What's new

Red ball next with Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood exhausted

Junaids

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Runs
17,956
Post of the Week
11
A big change is going to occur now.

The red Kookaburra is currently the worst ball that I have seen in 40+ years of watching cricket. It seams and swings for 20 overs, then does absolutely nothing. Batting from overs 20 to 80 is really not hard.

Which means that Pakistan have their work cut out for them, but so too do the Aussies.

The Pakistanis will never have played in front of a crowd of 80,000 before, but they will on Boxing Day.

If they can score 450 at the Gabba, they really should cope at Melbourne and Sydney. But they need to bat first.
 
This team has shown what it is capable of. Just need to replace Rahat with Sohail and I believe we can win at least one game
 
A big change is going to occur now.

The red Kookaburra is currently the worst ball that I have seen in 40+ years of watching cricket. It seams and swings for 20 overs, then does absolutely nothing. Batting from overs 20 to 80 is really not hard.

Which means that Pakistan have their work cut out for them, but so too do the Aussies.

The Pakistanis will never have played in front of a crowd of 80,000 before, but they will on Boxing Day.

If they can score 450 at the Gabba, they really should cope at Melbourne and Sydney. But they need to bat first.

Are you sure we will get this much crowd for a non Ashes test?
 
A big change is going to occur now.

The red Kookaburra is currently the worst ball that I have seen in 40+ years of watching cricket. It seams and swings for 20 overs, then does absolutely nothing. Batting from overs 20 to 80 is really not hard.

Which means that Pakistan have their work cut out for them, but so too do the Aussies.

The Pakistanis will never have played in front of a crowd of 80,000 before, but they will on Boxing Day.

If they can score 450 at the Gabba, they really should cope at Melbourne and Sydney. But they need to bat first.


3 spinners boss?

Amir & Sohail can bowl 20 overs with new ball (Sohail will last for 10 overs for sure) & PAK playing Nawaz, Yasir & Azhar for 60 overs - then again 20 by Amir & Sohail ....
 
3 spinners boss?

Amir & Sohail can bowl 20 overs with new ball (Sohail will last for 10 overs for sure) & PAK playing Nawaz, Yasir & Azhar for 60 overs - then again 20 by Amir & Sohail ....

I was disappointed that Pakistan didn't keep Mohammad Irfan in every squad this last 12 months, just so the fitness trainers could have him for 200+ days. Just to play 1 single match - the MCG Test. His bounce would have been so helpful.

Melbourne is a tough place to bowl if you don't make the new ball take wickets. I would have wanted Irfan and Wahab both bowling short sharp spells while Amir, Yasir and ?Asif / ? Nawaz did the donkey work.

I don't think a 4 man attack will work unless Pakistan get lucky with a greentop, which ain't going to happen.
 
Any combination, apart from Nawaz will work - in fact, PAK can go with Yasir & Asghar as well in both Tests & I am not joking. There is no point taking 3 pacers, if Captain doesn't know how to use them or doesn't trust them. Take Amir & Wahab & play 2 spinners against Aussies at MCG, SCG. I expect Misbah to win next 2 toss - batting first, 2 spinners can win the Test. Batting 2nd, even 3 pacers might not.

ONLY KEY, & I'll BANG MY HEAD ON THAT - $1,000,000 fine for every Catch drop ...............
 
It's a week between tests, I'm sure the Aussie bowlers will recover just fine for Boxing Day, especially if Australia get an extra day or two from batting first.
 
3 spinners boss?

Amir & Sohail can bowl 20 overs with new ball (Sohail will last for 10 overs for sure) & PAK playing Nawaz, Yasir & Azhar for 60 overs - then again 20 by Amir & Sohail ....

Oh god no. Not in Australia, Azhar is enough for a fifth option.
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] has hit the nail on the head by pointing out the workload of the Aussie pacers. It's the first game of the series and that wear and tear will accumulate over the next couple of weeks.
 
Starc and Hazlewood would have recovered from exhaustion within next couple of days.
 
I was disappointed that Pakistan didn't keep Mohammad Irfan in every squad this last 12 months, just so the fitness trainers could have him for 200+ days. Just to play 1 single match - the MCG Test. His bounce would have been so helpful.

Melbourne is a tough place to bowl if you don't make the new ball take wickets. I would have wanted Irfan and Wahab both bowling short sharp spells while Amir, Yasir and ?Asif / ? Nawaz did the donkey work.

I don't think a 4 man attack will work unless Pakistan get lucky with a greentop, which ain't going to happen.

Irfan has to take at a wicket per 2 overs rate, because I don't see him standing after 10 overs. I'll bet my house, if it's a green top at MCG - in fact, my hunch is, it's going to be dry. Considering Gabba crowd, CA accounted won't like the Test to end before Tea on Day 5.
 
Any combination, apart from Nawaz will work - in fact, PAK can go with Yasir & Asghar as well in both Tests & I am not joking. There is no point taking 3 pacers, if Captain doesn't know how to use them or doesn't trust them. Take Amir & Wahab & play 2 spinners against Aussies at MCG, SCG. I expect Misbah to win next 2 toss - batting first, 2 spinners can win the Test. Batting 2nd, even 3 pacers might not.

ONLY KEY, & I'll BANG MY HEAD ON THAT - $1,000,000 fine for every Catch drop ...............
I don't think T=Rahat was bad in the second innings. He was poor in the first one, but second time round he was on the money in terms of line, length and pace.

Mickey Arthur's comments about Sohail Khan being unselectable due to his inability to bowl a second, third and fourth spell will be most amplified at the MCG.

I don't expect Pakistan to get bundled out for 142 again. But four bowlers plus Azhar will be as overworked as Starc and Hazlewood here.
 
Almost all of our batsmen have found form and Melbourne will be an easier pitch to bat on than the Gabba was. It'll be another good contest but hopefully, Pakistan will compete well in both their batting innings.
 
Irfan has to take at a wicket per 2 overs rate, because I don't see him standing after 10 overs. I'll bet my house, if it's a green top at MCG - in fact, my hunch is, it's going to be dry. Considering Gabba crowd, CA accounted won't like the Test to end before Tea on Day 5.

Oh, I agree.

That's why I got so upset - like Mickey Arthur - when he broke down in the ODIs in England.

He could have had his workload and training built up all year so that by the MCG he could bowl one 5 over spell per session. 15 overs per day.

But no.
 
Oh god no. Not in Australia, Azhar is enough for a fifth option.
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] has hit the nail on the head by pointing out the workload of the Aussie pacers. It's the first game of the series and that wear and tear will accumulate over the next couple of weeks.

Misbah doesn't know how to attack with 3 pacers - he is comfortable with 2 men spin attack & I'll give it to him. Yasir, Asghar, Amir & Wahab for me. Batting is fine, only that Asad should have come earlier, but he has Midas touch at 6 - I'll bring Sarfy at 5 & drop Misbah at 7 (If he drops himself out of the Test, better).
 
Oh, I agree.

That's why I got so upset - like Mickey Arthur - when he broke down in the ODIs in England.

He could have had his workload and training built up all year so that by the MCG he could bowl one 5 over spell per session. 15 overs per day.

But no.

No training can make a 38 years old 7'1 giant play Test match as fast bowler. He was a mechanic in a factory till he was officially 27 - without any formal training or diet regime for his size. Nature gave him unique body & talent, while luck favored him that he was spotted - but he is gone for good, trust me.
 
Pumped for the match! Imo they should move Shafiq up to 5 and Misbah down to 6.

We have shown in this match that the Aussie bowling attack is not unplayable and can be scored off easily.

Need to score 500 runs in the first innings.
 
We need to fly in an extra pacer.
The problem is, the brilliant fightback means that no reinforcements will be called up.

The MCG requires tall fast bowlers, so Hasan Ali isn't an option.

Asif would have been so useful, especially to block up an end with Azhar Ali while Amir and Wahab and Yasir bowled short, attacking spells at the other end.

You all know that I do not like Mohammad Hafeez one little bit, but he'd have been more useful than Misbah at Number 6 at the MCG, against a team with 7 left-handed batsmen.

Each session could have looked like this:

FIRST HOUR
Asif and Amir - 6 overs each
Hafeez and Yasir - 1 over each

SECOND HOUR
Wahab 4 overs Yasir 4 overs
Hafeez 2 overs Azhar 2 overs

Per session:
Amir 6 overs
Asif 6 overs
Wahab 4 overs
Yasir 5 overs
Hafeez 3 overs
Azhar 2 overs

I genuinely believe that the fewer overs each quick bowler bowls, the more wickets he will take.
 
Pumped for the match! Imo they should move Shafiq up to 5 and Misbah down to 6.

We have shown in this match that the Aussie bowling attack is not unplayable and can be scored off easily.

If

No - confidence plays lot in cricket. Asad has done wonders at 6, let him stay there.

I'll bring Sarfy at 5 & drop Captain at 7. And, Babar must be told not to bother for his low scores - he should play his natural game. I said it before his ODI triple, that he is batting well, just managing to get out. Once he reaches his 1st one, he'll convert many. Same in Test - he is batting fluently for an hour or more & then getting out; he is just one good knock away from a series of big scores.
 
The big elephant in the room is Pakistan only managed to take 15 wickets in this test.
 
The big elephant in the room is Pakistan only managed to take 15 wickets in this test.
Your not expecting Pakistan to bowl Australia out in a session, are you?

If there is an issue to be discussed it is why it took such a considerable amount of time for Starc and co. to get rid of Yasir.
 
Your not expecting Pakistan to bowl Australia out in a session, are you?

If there is an issue to be discussed it is why it took such a considerable amount of time for Starc and co. to get rid of Yasir.

Well while you work on that issue Pakistan bowlers could not take 20 wickets, the requirement needed to win a test match.
 
Well while you work on that issue Pakistan bowlers could not take 20 wickets, the requirement needed to win a test match.
You failed to answer my question.

Were you expecting Pakistan to bowl Australia out in 39 overs?
 
Well while you work on that issue Pakistan bowlers could not take 20 wickets, the requirement needed to win a test match.

I am sure Gilly you must have had an excuse had Pakistan won.

Enjoy the victory though.
 
Well while you work on that issue Pakistan bowlers could not take 20 wickets, the requirement needed to win a test match.

Almost won this one and we only needed 15 Aussie wickets :yk
 
The big elephant in the room is Pakistan only managed to take 15 wickets in this test.

That's exactly what I'm getting at!

15 wickets with a pink ball on a grassier track than they are going to get.

I think Australia might rack up huge scores at Melbourne and Sydney.
 
That's exactly what I'm getting at!

15 wickets with a pink ball on a grassier track than they are going to get.

I think Australia might rack up huge scores at Melbourne and Sydney.
Again, you fail to look at the context of Australia's second innings.

39 overs is not enough to bowl an opposition out on a flat track.
 
Well while you work on that issue Pakistan bowlers could not take 20 wickets, the requirement needed to win a test match.

Hardly a requirement as long as Aus declares it. 40 more runs and Pakistan would have won this match without taking 20 wickets.
 
Hardly a requirement as long as Aus declares it. 40 more runs and Pakistan would have won this match without taking 20 wickets.

You wont win many matches relying on the opposition to declare because you will always be chasing 450+
 
You wont win many matches relying on the opposition to declare because you will always be chasing 450+

As long as you win 1-2, it will do the job for Pakistan. Anyway, I was just pulling your legs.
 
As long as you win 1-2, it will do the job for Pakistan. Anyway, I was just pulling your legs.

I am willing to bet that Pakistan gets bundled out for less than 200 (both innings) in atleast one of the tests.
 
How many times will a team get so lucky?
Pakistan missed the chance. Next declaration will not be so brave.

Aussies won't get be this lucky again, this was the warm up game for us. Melbourne will be the beginning of the end for the Aussies :rahat

I am willing to bet that Pakistan gets bundled out for less than 200 (both innings) in atleast one of the tests.

Well yeah, it's no fun if we don't give Australia a chance.
 
The big elephant in the room is Pakistan only managed to take 15 wickets in this test.

You are spot on :)
Thats the problem with ppers here. I keep telling them that pakistan's bowling is major issue. Here even in this test match bowling was not that good.

Pakistan is a bowling oriented team unlike india which wins matches mostly with its batting.
 
Aussies won't get be this lucky again, this was the warm up game for us. Melbourne will be the beginning of the end for the Aussies :rahat



Well yeah, it's no fun if we don't give Australia a chance.

Hopes ,Yes! Delusions: Noooo!!.
Pakistan played at their potential for the 3 innings of the game, 4th innings should not be imagined to be something they can repeat. Infact no team would claim to be able to repeat such a performance.
 
You are spot on :)
Thats the problem with ppers here. I keep telling them that pakistan's bowling is major issue. Here even in this test match bowling was not that good.

Pakistan is a bowling oriented team unlike india which wins matches mostly with its batting.

Batting more so than bowling (scoreboard would suggest otherwise)
 
Hardly a requirement as long as Aus declares it. 40 more runs and Pakistan would have won this match without taking 20 wickets.

Runs were flowing like river until they got within 40s. Then each run was becoming harder and harder to come by (kinda like batsman in his 90s). That's what fear of hope does that to you. If the target was 400 instead of 490, Pakistan would have likely crumbled at 350.

And Pakistan nine out of ten times would bundle under 200 in a situation like this based on their history. So this is just a coincidence IMO and should surprise the team itself.
 
had pakistan bowling been good then aussie tail wont score that much

aus would have scored about 360ish

Pakistan lacks penetration in their bowling

Yasir and Amir bowled better than what figure suggests. And waheb also gets job done.

They can do field setting differently for Yasir though (as warne and commentary team repetitively pointed out)
 
Last edited:
Hopes ,Yes! Delusions: Noooo!!.
Pakistan played at their potential for the 3 innings of the game, 4th innings should not be imagined to be something they can repeat. Infact no team would claim to be able to repeat such a performance.

We don't need to repeat this 4th innings performance.

We simply need to avoid being 67/8 in the first innings.
 
Runs were flowing like river until they got within 40s. Then each run was becoming harder and harder to come by (kinda like batsman in his 90s). That's what fear of hope does that to you. If the target was 400 instead of 490, Pakistan would have likely crumbled at 350.

I think in the same line so no disagreement here. Last 50 runs is always hardest if you have very few wickets left. It doesn't matter if you are chasing 250 or 400.
 
You are spot on :)
Thats the problem with ppers here. I keep telling them that pakistan's bowling is major issue. Here even in this test match bowling was not that good.

Pakistan is a bowling oriented team unlike india which wins matches mostly with its batting.

Not really. This Pakistan is not the same as the Pakistan of the old which had pace bowlers like Wasim, Waqar, Akhtar, etc., and relied on their bowling to win matches.

The current team is a bit India like, and has been like that for some time now. It relies on its batting (YK, Misbah, Azhar, Asad) and spinners (Yasir now, Ajmal before) to win matches.
 
Well while you work on that issue Pakistan bowlers could not take 20 wickets, the requirement needed to win a test match.
And aussies struggle so much to take 20 wickets even though they bowled 3/4 session under light with new ball.
 
But they do have 7 days until the next test and both are young men in cricketing terms (25 or 26).

Sure. Just pointing out a fact.

I think Smith over-bowled them. As most of the analysts pointed out, his lack of trust in Lyon was strange.
 
Brave declaration?490 is a brave declaration? Lmao

490 declaration with 2 and half days remaining is still something that you allow the opposition a chance of win.
He could have gone on to add till 600 hundred with no chance of Pakistan even thinking about winning. and still 150 overs to bowl out Pakistan.
 
490 declaration with 2 and half days remaining is still something that you allow the opposition a chance of win.
He could have gone on to add till 600 hundred with no chance of Pakistan even thinking about winning. and still 150 overs to bowl out Pakistan.

How are you 'allowing the opposition' a chance when it has never happened in the history of Test cricket? The only time a score of more than 451 was made in the fourth innings of a Test match was in a Timeless Test, 77 years ago.

It's possible that a team may chase a score in the region of 500 in future but I certainly wouldn't call that a 'brave declaration'. I'd simply give the batting team credit for pulling off such a ridiculous chase.
 
How many times has Pakistan managed to cross 250 in Aus NZ in recent times?

How many times has Pakistan played in Aus/NZ in recent times?

Our last Test in Australia was 6 years ago with an almost entirely different team.
 
How are you 'allowing the opposition' a chance when it has never happened in the history of Test cricket? The only time a score of more than 451 was made in the fourth innings of a Test match was in a Timeless Test, 77 years ago.

It's possible that a team may chase a score in the region of 500 in future but I certainly wouldn't call that a 'brave declaration'. I'd simply give the batting team credit for pulling off such a ridiculous chase.

Pakistan still were given a chance, and they almost grabbed it. It was overconfidence on part of Smith.

Out of the 18 400+ score in the 4th innings 9 have happened in this century, and out of the 18 again 5 were where the team batting last could only manage a draw because of lack of overs, while 4 won. Teams have managed to score more and more in the 4th innings over the years.

Capture.JPG
 
How many times has Pakistan played in Aus/NZ in recent times?

Our last Test in Australia was 6 years ago with an almost entirely different team.

Out of the 8 innings in Australia and NZ (including a tour game)this year:
Pakistan crossed 250 : 1

and 208/6 declared against Cricket Australia XI.
 
Pakistan still were given a chance, and they almost grabbed it. It was overconfidence on part of Smith.

Out of the 18 400+ score in the 4th innings 9 have happened in this century, and out of the 18 again 5 were where the team batting last could only manage a draw because of lack of overs, while 4 won. Teams have managed to score more and more in the 4th innings over the years.

View attachment 71637

We're also having more games in a year. Absolute numbers don't necessarily give a correct picture. This is where percentages help.
 
Pakistan still were given a chance, and they almost grabbed it. It was overconfidence on part of Smith.

Out of the 18 400+ score in the 4th innings 9 have happened in this century, and out of the 18 again 5 were where the team batting last could only manage a draw because of lack of overs, while 4 won. Teams have managed to score more and more in the 4th innings over the years.

View attachment 71637

Some extremely flat pitches may have allowed big scores in the 4th innings of Test matches since 2000, but as a whole, 4th innings haven't gotten any easier.

The Gabba is certainly not known to produce high totals in the fourth-innings.

Your theory of a 'brave declaration' has only one leg to stand on - and that is the nature of the pink ball which differs from the others.

While the Australian third innings was going on, the commentators were voicing their frustration towards the end regarding why Australia hadn't declared yet. I think it was Ian Chappell in particular who was quite vocal about it. They wanted Pakistan to bat for a few overs before Dinner on Day 3 so they saw this almost as a defensive, delayed declaration.
 
Rahat should definitely be dropped. At Sydney we can even go in with 2 spinners

I would have Imran for Rahat. Melbourne potentially offers some reverse and IK can be good there
 
Rahat should definitely be dropped. At Sydney we can even go in with 2 spinners

I would have Imran for Rahat. Melbourne potentially offers some reverse and IK can be good there

Don't you remember what arthur said about Imran? He is not going to play unless there is grass on the pitch.
 
Some extremely flat pitches may have allowed big scores in the 4th innings of Test matches since 2000, but as a whole, 4th innings haven't gotten any easier.

The Gabba is certainly not known to produce high totals in the fourth-innings.

Your theory of a 'brave declaration' has only one leg to stand on - and that is the nature of the pink ball which differs from the others.

While the Australian third innings was going on, the commentators were voicing their frustration towards the end regarding why Australia hadn't declared yet. I think it was Ian Chappell in particular who was quite vocal about it. They wanted Pakistan to bat for a few overs before Dinner on Day 3 so they saw this almost as a defensive, delayed declaration.

The more frustration was as to why the follow on was not enforced!
This declaration still gave Pakistan a slim chance to win and they almost grabbed it.
 
Don't you remember what arthur said about Imran? He is not going to play unless there is grass on the pitch.

Play Sohail then, with yasir bowling the bulk of overs he will do as efficient job as rahat if not more and Sohail is also a decent tailender.
 
Play Sohail then, with yasir bowling the bulk of overs he will do as efficient job as rahat if not more and Sohail is also a decent tailender.

he was even harsher on sohail that he cant bowl 3rd and 4th spell so no chance of him either.
 
he was even harsher on sohail that he cant bowl 3rd and 4th spell so no chance of him either.

There is no place for Rahat in international cricket. The quicker Arthur realizes this the better, I am sure even Sohail tanvir would be of more value to the team than this left arm Sami
 
Was watching the news this morning and reports are Australia is going to draft an allrounder into the squad and rest Hazlewood and Starc for the Boxing Day Test.
 
Was watching the news this morning and reports are Australia is going to draft an allrounder into the squad and rest Hazlewood and Starc for the Boxing Day Test.

A late change? Because they retained the same squad for the 2nd Test earlier today (or yesterday depending on your location...).
 
A late change? Because they retained the same squad for the 2nd Test earlier today (or yesterday depending on your location...).
Don't know about, that is simply what is being reported on Channel Nines Morning News.
 
Australia unchanged, quicks to be monitored

Australia to monitor players ahead of Boxing Day after Starc and Hazlewood pushed through career-high workloads in Brisbane.

After conceding the third-highest fourth-innings total in Test history, Australia captain Steve Smith says the National Selection Panel has discussed the possibility of bringing an allrounder back into the side to provide much-needed support for an overworked four-man bowling attack.

Australia have announced they will take the same 12-man squad that won the first Commonwealth Bank Test against Pakistan into the Boxing Day Test in Melbourne, with the caveat that players will be assessed over the next 24 hours after they toiled for 145 overs in the field through the fourth innings at the Gabba. Should one of the fast-bowling trio of Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Jackson Bird not pull up sufficiently well ahead of the traditional MCG clash, retained 12th man Chadd Sayers – who leads this year's Sheffield Shield wickets tally with 29 – would almost certainly be the man to debut

But Smith said an allrounder was also an option to be brought in as well and there remains a possibility that extra players will be added to the squad in the coming days. "The selectors are talking about (including an allrounder) at the moment," the skipper said, shortly before selectors confirmed the second Test squad.

"It's obviously been a very tough Test match for our fast bowlers. They've bowled a lot of overs and we're going to have to see how they pull up. "They'll be put on ice for the next couple of days and try to get back a bit of energy, and whatever soreness they've got in their body they'll try to get rid of that.

"So I think an allrounder will be talked about, but we'll wait and see which way the selectors go." As the pink ball softened on a less grassy Brisbane pitch than those that have been prepared for the day-night Tests in Adelaide, Smith rotated his three fast bowlers with the spin of Nathan Lyon, while only Nic Maddinson's three overs offered that foursome any respite. Spearhead Starc admitted he was "stiff and sore" before the final day of play and sent down a total of 56 overs for the match, while Hazlewood also bowled 56 and Bird (45 overs) and Lyon (40 overs) got through plenty of work.

The 38 overs Starc bowled in the fourth innings is the most he's ever bowled in a single Test innings, while Hazlewood's 42 overs is also a career high. Mitchell Marsh had his issues with the bat in the Test team and selectors ultimately tired of his failure to make runs, however coach Darren Lehmann remained a staunch supporter of his wicket-taking ability even as the axe fell. The West Australian took 29 wickets at 37 in his 19 Tests until selectors opted to rebalance the side with a more traditional six frontline batsmen, wicketkeeper, three pacemen and a spinner. Marsh's lack of runs is likely to cost him a return to the side in the event of another rejig, and there are other allrounders who have been stating their case in the Sheffield Shield.

Limited-overs regular James Faulkner recently hit his maiden first-class hundred for Tasmania and combines powerful batting with left-arm seamers. Faulkner, 26, has played one Test, taking six wickets in that match, and while he has performed brilliantly for Australia in the shorter formats, he has scarcely had a look-in again with the Test side since that debut in England in 2013.

Other options could be Blues allrounder Moises Henriques, who played Test cricket as recently as August in Sri Lanka but suffered a side strain in the Shield last month, putting a question mark on whether he is sufficiently fit to fill a fourth seamer's workload. However, the 29-year-old is fit enough to play the opening match of the KFC Big Bash League on Tuesday night. Victoria's Marcus Stoinis and Western Australia's Hilton Cartwright both scored first-class hundreds for Australia A in their Winter Series against South Africa A and India A respectively, and could also come into the selectors' discussions.

It was confirmed that Shaun Marsh was not considered for the second Test due to a finger injury, meaning Nic Maddinson has earned a reprieve despite scores of 0, 1 and 4 in his three Test innings so far. "These players have performed extremely well in earning back-to-back Test victories against South Africa and Pakistan and deserve the opportunity to stay together as a group to continue their development," interim selection chairman Trevor Hohns said of the 12-man squad. "We have the option to add to the squad depending on how the bowling unit pulls up after getting through a lot of overs in Brisbane and if we opt to go down that path then that is a decision we will make over the coming days.

"Shaun Marsh was not considered for selection as he continues his recovery from the finger injury that sidelined him following the Perth Test match and which has required surgery. He will be assessed by a specialist this week and will hopefully be given the all-clear to return to unrestricted training, at which point we will be able to consider him again for selection. "This squad has been selected for the Melbourne Test only and we will assess our requirements for Sydney during the Melbourne Test."

http://www.cricket.com.au/news/aust...pakistan-steve-smith-nic-maddinson/2016-12-19
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No - confidence plays lot in cricket. Asad has done wonders at 6, let him stay there.

I'll bring Sarfy at 5 & drop Captain at 7. And, Babar must be told not to bother for his low scores - he should play his natural game. I said it before his ODI triple, that he is batting well, just managing to get out. Once he reaches his 1st one, he'll convert many. Same in Test - he is batting fluently for an hour or more & then getting out; he is just one good knock away from a series of big scores.

Ie he is just one series of knocks away from a series of big scores.
 
"Our new ball bowling is weak. Until and unless we take wickets with the new ball, it would be difficult to beat Australia" - Wasim Akram
 
"Our new ball bowling is weak. Until and unless we take wickets with the new ball, it would be difficult to beat Australia" - Wasim Akram


That's true against every team barring PAK. Wasim knows his game - he was a brilliant Captain, when he wanted to win matches (even better, when didn't want to :pkflag), but he can't explain for general audience, hence he is a poor commentator & will be big a failure as head coach.

These days every team & by every team, I mean up to AFG, IRL, Canada & UAE (basically every team barring PAK) plays their top 3 aggressive players in 1, 2, 3 or at latest 1-4; therefore it's elementary that one has to strike with new ball. If I generalize it, couple of wickets in first 10 overs will sent back 2 of

IND - Dhawan, Rohit, Virat
AUS - Warner, Finch, Smith
SRL (Old one) - Dilshan, Mahela, Sanga
ENG - Roy, Root, Ducket
NZ - Guptil, Latham, Will
SAF - Kok, Amla, Roussou
BD - Tamim, Sarker/Kayes, Sabbir
.
.
.
AFG - Shahzad, Rahmat Shah......
UAE - Rohan Mushtafa ......

Same equation for PAK was Ahmed, Azhar, MoHa :( .......... hence team went to 9th.
 
Australia should select Mitchel Marsh or James Faulkner against Pakistan not because they are good but because the Pakistan team has a habit of making stars out of ordinary bowlers. #JasonHolder #NZnewbiecan'trememberhisname #MarcusNorth #ImranTahir
 
Last edited:
Not really. This Pakistan is not the same as the Pakistan of the old which had pace bowlers like Wasim, Waqar, Akhtar, etc., and relied on their bowling to win matches.

The current team is a bit India like, and has been like that for some time now. It relies on its batting (YK, Misbah, Azhar, Asad) and spinners (Yasir now, Ajmal before) to win matches.

difference of opinion :)
 
Back
Top