Senman
First Class Player
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2012
- Runs
- 3,104
Who is the lady?
Dhoni's wife.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Who is the lady?
Mate, I feel sorry for you this whole debacle must be like the apocalypse for you.Dhoni's wife.
Mate, I feel sorry for you this whole debacle must be like the apocalypse for you.
http://tehelka.com/how-to-fix-greed-2/
Tapes from the earlier match fixing event around 2001.
For my Pakistani friends, watch Part 1, you will get an idea about why Indians from the 90's rever Sachin Tendulkar
That's the attitude .Why? IPL will only get better because of this.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/indian-premier-league-2013/content/current/story/637019.html'I am innocent' - Sreesanth
In his first public statement since his arrest last week, Sreesanth has denied any wrongdoing. Sreesanth and his two Rajasthan Royals team-mates, Ankeet Chavan and Ajit Chandila, who were arrested on Thursday for their alleged involvement in spot-fixing, were remanded on Tuesday by a Delhi court to a further five days in police custody.
They were charged by Delhi Police under three laws of the Indian Penal Code: Section 409, which deals with criminal breach of trust and is a non-bailable offence; Section 420 which deals with deal with fraud and cheating; and Section 120B, which deals with deals with criminal conspiracy. The Delhi Police had registered cases against the players under Sections 420 and 120B when they were arrested in the early hours of May 16. The charge under 409 was added to the list following Rajasthan Royals' complaint against the three*.
"I am innocent and have done no wrong," Sreesanth said in a statement emailed by his lawyer, Rebecca John. "I have never indulged in any spot-fixing." He said he was confident that his name would be cleared. "As a cricketer, I have learnt to take knocks along with accolades, in my stride. I recognise that I am going through a tough period in my life. I have utmost faith in our judicial process and I am confident that with time I will be proved innocent, and my honour and dignity will be vindicated and restored."
His statement came on a day when he was first sighted since his arrest, dressed in a blue T-shirt on his way to court.
At the hearing, the police told the court that they were analysing the recorded conversations of players and bookies. Voice samples of the accused had been taken to match them with the recorded conversations. Additional Public Prosecutor Rajiv Mohan told the magistrate that during the investigation several new names had cropped up and their details would be submitted to the court in a sealed cover on Wednesday.
Sreesanth's advocate John opposed the plea for police remand saying no ground was made out for seeking his further custody. She said the agency had made all recoveries and confronted all the accused with one another for the past five days.
The decision to charge the cricketers under Section 409, which carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment, is seen as unusual as the law applies to a "criminal breach of trust" by anyone considered a "public servant" or "in the way of his business as a banker, merchant, factor, broker, attorney or agent." There were, however, two possible lines of arguments that the law could be applied to cricketers, according to Vidushpat Singhania, sports law expert and principal associate, Lakshmi Kumaran and Sridharan. The first was that, "the player is acting as an agent, in this case of Rajasthan Royals - he has been entrusted with a property under the contract with Rajasthan Royals - and he has breached that trust."
The second argument that could be made was that a player could be considered a public servant because, "he has, in Sreesanth's case for example, represented India and he has again, breached that trust they have in him." In February 2011, the Supreme Court had, for example, upheld a Kerala High Court decision that the state's cricket association officials could in any case, be considered "public servants".
Singhania said should this charge carry through and be upheld by the court, the punishment would be very stringent and could set a precedent in the future for cases involving fraud on the part of athletes, even without the introduction of a new law pertaining to fixing in sport. "There are provisions of criminal law that make it possible for it to be interpreted for the larger public good against a criminal offence."
However, it would appear that the first argument is the one being employed in this case. According to a report in the Hindu, Additional Public Prosecutor Rajiv Mohan said Section 409 was invoked because Sreesanth had violated the terms of his Royals' contract. The contract and its financial benefits, he said, were decided upon as per Sreesanth's "past experience and his match-winning abilities and it was an exclusive contract which granted him playing rights and performing rights, and the agreement did not allow performance for individual gain".
Sreesanth's advocate John countered that he was not entrusted with any property, or with any dominion over property, to be charged under this offence.
In a separate development, Mumbai Police announced it had made three fresh arrests, including that of Virendra Dara Singh Randhawa, also known as Vindoo, the son of famous Indian wrestler Dara Singh.
"The first [arrest] is that of Alpesh Patel, who was a hawala operator connected to these bookies. We have recovered Rs 1.28 crores (US$230,000) in cash from his premises," Himanshu Roy, joint commissioner of police (crime) in Mumbai, said.
"[Vindoo] has also been arrested for links with bookies who have been arrested by us (on Saturday)," Roy said. "The third is Prem Taneja. There are in remand till May 24."
Meanwhile, PTI reports that the government-run Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd suspended Sreesanth, who was employed as an assistant manager in its marketing division and posted at Irumpanam, near Kochi.
04.15GMT, May 22: This article has been updated after details on the charges against the players emerged
Just saw in some news channel that this Vindoo guy has told the police that it is ALLEGED that N. Srinivasan's son in law was placing bets through him.
I so hope this ends Srinivasan's rule at the BCCI's helm. How I wish we had Jagmohan Dalmiya as the BCCI chief!
The IPL crisis took a twist today with officials of the Mumbai Police reaching the house of Gurunath Meiyappan, chief executive of the Chennai Super Kings. It was not immediately clear why they were there, and there has been no official statement by either the police or the franchise.
However, there have been reports circulating in the Indian media since Tuesday on the proximity of Virender "Vindoo" Dara Singh, who was arrested that day in Mumbai for links with bookies, to the Super Kings franchise. Those reports, which included pictures of Vindoo watching IPL matches in the company of Super Kings captain MS Dhoni's wife, have not been denied in the 48 hours since.
Meiyappan is the son-in-law of BCCI president N Srinivasan, whose company India Cements owns the Super Kings franchise.
The police crackdown on bookies continued in other parts of the country. In Kolkata, ten people, including one bookie, were arrested for being allegedly involved in cricket betting. "We have arrested 10 people, including a bookie last night. We are investigating the case. They will be produced before a court today [Friday]," deputy commissioner Santosh Pandey told PTI.
Initial investigations said they had betted on a match between Mumbai Indians and Super Kings.
The games gone to the dogs, there's no one but the ICC to blame for letting it get as bad as it has.This sport is so corrupt, I feel stupid for wasting all this time watching this game...
This sport is so corrupt, I feel stupid for wasting all this time watching this game...
Don't tell me you you're actually watching the IPL?
Piece of junk.
Test cricket has been exposed earlier too
This sport is so corrupt, I feel stupid for wasting all this time watching this game...
Don't tell me you you're actually watching the IPL?
Piece of junk.
The IPL is trash even without the expose. 90 T20 games straight between random teams that keep morphing each year, two a night. Nuts.
Good one lol )To be forced to play in the IPL for the rest of their natural lives
It is no surprise that the Delhi police decided to link the IPL betting scandal to the D Company run by the fugitive Dawood Ibrahim. There are plenty of indications to point out the involvement of the D Company in the betting menace and reports would show that nearly 70 per cent of the betting market is controlled by the D Company.
In the year 1996 the traces of the D Company entering into the betting racket or syndicate emerged for the first time. The racket was being run in the name of the D Company by a Dubai based operative by the name Sharad Shetty also known as Sharad Anna.
Sharad Shetty began by fixing games at Sharjah and his contact person by Bhuktiar, the owner of the Sharjah stadium. The stadium owner would get in touch with at least three players from the team playing at the venue and fix them for a huge sum of money.
Towards 2003, the betting mafia was taken over in Dubai by a person called Sunil alias Sunil Dubai. There have been several crack downs on the betting mafia, but this has not deterred them one bit, says an officer with the Delhi police. He blames his counterparts in Bombay who were sitting on loads of information, but let key persons such as Sunil slip away and settle down in Dubai.
Delhi police sources say that during the questioning of the bookies they have found that some of the players had been marked many years back. The draw out a list of players who are vulnerable to betting and then trap them. In the case of Sreesanth he was marked by Anees Ibrahim, the brother of Dawood Ibrahim in the year 2008 itself. That was the year the Sreesanth was slapped by Harbhajan Singh and Anees Ibrahim felt that he could be on vulnerable target. Moreover they also felt that since he was a senior, if he was lured, they could get him to rope in many other players too. By this time, the bookies had started abstaining from match fixing to a large extent and concentrated only on spot fixing.
According to the confession of the bookies to the Delhi police, they marked Sreesanth in 2008 but managed to pin him down only in 2013. Anees Ibrahim passed on information about Sreesanth to Sunil who in turn activate the betting ring to tap the cricketer. During the same time they were also on the trail of Ankeet Chauvan and Chandila and the reason they managed to fall trap was because they showed vulnerability to a rich life style, the bookies claimed. All the three were approached individually and at no point in time was the modus operandi made known to each other due to the fear of the same being leaked.
The bookies found that Sreesanth vulnerable on two counts. One he liked a good life style and secondly there was a bit of resentment he had towards his team members after the slap gate incident. Sunil then roped in Ramesh Vyas and also Jupiter alias Chandresh Jain to tap Sreesanth. These got in touch with Jiju Janardhan who finally did the job for them. They resorted to various tactics such as honey traps and finally when Sreesanth fell trap they recorded the time he spent with these women which was used as a black mail tool.
In case you didn't know, this is one of the first things the god-fearing Sreesanth did after being released on bail.
Thought he became some right-wing politician, or did I miss something?
Failed at politics I think. Back to cricket.
May be he can play some leagues and make some money now. Will not get a sniff at the Indian Cricket team. Too much competition there.
No please keep him far away from Indian cricket.
No thanks.. But with aggressive machos like Kohli and Shastri at the helm.. you never know with their urge to pump in more and more AGGRESSION into the team.
Hoping Sreesanth comes back into the Indian team, especially with South Africa series coming up. Sreesanth has a good record against South Africa and will be needed there
Always knew that Sreesanth wasn't a fixer
BCCI will not allow any player from any level with any history of fixing near the Indian team,these kind of things won't be possible in India
Difference was that Amir is talented and Sreesanth isn't. Plus India have better fast bowlers ahead of him like Bhuvi, Shami, Bumrah, Pandya even.
Actually no. Difference is BCCI and PCB.
BCCI gives much importance to reputation. Azharuddin was banned when he was an integral part of the team. Till date, he's one of the best batsman to play against spin.
I don't think any other board has succumb like PCB did.
Azharuddin was 37 when he was banned. He was looking for a pay-cheque in my opinion. Amir was 18 when he committed his crime.
I think any other board would be crazy not to waste young talent.
BCCI never gives second chance to convicted fixer, talented or not, young or not. Im not saying PCB is wrong in bringing back Amir, it just BCCI would never do that.
And I'm saying boards in general wouldn't invest in old/average players, especially when they won't break into the first XI. As is the case with Sreesanth and Azharuddin, regardless if it's BCCI or not.
No room for him in any format and he's no Amir. Or even a Wahab.
Look at these Indians missing no opportunity to keep attacking Amir.
If you don't want Sreesanth back that's fine - that your choice.
We the Pak fans (vast majority) wanted Amir back after he served his sentence and rehabilitation and he paid his due back with his epic performance on June 18th - a day that will forever scar bitter Indian fans.
Depends on perspective.
I'll prefer to lose with honest cricketers rather than win with players who are tainted from past.