Sri Lanka vs Canada | WC'11 | Group A | Hambantota | 20/02/11

[mastermind_quad]

huge appeal ..they must review

 

[MRSN]

They have reviewed it

 

[mastermind_quad]

keeper is very confident ..I think Mahela nicked

 

[sohaib17]

i like their jersey ..... looks pretty cool

 

[MRSN]

not a no ball

 

[mastermind_quad]

bad camera angles

 

[shahrukh619]

hard decision

 

[mrk]

Thats out

 

[IAJ]

Should have had hot-spot here

 

[MRSN]

hot spot should have been used

 

[mastermind_quad]

given not out ...bad camera angles nothing is clear ....

 

[mrk]

THAT WAS OUT. IF WE HAD HOT SPOT..... ICC sux

 

[talha3]

They need hotspot or snicko!!

 

[Schickelgruber]

Wow no hot spot is such a fail

 

[hussnainn]

that is a disgrace..

 

[mrk]

for me it looked out. why they could not zoom ???

 

[dhump]

What a fail what is the point of review without having a hot spot.

This is really a joke.

 

[MRSN]

good tight bowling by the Canadians

 

[mastermind_quad]

from cricinfo

Joshua from Australia: "These two batsmen are one of only two pairs from any team to have more ODI runs together than SRT does alone - the other pair being Clarke and Ponting. Crazy."

SRt .. ...

 

[mastermind_quad]

Sri Lanka 107/2 (23 ov)

 

[emclub]

russel arnold and ian botham on comms - mute button pressed

 

[ace4rmspace]

Canadians putting on a mature show. Well done.

 

[mastermind_quad]

Balaji Rao ..going to bowl

 

[shahrukh619]

some fat guy bowling now

 

[Eagle_Eye]

6 in the circle

 

[sohaib17]

ithought there was no udrs in group matches

 

[mastermind_quad]

impressive Canada today

 

[mastermind_quad]

Rao is similar to Powar ...D

 

[IAJ]

some fat guy bowling now

The commies: halka pulka aur parathoun key shoukeen houn gaye.

 

[shahrukh619]

fat guy bowls good

 

[mastermind_quad]

poor fielding again ...run out missed

 

[shahrukh619]

The commies: halka pulka aur parathoun key shoukeen houn gaye.

you are what you eat

 

[mastermind_quad]

he is getting turn

 

[IAJ]

Has he got a warning running on the pitch?

 

[mastermind_quad]

IAJ bhai poora mazaa le rahe Hindi Commentary ka .....

 

[mastermind_quad]

SL RR 4.66 ...Canada did well till now

 

[mastermind_quad]

huge

 

[NJamal]

112/2 after 24 overs

 

[CalculatedRisk]

These wickets require an efficient accumulator in the middle overs.

Shoab Malik who I do not term as genuine batsman in non-subcontental pitches would have done really well at the world cup. Our team needs an accumulator who can work around the slower bowlers for ones and twos effortlessly.

 

[IAJ]

IAJ bhai poora mazaa le rahe Hindi Commentary ka .....

Hehe it's quite funny.

and a big by mahela

 

[farz88]

garbage fielding by canada. They throw so lazily

 

[NJamal]

66666666666666

 

[mastermind_quad]

this time out

 

[IAJ]

Another review!

 

[mastermind_quad]

I think SL review it or Canada

 

[dhump]

Now is it out or not ?

 

[talha3]

Again no conclusive eveidence.

 

[mastermind_quad]

its out from here

 

[jusarrived]

Jaya was out on the last one , not sure about this one

 

[dhump]

Their is no point of reviewing nothing is clear. really.

 

[mastermind_quad]

Ah! no conclusion

 

[dhump]

again not out shameful not using proper tech.

 

[talha3]

I think the first one was out but not this one.

 

[farz88]

this no Hotspot UDRS is a farce. Its gonna be a failure in the world cup with these stupid angles and no hotspot and snicko. And then BCCI will say see it doesnt work.

 

[mastermind_quad]

Review failed .....

UDRS ko nikalo ...UDRS haye haye ...UDRS haye haye

 

[mrk]

What a shame we dont have sinko or hot spot in World Cup. ICC is biggest jerks. No point in Review if u cant see any thing...

 

[IAJ]

hehe the keeper was very confidient on both occasions, but the replays are not conclusive so the benefit of the doubt goes to Mahela.

 

[dhump]

I feel sorry for canada really, I mean what is the point of this review system do they have hawk eye even or not ???

 

[tahir_dj]

I like these grounds they are for mens unlike kiwi's lady grounds

 

[ace4rmspace]

I think without hotspot, DRS becomes useless! I mean how is the third umpire supposed to determine whether there was a nick on that or not? With these sort of nicks there is never going to be any visibly deviation so, I mean, whats the purpose?

 

[jusarrived]

I think the first one was out but not this one.

yeah , in slow motion you can clearly see a deviation on first one

 

[talha3]

Well UDRS still works for LBW's

 

[nyyankee13]

no hot spot, no snicko, a single camera angle without slow motion.

what is the point of review system?

 

[mastermind_quad]

Spinners are key here ....every team should play 2 spinners ...Sri Lanka is rich in this department and they are favorites ....

 

[dhump]

Well UDRS still works for LBW's

Then its better to keep the review out of the play.

 

[IAJ]

From cricinfo:

24.3
Hansra to Jayawardene, no run, another referral, again it is for Mahela being caught behind, the keeper Bagai is absolutely confident, it was overpitched and outside off, Mahela looks to drive that through the off, ball goes through to the keeper, Bagai called for the referral immediately though one had been turned down recently, Mahela survives again, that's the fifth referral that has backed the umpire's decision, with no supporting tools for the third umpire, not sure how the decision can be overturned

 

[Muhammad Waleed]

This is not a boring match I'd say. They are trying to save every single run they can. And now this is called positive cricket.

 

[NJamal]

125/2 after 26 overs

 

[mastermind_quad]

shot ...

 

[dhump]

This is not a boring match I'd say. They are trying to save every single run they can. And now this is called positive cricket.

Teams like Bangladesh should look at this whom are so bad after so many years of International cricket.

 

[nyyankee13]

canada should have learned a lesson from the first review and not wasted their second referral.

review should only used for lbw and stumping/runouts.

does canada get two more referrals when they bat?

 

[talha3]

canada should have learned a lesson from the first review and not wasted their second referral.

review should only used for lbw and stumping/runouts.

does canada get two more referrals when they bat?

yes

 

[dhump]

canada should have learned a lesson from the first review and not wasted their second referral.

review should only used for lbw and stumping/runouts.

does canada get two more referrals when they bat?

I guess there are 3 reviews per match per team.

 

[IAJ]

I guess there are 3 reviews per match per team.

no, it's 2 per innings.

 

[mastermind_quad]

canada should have learned a lesson from the first review and not wasted their second referral.

review should only used for lbw and stumping/runouts.

does canada get two more referrals when they bat?

2 review for batting and 2 for bowling separately ....

 

[IAJ]

SL going after the spinners now.

 

[emclub]

Instead of kenya ICC cud hav had 2 pakistan teams one current and one with players who have been left out of squad for no real reasons! Lol

 

[dhump]

no, it's 2 per innings.

So canada is done with their reviews.

 

[IAJ]

canada should have learned a lesson from the first review and not wasted their second referral.

review should only used for lbw and stumping/runouts.

does canada get two more referrals when they bat?

You don't need review for stumping/run-outs.

 

[dhump]

Instead of kenya ICC cud hav had 2 pakistan teams one current and one with players who have been left out of squad for no real reasons! Lol

Or may be someone like Afghanistan.