shahidafridi123
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2011
- Runs
- 9,633
Sri Lanka's target is 260 in 37 overs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
misbah you legend. Whatta team talk
ok erm..hain jee? this is an attacking positive move from Misbah!! this is what "real"cricket is all about!!
some bachay need to stop watching this format as its beyond them!
Top work from Ammar Ashraf, who has dug up the stat that Saeed Ajmal's 34 overs is most bowled by a Pakistani in a Test without a maiden.
Already SL have 10 in first over.
We had the chance to come out of this test positive and on top carrying on batting. Now we'll be fighting to save the test and restrict Sri Lanka's run rate.
feel so annoyed. We dominated this test, and now we'll leave with the feeling that Sri Lanka were unlucky not to have chased this down.Completely agree..
feel so annoyed. We dominated this test, and now we'll leave with the feeling that Sri Lanka were unlucky not to have chased this down.
And at the rate Sri Lanka are going they could well pull this off.
They have a much better chance of winning than Pakistan do. And even if they don't, they'll walk away with the mental advantage that had they made pakistan worry about losing.SL won't win this, trust me.
Not quite. To get to this total, SL will end up losing wickets like no tomorrow. They will go defensive WAY before Pakistan will have to.Already SL have 10 in first over.
We had the chance to come out of this test positive and on top carrying on batting. Now we'll be fighting to save the test and restrict Sri Lanka's run rate.
Ridiculous captaincy.
If they get to 150 quickly, Pakistan can just set negative fields and bowl negatively.
just like Sri lanka did to us second innings? And even then we scored at six an over with a bowler doing most of the hitting. What if Sri lanka's aggressive batsmen like Dilshan, Matthews decide to have a shot at it?If they get to 150 quickly, Pakistan can just set negative fields and bowl negatively.
What was the whole bloody point of delcaring then!
just like Sri lanka did to us second innings? And even then we scored at six an over with a bowler doing most of the hitting. What if Sri lanka's aggressive batsmen like Dilshan, Matthews decide to have a shot at it?
SL need exactly 7.We didn't even get to 6rpo, SL need over 7. Plus we lost a couple of wickets. SL won't take any chances if they lose a wicket(s).
Are we forgetting the Ajmal and Rehman factor in a chase in a test match???
Ask England??
SL need exactly 7.
We got just under 6.
And we didn't start off as aggressively as Sri Lanka did.
1 run more per over isn't a huge difference. Especially considering we only lost 2 wickets. Sri lanka have their whole batting order to pull this off.
Don't think we'll lose this. But there's no way in hell we really had a shot at winning with this sort of declaration. Just a chance to lose.