Sunzi
Local Club Captain
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Runs
- 2,491
What is going on with the SA fielding and Aussie running.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Khawaja injured. Doubt he will play semi. Handscomb will probably play the semi.
Root dropped Rohit early in the innings. So did Tamim. Rohit probably wouldn't have scored that many centuries without dropped catches.
20/1 after 5.2 overs. Come on, Aussies.
I think Handscomb is a better ODI player than Khawaja. Khawaja is good for Test only.
Handscomb can bat at 3,4, or 5 so it's probably better for Australia. Also plays spin well so it's not a had replacement.
Khawaja injury may be costly for Aus in Semis
Australia 3 down effectively Review not taken lol Looks like they desperately want to play England lol
SMH SA didnt play well in the whole tournament now making the semis easier for India because it would be NZ vs Ind instead of Eng now.
I don't know why they select Khawaja in ODI. He is basically like Azhar Ali. Ashton Turner or Peter Handscomb can contribute better.
Why not? Their way-better 2011 team bottled in 2011 quarterfinal against India. They are as beatable as any other team.Don't see Australia playing this bad in a semi or final. It's better they have their bad day now.
SMH SA didnt play well in the whole tournament now making the semis easier for India because it would be NZ vs Ind instead of Eng now.
Why not? Their way-better 2011 team bottled in 2011 quarterfinal against India. They are as beatable as any other team.
Smith is getting LBW more often these days. Is his hand-eye coordination slowing down with age?
Smith is getting LBW more often these days. Is his hand-eye coordination slowing down with age?
How? We had only one good bowler in Zaheer back then and they only scored 260 even after having 4 wickets in hand on an Indian flat pitch. That is high-class bottling.Losing a game they were expected to lose is not bottling. India were always the favourites.
Damn, if Oz lose this then it's a guaranteed spot for India in the final.
How? We had only one good bowler in Zaheer back then and they only scored 260 even after having 4 wickets in hand on an Indian flat pitch. That is high-class bottling.
Don't see Australia playing this bad in a semi or final. It's better they have their bad day now.
Why not? Aussies aren't that great. They have just slightly better middle order than India's, their top 3 and bowling aren't as good as India's. They are as beatable as anyone, their strength has been similar to India's, they know how to to hold their nerves better than most others.
The clutch cheat averages 41 in Odi's, he is the most overrated player in LoI's.Lol. People already trying their max to declare Smiths demise. He is the most clutch player left in the tournament. Ruthless.
I think England would have definitely beaten India. I think Australia vs England is not a guarantee either way.
Match is still not over. England still could face India. Honestly i want India to beat them in the semis. Hope we get the team combo right with Jaddu and Bhuvi in place Kuldeep and Chahal.against England. India will have 9 batsmen and good restrictive bowlers and wicket takers.
Lol. People already trying their max to declare Smiths demise. He is the most clutch player left in the tournament. Ruthless.
The clutch cheat averages 41 in Odi's, he is the most overrated player in LoI's.
They were good back in the days just Windies was in 70’s and 80’s. But not anymore. They bottled in 2011, lost 16 ODI games recently, have brainless sloggers like Maxwell who bats like Afridi more than a typical Australian batsman and can bottle easily again in this world cup.A team who has won every world cup since 99 barring 1 is not a bottler.
As long as Warner is there, South Africa cannot feel safe. Warner can win the game by himself.
It is not demise. It is a legitimate observation about how he misses the deliveries he never missed.
This isn't the 90's, 41 is a pathetic avg for anyone wanting to be a good odi batsman. Also 1 world cup at home isn't actually proof, he has failed everywhere else except the wc at home. KL rahul averages 41 is he a world class player too?Since when has 41 became so bad? He has a very good record in WC KOs
Since when has 41 became so bad? He has a very good record in WC KOs
ONe while batting first on a flat wicket. Second chasing a very very small total. If he was chasing he was never going to make a 100. These are little things we tend to miss.
What has Mr Kohli done while batting first at home? Or ever in a WC KO?
This isn't the 90's, 41 is a pathetic avg for anyone wanting to be a good odi batsman. Also 1 world cup at home isn't actually proof, he has failed everywhere else except the wc at home. KL rahul averages 41 is he a world class player too?
And what has kohli got to do with Smith not being a great player? Get over your obsession with kohli.
Smith is not a great ODI player. He is average.
He is a potential ATG in Test though.
Check what he said,
Batting first
Flat wickets
He wouldn't have scored chasing. He scored a 50 in the final chasing after they lost wicket in the first over. He scored a 50 in the QF against Pak when Wahab was giving a working over to others. Isn't that enough?
What trees has pulled up this world cup? He is a mediocre odi player who has never played as well as he did in wc 2015 before or after that. His overall record is the proof that shows he is a average player who had 1 good tournament, having never repeated that form.He has mainly played a WC. In 2011, he was a fringe player. So only proof is of 2015.
He is already ATG in tests. Best test batsman in the world now. Then comes Daylight
Another low total on his home grown flat wicket. Wahab made the life of Watson hell nobody else's in the entire world cup lol Watson has issues against short balls. Case of things falling in place. You have to do it consistently around the world. Grand total of 3 innings don't define your career. Lot of nobodies have clicked in the semis, quarter final, finals.
Kohli is a better ODI player but Steven is better in tests.
He performed chasing in 2 of the 3 KOs of the only WC he has meaningfully participated. The other innings in SF, he scored a century. So that is 3 clutch 8nnings in 3 WC KOs. And No, chasing is never easy in WC KOs. Ask your Kohli. Those who performs in KO are not nobodies either.
What trees has pulled up this world cup? He is a mediocre odi player who has never played as well as he did in wc 2015 before or after that. His overall record is the proof that shows he is a average player who had 1 good tournament, having never repeated that form.
No, Gambhir only played well in final. Smith played well in QF, SF and final.Smith = Gambhir, thanks for playing.
Gambhir is GOAT ODI batsman.
The only WC he has played before, he was fantastic. Wait for this WC to finish. Either way, he is a legend in WC.
No, Gambhir only played well in final. Smith played well in QF, SF and final.