Australia [467 & 168/5d] defeat New Zealand [148 & 240] by 247 runs to win 2nd Test; Seal series 2-0

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,574
Australia [467 & 168/5d] defeat New Zealand [148 & 240] by 247 runs to win 2nd Test; Seal series 2-0

After being hit by injuries in the first Test against Australia, New Zealand will hope the return of Trent Boult facilitates their success in the Boxing Day Test at the MCG.

Overview

Australia v New Zealand, 2nd Test
ICC Test Championship
Melbourne Cricket Ground
Thursday 26 - Monday 30 December; 11:00am local, 12.00am GMT

Boult, who was ruled out of the first Test due to a rib injury, is one of three New Zealanders in the top 15 of the MRF Tyres ICC Test Rankings for bowling. The fast bowler was a big miss for the visitors in Perth, as they deployed debutant Lockie Ferguson to take his place. However, Ferguson, too, was ruled out of most of the Test, after incurring a right calf muscle strain on the first day.

While Ferguson will be unavailable for the second Test, Boult will slot back in. Skipper Kane Williamson also revealed a second change in their line-up, with Tom Blundell taking the spot of Jeet Raval at the top of the order.

Australia, too, lost a fast bowler halfway through the Test, as Josh Hazlewood picked up a hamstring injury on day two. Tim Paine confirmed that James Pattinson will replace him at the MCG, but whether Australia will deploy a fifth seamer in Michael Neser remains unclear. The Australia skipper has said that Neser is very much in the mix for a debut, but expects to take a final call on the morning of the Test.


The last time they met

In a pink-ball encounter where both teams were reduced to 10 men after the first two days, Australia came through by 296 runs at the Perth Stadium. The architects of the hosts' victory were Marnus Labuschagne, who hit his third hundred in as many innings, and their reliable bowling attack that bundled New Zealand out for 171 in the fourth innings. Electing to bat first, Australia piled on 416 runs, with Labuschange leading the charge with 143. New Zealand responded with 166, as Ross Taylor, Williamson and Colin de Grandhomme were the only players to hit double figures. The visiting bowlers then restricted Australia to 217, with Tim Southee clinching five wickets. However, with Mitchell Starc and Nathan Lyon claiming eight scalps between them, New Zealand were bowled out early in the 467-run chase.

What they said

Tim Paine, Australia captain: "Our batting team has been scoring a lot of runs so if we were to go one more bowler, we would be comfortable they could do the job. The wicket is a bit unknown ... but we've got a plan in place for both scenarios [with or without a fifth bowler]. We've probably got two different teams [in mind], to be honest, so we'll make the final call tomorrow."

Kane Williamson, New Zealand captain: "There's things we did well in Perth, there's things we didn't do so well. I think the strength of the group is we look at those areas and we look to improve, we're always looking to improve. Although it was a different type of Test cricket (pink ball), there's still things we learned from that."

Conditions

There is no threat of rain on the five days of the Test, but cloudy conditions are expected on all days except Thursday. New Zealand will back their chances ahead of the game, with Australia winning just two out of the last five Tests played at the MCG.

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1545100


Australia Squad: David Warner, Joe Burns, Marnus Labuschagne, Steven Smith, Matthew Wade, Travis Head, Tim Paine, Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc, Nathan Lyon, James Pattinson, Michael Neser, Peter Siddle


New Zealand Squad: Kane Williamson (c), BJ Watling (wk), Tom Latham, Tom Blundell, Ross Taylor, Henry Nicholls, Colin de Grandhomme, Mitchell Santner, Tim Southee, Neil Wagner, Trent Boult, Todd Astle, Jeet Raval, Matt Henry, Kyle Jamieson
 
Hopefully the team rebounds.

Perth was a disaster but a lot of that was down to the lack of time to acclimatize and poor selections.

No excuses this time.
 
Last edited:
Hopefully the team rebounds.

Perth was a disaster but a lot of that was down to the lack of time to acclimatize and poor selections.

No excuses this time.
Will be interesting to see how the pitch plays, if its the same as the last 3 years this match will surely be a draw.
 
I worry for both teams in different ways.

New Zealand’s bowling attack is too old, too short and too slow for an MCG wicket unless they get a greentop or cloud cover.

Australia’s problem is different: Pattinson is terrific, but who is going to bowl into the wind for long spells before Nathan Lyon does? Hazlewood usually does, but Cummins and Pattinson have fragile bodies and are both at risk of stress fractures doing this role.

Lastly, I hope this isn’t another boring dead drop-in MCG wicket.
 
Kiwis batting needs to show up in this game if they want to compete. I hope they leave some grass on the surface otherwise wicket and game will be dull.
 
I worry for both teams in different ways.

New Zealand’s bowling attack is too old, too short and too slow for an MCG wicket unless they get a greentop or cloud cover.

Australia’s problem is different: Pattinson is terrific, but who is going to bowl into the wind for long spells before Nathan Lyon does? Hazlewood usually does, but Cummins and Pattinson have fragile bodies and are both at risk of stress fractures doing this role.

Lastly, I hope this isn’t another boring dead drop-in MCG wicket.
Aus could still get a result if our batting is still shot.

Confidence will definitely be down after the abysmal performance with the bat last game. The Aussies are quicker, taller and good in form, even if the wicket is a road, they'll only need the odd great ball here and there and mistakes from our batsmen to win. For us it will be about digging and ensuring we give them no gifts, wear them down and then take advantage.

Our best way to get wickets is going to be bouncers, that's the only way for tourists to really get them in flat wickets in Aus when there is little there for the bowlers. I would have dropped Santner, don't trust him against genuine pace bowling with the bat and he offers zero with the ball in Tests.
 
Last edited:
[MENTION=132954]Aman[/MENTION]
Why haven’t the Kiwis realised that Mitchell Santner is not Daniel Vettori, he is Mohammad Nawaz?

The best chance for the Kiwis is if Australia pick five bowlers and elevate Paine to bat at Number 6. That’s a long tail, and I can only see New Zealand winning a low scoring match.

That would leave Australia with 4 batsmen and 2 wicketkeepers, rather like the Manchester United team under David Moyes with three left-backs (Rojo, Blind and Shaw).

Australia keeps getting lucky with the toss. If NZ don’t break the hoodoo, I guess India will next summer!
 
Big crowd expected. I believe it’s on track to beat the record for the largest non-Ashes Boxing Day crowd.
 
[MENTION=132954]Aman[/MENTION]
Why haven’t the Kiwis realised that Mitchell Santner is not Daniel Vettori, he is Mohammad Nawaz?

The best chance for the Kiwis is if Australia pick five bowlers and elevate Paine to bat at Number 6. That’s a long tail, and I can only see New Zealand winning a low scoring match.

That would leave Australia with 4 batsmen and 2 wicketkeepers, rather like the Manchester United team under David Moyes with three left-backs (Rojo, Blind and Shaw).

Australia keeps getting lucky with the toss. If NZ don’t break the hoodoo, I guess India will next summer!

Selectors expect him to get it together with the ball in Tests, I'm starting to think we're better off with going with a specialist spinner given Santner never seems to pick up wickets and is more of a bowler who just ticks it over.
 
So many teams have made this mistake in Australia.... Boxing Day Test at MCG and there will be some moisture on the track. BUT why you should bowl first!!!! This is MCG track, made to last for full distance- don’t think bowling first is the best idea. But Kiwis have gone with five men seem attack, may be almost obliged to bowl first.

Unless they take at least 3 wickets in morning session (that means at least two of Warner, Labu or Smith), it might backfire.
 
Selectors expect him to get it together with the ball in Tests, I'm starting to think we're better off with going with a specialist spinner given Santner never seems to pick up wickets and is more of a bowler who just ticks it over.
Santner just performed really well in 1 test against eng, his one off performances keep him in the team. In fact, will somerville is more consistent than santner

Ajaz patel is not only nz's best spinner, but can also be a rival to lyon.
Absurd how nz is wasting his years.

He is a must pick in every test in all conditions.
 
just bounce labu out. dude can't play bouncers.

Neither can smith.

As much as they love to claim they are good vs short ball, it's just simply not true.
 
Wow, ground is filling up.

Didn't expect that many people, looks like 70,000+
 
Has Trent Boult lost a yard in pace or is he still recovering from injury?
 
Has Trent Boult lost a yard in pace or is he still recovering from injury?
He's usually a lot faster than this, he's coming back from injury.

Boult usually bowls around high 130s to low 140s. Capable of mid 140s in ODIs.
 
Labu is in ungetouttable mode again. They better get rid of him early. He is fast becoming the most valuable wicket of Australia.
 
Need to get 2 more wickets or it could end up being another long day.
 
These two aren't going throw their wickets away and are tightening up to see the moving ball off. Need a good ball to get them.
 
These two aren't going throw their wickets away and are tightening up to see the moving ball off. Need a good ball to get them.

Southee already drastically reduced his pace to 130 kph. At the other end CDG is bowling at 125 kph. Hardly a threatening combo unless the pitch offers something.
 
This game has fast gotten away.

Not good enough with the new ball, Aus would of had us 3-5 down with these conditions.
 
The lack of pace and spinner is alarming.

This is nothing for Aus. Our bowlers are slower than India's fgs....
 
Chaloo match is over.

Congrats to Aus on the series win.
 
The lack of pace and spinner is alarming.

This is nothing for Aus. Our bowlers are slower than India's fgs....

what?you make it seem like india has slow bowlers. India bowled quicker than Aussies last time. India has the fittest bowlers in the world. what era you living in?

none of n.z bowlers cannbowl at pace like the Indians in the aussie heat.
 
rofl at boult bowling his 132 thunderbolts. slower than India's slowest bowler on average. ishant. Only 5th over rofl

After australia in general, india have been the quickest on average. Maybe west indies as well. Only Gabriel can even bowl close to 20 overs though without getting tired.
 
Australia’s morning - as IC will say; if you put a team in and don’t take them three down by lunch, over 80% time you won’t win that Test (probably loose almost all those 80% because these days it hardly ends in a draw).

Or may be 50-50, considering Kiwis have kept at least 20 runs short of usual - couple of strikes after lunch, they will be in driving seat.
 
Highest non Ashes crowd since the WIs in the 70s.

Expected to get bigger.
 
75,000+ in attendance.

Eat your heart out India.


IKR Indians think Australians come to watch them only they would rather watch newzeland any day of the week since it’s a white team. Plus it’s the overly populated Indians in Australia or every country that fills up the stadiums to watch India play not the people of the country they are playing in.
 
Newzealand already lost the plot when they decided to field first.
 
Williamson has to think about strategy here, he needs to find a way to break this partnership.
 
Huge blunder by Williamson not having a second slip in there...

Why not- Day 1, 2 wickets down, OZ two best players in, nibble bowler on and his plan was what? To wait until Smith & Labuschagne get bored of batting?

You need to GET these two out, take their wicket. Not with for scraps. It's day 1, not day 3.

It's the kind of NZ self doubt which sees them always the bridesmaid, never the bride no matter what they say about self belief etc.
 
Grandhomme gets one to leap at Labuschagne there. Oz quicks will take note.

Interesting cricketer CDG is, I had him pegged as a bits-n-pieces type player but he keeps finding ways to contribute.
 
75,000+ in attendance.

Eat your heart out India.

It is typical for boxing day test. By the way NZ is playing their first boxing day test in Australia after 1987. . India has played 6 boxing day tests in Australia since 1999. Even England has played only 5. Ofcourse England will have more attendance due to traditional rivalry. India vs Australia in 1999 had 49,000 attendance. After 2001. It jumped to 63,000 on par with Ashes at that time. Most recent close to 74000
 
It is typical for boxing day test. By the way NZ is playing their first boxing day test in Australia after 1987. . India has played 6 boxing day tests in Australia since 1999. Even England has played only 5. Ofcourse England will have more attendance due to traditional rivalry. India vs Australia in 1999 had 49,000 attendance. After 2001. It jumped to 63,000 on par with Ashes at that time. Most recent close to 74000
Aus v India attracts crowds of Indians, and Melbourne is full of em- more than any other city in Australia.
 
It is typical for boxing day test. By the way NZ is playing their first boxing day test in Australia after 1987. . India has played 6 boxing day tests in Australia since 1999. Even England has played only 5. Ofcourse England will have more attendance due to traditional rivalry. India vs Australia in 1999 had 49,000 attendance. After 2001. It jumped to 63,000 on par with Ashes at that time. Most recent close to 74000

This is a record for non Ashes since the WI in the 70s.
 
It is typical for boxing day test. By the way NZ is playing their first boxing day test in Australia after 1987. . India has played 6 boxing day tests in Australia since 1999. Even England has played only 5. Ofcourse England will have more attendance due to traditional rivalry. India vs Australia in 1999 had 49,000 attendance. After 2001. It jumped to 63,000 on par with Ashes at that time. Most recent close to 74000

NZ got hammered in the first Test, if they had fared better they could have done 85,000-90,000+.

More Kiwis would have definitely flown over and more Aussies would have been interested in the match.
 
Last edited:
NZ got hammered in the first Test, if they had fared better they could have done 85,000-90,000+.

More Kiwis would have definitely flown over and more Aussies would have been interested in the match.

Kiwis/Australia has its own rivalry despite getting thrashed most of the time in the last 20 years. India/Australia rivalry is different due to several controversies over the years. Also the onfield rivalry is so intense. England is their traditional rival. An Australian even made a documentary 2 Nations 1 obsession about their rivalry

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/2-n...ket-rivalry-border-gavaskar-trophy/2018-10-12

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9324614/
 
Wagner continues with his outstanding 130 k Thunderbolts.

boult with an Impressive speed of 131 on average. nice. phaassst bowling at its finest.
 
Aussies at home are invincible. You can eke out a session or two here and there. But it is hard to maintain your dominance more than 2 sessions.

yep. Only absolute prime version of Graeme Smith's saffers can beat them. Even then they would lose at home to the very same Australian team. So in truth it's like winning at home and losing away.
India could draw vs this current Aussie side away but beating them would be too difficult. Beating india in India is probably the hardest feat to achieve followed by australia at home.
 
Back
Top