@ wrongun, junaids believes height is the most important factor to succeed on Australian pitches. is that true? So skill and speed makes no difference ?
steyn is only 5'10. bumrah 5'10. jhye richardson who is Australia's future is only 5'10.
Yes, and the four Tests in Australia so far this summer really prove it.
I accept that a pace bowler with ATG-level skills of around 5'10 can succeed in Test cricket. But he needs to be like Dale Steyn and Ryan Harris and Malcolm Marshall:
1. He be the world's most skillful and accurate bowler, and
2. He must be an absolute minimum of 5'10 tall, and
3. He must bowl at a bare minimum pace of 140K.
Even then, the fact that he is so short means that the short fast bowler misses out on the opportunity to get batsmen out in SENA by lifting the ball off a full length, making the batsmen fence and edge to the slips.
Which is why Marshall was supported by tall bowlers like Garner, Ambrose and Holding who dried up the scoring at the other end due to their height. Similarly, Steyn had Morkel and Kallis at the other end, who were 6'0 and 6'5 tall.
Everybody knows that James Pattinson is more skillful than Starc, Hazlewood and even Cummins. But they are 6'5, 6'6 and 6'4 tall, whereas Pattinson is only 6'1 tall.
That means that he can't maintain the pressure on the batsmen the same way. And so he is on the bench, while less gifted bowlers play instead of him.
It's also why Australia won the First Test at Perth and why they are 275-4 now. These pitches are flat and the Kookaburra ball is only moving laterally very briefly. The only thing which is getting people out is the combination of higher pace from a full length delivered by a taller bowler who gets more lift.
That's why Jhye Richardson isn't Australia's Test future, indeed why he isn't even in the squad. He's got all the skills, but he's 4-6 inches too short for the role that Justin Langer needs him to perform.