RedwoodOriginal
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2018
- Runs
- 13,799
- Post of the Week
- 4
It was a nice effort but reality was always going to come crashing down in the end.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rizwan’s shots are triple X factorPakistan needs X factor players playing for "their" team.
There is a clear lack of capability, but that you can't build a team if you judge only by the failures.Am not sure you follow the current affairs as closely and the scorecard analysis does’t really paint a vivid picture of the damage he is causing the team on & off the pitch, vast majority still support the fallacy of his performances. No spot should be secure in any team, just due to a specialist position, playing a loose shot and getting out is one thing, but insanity is doing the same thing again & again, getting out during key moments repeatedly shouldn’t be wiped under rug. I don’t buy this argument there is no one better, if there isn’t you groom them, what if Rizwan gets hit by a bus tomorrow god forbid ? Are we going to position his corpse behind the stumps ?
Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Ave | BF | SR | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tests | 37 | 55 | 6 | 1555 | 111 | 31.73 | 2567 | 60.57 | ||||||
ODIs | 76 | 69 | 12 | 1978 | 106 | 34.70 | 2206 | 89.66 | ||||||
T20Is | 38 | 26 | 5 | 233 | 37* | 11.09 | 215 | 108.37 |
Yeah let’s trust you….Aussies will take Rizwan for their Test & ODI team with both hands & legs - trust me
Some who at least understands the difference between Rizwan & Gilchrist .... unfortunately.Yeah let’s trust you….
Who are you again?
Well, no you don’t in your mind.Some who at least understands the difference between Rizwan & Gilchrist .... unfortunately.
I see one more quality of yours - "Mind reader".Well, no you don’t in your mind.
What was your MVP argument about him again in your mind? Let’s hear it lest I misquote you.
Just asking you nicely about the MVP comment. I can’t be arsed to ready your 6000 word sentences which have more twists and turns than a bond movie.I see one more quality of yours - "Mind reader".
I have my arguments about Rizwan in many threads in PP - please be our guests to read those. You are not worthy enough for my time to repeat.
Any moron who has the gall to claim rizzu replaces any wk bat from aus has lost their minds. Aus would never ever allow itWell, no you don’t in your mind.
What was your MVP argument about him again in your mind? Let’s hear it lest I misquote you.
Utterly disgraceful how a 29 Average batsmen is not only accepted in the team but made to lead the team. Tells you about the standards of Pakistan cricket.Watching SA bat, I understand why Shan scored 140 and Babar 80 odd.
They were stat padding on a pancake.
Well let’s hear this self proclaimed expert who ‘understands cricket’ explain his argument from his own mouth.Any moron who has the gall to claim rizzu replaces any wk bat from aus has lost their minds. Aus would never ever allow it
Try to understand the abbreviation of MVP first and at what context it's used - then try to figure out in three formats which players from PAK team can fit into that. You should find yourself.Just asking you nicely about the MVP comment. I can’t be arsed to ready your 6000 word sentences which have more twists and turns than a bond movie.
I just need to pick out the one liners which expose your overall agenda (and nonsense basically).
Man up and restate that MVP argument alluding to Rizwan. This is my cricket team which I have followed dearly since 2003. The information that is spread in relation to it has to be correct, and not deceitful or misleading.
Just say the comment,Try to understand the abbreviation of MVP first and at what context it's used - then try to figure out in three formats which players from PAK team can fit into that. You should find yourself.
I'll write something about Rizwan, no worries... but not here, because it'll be lost in match thread.Just say the comment,
What is the meaning of:
-Rizwan
-MVP
-Pakistan
Simple as that, state your argument!
whats the point if u are not winning games?what an innings shan maqsood played . Brilliant hundread. People questioning him his captancy ,batting and sacking. He silenced all critics.
That's a bit uncalled for... as I posted the career stats of Alex Carey, let me do it againAny moron who has the gall to claim rizzu replaces any wk bat from aus has lost their minds. Aus would never ever allow it
Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Ave | BF | SR | 100s | 50s | 4s | 6s | Ct | St |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tests | 37 | 55 | 6 | 1555 | 111 | 31.73 | 2567 | 60.57 | 1 | 9 | 170 | 10 | 141 | 14 |
ODIs | 76 | 69 | 12 | 1978 | 106 | 34.70 | 2206 | 89.66 | 1 | 10 | 182 | 22 | 84 | 8 |
T20Is | 38 | 26 | 5 | 233 | 37* | 11.09 | 215 | 108.37 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 7 | 19 | 9 |
Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Ave | BF | SR | 100s | 50s | 4s | 6s | Ct | St |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tests | 36 | 59 | 9 | 2039 | 171* | 40.78 | 3751 | 54.35 | 3 | 10 | 214 | 15 | 93 | 7 |
ODIs | 83 | 74 | 17 | 2352 | 131* | 41.26 | 2652 | 88.68 | 3 | 15 | 200 | 29 | 93 | 3 |
T20Is | 106 | 93 | 21 | 3414 | 104* | 47.41 | 2723 | 125.37 | 1 | 30 | 285 | 95 | 55 | 12 |
I suppose Pakistan had an unbeaten record at Cape Town which Shan forfeitedwhats the point if u are not winning games?
Except for the fact that Carey bats at no 7 and bats lower down the order at every format.That's a bit uncalled for... as I posted the career stats of Alex Carey, let me do it again
Format Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100s 50s 4s 6s Ct St Tests 37 55 6 1555 111 31.73 2567 60.57 1 9 170 10 141 14 ODIs 76 69 12 1978 106 34.70 2206 89.66 1 10 182 22 84 8 T20Is 38 26 5 233 37* 11.09 215 108.37 0 0 19 7 19 9
Then let me post another guy's stats
Format Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100s 50s 4s 6s Ct St Tests 36 59 9 2039 171* 40.78 3751 54.35 3 10 214 15 93 7 ODIs 83 74 17 2352 131* 41.26 2652 88.68 3 15 200 29 93 3 T20Is 106 93 21 3414 104* 47.41 2723 125.37 1 30 285 95 55 12
Australia has allowed the first guy to play 150+ games for them ..... it'll be indeed moronic not to pick the second guy, had he been eligible.
Now, there could an argument - why with first guy, Aussies have won so many and the second guys team hasn't won near about that - answer is very simple.... cricket is a team game and there are other 10 players in it. And that only tells, Aussies would have been even better had they could replace the first guy with the second one.
They should cut a cake before returning to Pakistan .Pakistan's highest Test total against South Africa - a monumental effort after the follow-on
View attachment 149397
Because the second guy would never have made it through their system in the first place. And if he had, he wouldn’t be a juvenile mindset cricketer. Rizwan going through the system in Australia would not have turned out as the immature, comic relief of a player that we witness now. They are brutal when it comes to individual development, and nor would he have clear cut issues on the off side.Australia has allowed the first guy to play 150+ games for them ..... it'll be indeed moronic not to pick the second guy, had he been eligible.
Have to praise PAK batting here - with Saim batting, could have saved or even threaten a win here!!! However, bowling choices were atrocious - apart from PAK 1st innings, this track has produced 1000+ runs for 15 wickets at 4+ rate.... not sure what PAK tank was thinking for choosing a military medium bowling line-up with couple of part-time spinners.
Ideally, here PAK attack should have been Naseem, Shaheen, Abbas/Hamza and one specialist spinner who takes ball away from right-handers (SLAO or Right arm Leggi), backed by Aga.
Also, I think ICC needs to amend substitution law - along with concussion, if a player is injured serious enough not to take part further in the game, a similar replacement should be allowed.
Riz gone, but still Aga can save this Test with a 150 here, but PAK tail has to grind it out in middle - SAF won't like to chase over 170 here.
I wouldn't waste my time with such posters. These same posters think a guy with a fluke 40 odd who can't even get into our awfully poor domestics teams is better than rizwan.That's a bit uncalled for... as I posted the career stats of Alex Carey, let me do it again
Format Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100s 50s 4s 6s Ct St Tests 37 55 6 1555 111 31.73 2567 60.57 1 9 170 10 141 14 ODIs 76 69 12 1978 106 34.70 2206 89.66 1 10 182 22 84 8 T20Is 38 26 5 233 37* 11.09 215 108.37 0 0 19 7 19 9
Then let me post another guy's stats
Format Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100s 50s 4s 6s Ct St Tests 36 59 9 2039 171* 40.78 3751 54.35 3 10 214 15 93 7 ODIs 83 74 17 2352 131* 41.26 2652 88.68 3 15 200 29 93 3 T20Is 106 93 21 3414 104* 47.41 2723 125.37 1 30 285 95 55 12
Australia has allowed the first guy to play 150+ games for them ..... it'll be indeed moronic not to pick the second guy, had he been eligible.
Now, there could an argument - why with first guy, Aussies have won so many and the second guys team hasn't won near about that - answer is very simple.... cricket is a team game and there are other 10 players in it. And that only tells, Aussies would have been even better had they could replace the first guy with the second one.
Saying Rizwan would be picked by Australia over Carey is like saying James Cameron would cast Govinda over Leonardo Di Caprio in Titanic.
Firstly never claimed that. Your buddy bewal express lied about it. I have asked him for proof and he never provided it to me.I wouldn't waste my time with such posters. These same posters think a guy with a fluke 40 odd who can't even get into our awfully poor domestics teams is better than rizwan.