Shoaib Malik Support & Performance Watch

Should Malik be in the plans for the 2019 WC?


  • Total voters
    421
  • Poll closed .
i am ready to accept the bet by faras...now need suitable stakes...

I can raise the bar, he will score 2 50s while batting at #3 in five matches.

bus inti bahadri siruf? why not 4 fifties and at least one 5 for. AFterall he is the pakistani bradman, 4 fifties on flat decks against his favourite punching bag should be quite easy!
 
bus inti bahadri siruf? why not 4 fifties and at least one 5 for. AFterall he is the pakistani bradman, 4 fifties on flat decks against his favourite punching bag should be quite easy!

Letter (B) is common between bahduri and BZ! :P
 
even though i hate seeing malik bk in odi team

but still i wuld have him in the playing 11 .... in place of that useless DAMAD of pakistan
 
Not fearing anything actualy weak in english i m now posting about my favorurite malik a player who stops wl mouths soon so feel sorry for him
 
i am ready to accept the bet by faras...now need suitable stakes...

I can raise the bar, he will score 2 50s while batting at #3 in five matches.

no stipulations please, If Malik is the bradman that you say he is, he should be scoring 50s from any position.

and what are the stakes?

You'd accept Malik is the worst tullay baaz the world has ever seen and will stop posting in this thread. Your call?
 
farazaidi, that is one risky bet.

Malik is most likely going to play a few of the ODI's.


And getting a 50 against this Sri Lankan bowling attacks on the dead tracks of UAE isn't THAT hard.


Even a broken clock is right twice a day.


Malik may fluke his way to a 50 :))
 
farazaidi, that is one risky bet.

Malik is most likely going to play a few of the ODI's.


And getting a 50 against this Sri Lankan bowling attacks on the dead tracks of UAE isn't THAT hard.


Even a broken clock is right twice a day.


Malik may fluke his way to a 50 :))

I'm testing his patience, he has already raised the bet to two fifties, lets see how it goes :yk

The problem with last bet was that he blabbered too much and when the anti-brigade homed in on that, he chickened away with weird stipulations. Dont want to give him any room for that :inzi
 
I'd like to see him open the innings for a few games, that way we can fit both Shahid and Abdul.
 
no stipulations please, If Malik is the bradman that you say he is, he should be scoring 50s from any position.



You'd accept Malik is the worst tullay baaz the world has ever seen and will stop posting in this thread. Your call?

I am not clear what's offered from the haters?
Should be tempting.
 
I am not clear what's offered from the haters?
Should be tempting.

Perhaps the PP management can make you an honorary moderator for a day and you can block W63 from posting for a day.

Or

W63 has to create a thread praising Shoaib Malik and use statistics to prove that Malik is the best thing that ever happened to Pakistan (I'm sure you can help W63 with that). And all of us "haters" will provide supporting "bravos" and 'wah wah' to that thread and nominate it for the post of the week.
 
I'll take on for the lads /and Gals here!)..

If Malik scores two or more 50's I'm this odi series then I'll neverog onto PP again!

If Malik fails to score two 50's in the odi series then BZ has to finally admit that Malik's rubbish and this thread is to be locked down forever and BZ to never post about Malik again!!

Come on BZ, bring it on!
 
Perhaps the PP management can make you an honorary moderator for a day and you can block W63 from posting for a day.

Or

W63 has to create a thread praising Shoaib Malik and use statistics to prove that Malik is the best thing that ever happened to Pakistan (I'm sure you can help W63 with that). And all of us "haters" will provide supporting "bravos" and 'wah wah' to that thread and nominate it for the post of the week.

Ii assume that you confirmed with wl abt option 2?
 
Perhaps the PP management can make you an honorary moderator for a day and you can block W63 from posting for a day.

Or

W63 has to create a thread praising Shoaib Malik and use statistics to prove that Malik is the best thing that ever happened to Pakistan (I'm sure you can help W63 with that). And all of us "haters" will provide supporting "bravos" and 'wah wah' to that thread and nominate it for the post of the week.

well done..... :14: :14:

In both cases, I get to be Qurbaani ka Bakara???? I thought, Eid was over! :P

Siddique Bhai... what have I done to you.... kia bigara hai aap ka, main ney?
 
Last edited:
We are all Jealous of Maliks measly average of 20s and his score of 2, 14, 7, 11 vs Zimbabwe
 
Ok so BZ is all hot air then!!

All he had to do was publicly stop supporting Malik whereas I was prepared to never 'log in/on' to Pakpassion again!!
 
I am not clear what's offered from the haters?
Should be tempting.

why do you need an offer? just tell us what you want to have/see

Are you not confident of Malik scoring a single 50+ score in the series that you need to be tempted into this bet? :asif
 
if he plays in all ODI's since he is such a bradman he should make 5 fifties. He should average at least 50 in the ODI's because he has everything to his advantage here. His ultimate punch bag team, flat tracks, sania in the crowd(probably), BZ cheering him on with his malik shirt and pom poms! what can go wrong!

cmon BZ if he makes 5 fifties in all matches Ill come on this thread and write a eulogy to his greatness!
 
BZ how about a fun :yk bet :wasim.

If Malik scores 3 50s I will have this signature for two weeks.

Malik is better the Bradman.


and he fails to score more then one half century you will have a sig saying

Malik is a talentless wonder.
 
why do you need an offer? just tell us what you want to have/see

Are you not confident of Malik scoring a single 50+ score in the series that you need to be tempted into this bet? :asif

i am ok with your #2 option offer...get me the confirmation, now.
 
i am ok with your #2 option offer...get me the confirmation, now.

Helllllllloooooooooooooooooooooooooo

hell ... noooooooooooooooo

Not the way bet is worded.....

It has to be more specific!

What if Malik playes in only 2 ODI?
What if he bats at a position other than #3...


Be more specific... BZ.... which you never have been and never will.
 
Last edited:
Ok so BZ is all hot air then!!

All he had to do was publicly stop supporting Malik whereas I was prepared to never 'log in/on' to Pakpassion again!!

Thanks for the offer but what about other haters?

I need a collective offer...including WL, SS, TGK (as they are top posters in this thread).

Looks like SS, TGK, Faris are already in.
Keep tuned.
 
i am ok with your #2 option offer...get me the confirmation, now.

specifications req. as W63 mentioned

I bet Malik wont score even two 50+ scores in this series, if he doesnt you'll write your last post in this thread stating "Malik is the biggest tullaybaaz the world has ever seen", and you wont post in this thread anymore. If he does score two 50+ , ...........(fill in the blank)

deal? :butt
 
Helllllllloooooooooooooooooooooooooo

hell ... noooooooooooooooo

Not the way bet is worded.....

It has to be more specific!

What if Malik playes in only 2 ODI?
What if he bats at a position other than #3...


Be more specific... BZ.... which you never have been and never will.

I'll be more specific:

If Malik plays at #1, or #2 or #3 or #4 or at #5

and

if he comes to bat before 31st over.

then

he would score a 50, 40% of his completed innings.

(means 2 50s in 5 completed innings if he bats in top 5 and start his inning before 31st over)
 
specifications req. as W63 mentioned

I bet Malik wont score even two 50+ scores in this series, if he doesnt you'll write your last post in this thread stating "Malik is the biggest tullaybaaz the world has ever seen", and you wont post in this thread anymore. If he does score two 50+ , ...........(fill in the blank)

deal? :butt

This was your offer that I am willing to accept:

"W63 has to create a thread praising Shoaib Malik and use statistics to prove that Malik is the best thing that ever happened to Pakistan (I'm sure you can help W63 with that). And all of us "haters" will provide supporting "bravos" and 'wah wah' to that thread and nominate it for the post of the week."
 
I'll be more specific:

If Malik plays at #1, or #2 or #3 or #4 or at #5

and

if he comes to bat before 31st over.

then

he would score a 50, 40% of his completed innings.

(means 2 50s in 5 completed innings if he bats in top 5 and start his inning before 31st over)

:))

If if if if if if if if if if :))

How about....
If Sri Lanka uses tennis balls....
If Sri Lanka fields with only 4 fielder...
If umpires are blind folded.....
If Sri Lanka only selects players younger than Shahzebayub....
If Sania bowls for Sri Lanka.....




You are still not specific.....

What is your definition of "completed" innings....????
 
well that was offered by Farisiddiqui, not me. And I doubt if W63 is in on that :mazhar majeed
 
I'll be more specific:

If Malik plays at #1, or #2 or #3 or #4 or at #5

and

if he comes to bat before 31st over.

then

he would score a 50, 40% of his completed innings.

(means 2 50s in 5 completed innings if he bats in top 5 and start his inning before 31st over)

Too many ifs man.
 
if he plays in all ODI's since he is such a bradman he should make 5 fifties. He should average at least 50 in the ODI's because he has everything to his advantage here. His ultimate punch bag team, flat tracks, sania in the crowd(probably), BZ cheering him on with his malik shirt and pom poms! what can go wrong!

cmon BZ if he makes 5 fifties in all matches Ill come on this thread and write a eulogy to his greatness!

:)

I had offered 2 100s in 3 tests, unfortunately he wasn't given chance.

ODIs are different and scoring sometimes rely on circumstances ... like you come to bat with 35 to win...now how would you score 50?

or you come to bat in 40th over and other guy is not rotating the strike...still it would be hard to get 50.


lastly, bradman didn't play odis.
 
why not make it top 6 as you can be rest assured he wont be batting any lower than that?

When we have Farhat as one of the openers, it shouldnt be a problem, no?
 
he would score a 50, 40% of his completed innings.

completed innings...49 not out is not completed inning! so would not be counted.

Still could be subject to debate after the series.... NO ...


Since you always bring up fair comparison with other batsmen.....How about this.....

Do you think.....Malik will have better S/R and Ave than 4 out top seven batmen who batted in at least 3 innings..... (regardless of how many times/balls/innings bats)...... ???


You can refine it if you want... there will be no ifs, and buts... involved.

I have go right now... will log back on in one hour.... think about this .... this will prove Malik is better batsman than other pathetic players in the team.... on the same pitch against the same bowlers!!!!
 
Still could be subject to debate after the series.... NO ...


Since you always bring up fair comparison with other batsmen.....How about this.....

Do you think.....Malik will have better S/R and Ave than 4 out top seven batmen who batted in at least 3 innings..... (regardless of how many times/balls/innings bats)...... ???


You can refine it if you want... there will be no ifs, and buts... involved.

I have go right now... will log back on in one hour.... think about this .... this will prove Malik is better batsman than other pathetic players in the team.... on the same pitch against the same bowlers!!!!

Malik plays according to situation so i do not think it's fair criteria...

think about chasing 220...and Malik comes early and plays accordingly with rr of 4.2...and wins the game...and if other matches are high scoring games then...220 match would hit his s.r.
 
Malik plays according to situation so i do not think it's fair criteria...

think about chasing 220...and Malik comes early and plays accordingly with rr of 4.2...and wins the game...and if other matches are high scoring games then...220 match would hit his s.r.

They are in the same team so it'll affect them just as much :yk:hafeez:umarakmal:misbah
 
They are in the same team so it'll affect them just as much :yk:hafeez:umarakmal:misbah

BZ is the same guy who will not stop posting over and over ..... Azhar Ali's stats when ONLY Malik played! :)))

As IMMY69 said..... " hot air" ....nothing else!!!
 
They are in the same team so it'll affect them just as much :yk:hafeez:umarakmal:misbah

incorrect, as there won't be pressure and :yk:hafeez:misbah would excel and boost the average as usual :facepalm:

WL wanted him to be better than 4,

raising the criteria, if he plays at top three positions in all 5 matches then he will be the highest scorer for Pakistan.

deal?
 
Last edited:
raising the criteria, if he plays at top three positions in all 5 matches then he will be the highest scorer for Pakistan.

deal?

Because we all know Malik will not be playing in the Top Three Position
 
lol ... you've started going round in circles again :facepalm:

if you keep the deciding factor as the multiple of (average and strike rate), it wouldnt matter who bats where as batsman batting higher will have better averages and lower order batsman will have better S/R, so it'll even out
 
Malik plays according to situation
What situations have those been in last 32 international innings?



so i do not think it's fair criteria...
Back tracking again.....???
This is YOUR criteria.... and now you are calling is unfair? :))

Go look at your posts where you kept posting Azhar Ali's stats where only Malik played..... and kept calling is fair! :facepalm

think about chasing 220...and Malik comes early and plays accordingly with rr of 4.2...and wins the game...and if other matches are high scoring games then...220 match would hit his s.r.

What makes you think OTHER 6 batsmen will not have the same situation? What makes you think.... Farhat or Hafeez will not do that?

Like I said, refine it ... .if you don't like the way I presented it.
Do you think.....Malik will have better S/R and Ave than 4 out top seven batmen who batted in at least 3 innings..... (regardless of how many times/balls/innings bats)...... ???
 
why not make it top 6 as you can be rest assured he wont be batting any lower than that?

When we have Farhat as one of the openers, it shouldnt be a problem, no?

nope

here is the distribution of 50+ per batting order:
1/2 1447
3 1492
4 1406
5 987
6 584
 
incorrect, as there won't be pressure and :yk:hafeez:misbah would excel and boost the average as usual :facepalm:

WL wanted him to be better than 4,

raising the criteria, if he plays at top three positions in all 5 matches then he will be the highest scorer for Pakistan.


deal?

Yes.... my criteria will covers that....

When I say better than four out of seven... that mean only #3. If he is #3 (or better) in Ave & S/R ...... I lose the bet... otherwise you lose. Deal?
 
lol ... you've started going round in circles again :facepalm:
When did he stop going in circles? He always does that.

if you keep the deciding factor as the multiple of (average and strike rate), it wouldnt matter who bats where as batsman batting higher will have better averages and lower order batsman will have better S/R, so it'll even out

Because he KNOWS how pathetic Malik is!
 
lol ... you've started going round in circles again :facepalm:

if you keep the deciding factor as the multiple of (average and strike rate), it wouldnt matter who bats where as batsman batting higher will have better averages and lower order batsman will have better S/R, so it'll even out

explain to me, how will it even out?

avg= runs scored/ # of times out
s/r= runs scored/# of balls faced * 100
 
Yes.... my criteria will covers that....

When I say better than four out of seven... that mean only #3. If he is #3 (or better) in Ave & S/R ...... I lose the bet... otherwise you lose. Deal?

#3 means batting order :facepalm:

and i am sure he will rank FIRST! (top three is not a big deal, we talking about Malik!)
 
Simple formula average+SR/2 will be fair on all batsmen in top 7.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
If Malik bats at 6 and has average of 30+ SR of 90= 120/2 = 60

Hafeez average of 40+ SR of 75= 115=57.5
Sounds fair.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
what about top 4 positions?

Still will not include Malik

Make it top 6 and follow the Average + SR / 2 Formula

as saeed-sohail has explained
 
#3 means batting order :facepalm:

and i am sure he will rank FIRST! (top three is not a big deal, we talking about Malik!)

Why not top seven batting position???

Let me give you an example.... in 2003 series against mighty South Africa he was #3 in batting average .... and was #1 in S/R.

All I am asking that do you think he will be #3 (or higher) in Ave and S/R in this series.... against his favorite punching bag? If he can do that against South Africa ... why do you think he can't do it against SL??
 
explain to me, how will it even out?

avg= runs scored/ # of times out
s/r= runs scored/# of balls faced * 100

Lol. its a simple formula (average * strikerate) /2. Take eng vs Ind series for example. Here is what England batsman did, notice how Trott remains on top despite of his low strike rate but better average. But Samit Patel overtakes Peitersen because of the strike rate.
 
Re my avg+SR/2 formula minimum avg has to be 25+ or high SR is no good.
Say 12 of 8 is no good for the team then 30 of 40.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top