alberto
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2010
- Runs
- 12,355
You guys are quick to jump to conclusions.This guy is a hard worker and ideally suited to Test Cricket.He should bat at 4.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Did he nick it clearly to first slip?...
When was the last time Shafiq was dropped?chop change chop change..no wonder our players never find consistency..
When was the last time Shafiq was dropped?
chop change chop change..no wonder our players never find consistency..
He deserves another series.
An okay batsman who got unnecessary heat from the Umar Akmal fan club for obvious reasons but he can walk away with his head held high because he provided good service.
Those who want him back in the ODI setup have no clue unfortunately. He is probably as bad an ODI batsman as Younis is.
He should not be a fixture in the Test XI anymore, but can do a job as a reserve.
This guy got it right even before Asads overrated 111Asad does not have potential to play in pressure. He only performs where we have completely lost the game or we are too close for winning any game.
Umar akmal is way good batsment compared to asad shafiq however his averages maybe same as asad but he has win matches for pakistan through his batting.
To be honest asad is an average and mediocre batsmen.
The Player who cannot win matches for his country is not a world class player in my view. And unfortunately asad lies in that category.
(This is my personal obversation)!!!!!
If we want to put up scores of 100 to 150 in ODIs, then yes.Asad Shafiq must be made captain in all three formats with Fawad Alam being his deputy with a red card to Afridi, Misbah and Hafeez.
This is the best possible bet we can have towards the improvement of our cricket future.
The team should be supported by JUST ONE coach, and that should be a highshool level batting coach from Mumbai or Delhi India.
And Rashid Lateef should be PCB's chairman.
This is an ideal situation.
Sehban bhai, how do you expect our Test-only cricketers to improve when they play Test cricket on a very very disjointed basis? Players who are only in the Test side and do not travel with the limited overs sides are going to find it very hard to be consistently at the international level due to the lack of quality cricket.
By now you'd expect Shafiq to be peaking, at least he should be on about a 45ish average yet he's struggling to average 40. This just shows he isn't the batsman he's made to be. At the age of 28 odd he should have some nice 150s to his name with maybe even a 200 yet he still a rabbit in the headlight and bats as tho he's debuting.
The sooner Pakistan moves on from him, the better, is miles better than him as well(that's saying something)
If Pakistan replace him with Fawad Alam in tests, I think Fawad Alam can average 45+ in tests.Meh. No need to fix whats not broken. Replacing a batsmen who average 38 for another who averages about the same is no change
If Pakistan replace him with Fawad Alam in tests, I think Fawad Alam can average 45+ in tests.
Does the highest test score matter? Did it exactly come in a win? Instead of watching cricket on tables and charts, why don't you actually watch it?Amin is miles better - and his highest test score is? and his highest odi score excluding zim is?
Do people even watch cricket anymore or waste their time posting frivolously.
Does the highest test score matter? Did it exactly come in a win? Instead of watching cricket on tables and charts, why don't you actually watch it?
Asad Shafiq is useless, he may score an odd 100 in a losing matter. You can make your entire Pak team up of useless batsman who score when its over but I don't.
Amin is what 23 24ish? At least he has age on his side but Shafiq really has no excuse in being so poor but it doesn't matter does it? Next series, he'll score another magical 100 vs johnson and co whilst chasing 500 because he scored a duck in the first innings- then all will be forgotten
part 1:Umar Akmal scored on DEBUT 129 in New Zealand against Bond and co(also scored 75 in the same match)- scored some 50s in harsh conditions of Aus--All scored at a brisk rate. Asad Shafiq on the other hand cannot handle pressure..He scores when he knows he's scoring for nothing meaning there's no pressure...A number 6 batsman must be able to handle pressure. Two, he can't score big to save his life- he'll get you 80s and 90s with an odd 113 or so.Lets split this 'response' of yours in to two parts:
part 1 summary: please ignore any standard measures to judge a player
part 2: I am such a huuuuuuuuge amin fan that every one is sooooooooo bad compared to him.
anything else?
part 1:Umar Akmal scored on DEBUT 129 in New Zealand against Bond and co(also scored 75 in the same match)- scored some 50s in harsh conditions of Aus--All scored at a brisk rate. Asad Shafiq on the other hand cannot handle pressure..He scores when he knows he's scoring for nothing meaning there's no pressure...A number 6 batsman must be able to handle pressure. Two, he can't score big to save his life- he'll get you 80s and 90s with an odd 113 or so.
part 2: Umar Amin is a hack- he is still better than Shafiq.
So what's the probelm ?
I am not basing my entire case based on that 1 inning. I am also looking at his domestic stats where he averages a lot more than Asad Shafiq. He is averaging 50+ in domestics so we can expect him to average 45+ in international test matches at least. Thats 7 runs better than what Asad Shafiq is averaging in international test matches.Fawad has played one innings against SL. Even Hafeez looks like bradman against SL.
Hardly a compelling case.
You see though, Asad is living off one performance- Granted his 111 was top notch but has he done anything other than that? That is my question...This isn't just Tests now, this is apart of all forms of cricket. People were getting happy after he hit 4 4s- that's his standard...Not exactly a high bar is it?so...just so that we are clear, two posts ago you were talking about scoring but not contributing to a victory and then you pull out umar akmal efforts in matches we lost..and you continue to muse about umer amin without any real logic.
carry on - this was too easy. the smiley indicated the strength of the argument
part 1:Umar Akmal scored on DEBUT 129 in New Zealand against Bond and co(also scored 75 in the same match)- scored some 50s in harsh conditions of Aus--All scored at a brisk rate. Asad Shafiq on the other hand cannot handle pressure..He scores when he knows he's scoring for nothing meaning there's no pressure...A number 6 batsman must be able to handle pressure. Two, he can't score big to save his life- he'll get you 80s and 90s with an odd 113 or so.
part 2: Umar Amin is a hack- he is still better than Shafiq.
So what's the probelm ?
Domestic stats are not the only way to select players, I hope? We don't need selectors then. I don't really see fawad as a replacement for Shafiq in tests. I do feel fawad alam will have a good run for Pakistan in the next two years, as we will play mostly at home and against Sri Lanka.I am not basing my entire case based on that 1 inning. I am also looking at his domestic stats where he averages a lot more than Asad Shafiq. He is averaging 50+ in domestics so we can expect him to average 45+ in international test matches at least. Thats 7 runs better than what Asad Shafiq is averaging in international test matches.
Domestic stats are not the only way to select players, I hope? We don't need selectors then. I don't really see fawad as a replacement for Shafiq in tests. I do feel fawad alam will have a good run for Pakistan in the next two years, as we will play mostly at home and against Sri Lanka.
Why stop at 45 why not 55....Fawad will do better than shafiq in any condition.. he is a solid 45 plus average batsman. Shafiq can not average more than 38 in his entire career. He has a few good innings with long spaces. Yah we have selectors thats why malik and kamran akmal make their way back again and again and a domestic performer had to wait a long long time for his turn.
Does the highest test score matter? Did it exactly come in a win? Instead of watching cricket on tables and charts, why don't you actually watch it?
Asad Shafiq is useless, he may score an odd 100 in a losing matter. You can make your entire Pak team up of useless batsman who score when its over but I don't.
Amin is what 23 24ish? At least he has age on his side but Shafiq really has no excuse in being so poor but it doesn't matter does it? Next series, he'll score another magical 100 vs johnson and co whilst chasing 500 because he scored a duck in the first innings- then all will be forgotten
Why stop at 45 why not 55....
All conjecture, which is fine as well, everyone is allowed an opinion
For me fawad will have a couple of good years playing in UAE against rubbish opposition until we end up in SA or England or Aus. We don't play there much so we fawad can build a career around playing sl at home.
I see nothing in fawad to say that he will be a remotely decent test batsman when we travel.
Will do well against sl,Bangladesh, maybe India
No shame in that, many of our modern 'legends' ( HafeeZ, kami, Malik, afridi) owe their careers to subcontinental bowling.
You will never find a more biased poster then Pete Rose.
Ofcourse he averages 56 in domestic and i wont be surprised if he average 50 plus in test cricket as well. Hafeez kami are mediocre in domestic cricket as well which you conviniently choose to ignore. Asad shafeeq reflects his domestic average in international cricket and thats what he is.. mediocre.
Fawad alam despite his unusual methods knows how to score and thats what is important. Asad scores after an eon of failures.
I'm sorry but I had to come in here, says the person who follows Umar Akmal like a bad smell and as far as I am aware you think he is the best thing since slice bread.
I am watching his cricinfo profile and it seems he has not been in a good touch of lately.
Has crossed 20 only once in all forms of cricket in 11 innings at both international and domestic levels since his 130 against South Africa.
Too small a sample size to conclude anything on fawad. What is apparent of course is the horrible technique. All for him to prove.
I am watching his cricinfo profile and it seems he has not been in a good touch of lately.
Has crossed 20 only once in all forms of cricket in 11 innings at both international and domestic levels since his 130 against South Africa.
Amin is better because he can improve due to age..They both are on the same level in terms of being hacks but Asad should be peaking however Amin still has time. Since they both have no feats, one can base it on technique and ability where Amin far outweighs him.Amin is good because age is on his side?
Asad scores deliberate 100s in losing causes?
I will never drop Asad for Amin. Asad is 10 times better than him. Fawad Alam and Haris Sohail only these 2 can replace Asad Shafiq.
, you need to be able to find gaps and score runs.
Amin can only get into the team as a Mascot
I would not mind Asad Shafiq batting at #5 for the next couple of years as long as he can perform well in Asia. He is a decent player overseas too.