What's new

[VIDEOS/PICTURES] Bhuvneshwar Kumar is a blunt spearhead

Shaun Pollock is one of the greatest ODI bowlers of all time, Bhuvaneshwar won't even make Bangladesh squad. Great comparison

Also it's funny that you highlighted one name from my post and ignored the 7 other names?

Why? Please answer the actual point of my post rather than trying to distract everybody with your Shaun Pollock nonsense post.
 
Lol this guy is pure troll. Bhuvi with his pathetic stats wouldn't get selected even in current zimbawe side. It's same give runs with ball and then make 10 - 12 runs with bat to cover it lol. Let's see how he helps to win worldcup when top order will get out early and middle order will be under pressure.

You're the guy who thinks that we can win a WC with 4 tailenders in the side. :danish

Seeing you take about cricket is like watching a monkey trying to talk.

It's funny to watch but at the end of the day it's a complete waste of time.
 
Well he is definitely worth his place in the team in the squad for the WC if not in the team because sometime it get cloudy in England and then he can be useful. However he gets a little exposed on flat wickets against power full batsmen because simple line bowling doesn't work then as it worked against Pakistan (Asia Cup). I also have a feeling that India will play most of their matches on flat wickets where Kuldeep and Chahal will not come in to play all that much. England would be watching very carefully how India is relying on two spinners only in the middle overs so they would be mad if they haven't noticed that yet and instructed the groundsmen already.
 
And just as a reference point, Shaun Pollock's batting average was 26 and he batted at no 7 most of the time.

Shaun Pollock had almost twice batting average in an era when 250-260 was a winning score. His SR was 87. Bhuvi in this era has an SR of ~70 with an average of 14. LMAO. What's your point?
 
You're the guy who thinks that we can win a WC with 4 tailenders in the side. :danish

Seeing you take about cricket is like watching a monkey trying to talk.

It's funny to watch but at the end of the day it's a complete waste of time.

Let's see how your bhuvi sobers kumar wins match when there is pressure of worldcup. This would get smashed all around corner against good batsman.
 
Shaun Pollock had almost twice batting average in an era when 250-260 was a winning score. His SR was 87. Bhuvi in this era has an SR of ~70 with an average of 14. LMAO. What's your point?

Read all my posts and you'll understand my point. :sarf
 
Also it's funny that you highlighted one name from my post and ignored the 7 other names?

Why? Please answer the actual point of my post rather than trying to distract everybody with your Shaun Pollock nonsense post.

Dude you should feel ashamed if you are even mentioning that overrated trundler with pollock's class. This guy isn't even in pandya's class as bowler and batsman it's difference of miles. you should seriously stop trolling now.
 
Dude you should feel ashamed if you are even mentioning that overrated trundler with pollock's class. This guy isn't even in pandya's class as bowler and batsman it's difference of miles. you should seriously stop trolling now.

Dear Lord....

This is why I drew the talking-monkey parallel. Everything just goes over your head.

Read the entire post again. Try to understand how [MENTION=142823]Joseph Gomes[/MENTION] was mentioning Bhuvi's batting avg to suggest that he isn't useful with the bat.

And if this hurts your brain too much, then forget that I mentioned Pollock. Look at the other 7 names in that post. And this time try really hard to understand the line of argument.
 
Also it's funny that you highlighted one name from my post and ignored the 7 other names?

Why? Please answer the actual point of my post rather than trying to distract everybody with your Shaun Pollock nonsense post.

What nonsense? The only nonsense is you spouting that Bhuvaneshwar is not mediocre in ODIs. He absolutely is.
 
What nonsense? The only nonsense is you spouting that Bhuvaneshwar is not mediocre in ODIs. He absolutely is.

You were talking about his batting average and how it shows that he is no better than Shami because their averages are similar.

Don't try to shift the goalpost. Answer the particular question.

PS: idk about mediocre/genius but what I have said is that Bhuvi is the only player who has all the skills to fill the no 8 role. I've not said Bhuvi is some amazing player.

If you're struggling to understand the nuances of that argument then tell me and I'll explain it to you again.
 
You were talking about his batting average and how it shows that he is no better than Shami because their averages are similar.

Don't try to shift the goalpost. Answer the particular question.

PS: idk about mediocre/genius but what I have said is that Bhuvi is the only player who has all the skills to fill the no 8 role. I've not said Bhuvi is some amazing player.

If you're struggling to understand the nuances of that argument then tell me and I'll explain it to you again.

If a bowler (let's not kid ourselves, Bhuvaneshwar is as much allrounder as Mashrafe Mortaza) does not make the XI on bowling alone, he should not be playing in the first place. Bhuvaneshwar inclusion shows India's lack in reserve for bowlers and actual allrounders. He is neither a good ODI bowler nor an allrounder. About his roles, you do realize how bad he is in fulfilling them right? He gets smashed in death over every 3 match out of 4.

You should never have mentioned Pollock in the first place, Pollock is top 10 greatest ODI cricketer of all time.
 
If a bowler (let's not kid ourselves, Bhuvaneshwar is as much allrounder as Mashrafe Mortaza) does not make the XI on bowling alone, he should not be playing in the first place. Bhuvaneshwar inclusion shows India's lack in reserve for bowlers and actual allrounders. He is neither a good ODI bowler nor an allrounder. About his roles, you do realize how bad he is in fulfilling them right? He gets smashed in death over every 3 match out of 4.

You should never have mentioned Pollock in the first place, Pollock is top 10 greatest ODI cricketer of all time.

A simple question, who will be the bowlers for India?
 
If a bowler (let's not kid ourselves, Bhuvaneshwar is as much allrounder as Mashrafe Mortaza) does not make the XI on bowling alone, he should not be playing in the first place. Bhuvaneshwar inclusion shows India's lack in reserve for bowlers and actual allrounders. He is neither a good ODI bowler nor an allrounder. About his roles, you do realize how bad he is in fulfilling them right? He gets smashed in death over every 3 match out of 4.

You should never have mentioned Pollock in the first place, Pollock is top 10 greatest ODI cricketer of all time.

Here's the thing. I understand that he isn't performing his bowling role every time. You're right.

But who is the alternative? Shami will probably give me 1-2 more wickets than Bhuvi but he also gets smashed. He is a terrible death bowler. And he doesn't have a single variation. And on top of that, he will be your no 8 batsman. I'm sure you've seen him bat Do you really think Shami can bat?

Do you think if instead of Bhuvi it was Shami playing the Asia Cup final, we would have been able to chase down the total?

Same problem with Umesh as well. Even he gets more wickets than Bhuvi but he's also a poor death bowler and cannot contribute with the bat.

This is why, much to the dismay of many people here including [MENTION=134981]Bhaag Viru Bhaag[/MENTION] India had to test out "trundlers" like Shardul and Chahar. Because unfortunately, apart from Bhuvi, they are the only 2 pacers in India right now who can hold a bat.


If you want to be angry with someone be angry with Shami. Bhuvi's has worked on himself and developed tremendously. He came in 2012 as just a swing bowler. Since then he's developed his yorkers, cutters, knuckle ball and even improved his batting. On the other hand Shami is at the same level as he was in 2013. He still hasn't developed a single slower ball and he's still as poor with the bat today as he was in his debut match.
 
Here's the thing. I understand that he isn't performing his bowling role every time. You're right.

But who is the alternative? Shami will probably give me 1-2 more wickets than Bhuvi but he also gets smashed. He is a terrible death bowler. And he doesn't have a single variation. And on top of that, he will be your no 8 batsman. I'm sure you've seen him bat Do you really think Shami can bat?

Do you think if instead of Bhuvi it was Shami playing the Asia Cup final, we would have been able to chase down the total?

Same problem with Umesh as well. Even he gets more wickets than Bhuvi but he's also a poor death bowler and cannot contribute with the bat.

This is why, much to the dismay of many people here including [MENTION=134981]Bhaag Viru Bhaag[/MENTION] India had to test out "trundlers" like Shardul and Chahar. Because unfortunately, apart from Bhuvi, they are the only 2 pacers in India right now who can hold a bat.


If you want to be angry with someone be angry with Shami. Bhuvi's has worked on himself and developed tremendously. He came in 2012 as just a swing bowler. Since then he's developed his yorkers, cutters, knuckle ball and even improved his batting. On the other hand Shami is at the same level as he was in 2013. He still hasn't developed a single slower ball and he's still as poor with the bat today as he was in his debut match.
Yep you are right your point is perfectly valid, we do not have any other options. Bhuvi is needed in the lower order, our tail is too weak.
But please don't say bhuvi has developed even after developing yorker, cutters etc he is ineffective.
Andhon me kaane raja type situation.
 
Yep you are right your point is perfectly valid, we do not have any other options. Bhuvi is needed in the lower order, our tail is too weak.
But please don't say bhuvi has developed even after developing yorker, cutters etc he is ineffective.
Andhon me kaane raja type situation.

We can't blame Bhuvi if the rest of the bowlers are andha.

It's true that Bhuvi fails to deliver every now and then. But he has certainly developed.

When he debuted in 2012 the captain couldn't even bowl him at the death. I remember Dhoni had to finish his overs in the first 40.

From then if you look at where he is today, then definitely he has developed a lot.

But even that is not my point. My point is that at least he has tried to become more useful to the team. Shami looks like he hasn't even tried. He still has the same limited skillset today that he had 5 years ago.
 
Checked this thread after 24 hours and like it usually happens, reason for Bhuvi's inclusion has moved from him being a great bowler to he's there to 'provide balance'. Same how it happened in Dhoni's thread where discussion evolved from him being the best keeper batsman to him being a God who knows when to retire to finally Dhoni provides balance. Some intellectual mind!

Anyone who thinks that with these so called balancing acts team becomes stronger then he's delusional. If it gets to a game thsr Bhuvi's batting skills are needed to win a match, then in 9 out of 10 cases you will anyway loose that match. A tailender who averages 14 with the bat don't win you an important match. And if he ever done then it's an aberration and not a norm.

Reminds me of haryana police kids' joke who when sent to arrest a lion, arrest a sheep and beats him to pulp to force it to admit that its not a sheep but lion. Delusions.
 
Last edited:
Checked this thread after 24 hours and like it usually happens, reason for Bhuvi's inclusion has moved from him being a great bowler to he's there to 'provide balance'. Same how it happened in Dhoni's thread where discussion evolved from him being the best keeper batsman to him being a God who knows when to retire to finally Dhoni provides balance. Some intellectual mind!

Anyone who thinks that with these so called balancing acts team becomes stronger then he's delusional. If it gets to a game thsr Bhuvi's batting skills are needed to win a match, then in 9 out of 10 cases you will anyway loose that match. A tailender who averages 14 with the bat don't win you an important match. And if he ever done then it's an aberration and not a norm.

Reminds me of haryana police kids' joke who when sent to arrest a lion, arrest a sheep and beats him to pulp to force it to admit that its not a sheep but lion. Delusions.

It happened in the Asia Cup final. Should tell you who is the delusional one.

I'd also love it if you name a single WC winning team that had 4 tailenders. Give it a go. We've got time.
 
Pandya
Chahal/Jadeja
Kuldeep
Khaleel
Bumrah

That looks like a solid bowling lineup. Bhuvi is not that great as a LOI player. Think Khaleel would have a better impact.
 
It happened in the Asia Cup final. Should tell you who is the delusional one.

I'd also love it if you name a single WC winning team that had 4 tailenders. Give it a go. We've got time.

How about you tell us how many world cup winning teams have an opening bowler averaging 38+ overall and 50+ against the 3 most likely semi final opponents?
 
How about you tell us how many world cup winning teams have an opening bowler averaging 38+ overall and 50+ against the 3 most likely semi final opponents?

Munaf Patel averaged 51 against Australia, 45 against NZ and 35 against NZ.

Now you answer my question.
 
How about you tell us how many world cup winning teams have an opening bowler averaging 38+ overall and 50+ against the 3 most likely semi final opponents?

Munaf Patel averaged 51 against Australia, 45 against NZ and 35 against NZ.

Now you answer my question.

I'll give you another one. Sri Lanka's Wicramasinghe averaged 40 with the ball.

40 vs Australia, 75 vs England, 53 vs NZ and50 vs PAK.

Your turn.
 
We can't blame Bhuvi if the rest of the bowlers are andha.

It's true that Bhuvi fails to deliver every now and then. But he has certainly developed.

When he debuted in 2012 the captain couldn't even bowl him at the death. I remember Dhoni had to finish his overs in the first 40.

From then if you look at where he is today, then definitely he has developed a lot.

But even that is not my point. My point is that at least he has tried to become more useful to the team. Shami looks like he hasn't even tried. He still has the same limited skillset today that he had 5 years ago.

The skillset that meant he always had far better average than Bhuvi and performed in 2015 WC?I'd take that even today
 
Pathetic numbers. What are Shami's numbers in comparison?

u905vdw.png
 

These stats mean nothing anymore. Shami didn't play in 2016. And in 2017 and 2018, he played 5 games, picked 7 wickets at 40 avg and 5.66 SR. He gets tonked in death overs and can't bat. Bhuvi may have lost his zip in the last few games but at this point there is no alternative. Khaleel has been decent but he doesn't have death bowling credentials yet. Bhuvi will be part of the team atleast until there is an alternative. Until then, he will remain as he performs multiple roles in the team. Also, teams won't drop a regular for one bad series. WI was bad for him but he did well in the Asia cup and he will be given chances to regain his form
 
Last edited:
These stats mean nothing anymore. Shami didn't play in 2016. And in 2017 and 2018, he played 5 games, picked 7 wickets at 40 avg and 5.66 SR. He gets tonked in death overs and can't bat. Bhuvi may have lost his zip in the last few games but at this point there is no alternative. Khaleel has been decent but he doesn't have death bowling credentials yet. Bhuvi will be part of the team atleast until there is an alternative. Until then, he will remain as he performs multiple roles in the team. Also, teams won't drop a regular for one bad series. WI was bad for him but he did well in the Asia cup and he will be given chances to regain his form

How many back to back matches have you given to shami? Do you expect any bowler to come after year and be back to best in that format? He never played with Bumrah who puts more pressure than Umesh and that helps both bowler. Bhuvi gets alot benefits of playing Bumrah.
 
These stats mean nothing anymore. Shami didn't play in 2016. And in 2017 and 2018, he played 5 games, picked 7 wickets at 40 avg and 5.66 SR. He gets tonked in death overs and can't bat. Bhuvi may have lost his zip in the last few games but at this point there is no alternative. Khaleel has been decent but he doesn't have death bowling credentials yet. Bhuvi will be part of the team atleast until there is an alternative. Until then, he will remain as he performs multiple roles in the team. Also, teams won't drop a regular for one bad series. WI was bad for him but he did well in the Asia cup and he will be given chances to regain his form

Shami hasn't played much mysteriously after 2015 but by then he had already shown what he can do.As for these 5 games,he has a 4fer in it and 5.66 ER isnt bad at all.If he plays more he'll find his rythm back.Certainly can;t be judged on 5 games given his earlier record

Bhuvi's problem is not just WI series.He's been averaging 41 since 2016.Infact Asia Cup was a good one for him after a long time and he was back to poor vs WI.

Khaleel does have death bowling potential with his cutters etc.And can crank it up when required along with giving left arm variety.
 
Shami hasn't played much mysteriously after 2015 but by then he had already shown what he can do.As for these 5 games,he has a 4fer in it and 5.66 ER isnt bad at all.If he plays more he'll find his rythm back.Certainly can;t be judged on 5 games given his earlier record

Bhuvi's problem is not just WI series.He's been averaging 41 since 2016.Infact Asia Cup was a good one for him after a long time and he was back to poor vs WI.

Khaleel does have death bowling potential with his cutters etc.And can crank it up when required along with giving left arm variety.

I watched a domestic game that Shami played on willow. He was tonked all over the park by domestic teams. It was the same game during which his wife alleged domestic abuse. He is a decent test bowler but gives away a lot of runs and is definitely not a death bowler. It's still early days for Khaleel and he has the potential but he is terrible with bat too. There is no mystery is Shami's absence. He was injured, then lost his form in LOIs.
 
How many back to back matches have you given to shami? Do you expect any bowler to come after year and be back to best in that format? He never played with Bumrah who puts more pressure than Umesh and that helps both bowler. Bhuvi gets alot benefits of playing Bumrah.

You gave the answer yourself. Indian team feels Bhuvi and Bumrah complement well. They give little in the first 10 and are designated death bowlers. Yes, Bhuvi seems to have lost his form after Asia cup but the team invested a lot in him. They will give him chances to prove himself again
 
Shami hasn't played much mysteriously after 2015 but by then he had already shown what he can do. As for these 5 games,he has a 4fer in it and 5.66 ER isnt bad at all. If he plays more he'll find his rythm back.Certainly can;t be judged on 5 games given his earlier record

Bhuvi's problem is not just WI series.He's been averaging 41 since 2016.Infact Asia Cup was a good one for him after a long time and he was back to poor vs WI.

Khaleel does have death bowling potential with his cutters etc.And can crank it up when required along with giving left arm variety.

There's no mystery to it. He was out for over a year with a knee injury. He wasn't in the test team till mid-2016 either.
 
You gave the answer yourself. Indian team feels Bhuvi and Bumrah complement well. They give little in the first 10 and are designated death bowlers. Yes, Bhuvi seems to have lost his form after Asia cup but the team invested a lot in him. They will give him chances to prove himself again

Well fine then loose worldcup till he proves you his worth.
 
Still waiting on this [MENTION=147130]happydavy[/MENTION]

Dude I give it to you for the sheer effort you put in to actually extract Wicramasinghe's numbers!! It takes some doing so great work. Having said that let's keep the context in plauy. If Munaf or Wicramasinghe had equally bad averages as Bhuvi, then they weren't in the team because they could bat a bit and hence they provided balance. They were in the team because they were the best fast bowlers available to the captain, which is different to the argument you had been defending. Today Shami, Umesh and even Ishant are much better options than bhuvi, who's basically a nothing bowler. Atleast Shami, Umesh, Ishant get you wickets, Bhuvi does nothing. A trade off has to be worth something. Bhuvi as a bowler + bit of batsman is a nothing trade off for one of those 3 as bowlers. 0.4 + 0.1 would always be less than 1.0 + 0.05.
 
Last edited:
Dude I give it to you for the sheer effort you put in to actually extract Wicramasinghe's numbers!! It takes some doing so great work. Having said that let's keep the context in plauy. If Munaf or Wicramasinghe had equally bad averages as Bhuvi, then they weren't in the team because they could bat a bit and hence they provided balance. They were in the team because they were the best fast bowlers available to the captain, which is different to the argument you had been defending. Today Shami, Umesh and even Ishant are much better options than bhuvi, who's basically a nothing bowler. Atleast Shami, Umesh, Ishant get you wickets, Bhuvi does nothing. A trade off has to be worth something. Bhuvi as a bowler + bit of batsman is a nothing trade off for one of those 3 as bowlers. 0.4 + 0.1 would always be less than 1.0 + 0.05.

Shami doesn't take wickets anymore. And it shouldn't surprise anybody either. He simply doesn't have the skills that ODI cricket has required in the last 2-3 years. The back end of ODIs are now basically T20s.

And I know Umesh takes more wickets than Bhuvi. Frankly I would have loved to have Umesh or Khaleel in the side of they could bat better.

But I hope you realise now that teams simply don't win long tournaments with a tail that is 4 batsmen long.

You look at the top teams around the globe - AUS, SA, NZ and they all have batting down to number 9. England basically have batting down to number 11. Even WI has Nurse coming in at 8/9 and BD has Mehdi Hasan at 8/9. No matter how good your bowlers are at taking wickets, they will still go for plenty everytime because the opposition simply have too many batsmen. So they don't fear losing wickets and just keep going for it.

Like it or not, Bhuvi is needed in this team. If you have to be frustrated with somebody be frustrated with Umesh because he gives away too many runs. Or be frustrated with Bumrah and Chahal that despite playing international cricket for 2+ years they are still so bad with the bat. If either of those things weren't so crippling, Bhuvi might not have been in the team today.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure why the question mark on Bhuvanesh. A full fit Bhuvanesh is very lethal. He swings the new ball far more than any other of the Indian bowlers.
 
Put it simply Bhuvneshwar is a player that relies heavily on the players around him. Because he is playing for India he has the luxury of Bumrah, Yadav around him which are wicket- taking bowlers. However if we put this same Bhuvneshwar in the Pakistan set up he would most likely be dropped after a couple games.

He bounces off well with Bumrah that's why he is a good bowler for India.
 
The speed demon showed his skills again. He should lead India's bowling attack in the world cup :kp
 
Bhuvnesh Kumar will be an asset in English swinging conditions. Those those who say that Bhuvnesh Kumar will not make Bangladesh team, even Bradman will not make Bangladesh team, so let us not go there.:fizz
 
Bhuvnesh Kumar will be an asset in English swinging conditions. Those those who say that Bhuvnesh Kumar will not make Bangladesh team, even Bradman will not make Bangladesh team, so let us not go there.:fizz

if you are talking about test than you are right he is very good in that format but if you are talking about odis than england is not the same place it was 5 years ago now a days they prepare flattest pitches where 300 is under par score
 
As an Indian I can tell you that win or lose I will stick with Bhuvi. Loyalty is permanent, victory is fleeting.
 
Today's figures 8-1-28-2. Gets the openers out and then Chahal runs wild, setting up an Indian ODI series victory in Australia if the batsmen can deliver.
 
8 wickets in 3 matches ... very good series for him. His only problem offlate is bowling death overs where he goes for plenty otherwise he's a must in India's ODI side not just for his bowling but for his handy batting down the order as well.
 
He has moved from yorkers to slower balls at death. I mean the knuckle ball is like Kumble's wrongun, only the bowler believes it deceives the batsman.
 
I have come to accept that he isn't going anywhere.

In fact, with his potential replacement being Jaydev Unadkat, I am happy to have him in the team
 
8 wickets in 3 matches ... very good series for him. His only problem offlate is bowling death overs where he goes for plenty otherwise he's a must in India's ODI side not just for his bowling but for his handy batting down the order as well.

Maybe the team needs to think out of the box. Let Bhuvi bowl his ten overs at the beginning, and Bumrah and Shami can both the death overs.
 
Maybe the team needs to think out of the box. Let Bhuvi bowl his ten overs at the beginning, and Bumrah and Shami can both the death overs.
Do you think shami is a good death overs bowler?
He gets spanked in death overs.
 
4 overs 55 today. Samson scored 30 runs in 8 balls against him. Last match Russell obliterated him. Most recently he got smashed by Turner. Post injury his death bowling has taken a huge hit. He should finish all his quota upfront or else he could lose matches
 
4 overs 55 today. Samson scored 30 runs in 8 balls against him. Last match Russell obliterated him. Most recently he got smashed by Turner. Post injury his death bowling has taken a huge hit. He should finish all his quota upfront or else he could lose matches

Is he taking wickets these days or he doesn't believe in this moh maya? :inti
 
Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) might have won the game against Chennai Super Kings (CSK) at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium on Friday, but the team suffered a major blow as pace spearhead Bhuvneshwar Kumar suffered an injury and walked off the field in the 19th over. Speaking after the game, SunRisers Hyderabad skipper David Warner said that he didn't was "not too sure" about the extent of Bhuvneshwar Kumar's injury as he was on the field and will have to check with the physio.

"I am not too sure, have to speak to the physio, can answer this question when we have more information," Warner said in the post-match press conference.

Bhuvneshwar's injury in the left thigh didn't allow him to complete his over. The right-handed bowler tried to stretch his leg but aborted his run-up twice and limped off the field.

Khaleel Ahmed then had to bowl the remaining deliveries of the over and CSK scored 16 runs in the over, meaning the MS Dhoni-led team required 28 from the last six balls.

Abdul Samad bowled the 20th over and gave away 20 runs but it was not enough for CSK to get over the line as they suffered their third consecutive defeat in this IPL season.

SRH will next take on with Mumbai Indians on Sunday.

https://sports.ndtv.com/ipl-2020/cs...t-extent-of-bhuvneshwar-kumars-injury-2304573
 
what a good player he is when he is on.

excellent world class test bowler who has been finding it difficult to get Into the team as ishant has been playing so well. He can add with the bat too.

in odi he can be a bit on and off but he is a fantastic support bowler.

in t20 again he is a perfect foil for bumrah and shami.
 
He may have come to the end of the road for himself at the age of 31. Don’t see him playing a lot more cricket with his injuries, and declining pace.
 
Bhuvneshwar Kumar out for 6 months, to return only in IPL 2021

India pace bowler Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who has been out of action after injuring his thigh muscle during an Indian Premier League (IPL) game on October 2, will remain out of action till the 2021 IPL edition likely to begin in early April. The 30-year-old bowler, who is recuperating at Bangalore's National Cricket Academy (NCA), will complete his rehab next month.

Overall, he would remain out of action for six months since the date of injury.

"He will be able to play only during the IPL as he is out of competitive cricket for six months," an official in the know of things told IANS.

Bhuvi has also not been picked in the Uttar Pradesh team for the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy T20 tournament next month. While the domestic season is likely to be a curtailed one, India play a full international series against England prior to the IPL.

The national team touring Australia is already struggling with pace bowling options after Mohammed Shami joined the ranks of the injured last week after fracturing his arm on Saturday during the first Test. Ishant Sharma was ruled out of the Test series on November 27. India are now left with only two senior pace bowlers in Jasprit Bumrah and Umesh Yadav and will have to depend on youngsters for third seamer's choice in the absence of Ishant, Shami, and Bhuvneshwar Kumar.

"The problem with fast bowling is that it puts a huge toll on the body. He seems to be unlucky in the last couple of years and seems to be getting a lot of classic injuries -- back strain, side strain, hamstring strain -- that all focus in and around the lower back area, which is very often the problem area for bowlers," Matthews told IANS.

Asked if change in pace or style of bowling, like Bhuvneshwar has been trying, can have an impact on a fast bowler's body, Matthews said: "Sometimes a bowler who is trying to get extra pace and extra swing, it takes a couple of seasons to get that right. At times, the body also takes time to adjust to take the new stress, trying to do new things. Unfortunately, it can be overloaded in certain areas. At the elite level you are so close to the maximum that to make changes becomes very difficult for your body and takes a long time to adjust."

India had felt Bhuvneshwar's absence a lot in the recent ODI series where the Australians put up record totals in first two of the three games. Both Bumrah and Shami, along with the others, failed to make early breakthroughs as they failed to pitch the ball up and get movement with the ball, something that Bhuvneshwar specializes in.

Bhuvneshwar, who is considered India's best with the new ball, especially in the white-ball formats, has suffered multiple injuries over the last two years with back and hamstring injuries as well as side strain forcing him to miss many matches for India and even his IPL franchise, SunRisers Hyderabad.

In 2018, Bhuvneshwar suffered back injuries due to which he missed a few IPL games, then he missed a few matches on tour of Ireland and England and had to return midway through the Test series.

Although the Uttar Pradesh bowler was part of the India squad during the last tour of Australia in 2018-19, he was not 100 per cent fit. He did not play Tests, although he represented India in limited overs formats.

https://www.dnaindia.com/cricket/re...r-6-months-to-return-only-in-ipl-2021-2863893
 
Injured before England tour
Injured before NZ tour
Injured before Aus tour

It seems his only focus now is to play IPL. I am sure he will be fit by April 2021.
 
Him trying to be a quick fast bowler ruined him, his body simply can't handle the load.
 
Bhuvi in Powerplay in this T20 series (2021-England)

2-0-15-0
2-0-12-1
2-0-13-0
2-1-13-1
2-0-6-1
 
Him trying to be a quick fast bowler ruined him, his body simply can't handle the load.

He doesn’t even need to. His control of swing is unmatched in international cricket. Moves the ball in the air like nobody’s business. Hope India doesn’t become too pace obsessed where guys like him are pressured to bowl fast only. That is not his strength.
 
Always liked Bhuvi, comes across as down to earth too. Good control over swing and he right man to have in your bowling arsenal.
 
Best Economy in this match:

3.80 - Bhuvi
7.80 - Rashid

Look at the difference between one and two sums up Bhuvi performance.
 
Buvi was match turner and winner in last 2 T20s exceptional bowler
 
An economy rate of 3.8 on this pitch was incredible.

Should be on the test squad on the england tour as well
 
I mainly followed the series to see how good Bhuvi was bowling after his return and if he still had the swing. I'm hoping against hope that he doesn't get injured in this IPL and is fit for the WTC final and the test series in England.

He is someone we missed badly during the last tour of England and if he can move the white ball both ways at Ahmedabad with the dew, he certainly can do it on a cold morning at Trent Bridge with the Duke ball in England. An attack of Bhuvi, Ishant, Bumrah and Siraj would be mouth watering to have at your disposal in English conditions.
 
Brilliant comeback from Bhuvi. He has always been a brilliant T20 bowler. Won Sunrisers Hyderabad many games with bowl upfront.
 
Yes agree he’s very unassuming as well as a good bowler. A real shame he’s been so injury prone.

Absolutely brilliant today in what was otherwise a run fest. Could’ve been even better but for a few wides in his last over.
 
Back
Top