[PICTURES/VIDEOS] Should the catch by Daniel Mousley that dismissed David Willey in PSL 9 have been ruled out?

[Cricket Warrior]

The confusion is whether the foot is in the air when he pouches it, looks like his toe touched the ground when he caught the ball. Not sure why umpire is giving the benefit of the doubt to fielding side? That is not a good enough reason.

Well to be honest it never looked out to me!

 

[The Bald Eagle]

Surely not out. A very poor decision that cost MS the match.

 

[Asad T]

No way that was out -- the umpire said "benifit of the doubt should go to the fielder." which is wrong, benifit always is supposed to go to the batter.

 

[da_don]

hard to judge that the foot was off the ground.. in this case benefit of doubt should surely go to the batsman

 

[PakFan2010]

No way that was out -- the umpire said "benifit of the doubt should go to the fielder." which is wrong, benifit always is supposed to go to the batter.

The decision on the field was out?

 

[Major]

video plz

 

[Asad T]

video plz

https://x.com/i/web/status/1761085979664736257

 

[Asad T]

The decision on the field was out?

Yes it was given out. And Zalmi won by 6 runs in the end. So this was significant

 

[Asad T]

video plz

Video has also been added in the OP.

And Twitter is ok as long as its from a proper account and is relavent to the topic.

 

[Major]

nono, twitter is banned in Pakistan lol

 

[Cricket Warrior]

Standard of umpiring should improve in the PSL. How is that given out? Clearly he is touching the ground while the ball is in the hands; even a blind person can tell.

 

[kingusama92]

Definitely not out. The third umpire needs glasses.

 

[Rana]

Poor decision

It was 6 runs

 

[Cricket Warrior]

That poor decision cost them the match because they only lost by 5 runs and this six could have saved them.

 

[shamaan]

Clearly not out.

 

[FearlessRoar]

I think it was six, because his feet touched the ground while he had the ball in his hand.

How could the third umpire display such negligence in such a significant tournament? Such a disgrace

 

[BouncerGuy]

The confusion is whether the foot is in the air when he pouches it, looks like his toe touched the ground when he caught the ball. Not sure why umpire is giving the benefit of the doubt to fielding side? That is not a good enough reason.

Well to be honest it never looked out to me!

View attachment 142310

I think the umpire may have misjudged it due to the black sole of the fielder's boot and it may have him thinking that he is in the air but it looked not out to me. The umpire did not have conclusive evidence so he gave the benefit of the doubt to the fielding side.

 

[MANU ROY]

The confusion is whether the foot is in the air when he pouches it, looks like his toe touched the ground when he caught the ball. Not sure why umpire is giving the benefit of the doubt to fielding side? That is not a good enough reason.

Well to be honest it never looked out to me!

View attachment 142310

Its six lol

 

[MenInG]

Willey not happy!

Reposted this tweet

https://twitter.com/x/status/1761093883130458191