What's new

South Africa vs Pakistan | 3rd Test | Centurion | 24/2/13 | Day 3

Really bizarre performance in the series....complete pasting............. Steyn/Ab who will be MOS as MOM will be Abbott Laboratories
 
Lol yaar.

Farthead played a fart.

And some posters are defending it as trying to play attacking cricket.

what's the point of a useless 40 except aesthetic sense ?

Farthead isn't a nice name.

Would you like it if Farhat called you DR. ASSim? Too much disrespect from you.

& a useless 40 is better then a defensive coward 12.
 
Yeah shots maro ... jaldi jaldi out ho.

Positive cricket.

That's how you should play.

nahi shots na maaro, jo uski strength hai, woh bhi agar na khele, to yeh 40 run bhi nahi honay thay.

ek tuk tuk hai, aur dr sahab ek aap hain

Pakistaniyon mein ya 1st gear hai ya 5th gear hai, aur baatein bhi waisi hi samaj aaten hain :)

middle gear bhi naam ki cheez hoti hai.

Situation: Pakistan trailing by 150 odd runs 3 days remaining in the test match

What should be Pakistan's objective: - Overall
Broken down

Can you win from this position, has anyone pulled that off (Maybe yess, very difficult)

Can you draw from this position, has anyone pulled that off (maybe yes, very difficult, rare)

Ok, lets get the first objective, of diminishing the lead, further broken down by 50 runs each, then we plan ahead

Fine, in a day we look to get 250 atleast, last 10 overs, run rate is slowing down, bowlers are starting to dominate, anything short outside off, is considered a bad delivery and should be scored off

and it didnt happen :)

Khuda ke liye, jo kaam hai hamara, hum agar us mein apni expertise dikhayein, to achay bhi lagtay hain :)
 
Farthead isn't a nice name.

Would you like it if Farhat called you DR. ASSim? Too much disrespect from you.

& a useless 40 is better then a defensive coward 12.

Okay let me be nice.

Sir Imran Farhat from now on.

Well , here's the thing bro.

A useless 40 and a defensive coward 12 are the same if in the context of the match they both make you lose : )
 
Lol yaar.

Farthead played a fart.

And some posters are defending it as trying to play attacking cricket.

what's the point of a useless 40 except aesthetic sense ?

Its not attacking cricket!! He had a strike rate of 47!!!!

I'll take tjhat over the tuk tuks any day!
 
/

What about Alam/ Amin/Haris Sohail?

I dun know abt alam and Amin has not been alighting the domestic circuit one would have to drop YK to bring another new batsman. Personally speaking I would never ever hesitate to drop YK anyone would do I dun want YK in team but his fan base would go medieval on me so for peace I included him. :)
 
mate 1st of all we dun know there are more potential players look at what happened to jamshed.

2nd the point in the context of this series he has done really good compare to others and you can't take that away

The biggest problem is that everybody else has to perform to be in the side... Hafeez has a free pass. Where as he is worse of all. If you don't fix your opening you have no chance as a team. We have a long tail and openers, how you can win???
 
Collapse in progress, all out in about an hour I reckon
 
The biggest problem is that everybody else has to perform to be in the side... Hafeez has a free pass. Where as he is worse of all. If you don't fix your opening you have no chance as a team. We have a long tail and openers, how you can win???

hence my proposed new line up hafez need to go out of the team once and for all even the limited overs
 
mate 1st of all we dun know there are more potential players look at what happened to jamshed.

2nd the point in the context of this series he has done really good compare to others and you can't take that away

Dude.. you aren't living in this world... There are lot more potentials players like Harris Sohail, Umar Amin,Fawad alam, Ali waqas,... Who are young and talented than these tried and tested failures like Farhath, Malik etc... They are not given a long run.. A failure in 1 tests means they are out of international team.. NAd what has happened to jamshed.. jamshed played a wonderfull 45 in the first test,.. And he failed a little in second tests... Does that mean he should be dropped suddenly and give chance to tried and tested farhath..??? Wierd..
 
I won't be surprised if Virat Kohli and gang are sitting around a TV in the team hotel right now and chortling to themselves.

Commiserations Pakistan :msd
 
mate I have nothing against cut shot and I understand left handers are inherently prone to that. This was too close to cut as has been case with Farhat all along

dont think it was close as you guys make it out to be

Abbott to Imran Farhat, OUT, the appeal lasted an entire day and Bowden finally raises the crooked finger! Farhat doesn't challenge it, Abbott bowled it short and a touch too wide outside off, not exactly a wicket-taking delivery but Farhat's lack of footwork made it one, he was back at the crease and slashing awya from the body, AB and the restknew he edged it

See pitch map and graph attached too its maybe 6th or 7th off stump


And why do you guys, just to prove your point, go to the level of downgrading a batsmen, was too close to the off stump and he shouldnt have played it

Inna pata hai saariyan nu, tay appay jaake khedna si mama, dunya jahan nu tung kitta hoya hai :)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.jpg
    Capture.jpg
    23 KB · Views: 51
  • Capture2.jpg
    Capture2.jpg
    17.7 KB · Views: 50
ajmal in danger of fetting a higher average than hafeez this series... or has that already happeneded?

if so, ajmal could be the pakistan "all rounder"
 
So how much will Sarfraz make in this innings?

He is playing for his place in this....
 
I dun know abt alam and Amin has not been alighting the domestic circuit one would have to drop YK to bring another new batsman. Personally speaking I would never ever hesitate to drop YK anyone would do I dun want YK in team but his fan base would go medieval on me so for peace I included him. :)

Pakistan has not performed well in SA/AUS ever in last 60 years. The problem is not necessary with the players, since the same issue has remain across generation.

You have to build and train team for these kinds of tour in mind. Why some of the below things cannot happen?

1. Why we cannot play with two new balls (50% of the time) in Pakistan, specially when we play in north. We want to develop spinners too that's why we need old ball too..
2. Why we cannot sponsor 10 batsmen to play their first class in SA/AUS/ENG??
3. Our bowlers are not experienced in these conditions as well, they have to be playing in these conditions as well.

In past our bowlers have performed in seaming/swinging conditions because of county cricket experience. None of our bowlers play (except probably Junaid and maybe Gul, but Gul is not a bowler

Why Pakistan did not plan for 4 test and 3 ODIs??? - You need to focus on test cricket to improve... One thing England under Andy has done very well is their focus on test, they lost 3-0 to us, but they went played two more series the same year in those conditions and last one they won against India after 28 years. We don't have will to win overseas
 
Dude.. you aren't living in this world... There are lot more potentials players like Harris Sohail, Umar Amin,Fawad alam, Ali waqas,... Who are young and talented than these tried and tested failures like Farhath, Malik etc... They are not given a long run.. A failure in 1 tests means they are out of international team.. NAd what has happened to jamshed.. jamshed played a wonderfull 45 in the first test,.. And he failed a little in second tests... Does that mean he should be dropped suddenly and give chance to tried and tested farhath..??? Wierd..

mate u r not understanding me. I never said drop jamshed I would have taken his failures and played him all matches cuz its learning curve for him that can never be provided again. Point was and once again Jamshed comes out as one of best opener we have had in some time and yet even his technique/temperament wasn't good enough. We are tlking once again in context of this test series. Farhat scored as per his potential and didn't look troubled he didn't show fear and scored runs he should be given his due. Does this mean he should play for pak, ofcoz no. But u can't just single him out when he scored more then everyone in this test. Hope I have explained.
 
mate u r not understanding me. I never said drop jamshed I would have taken his failures and played him all matches cuz its learning curve for him that can never be provided again. Point was and once again Jamshed comes out as one of best opener we have had in some time and yet even his technique/temperament wasn't good enough. We are tlking once again in context of this test series. Farhat scored as per his potential and didn't look troubled he didn't show fear and scored runs he should be given his due. Does this mean he should play for pak, ofcoz no. But u can't just single him out when he scored more then everyone in this test. Hope I have explained.

makes sense...:malik
 
Almost feeling sorry for my Pakistani brothers, umpires trying to screw the already down team. Shameful.
 
philla was shadow practicing that throw at sarfraz again...like the school bully every morning taking his lunch money
 
Pakistan has not performed well in SA/AUS ever in last 60 years. The problem is not necessary with the players, since the same issue has remain across generation.

You have to build and train team for these kinds of tour in mind. Why some of the below things cannot happen?

1. Why we cannot play with two new balls (50% of the time) in Pakistan, specially when we play in north. We want to develop spinners too that's why we need old ball too..
2. Why we cannot sponsor 10 batsmen to play their first class in SA/AUS/ENG??
3. Our bowlers are not experienced in these conditions as well, they have to be playing in these conditions as well.

In past our bowlers have performed in seaming/swinging conditions because of county cricket experience. None of our bowlers play (except probably Junaid and maybe Gul, but Gul is not a bowler

Why Pakistan did not plan for 4 test and 3 ODIs??? - You need to focus on test cricket to improve... One thing England under Andy has done very well is their focus on test, they lost 3-0 to us, but they went played two more series the same year in those conditions and last one they won against India after 28 years. We don't have will to win overseas

Totally agree with this. Teams like Australia, South Africa, England take their international assignments very seriously. Yes our domestic cricket is terrible but you give yourself the best chance to compete by making the best preparation possible and that is something we did not do.
 
Pakistan has not performed well in SA/AUS ever in last 60 years. The problem is not necessary with the players, since the same issue has remain across generation.

You have to build and train team for these kinds of tour in mind. Why some of the below things cannot happen?

1. Why we cannot play with two new balls (50% of the time) in Pakistan, specially when we play in north. We want to develop spinners too that's why we need old ball too..
2. Why we cannot sponsor 10 batsmen to play their first class in SA/AUS/ENG??
3. Our bowlers are not experienced in these conditions as well, they have to be playing in these conditions as well.

In past our bowlers have performed in seaming/swinging conditions because of county cricket experience. None of our bowlers play (except probably Junaid and maybe Gul, but Gul is not a bowler

Why Pakistan did not plan for 4 test and 3 ODIs??? - You need to focus on test cricket to improve... One thing England under Andy has done very well is their focus on test, they lost 3-0 to us, but they went played two more series the same year in those conditions and last one they won against India after 28 years. We don't have will to win overseas

Its all good and valid point except they are devoid of ground realities.

1 - Pak is not playing intl cricket at home for a long while that something PCB has no control over. Without intl cricket at home its hard to develop players specially debutantes.

2 - The county cricket will help batsman no doubt abt it. Unfortunately we don't have any batsman good enuff to play in county and those who had potentials like inzi, yosef and YK didn't play that much.

3 - County cricket helps some seamers but hurts pakistan development of fast bowlers at home as e.g W & W went to play county on cost of domestic hence deprived us with development of fast bowlers. To certain extent same goes with batting, where our best were playing county and were not playing domestic to develop the pak batting.

4 - IMHO, the only thing that needs to be fixed is domestic cricket, (i dun mean pitches etc that need tweaking not fixing) I mean structure of domestic. To run them professionally, appointing coaches, physio etc. Payment and make sure every one play domestic, the players can't go and play T20 league on the expense of domestic. Unless we do that we will never have development cuz we not having intl cricket. Players r right to say they earn more but then once a player chose that we all know where his heart lies i.e make money of his skills.
 
If that was Davis the finger would have been up even before any appeal.
 
Back
Top