[VIDEOS] Shreyas Iyer Performance Watch

We are talking about tests why would you bring odi format into this ?

This is his debut test. So how did you come to conclusion he won't be successful overseas.
So I am giving you an example that he has done well in NZ so there is a sample atleast that he might do well overseas. If opportunities are not provided to someone and you keep assuming he won't do well, that's not fair for any player.
 
This is his debut test. So how did you come to conclusion he won't be successful overseas.
So I am giving you an example that he has done well in NZ so there is a sample atleast that he might do well overseas. If opportunities are not provided to someone and you keep assuming he won't do well, that's not fair for any player.

I didn't say he won't be successful in overseas i said he should play in asain conditions becouse I do think thiers better players than him in india in SENA conditions.
 
Shreyas Iyer is the first Indian player to score a hundred in one innings and a fifty in the another on Test debut.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Fantastic Test debut for Shreyas Iyer:<br><br>Century in his first innings<br>Fifty in the second innings<br>He has become the first Indian to score a hundred and a fifty on Test debut <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/INDvsNZ?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#INDvsNZ</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@SajSadiqCricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/SajSadiqCricket/status/1464879134270709763?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 28, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Iyer should stay for the next test. When Kohli returns, he should replace...you guessed it.

Rahane is an absolute deadweight and is pulling down the legacy of Indian batsmanship.
 
He has been quite impressive. I expect him to be making the XI regularly from now on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Next test :-

Gill
Mayank
Pujara
Kohli(c)
Iyer
Jadeja
Ashwin
Saha
Axar
Siraj
Umesh

Obviously Mayank and Pujara stays as there are about 5-6 players rested who should come and take over their places too. But for a start, drop Rahane now.
 
Two vital innings in this match that have forged a significant amount of the difference that sits between the sides. Well done to him.
 
Babar should watch his innings few times, he may learn how to play test cricket.
 
He will kill it in SC conditions, anyone who followed his FC career could see this coming 5 years ago. Who all remember the mauling he gave to visiting Aussies in the FC game before 2017 series, India A vs Australia. Like Tendulkar in 1998 (Mumbai vs Australia), Iyer scored a fabulous run a ball unbeaten 200, violently hitting Lyon out of the park like it was a video game.

He sucks against the short ball which isn't common among modern day Indian batsmen. Weak against seam/swing movement but every batter in India seems to have that problem. One of the best against spin and low bounce, skiddy pace bowling, and appears to be clutch. Don't see him succeeding in SENA, but is a match-winner for home tests. That makes him a better option than Pujara and Rahane.
 
He will kill it in SC conditions, anyone who followed his FC career could see this coming 5 years ago. Who all remember the mauling he gave to visiting Aussies in the FC game before 2017 series, India A vs Australia. Like Tendulkar in 1998 (Mumbai vs Australia), Iyer scored a fabulous run a ball unbeaten 200, violently hitting Lyon out of the park like it was a video game.

He sucks against the short ball which isn't common among modern day Indian batsmen. Weak against seam/swing movement but every batter in India seems to have that problem. One of the best against spin and low bounce, skiddy pace bowling, and appears to be clutch. Don't see him succeeding in SENA, but is a match-winner for home tests. That makes him a better option than Pujara and Rahane.

I think at this point I will not speculate whether he can score runs in SENA or not. The guy averages 52 in FC, so he should have decent technique. Also playing LOI and Test matches are completely different. He just needs to develop a good technique to avoid short ball and is not under pressure to score of it in longer format. We will have to wait till he actually plays Tests there. I would keep him in the XI for the temperament. He came into bat when the team was under pressure in both the innings and pulled us through both the times. We normally don't get players so mentally strong and should not discard him on some hypothetical and unproven stuff like he can't score runs in SENA in Tests based on his LOI performances.
 
Everyone knows he has 4000 FC runs at an average of 52.

But what is even more interesting is that those runs have come at a Strike Rate of more than 80 !
 
Everyone knows he has 4000 FC runs at an average of 52.

But what is even more interesting is that those runs have come at a Strike Rate of more than 80 !

That SR of 80 is indeed a surprise. No way he will strike at 70 at test level, let alone 80+.
I am quite sure he will SR under 60 if he plays regularly.
It seems India's FC is not that competitive.
 
That SR of 80 is indeed a surprise. No way he will strike at 70 at test level, let alone 80+.
I am quite sure he will SR under 60 if he plays regularly.
It seems India's FC is not that competitive.

Perhaps the BCCI needs to employ a few experts from the QeA trophy to make the Ranji trophy a competitive one:shakib
 
Perhaps the BCCI needs to employ a few experts from the QeA trophy to make the Ranji trophy a competitive one:shakib

All hail Shreyas Iyer!

Single handedly did what most were struggling to do, on verge of ending the careers of Ajinkya Rahane or Cheteshwar Pujara :kp
 
That SR of 80 is indeed a surprise. No way he will strike at 70 at test level, let alone 80+.
I am quite sure he will SR under 60 if he plays regularly.
It seems India's FC is not that competitive.

That may be true to some extent but even his knocks against touring sides for India A have been at a similar SR. The double hundred he got against the visiting Australians was almost at 100 SR.

Rishabh Pant also has a FC SR of 80+ and Test SR of 67 now.
 
Perhaps the BCCI needs to employ a few experts from the QeA trophy to make the Ranji trophy a competitive one:shakib

I don't know. But there is no other first class system in witch there is such a big gap between performances. No way a bowling all rounder who strugles to scores even one century in Test cricket can score 3 triple hundreds in first class.

Not batting at a SR of 80 is not an issue. The top batsmen in the world are all bating at a SR around 55 and there is no issue with this. Was just wondering how he got such a high SR in first class.
 
I don't know. But there is no other first class system in witch there is such a big gap between performances. No way a bowling all rounder who strugles to scores even one century in Test cricket can score 3 triple hundreds in first class.

Not batting at a SR of 80 is not an issue. The top batsmen in the world are all bating at a SR around 55 and there is no issue with this. Was just wondering how he got such a high SR in first class.

Who, Jadeja?

He has been in top form with the bat in the last few years, averaging nearly 50. Of course it's a bit hard to get centuries at 7 or 8 while he bats at 4 or 5 for his state team. You should watch more Test cricket.
 
That SR of 80 is indeed a surprise. No way he will strike at 70 at test level, let alone 80+.
I am quite sure he will SR under 60 if he plays regularly.
It seems India's FC is not that competitive.

he used to open earlier in FC and that's easier. Sehwag/Gill/Shaw also have high SR
 
I don't know. But there is no other first class system in witch there is such a big gap between performances. No way a bowling all rounder who strugles to scores even one century in Test cricket can score 3 triple hundreds in first class.

Not batting at a SR of 80 is not an issue. The top batsmen in the world are all bating at a SR around 55 and there is no issue with this. Was just wondering how he got such a high SR in first class.

Iyer smoked a double century off 210 balls in a warm up match vs Australia. He's just a very good player of spin, and coincidentally you get to play a lot of spin in India.

Shaw and Pant too have similar strike rates in first class. They are all naturally attacking players.
 
After his debut performance in test, it is time to start considering him as one of the future potential leaders of Indian cricket alongside KL Rahul, Rishabh Pant, Shubhman Gill and Prithvi Shaw post the end of Kohli-Rohit era.
 
Kulwant khujroliya
Basil thamby
Mohd siraj
Lalit yadav
Baba safi pathan
Nathu Singh
Aniket chaudhary
Ankit rajpoot
Sandeep warrior
Pradeep sangwan
Shardool thakur
Mohsin sayed
Nitin saini and their are few names forgot to mention, of which,kulwant,nathu,warrior,sangwan can bowl 150 kph
And rest can bowl upto 146-147kph,good thing is guys like lalit are young so will gain more pace.

I am sure you can put Shardool Thakur in the 150+ mark. He bowls 146-147kph in his sleep.

Ah some Indian posters...
 
What a find this guy is. At the peak of his power. Can he become the Indian version of Hussey?

So much talent in India.
 
Poor man's Shoaib Malik. Does well only in India.

Hardik Pandya is far better :inti.
 
With as many as three franchises heading into the India Premier League (IPL) 2022 auction in search of a captain, the battle for top players in the T20 league is going to be intense. Royal Challengers Bangalore, Kolkata Knight Riders and Punjab Kings all need a captain from this season onwards. As far as Indian players go, Shreyas Iyer seems to be topping the captaincy candidates' list.

Iyer, who left Delhi Capitals in the bid to find a captain's role with any of the other 9 franchises, is bound to be on the radar of KKR, RCB and PBKS. It was learned that Iyer had a few offers from some other teams ahead of the auction but he turned them down as they were non-captaincy roles.

Heading into the auction, Iyer isn't just expected to be courted by one of RCB, KKR and PBKS as skipper. But, the India international is also likely to be the 'most expensive buy' at the IPL 2022 auction from the marquee list.

Aakash Chopra, in a video on his YouTube channel, predicted Iyer to be the most expensive player from the marquee list. He also stressed that one of KKR and RCB can rope him in as captain, but also opined that PBKS is unlikely to bid for him.

“Shreyas Iyer could be a potential captain of KKR or RCB. I don't think Punjab would be looking at him,” Chopra said in a video on his YouTube channel.

In the video, Chopra also revealed that he has heard of the fact that the Bengaluru franchise has kept an upper limit of INR 20 crore for Iyer at the auction. "Someone told me that RCB has kept 20cr for Shreyas Iyer in IPL 2022 Mega Auction", said the former India and Knight Riders opener.

“The most expensive player, to be very honest, is going to be Shreyas Iyer. In this list, the most expensive will be Iyer because Ishan Kishan is not there. If Ishan was there, there could've been a tug of war. Now, they will reserve money for Ishan and money will be splashed out for Iyer,” he added.

West Bengal sports minister Manoj Tiwary was shortlisted for IPL 2022 mega auction along with the likes of S Sreesanth, Arjun TendulkarIPL mega auction: Bengal Sports Minister Manoj Tiwary shortlisted; Arjun Tendulkar, Sreesanth make the cut
Speaking of the most expensive overseas players, the cricketer-turned-pundit put Kagiso Rabada at the top of his list. For the second place, Chopra feels there will be big competition between Quinton de Kock and David Warner.

“The three most expensive overseas players will be Rabada, and then one of Quinton de Kock or David Warner will be the most expensive overseas player as well. There's a good possibility.”

Be it the rumours or Iyer's own ambitions, there's no doubting that he will be among the most chased player in the IPL 2022 auction. Whether he goes on to break records or not, remains to be seen.

https://www.timesnownews.com/sports...e-for-shreyas-iyer-at-ipl-2022-auction/855089
 
Another home Test and Shreyas Iyer has been in sublime touch. He scored an extraordinary 92 in the first innings against Sri Lanka on a tricky Bengaluru track on Saturday and an evening later followed it up with a second half-century in the same Test. With the twin fifties, Iyer became the first Indian two achieve a sensational feat in Test cricket.

Iyer, who is playing his first Day-Night Test for India, managed to score half-centuries in both the innings of the Test and hence became the first Indian cricketer to do so.

Overall, he is the fourth cricketer to score fifty or more in both the innings after West Indies batter Darren Bravo (87 & 116 against Pakistan in Dubai, 2016), Australia's Steve Smith (130 & 63 against Pakistan in Brisbane, 2016) and Marnus Labuschagne, who is the only batter to do this twice in his career - 143 & 50 against New Zealand in 2019 Perth Test and 103 & 51 against England in Adelaide last year.

Iyer's 92 off 98 on Saturday had helped India to revive after a massive batting collapse to post a total of 252.

Although it seemed that Iyer had missed out on a well-deserved century, the youngster admitted that the score felt like a hundred.

"I personally felt that fifty was like a century. That's why I celebrated like that. It was like a century feeling for me.

"You saw the players who defended the ball, there was a lot of chance of nicking, and there was variable bounce on that wicket. You can't just play very negatively on that wicket and just keep defending the ball. You've got to have that positive intent when you step out on the field. The wicket is not that great. It's obviously bowler-friendly."

The Indian bowling attack then bundled Sri Lanka for just 109, taking a 143-run lead in the first innings before taking the figure past 400 on Sunday.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...win-fifties-in-bengaluru-101647181726022.html
 
Poor man's Shoaib Malik. Does well only in India.

Hardik Pandya is far better :inti.


He is yet to play a Test outside India. So too early to judge? Pandya is "far better"? How? Mishra has an 86 in England too. Agarkar has a 100, Thakur has 64 in Australia.
 
He is yet to play a Test outside India. So too early to judge? Pandya is "far better"? How? Mishra has an 86 in England too. Agarkar has a 100, Thakur has 64 in Australia.

Has issues against pace and bounce. This is why he has failed in ODIs in Australia and South Africa whenever toured there. Nevertheless, he has got a solid temperament and seems to relish in these 40/3 conditions so I don't mind having him.

Rest of the part was more of a sarcastic remark and I expect that the emoti should have made this clear :inti
 
As I said countless times before

He should 100% be the next Indian captain


Superstar
 
Shreyas and Pant are future of Indian cricket. One of the major reasons why Delhi Capitals( in IPL) turned things around in last three years was due to presence of these two guys.

Delhi never really qualified to even playoffs between 2013-18(6 years) and literally had no major fan following whatsoever. But these two under the coaching of Ricky Ponting have lightened up things for them. They reached playoffs in 2019 and finals in 2020 under Iyer's captaincy and then again got to the top 3 in last year's IPL( under Pant).
 
Looks like he has an excellent temperament and game management, very good player of spin but also in both inns knew when to dig in and then also attack later. with time i can see him moving up to bat higher at 4 or 5 in years to come.
 
India's future XI after Kohli, Ashwin, Jadeja, Shami and Rohit retirement:

Rahul
Shaw
Vihari
Gill
Pant(wkt)
S Iyer
W Sundar
Axar Patel/ Shardul Thakur
Siraj
Bumrah
Prasidh ( spinner in Subcontinent)
 
India's future XI after Kohli, Ashwin, Jadeja, Shami and Rohit retirement:

Rahul
Shaw
Vihari
Gill
Pant(wkt)
S Iyer
W Sundar
Axar Patel/ Shardul Thakur
Siraj
Bumrah
Prasidh ( spinner in Subcontinent)


I would worry about the future if Axar and Washy are the frontline spinners. Rahul is approaching 30 and Shardul is already 30.
 
I would worry about the future if Axar and Washy are the frontline spinners. Rahul is approaching 30 and Shardul is already 30.

In subcontinent, it will be one frontline spinner(which we still have to figure out), Axar will be second spinner and Washington as third spinner.

Outside Subcontinent, it will be Washington Sundar and four pacers or if Axar improves his batting then we can have him and four pacers too.

Subcontinent players play till 37-38.
 
India's future XI after Kohli, Ashwin, Jadeja, Shami and Rohit retirement:

Rahul
Shaw
Vihari
Gill
Pant(wkt)
S Iyer
W Sundar
Axar Patel/ Shardul Thakur
Siraj
Bumrah
Prasidh ( spinner in Subcontinent)

Still not sold on Shaw as an opener. Like the rest of the batting lineup.
Not sure of Präsidh in tests either.

I do like the idea of playing both Thakur and Sundar in SENA. but on pitches offering spin in SENA (Sydney/Oval?), would replace either Sundar or Prasidh with a proper spinner.

We need backups in each position though. A 3rd opener (either Padikal or that 2020 u19 opener from Mumbai), another MO, backup for Pant (Samson?), a good top class spinner, a top class 3rd seamer.
 
Still not sold on Shaw as an opener. Like the rest of the batting lineup.
Not sure of Präsidh in tests either.

I do like the idea of playing both Thakur and Sundar in SENA. but on pitches offering spin in SENA (Sydney/Oval?), would replace either Sundar or Prasidh with a proper spinner.

We need backups in each position though. A 3rd opener (either Padikal or that 2020 u19 opener from Mumbai), another MO, backup for Pant (Samson?), a good top class spinner, a top class 3rd seamer.

Shaw's challenge is overseas but he was considered a prodigy so I have included him but yeah not convinced on him entirely as opener overseas.

Prasidh is perfectly suited to Test Cricket due to his pace and bounce. He will be pretty lethal in Australia and South Africa conditions for sure. His best formats should be Tests and ODIs as he is a genuine wicket taker option.

Shardul's backup can be Deepak Chahar who should be very good for England and New Zealand conditions.

Samson is not a test material. India should look to figure out one more test keeper option outside of Rishabh Pant.
 
RgnQk5b.png
 
Pretty poor shot from this chap to get out in the second dig, there were a few nice runs for the taking for him there.
 
He's blown a massive chance in both innings to make a name for himself. All he needed to do was milk the bowling. He has some issues with patience and the urge to go for the spectacular.
All in all i doubt his hunger for test cricket, he just looks sold out on the t20 razzamatazz
 
Seems like he will be out from the side once Rohit returns with Pujara reclaiming his spot.
 
My God this kid really struggles against the short ball. He simply shouldn't be selected on any tours outside of the sub continent
 
Nasser Hussain said this guy is captain of KKR. It got me thinking watching him bat - how out of place he must've been feeling and more importantly, how small, he must feel playing test cricket, compared to the glitz he enjoys at the IPL.

Shreyas Iyer, Hardik Pandya, captains of IPL teams - and that's about their level.

They might have some role maybe in the national T20 teams, but even there, they won't be the big boys.
 
My God this kid really struggles against the short ball. He simply shouldn't be selected on any tours outside of the sub continent

If you are struggling with short ball against this bowling attack, damn what will the likes of Starc, Cummins ,Hazelwood, Rabada, Nortje, Jansen, Archer, Wood, Robinson, Jamieson and Ferguson do. Even Kemar Roach and Gabriel will enjoy bowling to him.
 
If you are struggling with short ball against this bowling attack, damn what will the likes of Starc, Cummins ,Hazelwood, Rabada, Nortje, Jansen, Archer, Wood, Robinson, Jamieson and Ferguson do. Even Kemar Roach and Gabriel will enjoy bowling to him.

It will be murder on the pitch, him facing the above bowlers.

When Shreyas was walking out to bat Eng dressing room was putting up arm signals asking the bowlers to bowl short immediately lol
 
Nasser Hussain said this guy is captain of KKR. It got me thinking watching him bat - how out of place he must've been feeling and more importantly, how small, he must feel playing test cricket, compared to the glitz he enjoys at the IPL.

Shreyas Iyer, Hardik Pandya, captains of IPL teams - and that's about their level.

They might have some role maybe in the national T20 teams, but even there, they won't be the big boys.

Hardik will be a good addition for England, South Africa and New Zealand type conditions if he :

1. is bowling.
2. Has the right attitude.

He has a 100 vs Steyn, Rabada, Philander and Morkel in South Africa and a 5-fer in England and couple of crucial 50s too.
 
It will be murder on the pitch, him facing the above bowlers.

When Shreyas was walking out to bat Eng dressing room was putting up arm signals asking the bowlers to bowl short immediately lol

I hope BCCI listens this. They cannot put anyone's life on bet, no way he should play in SENAW. They should have sent him to the Ireland tour first.
 
Hardik will be a good addition for England, South Africa and New Zealand type conditions if he :

1. is bowling.
2. Has the right attitude.

Why should we be all waiting for this third-class fellow to be 'willing' and 'ready' to play for India. Who is he? He has talent, but are we that bereft of other talent that we keep waiting for this primadonna to 'decide' when he's going to play for India. By the way, why isn't in this test squad. Haven't been following. He played some T20s vs Ireland right?
 
Can't face the short ball for nuts.

The new Suresh Raina.
 
Why should we be all waiting for this third-class fellow to be 'willing' and 'ready' to play for India. Who is he? He has talent, but are we that bereft of other talent that we keep waiting for this primadonna to 'decide' when he's going to play for India. By the way, why isn't in this test squad. Haven't been following. He played some T20s vs Ireland right?

He lost his place to Shardul Thakur and Ravindra Jadeja in Tests. Both are doing well so they don't need him. There is Washington Sundar as well who although is injured half of the times but can be useful too.

Pandya hasn't been selected, it is not like he is willingly not playing in tests.But he has some quality and will add depth to the batting and can score fast at no.6 and be the fourth pacer. However, as long as Shardul is doing the job, HP is after thought now.
 
Not good enough for tests.

He had such a great chance to cement his place in India's test side to take on Australia in November but he seems to have blown it.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">5⃣0⃣ Runs<br>3⃣7⃣ Balls<br>8⃣ Fours<a href="https://twitter.com/ShreyasIyer15?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ShreyasIyer15</a> departs but not before scoring a quickfire half-century. <br><br>Follow the match ▶️ <a href="https://t.co/d65WZUUDh2">https://t.co/d65WZUUDh2</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TeamIndia?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TeamIndia</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/INDvSA?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#INDvSA</a> <a href="https://t.co/jLWWbEInWh">pic.twitter.com/jLWWbEInWh</a></p>— BCCI (@BCCI) <a href="https://twitter.com/BCCI/status/1578053056381734913?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 6, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Shreyas Iyer c Rabada b Ngidi 50(37)

Practicing in ODI for T20 reserve spot eh ? Geniusah Iyerah
 
How long before your turn on against him as well? :inti

Counter Question:-

How long will you continue criticising Pant and Pandya and just for the sake of that, showing fake support towards Samson, Kishan, Vijay Shankar, Kedhar Jadhav, Venky Iyer etc? :inti
 
Counter Question:-

How long will you continue criticising Pant and Pandya and just for the sake of that, showing fake support towards Samson, Kishan, Vijay Shankar, Kedhar Jadhav, Venky Iyer etc? :inti

This thread is about Shreyas Iyer.

I criticise based on stats. In LOIs especially in T20s, we do have better options than Pant. You are more than welcome to counter that. I criticise Pandya for his inconsistency that doesn't mean I don't want him in the T20 team. In ODIs, if he doesn't bowl I would pick a specialist batter instead. I think I have already said the same multiple times but you keep coming back like a 5 year old and ask these over and over again. Now tell how long before you turn on against Iyer as well? :inti
 
This thread is about Shreyas Iyer.

I criticise based on stats. In LOIs especially in T20s, we do have better options than Pant. You are more than welcome to counter that. I criticise Pandya for his inconsistency that doesn't mean I don't want him in the T20 team. In ODIs, if he doesn't bowl I would pick a specialist batter instead. I think I have already said the same multiple times but you keep coming back like a 5 year old and ask these over and over again. Now tell how long before you turn on against Iyer as well? :inti

I want to tell but at the same time I don't want to tell to you because you don't deserve an answer :kp :inti
 
Shreyas Iyer held it together for India today, looking scratchy at the start but ending up on 80.
 
Best ODI batsman in the world on current forum.

India’s talent is mind-boggling. He would be a superstar in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. He would be known as the best batsman in the country, the all-format captain etc.

In India, he is just a fringe player who gets his chance only when the frontline batsmen are unavailable. Embarrassment of riches.

He is better than Babar but unlike Babar, his competition is not (or was not) Hafeez and Malik.
 
Best ODI batsman in the world on current forum.

India’s talent is mind-boggling. He would be a superstar in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. He would be known as the best batsman in the country, the all-format captain etc.

In India, he is just a fringe player who gets his chance only when the frontline batsmen are unavailable. Embarrassment of riches.

He is better than Babar but unlike Babar, his competition is not (or was not) Hafeez and Malik.
He is half as good as Latham.

His competiters are as bad as him. A finished Kohli, Rahul, Pant, SKY and tuktuk Gill.

No surprise they lost in 47 overs.
 
He is half as good as Latham.

His competiters are as bad as him. A finished Kohli, Rahul, Pant, SKY and tuktuk Gill.

No surprise they lost in 47 overs.
A finished Kohli trumped peak Babar both in asia cup and t20 Wc, so just imagine what a peak Kohli would do.
 
A finished Kohli trumped peak Babar both in asia cup and t20 Wc, so just imagine what a peak Kohli would do.

Your understanding is near zero as always.
The match just played was an odi. Mamoon thinks Iyer is the best ODI batsman in the world. I answered to his post ( so I am talking about ODI's.)

Hard to understand for you, I know.

By the way, what do you think, Iyer is the best ODI batsman in the world or Mamoon has lost it?
 
What a match loosing innings. Came in after 25 overs with just one wicket down and tucked tucked a run a ball 80 batting till the last over when India never had a problem with wickets in hand.
They got to a decent total thanks to Sundar. Iyer was unable to hit at all.

The sooner he is shown the door the better it is for Indian team.
 
Your understanding is near zero as always.
The match just played was an odi. Mamoon thinks Iyer is the best ODI batsman in the world. I answered to his post ( so I am talking about ODI's.)

Hard to understand for you, I know.

By the way, what do you think, Iyer is the best ODI batsman in the world or Mamoon has lost it?
He is definitely no where near the best but saying that Latham is twice the player is wrong too, both Iyer and Latham have their fair share of problems.

As for Kohli, he is back in form and will reclaim his Odi throne once again.
 
What a match loosing innings. Came in after 25 overs with just one wicket down and tucked tucked a run a ball 80 batting till the last over when India never had a problem with wickets in hand.
They got to a decent total thanks to Sundar. Iyer was unable to hit at all.

The sooner he is shown the door the better it is for Indian team.
See the problem is you say things like but call Babar's 32 off 28 and 40(35) a fine innings.
So it's a bit hypocritical
 
He is definitely no where near the best but saying that Latham is twice the player is wrong too, both Iyer and Latham have their fair share of problems.

As for Kohli, he is back in form and will reclaim his Odi throne once again.

So then why quote me?
Go and quote Mamoon and tell him that he has lost it? Or you are not honest enough to go and tell someone just because he is saying things in favor India?

Honesty problems?

Iyer is an okay interntional batsman at best. Don't see him making a long career.
 
What a match loosing innings. Came in after 25 overs with just one wicket down and tucked tucked a run a ball 80 batting till the last over when India never had a problem with wickets in hand.
They got to a decent total thanks to Sundar. Iyer was unable to hit at all.

The sooner he is shown the door the better it is for Indian team.

You are not considering the fact that they were 4 down by 32nd over too.
 
lol at those who think Iyer is world's best ODI bat, he isn't even in top-5 ODI bats. If ever there was a hyperbole.
 
Back
Top