first of his kind - a batsman who can do both with incredible consistency.
 
He does it again.

Kohli the ultimate chaser. The ultimate match winner.
 
Effortless.

They had Maxwell miked in and even with 60 runs to go, he knew that unless they somehow got Kohli, the chase would be comfortable.
 
Pure bloody class. This bloke is from another era. Is there anyway we can loan him and have him play in our team for a month or so. I am hoping that will be an incentive big enough for our players to watch and learn
 
Pure bloody class. This bloke is from another era. Is there anyway we can loan him and have him play in our team for a month or so. I am hoping that will be an incentive big enough for our players to watch and learn

If [MENTION=145164]Proactive_[/MENTION] was incharge of things he would have done that in a heartbeat .... :91:
[MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION]
 
If [MENTION=145164]Proactive_[/MENTION] was incharge of things he would have done that in a heartbeat .... :91:
[MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION]

And what about what we would have done to him in a heartbeat after he dares to do that? I'd be the first one in a line of millions :))
 
Coming back to the point, I'm seriously beginning to wonder whether I have seen a better batsman than Kohli. I'll even bite my tongue and say that maybe he tops even Sachin. And this is coming from a person who has a large color tattoo of Sachin on his forearm.
 
Coming back to the point, I'm seriously beginning to wonder whether I have seen a better batsman than Kohli. I'll even bite my tongue and say that maybe he tops even Sachin. And this is coming from a person who has a large color tattoo of Sachin on his forearm.

He would have held his own in that era but Sachin has a better resume so unless that is surpassed he can't be rated higher
 
He would have held his own in that era but Sachin has a better resume so unless that is surpassed he can't be rated higher
I agree but the way VK is progressing, it s only a matter of time before he makes Sachin's resume look fairly ordinary. Scary, but in a good way.
You don't see this sort of talent very often and I for one appreciate this. Only history will tell where this ends and until then, enjoy the game and the player
 
I agree but the way VK is progressing, it s only a matter of time before he makes Sachin's resume look fairly ordinary. Scary, but in a good way.
You don't see this sort of talent very often and I for one appreciate this. Only history will tell where this ends and until then, enjoy the game and the player

I don't know man, ST has so many iconic knocks in ODI's and faced many hall of fame bowlers as well, that's not Virat's fault obviously, perhaps the World Cup is an opportunity for him to make a case for himself though
 
I agree but the way VK is progressing, it s only a matter of time before he makes Sachin's resume look fairly ordinary. Scary, but in a good way.
You don't see this sort of talent very often and I for one appreciate this. Only history will tell where this ends and until then, enjoy the game and the player

Tendulkar's peak test average 59.7. I hope Virat maintains even 55. Test cricket is the only format that Kohli should target in order to be proven ahead of Sachin. Everyone knows the landscape's changed greatly in LOIs. It was the same for Sachin for the same reasons. Had he ended with an underwhelming test record no amount of ODI centuries would have had him put above Gavcaskars and actually there are many who still don't put him over Gavaskar so that is that. It's test cricket that defines a player's legacy and Kohli's not going to ever make Tendulkar's resume look ordinary unless he can retire with a 60+ average after 200 tests.
 
Last edited:
I don't know man, ST has so many iconic knocks in ODI's and faced many hall of fame bowlers as well, that's not Virat's fault obviously, perhaps the World Cup is an opportunity for him to make a case for himself though

Yes he did.

Every cricketing era has its strengths and weaknesses and a good player would know how to exploit those to his advantage. Sachin, Wasim Akram, Javed Miandad, Richard Hadlee, Malcom Marshall, Kapil Dev, David Boon, Shane Warne, Jack kallis, Lara etc gave some incredible performances during their times and the records they created set the bar for the next generation. Unfortunately all those records have an expiry date :). All it needs is someone motivated, talented and lucky on a day to break those and raise the bar further. That is the beauty of Sports. Like I said, only history will tell how high VK lands
 
Coming back to the point, I'm seriously beginning to wonder whether I have seen a better batsman than Kohli. I'll even bite my tongue and say that maybe he tops even Sachin. And this is coming from a person who has a large color tattoo of Sachin on his forearm.

Same here ! Eventually it will come down to 2 things:

1. World Cup Performances
2. How many Tests he plays and keeps up the performance levels.

[MENTION=428]Romali_rotti[/MENTION]
 
Last edited:
Same here ! Eventually it will come down to 2 things:

1. World Cup Performances
2. How many Tests he plays and keeps up the performance levels.

[MENTION=428]Romali_rotti[/MENTION]

I have always hated T20 cricket, and yet I switch into my TV whenever he is batting in a T20 match. That's the effect of Kohli on me :))
 
Coming back to the point, I'm seriously beginning to wonder whether I have seen a better batsman than Kohli. I'll even bite my tongue and say that maybe he tops even Sachin. And this is coming from a person who has a large color tattoo of Sachin on his forearm.

:))

What is his average in knockout matches? What is his average in major tournament finals? :))
 
:))

What is his average in knockout matches? What is his average in major tournament finals? :))

Somebody answer this question!

Kohli is not a good batter when it matters. And that's final.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Same here ! Eventually it will come down to 2 things:

1. World Cup Performances
2. How many Tests he plays and keeps up the performance levels.

[MENTION=428]Romali_rotti[/MENTION]

100 Percent on the above 2 points. For me maybe a little bit of biased ness I feel SRT at his peak is a step ahead of Kohli however the way Kohli batted yesterday, some of the shots were incredible.. When all said and done I believe Kohli will go down as the greatest bat of his ERA easily and top 5 all time batsmen of any ERA...
 
:))

What is his average in knockout matches? What is his average in major tournament finals? :))

Last year, "What's his average in English conditions?"

How'd that work out? :ibutt

It's always a matter of time with someone like Kohli. You could tell from a mile away he was going to dominate in England.
 
Last year, "What's his average in English conditions?"

How'd that work out? :ibutt

It's always a matter of time with someone like Kohli. You could tell from a mile away he was going to dominate in England.

Hey bro, I am missing Canadian food, can you send me a box of Nestle Turtles ? lol sorry off topic haha :P
 
Kohli has significant weakness against quality bowling as well as in pressure cooking situations. He isn't even the best batter of this current era and here some of his fans r trying to portray him as the greatest ever batsman. Hilarious, isn't it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kohli has significant weakness against quality bowling as well as in pressure cooking situations. He isn't even the best batter of this current era and here some of his fans r trying to portray him as the greatest ever batsman. Hilarious, isn't it?

They can't differentiate between media built hype and real quality. Their loss.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last year, "What's his average in English conditions?"

How'd that work out? :ibutt

It's always a matter of time with someone like Kohli. You could tell from a mile away he was going to dominate in England.

Dude, those were soft runs and didn't make any difference in the result of the series. I m not saying he's bad or anything. He's one of the best batters in the world. But he falls way behind all the other greats due to his inability to play clutch innings when it matters the most.
 
Dude, those were soft runs and didn't make any difference in the result of the series. I m not saying he's bad or anything. He's one of the best batters in the world. But he falls way behind all the other greats due to his inability to play clutch innings when it matters the most.

Kohli might not be the best batter of this era but it is ridiculous to say he isn't good against good bowling. He was India's best batter in SA and scored a hundred and couple of good scores on a mine-field of a pitch. Scored double the runs of either team in England in Test series. Scored runs in ODI series in England and SA. What more do you want from a player? You cannot recreate 90s' bowlers and wickets to have him prove his worth. He is one of the greats of the game and it does not matter if someone thinks he is not. The guy hasn't performed in the WC but again there have been greats in the past who haven't either.
 
Kohli has significant weakness against quality bowling as well as in pressure cooking situations. He isn't even the best batter of this current era and here some of his fans r trying to portray him as the greatest ever batsman. Hilarious, isn't it?

kohli has weaknesses?? Tell me in which part of the world he hasnt scored?? in ODIs and Tests

Please dont be so lame
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have always hated T20 cricket, and yet I switch into my TV whenever he is batting in a T20 match. That's the effect of Kohli on me :))
Exactly my feelings. Virat has just been on a different planet for last few years.
 
Kohli has significant weakness against quality bowling as well as in pressure cooking situations. He isn't even the best batter of this current era and here some of his fans r trying to portray him as the greatest ever batsman. Hilarious, isn't it?

34 runs to win in 2 overs lol
 
Dude, those were soft runs and didn't make any difference in the result of the series. I m not saying he's bad or anything. He's one of the best batters in the world. But he falls way behind all the other greats due to his inability to play clutch innings when it matters the most.
If kohli's runs were soft then what about shakib.
All his fifers in sena came in losing cause, all his hundreds were useless and u claim that he is an atg.
Please put some logic in your posts.
Lets see what excuses u come up with.
 
Yes. And against Pak double yes with both hands tied behind his back, twice on a Sunday and thrice on a public holiday
 
This is probably one of the old style chase he would do. 46 singles or something. Totally risk free chase. He remotely has the same power/timing he used to have. But he compensated with running. He should retire after this.
 
This is probably one of the old style chase he would do. 46 singles or something. Totally risk free chase. He remotely has the same power/timing he used to have. But he compensated with running. He should retire after this.

Even if Pakistan set India 300, he would've chase it for you guys. No one has dominated a single team more than Kohli has.
 
keep dreaming... bevan has done it in world cups consistently and has played against better bowling on more livelier pitches ......even tho kohli is batting on roads his average is still lower than bevan ...... :yk let me know when kohli has a better average and done it in wold cups matches but hey keep worshipping kohli bevan is simply better without a doubt ask any cricket fan who watched bevan and make sure they not indian :davthen you would see who the master really is !:amir
Ok, there you go! You have been let known.
 
He is up there but not sure if he is the best ODI chaser of all time. There are many factors to consider.

He played during a period when many teams experienced transition phases. Windies, SL, and Pakistan declined. Kohli wasn't tested as much as batters from previous generations were tested.

:inti
.
 
The greatest ever without an iota of doubt.

Kohli didn't face Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, Wasim, Waqar, Holding, Vaas, Lilliee, Hadlee etc. So, we can't say he is the greatest chaser ever. He didn't face some of the legendary bowlers from the previous eras.

However, I concede he was the best chaser in that period (from around 2011 till around 2016). :inti
 
Kohli didn't face Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, Wasim, Waqar, Holding, Vaas, Lilliee, Hadlee etc. So, we can't say he is the greatest chaser ever. He didn't face some of the legendary bowlers from the previous eras.

However, I concede he was the best chaser in that period (from around 2011 till around 2016). :inti
Richards didn’t face Warne, McGrath, Steyn, Murali, Anderson, Pollock, Donald, hardly ever faced Waqar (not that he was an ODI great) … Richards didn’t face his own West Indian greats either who wreaked havoc on the opposition…

Bradman didn’t face any of the bowlers you or I mentioned, yet he’s an established GOAT.

You can only face what’s in front of you and Kohli’s record is better than anyone in the past or present in white ball cricket. He’s not a God so there will be chinks in his armor, but I can easily find much bigger chinks in anyone else’s armor.
Respect royalty when you see one, country should not matter. But I know you and your agenda better, so I don’t really care.
 
He is up there but not sure if he is the best ODI chaser of all time. There are many factors to consider.

He played during a period when many teams experienced transition phases. Windies, SL, and Pakistan declined. Kohli wasn't tested as much as batters from previous generations were tested.

:inti
.
Not sure if you're trolling or completely lack any cricketing acumen
 
Best odi chaser of all time and top 5 odi cricketers of all time.

Imo pointing, Sachin and viv are better odi batters then he is, But he's no 4 all time.
 
Best odi chaser of all time and top 5 odi cricketers of all time.

Imo pointing, Sachin and viv are better odi batters then he is, But he's no 4 all time.

Out of curiosity, who are your top 5 overall ODI batters? Regardless of batting position
 
Kohli didn't face Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, Wasim, Waqar, Holding, Vaas, Lilliee, Hadlee etc. So, we can't say he is the greatest chaser ever. He didn't face some of the legendary bowlers from the previous eras.

However, I concede he was the best chaser in that period (from around 2011 till around 2016). :inti

You forgot to mention Tapash Baisya.
 
Out of curiosity, who are your top 5 overall ODI batters? Regardless of batting position
Ranked in Order

1) Viv (His reactions are > Any cricketer in history, it's a shame he played in a much harder era back when helmets weren't worn, Bowlers could bowl 6 bouncers and over, PP rules are stupidly broken, wide margins were ridiculous, Free hits didn't exist and bat quality was rubbish with those paper thin bats)

2) Sachin (Technically he's the most complete batter in history, reactions wise he's poorer then viv and late in his career he suffered from injuries and aged reactions but technique wise he's ridiculously compact in both footwork, Timing, Shot selections. You can tell he's mastered all fundamentals)

3) Pointing (After viv, he's the 2nd best player of pace in history and a really good legspin player and has freaky reactions and footwork in prime. He's a bit weak against offspin and for some reason harbjan got thr better of him and idkw since harbajan would get spanked by batters far lesser then him. Harbajan was a strange outlier for pointing)

4) Kohli (In terms of rr management and chasing he's no 1, techincally he's bang avg against leg spin and is bad on the 3rd offstump line, as he grew older these weaknesses got exposed more and more whereas in prime his quick reactions and mentality mindset could make up for it. Very solid player of pace especially inswing and gun player of offspin, one of the best of all time)

5) Lara (1992-1998): Dude was a machine, probably the best backlift player in history and his bat swing speed is crazy. Steven Smith in tests is the only other batter who has the same bat swing but Smith's technique allows him to do a 180 while lara somehow managed to do it with a normal stance, and that too in odi not just in test cricket. Eye sight and reactions wise he's no 2 on the list only behind viv. His main issue was that his backfoot was kinda weird, Hamstring issues were bound to happen and once he got injured he never truly recovered and wasn't a great odi batter post 1998.
 
Ranked in Order

1) Viv (His reactions are > Any cricketer in history, it's a shame he played in a much harder era back when helmets weren't worn, Bowlers could bowl 6 bouncers and over, PP rules are stupidly broken, wide margins were ridiculous, Free hits didn't exist and bat quality was rubbish with those paper thin bats)

2) Sachin (Technically he's the most complete batter in history, reactions wise he's poorer then viv and late in his career he suffered from injuries and aged reactions but technique wise he's ridiculously compact in both footwork, Timing, Shot selections. You can tell he's mastered all fundamentals)

3) Pointing (After viv, he's the 2nd best player of pace in history and a really good legspin player and has freaky reactions and footwork in prime. He's a bit weak against offspin and for some reason harbjan got thr better of him and idkw since harbajan would get spanked by batters far lesser then him. Harbajan was a strange outlier for pointing)

4) Kohli (In terms of rr management and chasing he's no 1, techincally he's bang avg against leg spin and is bad on the 3rd offstump line, as he grew older these weaknesses got exposed more and more whereas in prime his quick reactions and mentality mindset could make up for it. Very solid player of pace especially inswing and gun player of offspin, one of the best of all time)

5) Lara (1992-1998): Dude was a machine, probably the best backlift player in history and his bat swing speed is crazy. Steven Smith in tests is the only other batter who has the same bat swing but Smith's technique allows him to do a 180 while lara somehow managed to do it with a normal stance, and that too in odi not just in test cricket. Eye sight and reactions wise he's no 2 on the list only behind viv. His main issue was that his backfoot was kinda weird, Hamstring issues were bound to happen and once he got injured he never truly recovered and wasn't a great odi batter post 1998.
Helmets were there during Viv's time. He chose not to wear them deliberately. His reason being that wearing a helmet would give the impression that he was afraid of fast bowlers, and he would never let any fast bowler intimidate him. Rather it was him who was going to do the imtimidating bit. He was the man.​
 
Helmets were there during Viv's time. He chose not to wear them deliberately. His reason being that wearing a helmet would give the impression that he was afraid of fast bowlers, and he would never let any fast bowler intimidate him. Rather it was him who was going to do the imtimidating bit. He was the man.​
I'm aware but their were many who didn't wear it besides him, granted it was vs spinners, he was the only one who decided to not wear one against pacers.
 
I'm aware but their were many who didn't wear it besides him, granted it was vs spinners, he was the only one who decided to not wear one against pacers.
Sunny didn't wear helmets either but his reasoning was that wearing one obstructed his vision.
 
Ranked in Order

1) Viv (His reactions are > Any cricketer in history, it's a shame he played in a much harder era back when helmets weren't worn, Bowlers could bowl 6 bouncers and over, PP rules are stupidly broken, wide margins were ridiculous, Free hits didn't exist and bat quality was rubbish with those paper thin bats)

2) Sachin (Technically he's the most complete batter in history, reactions wise he's poorer then viv and late in his career he suffered from injuries and aged reactions but technique wise he's ridiculously compact in both footwork, Timing, Shot selections. You can tell he's mastered all fundamentals)

3) Pointing (After viv, he's the 2nd best player of pace in history and a really good legspin player and has freaky reactions and footwork in prime. He's a bit weak against offspin and for some reason harbjan got thr better of him and idkw since harbajan would get spanked by batters far lesser then him. Harbajan was a strange outlier for pointing)

4) Kohli (In terms of rr management and chasing he's no 1, techincally he's bang avg against leg spin and is bad on the 3rd offstump line, as he grew older these weaknesses got exposed more and more whereas in prime his quick reactions and mentality mindset could make up for it. Very solid player of pace especially inswing and gun player of offspin, one of the best of all time)

5) Lara (1992-1998): Dude was a machine, probably the best backlift player in history and his bat swing speed is crazy. Steven Smith in tests is the only other batter who has the same bat swing but Smith's technique allows him to do a 180 while lara somehow managed to do it with a normal stance, and that too in odi not just in test cricket. Eye sight and reactions wise he's no 2 on the list only behind viv. His main issue was that his backfoot was kinda weird, Hamstring issues were bound to happen and once he got injured he never truly recovered and wasn't a great odi batter post 1998.

It’s a nice list. I think same for a lot of people, just the order might differ. But i like you’ve got all the champion batters in there and nice reasoning. Viv and Lara truly had freak reflexes. Tendulkar truly a complete batter, Ponting indeed the dominating force against pace & bounce, Kohli 100% pure heart.

Actually Bhaji kept it very very tight in ODIs. He didn’t take as many wickets as we wanted but the run rate was always reasonable.
 
Helmets were there during Viv's time. He chose not to wear them deliberately. His reason being that wearing a helmet would give the impression that he was afraid of fast bowlers, and he would never let any fast bowler intimidate him. Rather it was him who was going to do the imtimidating bit. He was the man.​
Not exactly that. He respected the cap. Out of sheer respect for that cap he did not wear helmet. Also he had a mouth guard which he did not wear because he couldn't chew the gum and also it is uncomfortable. There was another point long back i read. No verified interview. But without helmet you have increased field of vision. It helps you better.
 
It’s a nice list. I think same for a lot of people, just the order might differ. But i like you’ve got all the champion batters in there and nice reasoning. Viv and Lara truly had freak reflexes. Tendulkar truly a complete batter, Ponting indeed the dominating force against pace & bounce, Kohli 100% pure heart.

Actually Bhaji kept it very very tight in ODIs. He didn’t take as many wickets as we wanted but the run rate was always reasonable.
These batters are interchangeable and I don't mind who's > who on any list. Each batter has been no 1 in one trait.

1) Viv = No 1 Reactions

2) Kohli = RR management and game awareness

3) Sachin = Shot, footwork and technique fundamentals.

4) Lara = Backlift and bat swing

5) Pointing = Pace timing and pace play, inswing and outswing don't bother him.

These guys are top 5 cause their all no 1 in one trait that no one will ever surpass them on.
 
Not exactly that. He respected the cap. Out of sheer respect for that cap he did not wear helmet. Also he had a mouth guard which he did not wear because he couldn't chew the gum and also it is uncomfortable. There was another point long back i read. No verified interview. But without helmet you have increased field of vision. It helps you better.
Really? I always thought otherwise. He even mentioned it in some of his interviews after retirement that wearing a helmet would signal that he was scared of fast bowler, and he would never do that.
 
Ponting lauds Virat Kohli's chase masterclass against Pakistan in the Champions Trophy

he game was headlined by Virat Kohli’s carefully crafted unbeaten century, which not only secured India's win but also saw him achieve remarkable individual milestones.

Speaking on The ICC Review, Australia legend Ricky Ponting lauded Kohli’s ability to step up in crucial moments, and for breaking a plethora of records on his way.

“I've always said big games equal big names. You need your big names to stand up in those big moments, and no bigger game for India than a game against Pakistan,” the ICC Hall of Famer said.

“Your reputation is forged in what you do in the biggest contests on the international stage. So it's no surprise to me that that has happened,” he added, describing Kohli's unbeaten 100 off 111 balls as a testament to his temperament and ability to deliver in crucial situations.

Ponting drew parallels between the batting stalwart’s clutch knock in Melbourne at the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2022, against the same opponent, that steered India to a win to his brilliance in Dubai.

“Yeah, as you say, 2022 and now, he stood up against the team that he would probably steel himself the most to play against," Ponting said.

“And no bigger moment than last night when Pakistan had batted first on a tricky wicket. It needed someone at the top of the order to play a match-winning innings like that. And once again, it was Kohli to get the job done.”

Opting to bat first, Pakistan posted 241 in 49.4 overs, a total that seemed competitive but ultimately fell short against India's batting prowess.

Pakistan had several batters who got starts but failed to convert them into bigger scores, something Ponting pointed out as a key shortfall.

Saud Shakeel (62), Mohammad Rizwan (46) and Khushdil Shah (38) all contributed, but none of them played a defining innings for the hosts.

“You look at the two scorecards, it’s one, Virat making a 100, and lots of Pakistan starts without anyone going on and making a big score," Ponting noted.

“I've said forever, in any format of the game, a 50 or a half-century never wins you or your team anything. You have to get big scores. And so the individual big scores weren't there, but the big partnerships weren't there either.”

Experienced duo Kuldeep Yadav (3/40) and Hardik Pandya (2/31) were instrumental for India in restricting Pakistan, ensuring that they couldn’t set a more daunting target.

Chasing 242, India lost early wickets, but Kohli anchored the innings with composure and precision.

Forming a crucial partnership with Shreyas Iyer (56), he guided India home with several well-timed strokes and controlled aggression.

Ponting, himself among the leading ODI run-scorers, acknowledged Kohli’s consistency and greatness. During his innings, Kohli also surpassed the 14,000-run mark in ODIs, now trailing only Kumar Sangakkara and Sachin Tendulkar.

“He's obviously been a champion player for a long, long time. And particularly in the white-ball formats, where he's been an unbelievably good 50-over player,” Ponting said.

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen a better 50-over player than Virat Kohli. Now that he's gone past me and only two ahead of him, I'm sure he would want to give himself the best chance to be remembered as the all-time leading run scorer in the game.

“As long as the hunger's there, obviously physical-wise, he’s probably as fit as he's ever been and works exceptionally hard on that side of his game.”

With Kohli now just 149 runs behind Sangakkara but over 4,000 short of Tendulkar, Ponting was asked if the latter’s record was within reach.

“It’s crazy when you think about it, isn’t it? Just how good Virat’s been over such a long period of time, yet he’s still 4,000 runs behind Sachin. It just goes to show how good Sachin was, but also his longevity in the game," Ponting said.

“But with someone like Virat, you never write him off. If the hunger's still there, then I’m never going to write him off.”

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s campaign is now over after back-to-back losses at the tournament.

Ponting questioned whether Pakistan were maximising the potential of their key players, particularly Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan.

“They haven’t been able to give their best back to their team. Those two guys had to stand up, they had to make big runs, and they haven't been able to do it in the first couple of games, and that might be the reason why Pakistan don't make it through to the semi-finals,” Ponting said.

ICC
 
Ponting lauds Virat Kohli's chase masterclass against Pakistan in the Champions Trophy

he game was headlined by Virat Kohli’s carefully crafted unbeaten century, which not only secured India's win but also saw him achieve remarkable individual milestones.

Speaking on The ICC Review, Australia legend Ricky Ponting lauded Kohli’s ability to step up in crucial moments, and for breaking a plethora of records on his way.

“I've always said big games equal big names. You need your big names to stand up in those big moments, and no bigger game for India than a game against Pakistan,” the ICC Hall of Famer said.

“Your reputation is forged in what you do in the biggest contests on the international stage. So it's no surprise to me that that has happened,” he added, describing Kohli's unbeaten 100 off 111 balls as a testament to his temperament and ability to deliver in crucial situations.

Ponting drew parallels between the batting stalwart’s clutch knock in Melbourne at the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2022, against the same opponent, that steered India to a win to his brilliance in Dubai.

“Yeah, as you say, 2022 and now, he stood up against the team that he would probably steel himself the most to play against," Ponting said.

“And no bigger moment than last night when Pakistan had batted first on a tricky wicket. It needed someone at the top of the order to play a match-winning innings like that. And once again, it was Kohli to get the job done.”

Opting to bat first, Pakistan posted 241 in 49.4 overs, a total that seemed competitive but ultimately fell short against India's batting prowess.

Pakistan had several batters who got starts but failed to convert them into bigger scores, something Ponting pointed out as a key shortfall.

Saud Shakeel (62), Mohammad Rizwan (46) and Khushdil Shah (38) all contributed, but none of them played a defining innings for the hosts.

“You look at the two scorecards, it’s one, Virat making a 100, and lots of Pakistan starts without anyone going on and making a big score," Ponting noted.

“I've said forever, in any format of the game, a 50 or a half-century never wins you or your team anything. You have to get big scores. And so the individual big scores weren't there, but the big partnerships weren't there either.”

Experienced duo Kuldeep Yadav (3/40) and Hardik Pandya (2/31) were instrumental for India in restricting Pakistan, ensuring that they couldn’t set a more daunting target.

Chasing 242, India lost early wickets, but Kohli anchored the innings with composure and precision.

Forming a crucial partnership with Shreyas Iyer (56), he guided India home with several well-timed strokes and controlled aggression.

Ponting, himself among the leading ODI run-scorers, acknowledged Kohli’s consistency and greatness. During his innings, Kohli also surpassed the 14,000-run mark in ODIs, now trailing only Kumar Sangakkara and Sachin Tendulkar.

“He's obviously been a champion player for a long, long time. And particularly in the white-ball formats, where he's been an unbelievably good 50-over player,” Ponting said.

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen a better 50-over player than Virat Kohli. Now that he's gone past me and only two ahead of him, I'm sure he would want to give himself the best chance to be remembered as the all-time leading run scorer in the game.

“As long as the hunger's there, obviously physical-wise, he’s probably as fit as he's ever been and works exceptionally hard on that side of his game.”

With Kohli now just 149 runs behind Sangakkara but over 4,000 short of Tendulkar, Ponting was asked if the latter’s record was within reach.

“It’s crazy when you think about it, isn’t it? Just how good Virat’s been over such a long period of time, yet he’s still 4,000 runs behind Sachin. It just goes to show how good Sachin was, but also his longevity in the game," Ponting said.

“But with someone like Virat, you never write him off. If the hunger's still there, then I’m never going to write him off.”

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s campaign is now over after back-to-back losses at the tournament.

Ponting questioned whether Pakistan were maximising the potential of their key players, particularly Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan.

“They haven’t been able to give their best back to their team. Those two guys had to stand up, they had to make big runs, and they haven't been able to do it in the first couple of games, and that might be the reason why Pakistan don't make it through to the semi-finals,” Ponting said.

ICC
LOL, it would be comical for some fans still to compare Babar Azam with him.
 
LOL, it would be comical for some fans still to compare Babar Azam with him.
The reason the comparison was started to kickstart his brand. Then they started this "after XXX matches" trend. They just piggybacked on Kohli's immense popularity. All said and doen it worked. Kohli fans got angry started replying to these posts. It initiated conversation which was enough for Babar PR team.
 
The reason the comparison was started to kickstart his brand. Then they started this "after XXX matches" trend. They just piggybacked on Kohli's immense popularity. All said and doen it worked. Kohli fans got angry started replying to these posts. It initiated conversation which was enough for Babar PR team.
@Bilal7 was mentioning the other day that Babar has already achieved more than Kohli at similar age and that he will end up a greater ODI batsman than Kohli eventually. And that Kohli averages just 46 in Tests, and Babar doesn't need to do anything extraordinary in that format to go past Kohli :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Not to mention that his 'Babbar Sher' would roar like a lion and end his career as the greatest batsman ever from Asia replacing Sachin 🤡 🤡
 
@Bilal7 was mentioning the other day that Babar has already achieved more than Kohli at similar age and that he will end up a greater ODI batsman than Kohli eventually. And that Kohli averages just 46 in Tests, and Babar doesn't need to do anything extraordinary in that format to go past Kohli :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Not to mention that his 'Babbar Sher' would roar like a lion and end his career as the greatest batsman ever from Asia replacing Sachin 🤡 🤡
Let him come anywhere close to Gill's level and then might think about including his name in the same sentence as Gill let alone Kohli!

Man don't even bring Sachin's name up into this crap
 
@Bilal7 was mentioning the other day that Babar has already achieved more than Kohli at similar age and that he will end up a greater ODI batsman than Kohli eventually. And that Kohli averages just 46 in Tests, and Babar doesn't need to do anything extraordinary in that format to go past Kohli :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Not to mention that his 'Babbar Sher' would roar like a lion and end his career as the greatest batsman ever from Asia replacing Sachin 🤡 🤡
You don't need to do much in test cricket to go past kohli.

But

You don't need to do anything to go past babar in test cricket 🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
You don't need to do much in test cricket to go past kohli.

But

You don't need to do anything to go past babar in test cricket 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kohli is a good Test batsman. I can't take that away from him. An average of a shade below 47 with 30 centuries is proof.

But that's where the buck stops! He is nothing more than a good Test batsman.
 
You don't need to do much in test cricket to go past kohli.

But

You don't need to do anything to go past babar in test cricket 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kohli is a good test batsman. On par with KP/Clarke/Amla etc.

Babar will finish with average below 40 now that dustbowl era has started and have lesser legacy than guys like Rahane.
 
Back
Top