What's new

Australia v New Zealand | 1st Test-Day 1 | Gabba | 20/11/08

Random Aussie said:
Yawn Bones yawn, yes India are great. If it were not for umpires, white men & CIA they would be world champions already.
There again, you are dragging India in my neutral holistic comments!
 
bones20 said:
There again, you are dragging India in my neutral holistic comments!

Yeah it gets tiring when someone continually brings the country a poster supports into every thread eh? :D

Don't you like it when it is being done back to you?
 
bones20 said:
Does anybody else find this 3 some commentary irritating compared to a 2 some?
Nothing wrong with it unless one of them is Ian Healy.
 
Random Aussie said:
Yeah it gets tiring when someone continually brings the country a poster supports into every thread eh? :D

Don't you like it when it is being done back to you?
I dont mind the attention. Sure.
 
Just imagine if Australia were bowling NZ would probably be 0-120 by now.
 
Fish said:
South Africa have been absolutely brilliant at beating us in games that they never played. Look at their trophy cabinet it is full of trophys from games thay would have won against us if they played.

And what about the games they actually did play us?.

A great team doesn't need to justify their greatness by digging into the past. This is no great team.
 
saffer said:
A great team doesn't need to justify their greatness by digging into the past. This is no great team.

And neither is SA, except their greatness is what they could have done instead of what they have done.
 
Random Aussie said:
Yawn Bones yawn, yes India are great. If it were not for umpires, white men & CIA they would be world champions already.


or Mendis and Murali. How quicky people forget India lost to SriLanka away from home.

Yeah they beat Eng in Eng, but they also lost to South Africa and theri last visit to Pakistan.

dont know how winning one Test series at home makes you the best in the world.

Let them do that for 2-3 years all over the world then we'll talk.

for heavens sake only this year they drew with SA at home!
 
saffer said:
A great team doesn't need to justify their greatness by digging into the past. This is no great team.

Don't be so touchy. Australia's reign was always going to end eventually.
It's been a good few years and the pool's dried up. These haddin's an Johnsons and kattich and longtoothed hayden are not the mirror of the past 10 years. Let's just admit that.
 
bones20 said:
In the last match, we showed him his place.

Oh ok then, you really showed him.

I am surprised he fronted up for Test cricket again after that.
 
Last edited:
Now the hobbits show Hussey his place! Out.

Roy in, cue racist comments from Indians
 
Last edited:
saffer said:
Don't be so touchy. Australia's reign was always going to end eventually.
It's been a good few years and the pool's dried up. These haddin's an Johnsons and kattich and longtoothed hayden are not the mirror of the past 10 years. Let's just admit that.

I'm not concerned about Australia, they will do whatever they do thats the beauty of sport.

South Africa have done nothing in Austrlaia even though last time they come here Smith sounded a bit like you claiming how good they were and how they dont fear Australia. So save your bragging until you do beat us but up until then you are just blowing hot air about how good you are.
 
Fish said:
I'm not concerned about Australia, they will do whatever they do thats the beauty of sport.

South Africa have done nothing in Austrlaia even though last time they come here Smith sounded a bit like you claiming how good they were and how they dont fear Australia. So save your bragging until you do beat us but up until then you are just blowing hot air about how good you are.
LOL, what did Smith say the last time S.A. visited Australia ?
 
bublubhuyan said:
LOL, what did Smith say the last time S.A. visited Australia ?

Mouthed off in the media before the series, during the series and after the series. Then went to South Africa and did the same.
And made no runs of consequence.
 
Random Aussie said:
Mouthed off in the media before the series, during the series and after the series. Then went to South Africa and did the same.
And made no runs of consequence.
How can a captain mouth off after losing a series ?? :20:
 
Fish said:
Ask Kumble,

He had a good ole cry after Aus thumped him.
He was asking how a captain can mouth off after losing. And that we get to see in the public Diaries logging the whine attacks!
 
bublubhuyan said:
How can a captain mouth off after losing a series ?? :20:

"Only one team was playing in the right spirit"

Says the angelic Indians....

4/109 Pup on 47.
 
bublubhuyan said:
How can a captain mouth off after losing a series ?? :20:

It was something about how they beat everybody else and would have beaten any team in the world except Australia the way they played. And some complaining about umpires, about crowd abuse, about sledging....
 
Random Aussie said:
"Only one team was playing in the right spirit"

Says the angelic Indians....

4/109 Pup on 47.
Thats not mouthing off Bro, thats being righteous :ibutt
 
This is fantastic going at 2.8 an over at home against a minnow

Symonds trying to fix that with 3 consecutive fours
 
Last edited:
bones20 said:
Thats not mouthing off Bro, thats being righteous :ibutt

And the righteous will be fined, unless of course the get a little slap across the face then they shall bawl like a baby.
 
Geez Southee is doing a Hadlee at the moment. I can just see the new chant starting up: "Southee's a w@nker"...

As for the OZ, I'm not too worried yet. If Southee can take 4 wickets here I fancy the likes of Lee, Clark and MJ to wreak havoc. It's a wicket with a lot of sideways movement and bounce.
 
Random Aussie said:
It was something about how they beat everybody else and would have beaten any team in the world except Australia the way they played. And some complaining about umpires, about crowd abuse, about sledging....

What's funny is that if you read Steve Waugh's book (an excellent book by the way, best cricket book I ever read) you'll know that the Indians, led by Gavaskar, Mohander Singh, Ravi Shastri and Vengsarkar, were never shy of a bit of verbal chatter around the batsman. It happens with every team and anyone who has played even district or schoolboy cricket will know that verbals take place. Just ask Harby or Gamby! :)))
 
PlanetPakistan said:
What the heck is wrong with AUS?
The molestation they received by the Indians has broken their hearts and scarred their minds with the dreadful experience :16: !
 
bones20 said:
The molestation they received by the Indians has broken their hearts and scarred their minds with the dreadful experience :16: !

You know the team you support is pretty lame when a 2 nil home victory is called molestation. :D
 
Random Aussie said:
New Zealand are doing well, good on them.

Might be a closer series than we thought.
don't think it will be a close series but AUS are letting their own level of play slip away.
 
O'Brien to Symonds, 7 runs, Now Symonds clubs another short ball from outside off, the ball just falls short of the rope at deep midwicket and they run four, worse for N there are four overthrows as well as the ball beats the keeper. Due to scoring issues the ball is being scored as 7 runs for the moment. It's complicated and I really can't explain why????

???????????????????
 
OZGOD said:
What's funny is that if you read Steve Waugh's book (an excellent book by the way, best cricket book I ever read) you'll know that the Indians, led by Gavaskar, Mohander Singh, Ravi Shastri and Vengsarkar, were never shy of a bit of verbal chatter around the batsman. It happens with every team and anyone who has played even district or schoolboy cricket will know that verbals take place. Just ask Harby or Gamby! :)))

OZGOD,

There is a difference between chatter/verbals vs abuse/foul-mouthing.


are NOT chatters and any book by any Cricketer worth his word will tell you that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ajeyastra said:
OZGOD,

There is a difference between chatter/verbals vs abuse/foul-mouthing.

F_uck you Mofo
Taste My D_ick
Hey you ugly MothaF-ucka
Hey Sarwan, how did Lara's d_ick taste like

are NOT chatters and any book by any Cricketer worth his word will tell you that.

What does Ma=kee or what ever your little saint darling Harbijan say. And as precious little Gambhir was told if you dont like people swearing then dont go around swearing.

Indians are hypochrites when it comes to this type of behavoir.
 
Fish said:
What does Ma=kee or what ever your little saint darling Harbijan say. And as precious little Gambhir was told if you dont like people swearing then dont go around swearing.

Indians are hypochrites when it comes to this type of behavoir.

Who started it on that occasion dumbkopf?
 
cricketrulez said:
Who started it on that occasion dumbkopf?

Waaaaaa they are calling me names, quick lets get a plane and fly home so mommy can soothe our little broken hearts :))) :)))
 
Fish said:
Waaaaaa they are calling me names, quick lets get a plane and fly home so mommy can soothe our little broken hearts :))) :)))

No you *****, it was the convicts who got their panties twisted in a knot over what happened on the field. Anyway, Blackcraps are reaming your team a new one. Enjoy!
 
cricketrulez said:
Who started it on that occasion dumbkopf?

Well Gambhir start it with Katich but you will just ignore that won't you?

7/152 Haddin out, this bloke is a dud
 
cricketrulez said:
No you *****, it was the convicts who got their panties twisted in a knot over what happened on the field. Anyway, Blackcraps are reaming your team a new one. Enjoy!

No personal abuse thanks whiny little Indian poser. :D
 
Random Aussie said:
Well Gambhir start it with Katich but you will just ignore that won't you?

7/152 Haddin out, this bloke is a dud

Oh you mean when katich couldn't bowl worth **** & got all catty after being carted for a boundary?

Convict hypocrite....
 
Ajeyastra said:
OZGOD,

There is a difference between chatter/verbals vs abuse/foul-mouthing.


are NOT chatters and any book by any Cricketer worth his word will tell you that.

So now we can admit the Indians sledge but now we can whine about the nasty langauge the Aussies use :6: :6: :6: :6:
 
cricketrulez said:
Oh you mean when katich couldn't bowl worth **** & got all catty after being carted for a boundary?

Convict hypocrite....
Chill out dude. Its just fun screwing each other. nothing serious.
 
cricketrulez said:
Oh you mean when katich couldn't bowl worth **** & got all catty after being carted for a boundary?

Convict hypocrite....

Ohhh name calling. You are so tough mate.

:))) :))) :))) :)))
 
Back to the game we are in deep trouble here. Will be lucky to make 200 on the first day on a home pitch against a pretty weak team. To be fair though their weakness is their batting not the bowling which is ok when the conditions suit.

7 down at tea.
 
Random Aussie said:
Ohhh name calling. You are so tough mate.

:))) :))) :))) :)))

Dont abuse him back RA or he will fly home, remember it is considered very bad to swear in India. :)))
 
cricketrulez said:
Oh you mean when katich couldn't bowl worth **** & got all catty after being carted for a boundary?

Convict hypocrite....
Thats a really cheap shot dude.

Repeatedly calling them as "convicts" makes you a bigger hypocrite.
 
Random Aussie said:
So now we can admit the Indians sledge but now we can whine about the nasty langauge the Aussies use :6: :6: :6: :6:

Actually NO. It only means some Random Aussies are quite poor at understanding simple straightforward things. :)

We can start by admitting that a generic "So and so player used to chatter" is not the same as "So and so players kept vomitting the kind of foul and stinky diarhhoea that the so called tough-aussies do" or "So and so player kept up on his perverse remarks about the opponents wife/mother's anatomical parts and their sexual forays/accomplishments".

As for Fish, he needs to make up his mind first whether Harbhajan said "Maaki" or "Monkey". It seems where convenient, he wants to use Maaki but sooner or later he will return to claim it was "Monkey".
 
Ajeyastra said:
Actually NO. It only means some Random Aussies are quite poor at understanding simple straightforward things. :)

We can start by admitting that a generic "So and so player used to chatter" is not the same as "So and so players kept vomitting the kind of foul and stinky diarhhoea that the so called tough-aussies do" or "So and so player kept up on his perverse remarks about the opponents wife/mother's anatomical parts and their sexual forays/accomplishments".

As for Fish, he needs to make up his mind first whether Harbhajan said "Maaki" or "Monkey". It seems where convenient, he wants to use Maaki but sooner or later he will return to claim it was "Monkey".

So what does Maaki mean just so I know what players from India speak like.?
 
cricketrulez said:
Oh you mean when katich couldn't bowl worth **** & got all catty after being carted for a boundary?

Convict hypocrite....

Come on man, you can't be calling them these slurs in a little bit of friendly banter :).
 
Viv_rav said:
Come on man, you can't be calling them these slurs in a little bit of friendly banter :).

Do you really think that something from over 150 years ago is going to even slightly bother anyone. Let him go it is of no consequence to any Australian to be called a convict. In fact as I said before it is quite fashionable and people pay money to get a certificate showing their ancestors were convicts. It is not an Australian thing to feel shame for something that happened ove 100 years ago, we let go of that during the world war in 1915.
 
Oh comeone Australia ! Don't lose to new zealand and steal out thunder when we whip you !
 
Ajeyastra said:
Actually NO. It only means some Random Aussies are quite poor at understanding simple straightforward things. :)

We can start by admitting that a generic "So and so player used to chatter" is not the same as "So and so players kept vomitting the kind of foul and stinky diarhhoea that the so called tough-aussies do" or "So and so player kept up on his perverse remarks about the opponents wife/mother's anatomical parts and their sexual forays/accomplishments".

As for Fish, he needs to make up his mind first whether Harbhajan said "Maaki" or "Monkey". It seems where convenient, he wants to use Maaki but sooner or later he will return to claim it was "Monkey".

Dude you have a few issues going on
 
Indian spinners have brought them back in the game. The way English play spin, Mendis can get them all out in 3 overs I dare say.
 
Back
Top