What's new

Russia endorses PM Imran Khan's dialogue for peace, expects India and Pakistan to solve conflict

SecondSlip

Debutant
Joined
Oct 12, 2012
Runs
257
TASS NEWS AGENCY

Russia expects India, Pakistan to refrain from bringing bilateral differences to SCO
Russian Politics & Diplomacy February 19, 15:36
At the same time, Moscow understands that multilateral platforms will inevitably be affected by bilateral conflicts, says official
MOSCOW, February 19. /TASS/. Moscow expects that Islamabad and New Delhi will resolve bilateral tensions through dialogue, refraining from bringing them to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Russian Special Presidential Representative for SCO and the Foreign Ministry’s Special Envoy Bakhtiyer Khakimov told TASS on Tuesday.

"We hope that India and Pakistan will fulfill one of the most important conditions and obligations they undertook when joining the SCO, which stipulates that member countries should not bring bilateral differences to the SCO platform since it is multilateral," he pointed out.

According to him, Russia understands that multilateral platforms will inevitably be affected by bilateral conflicts but Moscow believes that this kind of activities are based on clear rules, which include "mutual respect and the need to search for compromise solutions, maintain dialogue and hold consultations" that are always helpful in finding mutually acceptable options.

"That said, we expect that all bilateral issues will be resolved through dialogue between New Delhi and Islamabad," Khakimov added.

On February 14, a suicide attacker rammed a vehicle filled with explosives into an Indian paramilitary convoy in Jammu and Kashmir, killing 45. The Jaish-e-Mohammed group, which aims at separating Kashmir from India and bringing it under Pakistan’s control, claimed responsibility for the attack.

A diplomatic crisis between India and Pakistan followed as New Delhi and Islamabad recalled their ambassadors for consultations. India said it had evidence proving Pakistan’s involvement in the attack, while Islamabad rejected this accusation.

http://tass.com/politics/1045383/amp?__twitter_impression=true
 
India isn’t Russian puppy anymore, India has a new master now.

And who would that be? Can't say US because India does business with Iran and Venezuela despite US sanctions. Maybe alien overlords huh
 
India can only buy oil of Iran for a 6 months period.

India is building a port on Iranian soil! India is one of a few countries that can buy Iranian oil for the 6 months. And apparently the transactions are not in USD.
 
India is building a port on Iranian soil! India is one of a few countries that can buy Iranian oil for the 6 months. And apparently the transactions are not in USD.

Interesting point about transaction currency. Non-USD is something the US ain't gonna be happy about but it is what it is in terms of their best interests. Any idea what currency the transaction will be?
 
If Kashmir was to be solved by talks it would have been done so by now. One doesn't have to be a genius to realise that 70 years off talks have been a waste of time.
 
If Kashmir was to be solved by talks it would have been done so by now. One doesn't have to be a genius to realise that 70 years off talks have been a waste of time.

So, what is your path to solution if not for talks? Bomb all of them "evil infidels" to teach them a lesson?
 
India is building a port on Iranian soil! India is one of a few countries that can buy Iranian oil for the 6 months. And apparently the transactions are not in USD.

Think about why the exception is giving to India and not China?
 
Think about why the exception is giving to India and not China?

Not sure what you're implying here.

"India did get a waiver, alongside seven other Iranian oil customers, including the single biggest, China. The waivers allow those eight countries to continue Iranian oil imports at reduced volumes until early May 2019"
 
So, what is your path to solution if not for talks? Bomb all of them "evil infidels" to teach them a lesson?

Independence of Kashmir from both India and Pak. What's this obsession with bombs and all? Get over it and tell your cheap news anchors to do the same.
 
Independence of Kashmir from both India and Pak. What's this obsession with bombs and all? Get over it and tell your cheap news anchors to do the same.

My news anchors are CNN, Fox, and MSNBC. Granted they have their own rhetoric but not as cheap as what y'all face in South Asia. Once again ... stop assuming everything that has a counter-point to you has something associated with India because your only responses seem to be talking negative about a specific country instead of anything logical.

Why bombs - Well, since you said talks are not an option, how are you planning to achieve independence for Kashmiri people? Raffle the state of Kashmir in some powerball lottery - since you seem to be ruling out both talks and war? Care to answer this, chief?
 
My news anchors are CNN, Fox, and MSNBC. Granted they have their own rhetoric but not as cheap as what y'all face in South Asia. Once again ... stop assuming everything that has a counter-point to you has something associated with India because your only responses seem to be talking negative about a specific country instead of anything logical.

Why bombs - Well, since you said talks are not an option, how are you planning to achieve independence for Kashmiri people? Raffle the state of Kashmir in some powerball lottery - since you seem to be ruling out both talks and war? Care to answer this, chief?

So you are not Indian? Why should I not speak poorly about India when over the past week all they have done is war mongering? They deserve to get a severe telling off from my likes. You Americans are in no position to teach other people about peaceful living my the way so nuff of the hypocrisy.

Simple if you cared to think. Both armies in particular the Indian one that has tens of thousands of soldiers in the valley pull out first and foremost. After that a plebiscite has to take place as promised under UN observers. There need not be any further killings in the name of bringing peace then again it is India not Pak that is killing and blinding the Kashmiris.
 
So you are not Indian? Why should I not speak poorly about India when over the past week all they have done is war mongering? They deserve to get a severe telling off from my likes. You Americans are in no position to teach other people about peaceful living my the way so nuff of the hypocrisy.

Simple if you cared to think. Both armies in particular the Indian one that has tens of thousands of soldiers in the valley pull out first and foremost. After that a plebiscite has to take place as promised under UN observers. There need not be any further killings in the name of bringing peace then again it is India not Pak that is killing and blinding the Kashmiris.

Remember - you said no talks. So how do you plan to achieve the objective (quoted in bold) without talks?

Enough with name calling of others' backgrounds please? Can you respond without talking bad about the other persons' backgrounds/religions/nations? We all represent national/religious/communal entities with some level of blood somewhere. Who are we kidding here?
 
Remember - you said no talks. So how do you plan to achieve the objective (quoted in bold) without talks?

Enough with name calling of others' backgrounds please? Can you respond without talking bad about the other persons' backgrounds/religions/nations? We all represent national/religious/communal entities with some level of blood somewhere. Who are we kidding here?

I mean no talks with India directly. We can however talk to the UN or through some other third party. So where have I spoken poorly about other religions or anything else?. That coming from a person not caring about those who suffer from cancer doesn't look very good. "We all represent national/religious/communal entities with some level of blood somewhere. Who are we kidding here?" So what?
 
I mean no talks with India directly. We can however talk to the UN or through some other third party. So where have I spoken poorly about other religions or anything else?. That coming from a person not caring about those who suffer from cancer doesn't look very good. "We all represent national/religious/communal entities with some level of blood somewhere. Who are we kidding here?" So what?

Let me explain this in a simpler way - Every country has some bad history (so does yours). So making unprovoked bad statements about my country does not prove any point. Dig deep enough in history, your country has as much blood in its hands as does the other next country and so on and so forth .... That's what. Get it?
 
I mean no talks with India directly. We can however talk to the UN or through some other third party. So where have I spoken poorly about other religions or anything else?. That coming from a person not caring about those who suffer from cancer doesn't look very good. "We all represent national/religious/communal entities with some level of blood somewhere. Who are we kidding here?" So what?

For this to be a feasible plan the other party (India) has to agree, for which you need to talk to them first. Them (India) withdrawing troops because Pakistan has influenced some 3rd party - this is completely out of touch with current ground realities of international relations at so many levels. Pakistan lacks the required diplomatic clout to make it happen and India matter of fact seems to have more of the diplomatic clout as of now.

If your objective is to have Indian troops withdrawn your only choices as of now are military solution or talks with India. Talking to some 3rd party to coerce/force it to happen is just not reality in current geopolitics.
 
Any sensible person will know that talks are vital. But then this is Modi we are talking about, the most clueless PM this country has seen. Forget Pakistan he doesn't even talk to Indian press, Kashmiri people, and anyone who has a different ideology or is not a boot licker.
 
Any sensible person will know that talks are vital. But then this is Modi we are talking about, the most clueless PM this country has seen. Forget Pakistan he doesn't even talk to Indian press, Kashmiri people, and anyone who has a different ideology or is not a boot licker.

True this. I think if Pakistan makes enough genuine overtures and if Modi govt keeps rebuffing them, then diplomatic power could tilt in favor of Pakistan soon.
 
Let me explain this in a simpler way - Every country has some bad history (so does yours). So making unprovoked bad statements about my country does not prove any point. Dig deep enough in history, your country has as much blood in its hands as does the other next country and so on and so forth .... That's what. Get it?

No I don't get it boy so come again! Once again open up your ears that we need not talk directly with India. Some countries are worse then others like India, Israel and America! These are the Zionist trilogy of evil which is why I struggle to find anything good in them. Therefore, it is for other countries irrespective of how many bad people live within to fight and defeat them.My country is far better then the above mentioned three that there is no doubt about! We have not killed millions of Kashmirs, Palestinians and the rest. Know your place!
 
For this to be a feasible plan the other party (India) has to agree, for which you need to talk to them first. Them (India) withdrawing troops because Pakistan has influenced some 3rd party - this is completely out of touch with current ground realities of international relations at so many levels. Pakistan lacks the required diplomatic clout to make it happen and India matter of fact seems to have more of the diplomatic clout as of now.

If your objective is to have Indian troops withdrawn your only choices as of now are military solution or talks with India. Talking to some 3rd party to coerce/force it to happen is just not reality in current geopolitics.

No we don't! We can just ignore India letting them talk to themselves! You can't do nothing when the other party refuses to engage in debate. The UN can tell India to get out of the valley first and foremost before Pak thinks about talking to them. Rubbish! This is the nonsense Indian media is reporting that Pak has been isolated however we have not put our case forward as we should have. So yes we have failed in diplomacy over the years due to our own lacklustre attitude and indecisive decisions. India itself is doing a great job in Kashmiris hating on them. The scary thing for Indian troops is suicide bombings could become the future form of resistance which seems to be the case. Our ultimate aim is to let the Kashmiris decide what they want wven if that is complete independence. One thing is certain that India is losing sympathy and the Kashmiris don't want to live with your lot so lets stop mincing up words.
 
Pakistan ans Russia relations have really come a long way and its heartening to see Russia siding with Pakistan here when in the past they always supported Indian narrative..
 
Pakistan ans Russia relations have really come a long way and its heartening to see Russia siding with Pakistan here when in the past they always supported Indian narrative..

Where have Russia supported Pakistani narrative?
 
Back
Top