No, we should judge his output since Jan 2024 because Arteta played him out of position in the first half of last season. His defensive work rate is great but he's not a midfielder.
Ollie Watkins is about to turn 29 and it's fair to say he was a late bloomer. I believe Havertz has a much higher ceiling. That's the difference.
Who cares about how he plays for Germany. I remember the FA cup game against Liverpool very well. It was his first game where he was tried as a centre forward for Arsenal and he was awful in front of goal. But since then he's scored 13 goals from xG of 13. You can't ask for much more than that.
Haaland has played 23 PL games up until now in 2024. Havertz has played 26 PL games during the same period.
The Norweigan is the better goal scorer but I don't think it's silly comparison at all.
Havertz played in all 10 of those games but again he started as a CF in Jan 2024. He only played the knockout games against FC Porto and Bayern Munich. Arsenal were collectively underwhelming against these two sides, where they only scored 3 goals in their 4 games.
He's played in both CL games this season and he scored a fine header against PSG. I know you'll say they're an average team but I'd still expect them to make it into the next round.
So how do you distinguish between two players who have scored the same (or similar) number of goals in the same (or similar) number of appearances?
As I was saying earlier, the game has changed. There is a focus on taller and bigger units playing as goal poachers. Back in the day it was different, there were more flair players playing upfront, so I get if Havertz doesn't excite you. The harsh truth is modern football is relatively dull.
Look I was in the same boat as you this time last year. I was bewildered when I heard we had signed him because firstly he was a depreciating asset at Chelsea. Despite this, Arsenal paid £65m for him and made him the highest paid player, as he's on almost £300k per week. But it's time to give some credit rather than clutch at straws with all these excuses. No one is saying he's near world class, let alone world class, but he's certainly exceeded our expectations. I have no shame in admitting this.
- the excuse he was played out of position, is a load of nonsense. He's played in midfield for leverkusen, Germany, Chelsea and Arsenal. Arteta signed him to play in midfield, you have to go back to 1st half of season where he was consistently played there. But now the excuse is those performances where he played like a freshly dropped turd can just be ignored. Also let's not pretend he isn't going to be used in midfield again, because he was at weekend. So excuse number 1 has zero substance or credibility to it. He's the highest paid player at club and only when he plays in certain position it counts? Absolutely nonsense. Same goes for any player trossard, partey or any other player playing in different positions.
- Whether havertz has so called higher ceiling due to being younger is irrelevant. The whole discussion is about players at this current point in time. So age and what a player does in 4 or 5 years etc.. has zero relevance to right now.
So what if rest of team was underwhelming, did the club pay 65M and 300k week wages for a player to be a ghost in these CL games or to make a difference? In the CL knockout stages chances are at a premium, this is where your elite or so called one top 10 strikers make a difference. Something havertz didn't. So again this excuse doesn't hold any substance.
1 goal vs PSG in league stage has zero relevance. Let's see what happens when it gets to knock out stages.
If two players have sane number of goals in similar amount of games, I look at who those goals came against, the impact of those goals. For example player A could have 16 goals in 25 games and vast majority have come against relegation fodder and teams in bottom half table teams. Striker B, goals are in title deciders, cup knock out games and games which have impact of teams success. Not being a flat track bully.
Players like betbatov at united, adebayor at Arsenal are prime examples of players who scored loads of goals in a single season but pretty much were feasting on lower half of league teams, and had zero impact in bigger important games in all competitions
Havertz played up front vs man city in community shield, had played up front for leverkusen, Germany and chelsea. So the excuse that missing 4 or 5 sitters vs liverpool was because its 1st game upfront for Arsenal is yet another poor excuse that doesn't watch. Havertz when it comes to missing sitters is same sort of level as lukaku.
Finally the so called "in top 10 in world" and this goes for everyone. Just performing in your domestic league only isn't a yardstick for being best in world. You need to perform in cup competitions, Europe (or the Asia, Africa, South American equivalent club competions) and internationally. Otherwise you can just pick the best 10 players with best domestic league stats which tells you nothing.
Best in world or in top 10 in world is exactly what it is "in the world"
"domestic is not the world"
The haaland comparison the fact, that penalties are being excluded
![Man facepalming :man_facepalming: 🤦♂️](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f926-2642.png)
. What's next excluding goals scored with head or some other silly stipulation.
So there is no clutching at straws here, all uve done is list out a load of excuse, and used at justification for so called non-performance.
The one thing I will agree on, his performances have improved so yet credit goes there.
.But this so called same level as haaland, legend, world class, best striker in Europe etc..that this fan base is twerking for is hilarious. Seems like since a certain posters has said your now best mates, and he's always loved your posts, that the excuses he rambles out with have started to rub off you on.
Fair play for saying a player has performed better than you thought, but getting carried away as though he's elite is a completely different conversation.