It has to be said that Australian bowlers like Hazlewood in the Ashes are guilty of similar things to the Kiwi quicks today.
But back in Australia under conditions that he's used to they trust that he won't try to reinvent the wheel.
A part of the reason why Australian cricketers are so aggressive in how we play cricket is self fulfilling due to an infatuation with our own legend of aggressive cricket which fuels more aggressive cricket. Part of it could be because many of the influential people in the early days of Australian cricket were tough country lads or working class boys with plenty of mongrel as opposed to the upper middle class MCC types in England or the elites in India or the white elite in South Africa but the main thing that started it was because Australian wickets encourage aggressive play.
Martin Guptill says that he just got advice from Martin Crowe on how to succeed in Australia. And Crowe told him to get on the front foot even though the bowlers are quick and pushing him back.
The English players can block and leave all day but they don't like what happened in 2013/14 when Johnson got right up them and forced them to play poor shots on the back foot.
And modern Australian batsmen can no longer adapt from how to bat in Australia to how to bat elsewhere. Possibly because they no longer play as much county or even club cricket in England as they used to.
And it's no coincidence that Australia has generally struggled in India because the traits necessary for success in India are as far from what is needed in Australia as you can get.
And back before the Great Southern Stand in the early 90s, when the MCG wasn't a gigantic, enclosed Colosseum (and the pitch wasn't a drop in) it was quite conductive for swing and for really difficult wickets (see Hughes' boxing day century, arguably the greatest innings ever played in Australia). And Victoria back then produced all the gritty, test batsman who could bat all day but hasn't produced much in terms of batting since.
And due to conditions NSW could produce more aggressive players and WA produced great players of the hook, pull and cut shots. Finch and Maxwell would have never gone through Victorian ranks if they made their debuts 30 years ago.
Now that Cricket Victoria is moving to the Junction Oval which isn't a drop in and is enclosed by a fence I wonder if things will start changing again.
Sheffield Shield cricket is staying at the WACA and of course Tasmania play in Bellerive. Victoria are moving to the Junction and if the Gabba ever became a drop in I'd expect Queensland to move to the Allan Border Field.
New South Wales will stay at the SCG but continue to play a few games in Newcastle and Canberra and Wagga Wagga.
So the shield wickets are soon going to diverge even further from the test wickets
India meanwhile seems to be going the other way, producing green mambas which makes the likes of vinay kumar and stuart binny look like legends
On the other hand a lack of exposure to swing has left Australian batsmen pretty vulnerable.
[MENTION=132373]Convict[/MENTION] has me wondering whether the most useful alternative Kiwi support bowler might have been McClenaghan, just because he hits the deck hardest.
Possibly. But I'd have gone with Henry over Bracewell. Possibly even Wagner but I think he's injured.