Time up for the Babar Azam-Mohammad Rizwan opening partnership in T20Is?

He scored an unbeaten 90 of 63 balls out of 158 more than half the score and some how riz is responsible

What do think the other players with bats in their hands are suppose to do.

score nothing?.

Having a personal agenda is never a good thing. Be factual and make constructive criticism.
Frustration and denial in accepting that Pakistan just does not have the talent to play modern day cricket.

Domestic top performers getting exposed so ruthlessly at international level is getting to these fans.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Correction.

We can't even win a single T20 unless Rizwan and Babar open against Namibia, Uganda, PNG, 3rd string England or 4th string NZ Or some version of their sides.

We can definitely pad though.

To a match losing total.

Unfortunately you woke up to Rizwan proving you wrong, again.

You would have found something else negative to say if the bowlers had defended 160 on this pitch which thanks to Rizwan they had the opportunity to do so. Your agenda is against Rizwan and not his performances.

Nobody else in this team ever steps up except Rizwan and Babar.

Real Pakistan fans appreciate what these two bring to a side which evidently is 5th-6th ranked on ability. Without them you'd be watching World Cups from the sidelines because we would not qualify.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He scored an unbeaten 90 of 63 balls out of 158 more than half the score and some how riz is responsible

What do think the other players with bats in their hands are suppose to do.

score nothing?.

Having a personal agenda is never a good thing. Be factual and make constructive criticism.

You make it sound like it was a glorious innings.

You do realize Pakistan lost, right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unfortunately you woke up to Rizwan proving you wrong, again
Who did Rizwan prove wrong? He’s been proving his critics right again and again. He’s useless
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They did last year against Afghanistan. Pakistan got destroyed predictably so.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please keep your myths to yourself that without Rizwan and Babar, Pakistan wouldn't score.

First, let them both sit out and then let's re-evaluate.

Back to the usual then.

"Try changing the opening combination, try letting them sit out, try changing the captain, try...."

What you mean is - "try anything and everything until you find something that fits my agenda!"
 
Stop waffling.

if thats how you feel accept it and dont watch it.
The point is to accept your shortcomings and build a team around your strengths. Babar and Rizwan are your top batsmen in T20 cricket, and while they are no match for the other top-orders in world cricket, they have produced results.

Chasing this pipe-dream of attacking openers will lead us nowhere. Fakhar's stats as an opener in T20 cricket shed some light on how Pakistan just cannot afford to have such players opening the batting for us.
 
They did last year against Afghanistan. Pakistan got destroyed predictably so.

Revisionism.

They lost 2-1 and they put up 182 in 3rd game.

Not the 50 all out people are expecting if these blue eyed boys don't play.
 
You can't eat up 10 overs in T20 and not put a winning score for your team.

Rest is all hogwash.

I am not here to see Rizwan circus or theater show.

If you bat 10 plus overs and you team doesn't even touch 160, you can kindly keep your hideous performance for your ignorant fans.
One of the worst posts I've ever seen on PP!!
 
It is because of this nonsense that we lost Babar as captain and broke up the successful RizBab partnership at the top.

The results are there. 5-0 is loading.

And the only reason matches haven't been a complete mauling is thanks to Babar and Rizwan.

If you say we're better off without these two in the side then i assume you're trolling because nobody is genuinely that stupid.
 
Revisionism.

They lost 2-1 and they put up 182 in 3rd game.

Not the 50 all out people are expecting if these blue eyed boys don't play.
Wonderful. One win against Afghanistan is cause for celebration of our talent now, seeing as how the first two games were so one-sided. The batting collapsed under pressure in two consecutive games.
 
You do realise we play more than one batter in the line up.

you do realise others are playing with bats in their hands and are paid to score runs aswell.

The one batter who bats bats for nearly 11 overs and scores 90.

Okay what do you expect other batsmen to score in their 54 balls total left.

Be realistic.
 
It is because of this nonsense that we lost Babar as captain and broke up the successful RizBab partnership at the top.

The results are there. 5-0 is loading.

And the only reason matches haven't been a complete mauling is thanks to Babar and Rizwan.

If you say we're better off without these two in the side then i assume you're trolling because nobody is genuinely that stupid.

Babar can be tolerated as one anchor.

Why do you want 2 anchors?

And what successful partnership?

Which tournament have they won that I missed out on?

You are just in denial that Rizbar partnership was a smokescreen and only good for 3rd division sides.
 
The point is to accept your shortcomings and build a team around your strengths. Babar and Rizwan are your top batsmen in T20 cricket, and while they are no match for the other top-orders in world cricket, they have produced results.

Chasing this pipe-dream of attacking openers will lead us nowhere. Fakhar's stats as an opener in T20 cricket shed some light on how Pakistan just cannot afford to have such players opening the batting for us.
The point is having patience, select the players who are capable and give them a run in the side.

Right now people are fixated with openers but the truth is the middle and lower order is a let down which is costing us wins.

Numbers 5 , 6 and 7 are the problem areas.

Before this series many people on this forum we saying play youngsters, dont care if we loose and now people are turning and complaining.
 
The point is having patience, select the players who are capable and give them a run in the side.

Right now people are fixated with openers but the truth is the middle and lower order is a let down which is costing us wins.

Numbers 5 , 6 and 7 are the problem areas.

Before this series many people on this forum we saying play youngsters, dont care if we loose and now people are turning and complaining.
Play youngsters where spots are open, don't disrupt something that had an established base. We have always had issues with Number 4, 5 and 6, so why are you playing four openers in the team and breaking up a partnership that has scored runs for Pakistan?

We need to accept our shortcomings, modern day cricket is beyond our grasp if we have four openers playing in the same team and hogging middle-order spots.

The sad part is, we don't have middle-order batsmen at all in our domestic circuit.
 
The one batter who bats bats for nearly 11 overs and scores 90.

Okay what do you expect other batsmen to score in their 54 balls total left.

Be realistic.
That s 9 overs nearly half the innings for other batters to score.

What s unrealistic about that.

How many more overs would you expect the middle order to Bat?.

In fact if you pick up most scorecards you will one top scorer with the rest playing cameos.

That s T20 cricket.
 
That s 9 overs nearly half the innings for other batters to score.

What s unrealistic about that.

How many more overs would you expect the middle order to Bat?.

In fact if you pick up most scorecards you will one top scorer with the rest playing cameos.

That s T20 cricket.

Exactly.

But do you think that one scorer will be 90 off 65 balls?

With inability to hit 6s and 4s and taking singles till the end?
 
The one batter who bats bats for nearly 11 overs and scores 90.

Okay what do you expect other batsmen to score in their 54 balls total left.

Be realistic.
If they lasted and were scoring big then Rizwan would not even had that much balls to face.
 
Who did Rizwan prove wrong? He’s been proving his critics right again and again. He’s useless

Apparently according to some after reading their posts Babar shifting one position from 3 to opening would have helped Pakistan win this series people really think that would have happened.

Unless I’m missing something they both played all 4 matches and had plenty of batting opportunity and Pakistan lost all 4 matches.

If anything it shows without Fakhar playing a blinder Pakistan isn’t good enough to out score better teams in high scoring matches and wherever Rizwan and Babar bat that wont change as Finn Allen scored a big hundred when facing the same number of balls as our dead rubber warrior Rizwan who couldn’t even make a century.

:moyo
 
Play youngsters where spots are open, don't disrupt something that had an established base. We have always had issues with Number 4, 5 and 6, so why are you playing four openers in the team and breaking up a partnership that has scored runs for Pakistan?

We need to accept our shortcomings, modern day cricket is beyond our grasp if we have four openers playing in the same team and hogging middle-order spots.

The sad part is, we don't have middle-order batsmen at all in our domestic circuit.
First of all Riz and Babar were not openers we made them openers and gave them the role in which they performed.

However its about evolving and getting better and Saim coming in gives us a new dynamic at the top of the order to make sure we cash in on the PP.

The top 4 is sorted with Saim, Riz, Babar and Fakhar in whatever order these four play.

The troublesome area is numbers 5 , 6 and 7 and finding the right players for the roles.

We need to understand the requirements in order to fulfil the role that is where the short comings are.

Other teams are smarter at identifying a players weakness and executing plans and knowing their scoring areas of strength and weekness.

Like Azam khan for example I know sitting at home without a ball being bowled he s going to be tested with the short ball so if I was him and the coaches i would be working on him and creating a strategy to counter it. I.e Cut, ramp, scoop over the keeper etc.

Batting wise every player should know their game inside out, Know their go to shots and know where the opposition are likely to target them, Targeting the shorter boundaries etc and create a counter strategy.

That s modern cricket using your brain and data analyses to make the percentages in your favour.

Players and supporters need to understand this is modern cricket, not just ramps, reverse scoops, switch hits or whatever.
 
Exactly.

But do you think that one scorer will be 90 off 65 balls?

With inability to hit 6s and 4s and taking singles till the end?
It was 90 off 63 what more can you ask for.

your dodging the question.

It was the inability of the others that cost us not Riz.

Ifti scoring 10 of 14 balls etc.
 
It was 90 off 63 what more can you ask for.

your dodging the question.

It was the inability of the others that cost us not Riz.

Ifti scoring 10 of 14 balls etc.
A clone of Rizwan would Pakistan at 180.

Still not good enough.

We would have lost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First of all Riz and Babar were not openers we made them openers and gave them the role in which they performed.

However its about evolving and getting better and Saim coming in gives us a new dynamic at the top of the order to make sure we cash in on the PP.

The top 4 is sorted with Saim, Riz, Babar and Fakhar in whatever order these four play.

The troublesome area is numbers 5 , 6 and 7 and finding the right players for the roles.

We need to understand the requirements in order to fulfil the role that is where the short comings are.

Other teams are smarter at identifying a players weakness and executing plans and knowing their scoring areas of strength and weekness.

Like Azam khan for example I know sitting at home without a ball being bowled he s going to be tested with the short ball so if I was him and the coaches i would be working on him and creating a strategy to counter it. I.e Cut, ramp, scoop over the keeper etc.

Batting wise every player should know their game inside out, Know their go to shots and know where the opposition are likely to target them, Targeting the shorter boundaries etc and create a counter strategy.

That s modern cricket using your brain and data analyses to make the percentages in your favour.

Players and supporters need to understand this is modern cricket, not just ramps, reverse scoops, switch hits or whatever.
Rizwan and Babar are very good batsmen who are good enough to bat anywhere in the top order, but their maximum benefit is when they open for Pakistan and make sure we have a decent base to launch from.

Shadab’s return might balance things out better though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rizwan taking a swipe at management for breaking his opening pair with Babar. Throwing youngster under the bus.
Next level toxicity.
 
Time should comeback for this duo to take responsibility again. Saim's experiment failed.
We want our Finn Allen, but Finn Allen has 12 failures in the last 20 internationals, and averages 26. And he is an established cricketer.

If our management and board think Saim is the answer, he needs a long rope, and we need to judge him consistently with other international players. We can't start complaining after a few failures (especially of a guy trying to establish himself)
 
A clone of Rizwan would Pakistan at 180.

Still not good enough.

We would have lost.
180 on that wicket was more than enough. Fakhar Sahibzada and Ifti made 20 off 32. That was the only thing stopping us getting to 180.
Even 160 was interesting had the catches been taken.
In short Rizwan played a good knock today but it's a team game.
 
A clone of Rizwan would Pakistan at 180.

Still not good enough.

We would have lost.
Where do all the other guys also come into the equation. Do Riz and Babar owe it to all other batsman. This is International cricket and ultimately everyone has to perform.
 
MR big mouth has a lot to say after scoring useless runs in a dead rubber
Something you are favorites can't even score in a dead rubbers. Babar and rizwan are the best batters in Pakistan by a country mile.
 
We need to ignore the noise and stick to the top 4 of Saim Rizwan Babar Fakhar.
We need to invest in Saim, regardless of what has happened in the past.
Numbers 4-8 need to be flexible and strike at 150+ and we are not concerned by their average.
 
Agreed that Salman needs a go in the Ifti role. Right now Ifti isn’t doing anything and we can’t hold onto him on the basis that he “might” start performing.

The guy is at least 43 years old. Don’t waste any time giving Agha opportunities imo
I still think Ifti in the WI conditions will do a decent job, both with bat and ball.
The issue right now is that Shaheen isn't giving him the ball.
Maybe it's because NZ don't have left handers
 
Where was all this Yap from Rizwan when Pakistan lost the first 3 T20s? He’s got a big mouth now because he scored a useless 90?
 
What have the other guys done in the series. Any ideas?

Fakhars 50 of 25 balls was the only half decent innings in the series none of the other scores were anything close to match winning.

When a team is experimenting with new players especially against a decent team who are at full strength one would expect some inconsistency but the more experienced batsmen like Rizwan Iftikhar Babar Fakhar have to win matches for the team which they collectively have failed to do.
 
Babar (and rizwan) are definitely NOT the reason why Pakistan is staring at a humiliating whitewash. But it's also true that Babar has been shown up as lacking that extra gear or X factor that generational talents are meant to have. So in that sense, he is not really in the conversation of meriting a place among the best LOI bats worldwide.
 
Wish I had the kismet that chacha has

How he is getting selected over and over and very little to show for it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The youngsters can't even strike high.

None of them have SR's that much higher than Babar or Rizwan. But their ability to last more than 15 balls is close to zero.

If they were consistently getting you 20 (10) type scores that would be fine.

But the Azam's, Asif's, Saim's etc aren't outputting even that.
Look up SR in T20s of Babar, Rizwan, Saim, Haris. You will have your answer
 
I think we need to hold our nerve and let the likes of Saim have time. Riz and Babar can still be an option in the WC but defeats here matter little if we have a competitive team in the WC
 
I think we need to hold our nerve and let the likes of Saim have time. Riz and Babar can still be an option in the WC but defeats here matter little if we have a competitive team in the WC
its better to go back with Babar Rizwan opening combo atleast they both were giving us consistent starts
 
its better to go back with Babar Rizwan opening combo atleast they both were giving us consistent starts
Not so quickly. It will give a chance to others and force these guys to improve. Generally they were good at chasing totals but found setting targets short by roughly 20 runs( conditions dependent)
 
lets try fakhar or Sahibzada Farhan at No.3 position... this saim rizwan duo is a total failure
Oh yar mere bhai

Leave Babar at 3. Please. You can’t have any 50/50 guy in that position. Please understand this bro.
 
Oh yar mere bhai

Leave Babar at 3. Please. You can’t have any 50/50 guy in that position. Please understand this bro.
Let's try Sahibzada at today. If he succeeds then we could shuffle squad.
 
Oh yar mere bhai

Leave Babar at 3. Please. You can’t have any 50/50 guy in that position. Please understand this bro.
Then Fakhar with Sahibzada Farhan as openers could do the trick because Fakhar is totally useless at the No. 4 position and Farhan could only perform as an opener. Let's try Saim Ayub at No. 4.
 
We are weaker with Babar at 3. It’s better to have two good openers than one good opener and one good no.3.

However we should still leave Babar at 3 at test out other openers. It would be even better if we could have 2 good openers as well as a good no.3.

Open with Fakhar to partner Rizwan. He has the highest chance of succeeding out of the other openers given his PSL performance and ODI. If he fails then try out the rest.
 
Babar and Rizwan stats at the last T20 World Cup:

Rizwan : average 25 strike rate 109

Babar : average 17 strike rate 93

Now we see why they are testing new players if Babar and Rizwan open in this years tournament and produce those numbers they should never be allowed to play international T20 cricket again.

It’s best to let the younger players lose in tournaments in the future as people would have had enough of seeing the same mentally weak players failing in big matches over and over.
 
Babar can be tolerated as one anchor.

Why do you want 2 anchors?

And what successful partnership?

Which tournament have they won that I missed out on?

You are just in denial that Rizbar partnership was a smokescreen and only good for 3rd division sides.
your so called power hitters are all big flop.
 
Then Fakhar with Sahibzada Farhan as openers could do the trick because Fakhar is totally useless at the No. 4 position and Farhan could only perform as an opener. Let's try Saim Ayub at No. 4.
Fakhar was always useless -- he plays couple of good innings and this costs us a lot -- Pakistani fans are also mediocre like Pakistan team ---
 
Whatever everybody thinks about the Rizbabar duo, these guys won more matches than anybody could imagine in the current team playing as an opener combination. Saim and riz experiment failed badly, fakhar was mediocre when he opened as well. Nobody will be able to match the accomplishments that Riz Babar achieved. Hope so that some experiments works in favor of Pakistan in coming days but till now, nothing has worked.
 
Whatever everybody thinks about the Rizbabar duo, these guys won more matches than anybody could imagine in the current team playing as an opener combination. Saim and riz experiment failed badly, fakhar was mediocre when he opened as well. Nobody will be able to match the accomplishments that Riz Babar achieved. Hope so that some experiments works in favor of Pakistan in coming days but till now, nothing has worked.
Accomplishments?

No matter how many tests you pass before the final exam, if you fail your major exam it is all pointless.

Scoring 200 against 3rd division sides and hitting century partneships against Nepal is pointless.

You may consider these as accomplishments but I consider them as stat padding because when the real events come they flop under pressure like everyone else.
 
Babar can be tolerated as one anchor.

Why do you want 2 anchors?

And what successful partnership?

Which tournament have they won that I missed out on?

You are just in denial that Rizbar partnership was a smokescreen and only good for 3rd division sides.
Your acting like pakistan have won to many tournaments.
 
Talking about giving youngsters a chance both of them played whole series 🤣 . Such seniors are curse for a team
 
Babar-Rizwan partnership got aptly exposed today.

If anyone dares mention them together again they are not a Pakistan fan.

End of story.
 
Babar-Rizwan partnership got aptly exposed today.

If anyone dares mention them together again they are not a Pakistan fan.

End of story.
Bro but couldn’t you see they have to bat like they do otherwise we won’t reach 100?
 
Pakistan only have one modern day batsman of world class quality and that is Fakhar Zaman .

Unfortunately he is not batted in his natural position in t20s since 2020. Criminal.
and the world class batsman totally failed -- natural position unnatural position, these are all excuses --

His only accomplishment is hitting some big sixes --
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Babar Riz are the reason pakistan reached a respectable total in the whole series, else it would have been embarrassing 120 130s.
 
Rizwan and Babar are very good batsmen who are good enough to bat anywhere in the top order, but their maximum benefit is when they open for Pakistan and make sure we have a decent base to launch from.

Shadab’s return might balance things out better though.
We need to cash in on the PP with most T20s being good batting wickets unlike todays used wicket which is why Riz with Saim opening follwed by Babar and Fakhar is what the management will probably go with.

I would open with Fakhar and Saim to blaze away in the first 6 and get us around 80 so that the platform is set for Riz and Babar.

Even if they went at eights or nines till over 14 we would score between 144 and 152 which leaves 6 overs to launch big at the back end.

If shadab s bowling form returns then he s a guaranteed starter other wise I would start Abrar if fit with 3 pacers plus Jamal we need wicket takers in the middle.
 
Only think we’ve learnt unfortunately is that Saim failed as opener. The whole argument anyone can open, just hasn’t held up. The players in our squad and team can’t replicate easily what Rizwan and Babar do even if they drop their SR. They can’t stay in long enough. That doesn’t excuse Rizwan’s and Babars flaws of low SR. The way to expose them is someone comes in and outperforms them as opener. Which hasn’t happened, and Babar was our most consistent middle order player.

It also kind of proves Afghanistan wasnt a fluke where even Rizwan and Babar would have got out next to nothing according to some. They still put up scores on the board this series. And it was still a below par series for their standards. And the youngsters still put out nothing just like Afghanistan. They just aren’t ready. It is likely we would have won that series if say even Rizwan and Babar had contributed in that tour similar to this series.

What we need is someone with a real chance who can actually prove that the Rizwan and Babar opening combination is not the best. Open with Fakhar and see how he does in comparison to Rizwan. That’s the only true way of proving this theory right or wrong.
 
So what was the point in playing Rizwan and Babar all 5 games in this meaningless series?
I mean these guys are beyond understanding, seriously whats the point in playing every single game and having the younger guys play 1, 2 or max 3 games and even then out of position!
 
Fakhar last opened in 2020. His last two Seasons in PSL as opener have yielded 1000 runs @39 SR of 156.

Couple that with him being a proven performer why would he not be given another chance is beyond me.
 
Read something very interesting on Twitter:

“Combined runs scored by Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan in each match:

Match 1: 82 runs
Match 2: 73 runs
Match 3: 82 runs
Match 4: 109 runs
Match 5: 51 runs

Pakistan won the only match in which neither Babar nor Rizwan scored 50+ runs each”

Eye opener for those who argue Pakistan can only win a game if these two score runs
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Read something very interesting on Twitter:

“Combined runs scored by Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan in each match:

Match 1: 82 runs
Match 2: 73 runs
Match 3: 82 runs
Match 4: 109 runs
Match 5: 51 runs

Pakistan won the only match in which neither Babar nor Rizwan scored 50+ runs each”

A huge slap on the face of those who argue Pakistan can only win a game if these two score runs
Yes, we have to look beyond these two.
 
Read something very interesting on Twitter:

“Combined runs scored by Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan in each match:

Match 1: 82 runs
Match 2: 73 runs
Match 3: 82 runs
Match 4: 109 runs
Match 5: 51 runs

Pakistan won the only match in which neither Babar nor Rizwan scored 50+ runs each”

A huge slap on the face of those who argue Pakistan can only win a game if these two score runs
lol well no one scored 50 last game. So you can say the same we won last game when Fakhar didn’t get a 50.

It just happened that Babar scored more fifties than the others.
 
Read something very interesting on Twitter:

“Combined runs scored by Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan in each match:

Match 1: 82 runs
Match 2: 73 runs
Match 3: 82 runs
Match 4: 109 runs
Match 5: 51 runs

Pakistan won the only match in which neither Babar nor Rizwan scored 50+ runs each”

A huge slap on the face of those who argue Pakistan can only win a game if these two score runs
No one scored a 50 in the whole game. Pakistan has won many game with or without their 50s but coming with something like this is just childish.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Give them a 7 match T20I series against Nepal.

Babar can’t turn this down. He won’t have to face Sandeep Lamichanne.
 
Nothing is funnier than watching the tears of @topspin and co stream down their faces.

Anger, hatred and bitterness spews from their brains while Rizwan smiles and makes yet another top score lol.

They were so happy at half time at what looked like an under par score. Rizwan had been finally “exposed” and the jubilation was all over the match thread.

But because his 38 ended up being so pivotal to the outcome of the match, as a result of the tight slaps they received they are reaching Willy Wonka levels of loopy today.

You don’t need comedy when you have these guys. May we have many more years of Rizwan for the lols he provides to PakPassion.
 
Nothing is funnier than watching the tears of @topspin and co stream down their faces.

Anger, hatred and bitterness spews from their brains while Rizwan smiles and makes yet another top score lol.

They were so happy at half time at what looked like an under par score. Rizwan had been finally “exposed” and the jubilation was all over the match thread.

But because his 38 ended up being so pivotal to the outcome of the match, as a result of the tight slaps they received they are reaching Willy Wonka levels of loopy today.

You don’t need comedy when you have these guys. May we have many more years of Rizwan for the lols he provides to PakPassion.

Posts like this just go to show that you’re a bigger Rizbar fan than a Pakistan cricket one.

Cheerleading a run ball innings in a dead rubber must be a new low on PP. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything like this on here, so congrats for setting a new record.
 
They were so happy at half time at what looked like an under par score. Rizwan had been finally “exposed” and the jubilation was all over the match thread.

We all know your credibility got exposed after the 2022 WT20 but that doesn’t excuse you for coming up with lies.

If you did your due diligence, you would find I wasn’t even on PP at any stage during the game because I wasn’t even watching it.

Also, there’s no such thing as “half time”. This is cricket, not football. It’s called an Innings Break.
 
Only think we’ve learnt unfortunately is that Saim failed as opener. The whole argument anyone can open, just hasn’t held up. The players in our squad and team can’t replicate easily what Rizwan and Babar do even if they drop their SR. They can’t stay in long enough. That doesn’t excuse Rizwan’s and Babars flaws of low SR. The way to expose them is someone comes in and outperforms them as opener. Which hasn’t happened, and Babar was our most consistent middle order player.

It also kind of proves Afghanistan wasnt a fluke where even Rizwan and Babar would have got out next to nothing according to some. They still put up scores on the board this series. And it was still a below par series for their standards. And the youngsters still put out nothing just like Afghanistan. They just aren’t ready. It is likely we would have won that series if say even Rizwan and Babar had contributed in that tour similar to this series.

What we need is someone with a real chance who can actually prove that the Rizwan and Babar opening combination is not the best. Open with Fakhar and see how he does in comparison to Rizwan. That’s the only true way of proving this theory right or wrong.
Riiiight… so he’s a failure because after 4 games in which the team was chasing very steep totals that have rarely been chased on those grounds, he’s a failure.

Wow, incredible 🤔

Do tell, what were Babar and Rizwan’s first 4 innings like in international cricket?

Y’all will do anything to justify opening with RizBab even if it means deeming a 21 year old a “failure” because he failed in 3 out of his first 4 innings, 3 of them chasing 190-220+. While the same RizBab couldn’t save the game despite playing in the top order for 2-3 years now.

Also, Saim got the team off to a flier in the first game and was run out. But ofc… to RizBab supporters anything less than a 40 at 90 SR is considered a failure in t20s.

That 27 off 8 had more impact than anything Rizwan and Babar have done this series.

If this is the mentality of some of the esteemed fans on this forum then ofc the brain dead and thick headed management will be even worse. Why else do we keep dumping out aggressors and keep loading the top order with accumulators.

Because we are trying to not lose rather than actually try to win when it comes to playing the big boys.

Let that sink in for a sec.

This has been our go to mindset regardless of format for more than 10 years.

The stats of Rizwan and Babar themselves in t20s tell this story too.
 
Back
Top