50 for bhai!!!!!
bhai bhai with them fifties
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
50 for bhai!!!!!
It’s still a good passage of play for Pakistan
Pakistan have pulled back the RR dramatically here
Imad is such a nothing bowler. Need a proper second spinner.
i'll place an order for one, should be here soon.
how?
you honestly think this team is capable of chasing 300?
South Africa haven’t been able to get away with the run rate. Pakistan need wickets definitely, but these are two guys on 50 struggling against some pretty good bowling. Just two boundaries over the last 6 overs or so.
I think so - this is J'burg with 60 metre boundary and 2 balls. Obviously if one opener bats entire Power Play and then gets out for 19 (35), it won't happen, but 300 is within range. Once set, it's impossible to contain set batsman a 2000 metres altitude with a small boundary. Also, PAK's batting is stronger today on papers.
Lol at no one criticising Malik's captaincy.
Faf getting annoyed with Rizwan lol
Shadab looks more threatening than Chal/Kuldeep at times.
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] what Malik has done here to give spinners long spells specially shadab and he looks more threatening.
What's Rizwan doing?
Faf getting annoyed with Rizwan lol
He has been good
imad has been getting all the hate yet has been more economical than shadab
shadabs role in the team is trying to pick a wicket which means pitching it up and getting hit more too
Yeah but with hitters like Miller in the shed as well as Faf going savage mode anytime its gonna take just 2 good overs to undo all this.
Wickeless period has more impact I think than some quiet overs
Have a feeling Shadab will get Faf IA
shadabs role in the team is trying to pick a wicket which means pitching it up and getting hit more too
not happening, even with an afridi blitz they only managed about 309 odd last time...
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] strongly disagree here.Shadab may not be upto the mark but Imad over him,lolz.I understand that this is not a popular viewpoint, but I prefer Imad to Shadab.
Shadab is not good enough to bat in the middle-order, and his tuk tuk is of no use down the order. His batting does not have the impact of Imad.
As far as his bowling is concerned, for all the oohs and aahs and the googlies, he doesn’t take enough wickets against good opposition, and his returns are more or less similar to Imad’s.
Imad is the most reliable lower-order hitter we have at the moment. Yes he is no Buttler or Maxwell, but he is relatively better than our other options such as Nawaz, Faheem, of course Shadab and that hack Asif Ali.
Shadab is obviously better at fielding for the cameras though.
Nevertheless, Shadab is one of the blue eyed boys who can do wrong, while Imad is one of the villians who can do no right.
Shadab especially the bowler has a lot of talent you can clearly see he has not bowled enough overs to be consistent with his length I believe if he made a debut at 25 rather then 20 with lots of FC overs behind he would have done better for Pakistan but I guess he is one of those talents who we can afford to train on the job.I understand that this is not a popular viewpoint, but I prefer Imad to Shadab.
Shadab is not good enough to bat in the middle-order, and his tuk tuk is of no use down the order. His batting does not have the impact of Imad.
As far as his bowling is concerned, for all the oohs and aahs and the googlies, he doesn’t take enough wickets against good opposition, and his returns are more or less similar to Imad’s.
Imad is the most reliable lower-order hitter we have at the moment. Yes he is no Buttler or Maxwell, but he is relatively better than our other options such as Nawaz, Faheem, of course Shadab and that hack Asif Ali.
Shadab is obviously better at fielding for the cameras though.
Nevertheless, Shadab is one of the blue eyed boys who can do wrong, while Imad is one of the villians who can do no right.
I understand that this is not a popular viewpoint, but I prefer Imad to Shadab.
Shadab is not good enough to bat in the middle-order, and his tuk tuk is of no use down the order. His batting does not have the impact of Imad.
As far as his bowling is concerned, for all the oohs and aahs and the googlies, he doesn’t take enough wickets against good opposition, and his returns are more or less similar to Imad’s.
Imad is the most reliable lower-order hitter we have at the moment. Yes he is no Buttler or Maxwell, but he is relatively better than our other options such as Nawaz, Faheem, of course Shadab and that hack Asif Ali.
Shadab is obviously better at fielding for the cameras though.
Nevertheless, Shadab is one of the blue eyed boys who can do wrong, while Imad is one of the villians who can do no right.
The context was totally different - single ball, 4 fielders in ring between 11-40 overs and that was a different SAF attack. Also, PAK's top order failed and they were chasing 343, had balls in hand, but lost too many early wickets.