What's new

Australia v New Zealand | 2nd Test | WACA | Nov 13-17, 2015 | Match Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Where are all the FLAT PITCH accusers today? :))

Finally NZ have figured out what needs to be done instead of just putting the ball at random positions on the pitch and expecting it to do everything.

Not really.

Australia have just been having a happy-go-lucky slog today, in the knowledge that they already have a huge slog.

I learned two lessons yesterday.

1. Whether your quick enough or tall enough, in Australia you need to bowl the right line and length.

2. McCullum is an even crappier captain that I already thought. What kind of moron doesn't have any slips at all at the WACA before the end of Day 1? His stupid "funky" fields meant that his quicks couldn't even just bowl a defensive line outside off-stump. McCullum is like Afridi - an idiot who doesn't respect the history of the game and is so ignorant that he makes the wrong decisions as a result.
 
Pitch is still good to bat on, we've been better with our lengths while you've been more careless with 400 already on the board.

No, if NZ bowled as poorly as they had in the last few days then Australia would have had 4/550 by lunch. NZ tightened the screws and Australia had to battle through the morning. The slogging wickets only came because of the tight morning session. Otherwise Aus could have declared at lunch.
 
Last edited:
Not really.

Australia have just been having a happy-go-lucky slog today, in the knowledge that they already have a huge slog.

I learned two lessons yesterday.

1. Whether your quick enough or tall enough, in Australia you need to bowl the right line and length.

2. McCullum is an even crappier captain that I already thought. What kind of moron doesn't have any slips at all at the WACA before the end of Day 1? His stupid "funky" fields meant that his quicks couldn't even just bowl a defensive line outside off-stump. McCullum is like Afridi - an idiot who doesn't respect the history of the game and is so ignorant that he makes the wrong decisions as a result.

No they haven't. Smith Voges & Marsh played very cagey innings. The slogging only started after lunch.

I agree with the rest of your post.
 
Soft wickets. Aus getting as many as they can before a declaration just before tea.

You clearly didn't watch. Australia were batting very defensively. Your rubbish trundlers finally got their line right and the bounce did the rest.
 
You clearly didn't watch. Australia were batting very defensively. Your rubbish trundlers finally got their line right and the bounce did the rest.
Pitch is still good to bat on, we've been better with our lengths while you've been more careless with 400 already on the board.

Yes, we were bowling tighter but the Aussies were also not attacking those deliveries, if they had they would have hit our bowlers off their lines like Warner did yesterday.
 
Now all I need is for Johnson to take 7/64 or something and then people will stop making excuses for an atrocious touring performance, probably the worst bowling I have ever seen in Australia. It has nothing to do with the wickets, they've simply been awful and even if they had the greentops they apparently crave, they would still have copped a phainty.
 
Now all I need is for Johnson to take 7/64 or something and then people will stop making excuses for an atrocious touring performance, probably the worst bowling I have ever seen in Australia. It has nothing to do with the wickets, they've simply been awful and even if they had the greentops they apparently crave, they would still have copped a phainty.

It is a boring wicket by WACA standards, but I can't help agreeing with you.

New Zealand, like in England, have come in to a series hopelessly underdone, and have only started to compete at the halfway point.
 
:))

Flat pitch, no swing lads! Starc must be the best bowler ever to strike in the 3rd over on this wicket.
 
Yes, we were bowling tighter but the Aussies were also not attacking those deliveries, if they had they would have hit our bowlers off their lines like Warner did yesterday.

Warner targets every bowler regardless. It is up the bowlers to keep their nerve and keep the ball on a consistent line. He'll eventually edge one if he doesn't respect the good balls.
 
Today is the day New Zealand bowlers learned how to bowl. Mark this day in your calendar folks, its a historical day. There should be a national Holiday on New Zealand celebrating this.

Meanwhile, Starc strikes with nothing but Swing. I guess the blame should go to the scorecard which pressurs the batsmen by displays such a Humongous total :shrug
 
Geez. Starc swinging it at 150 kph. Only bowler in the world who can do that. that too with the kookaburra ball.
 
Laughable how Guptill is being used as a barometer for how good a wicket is :))
 
Two of the Seven Highest total of Australia against New Zealand have been scored in this series :)))
 
Today is the day New Zealand bowlers learned how to bowl. Mark this day in your calendar folks, its a historical day. There should be a national Holiday on New Zealand celebrating this.

Meanwhile, Starc strikes with nothing but Swing. I guess the blame should go to the scorecard which pressurs the batsmen by displays such a Humongous total :shrug

I place my bet on the NZ having forgotten everything they learned today and bowl as pathetically as they did yesterday if there is a second innings.
 
Laughable how Guptill is being used as a barometer for how good a wicket is :))

The wicket is still good. Perth's pitch have always been great for fast bowlers. It's not Australia's fault that New Zealand don't have any. It's New Zealand's fault
 
Starc is bowling ODI lengths, not Test match lengths through a channel btw.
 
Michael Slater just now "Excellent batting conditions".

But go on.

Every Australian pitch is excellent for batting because you get extreme value for your shots but it does not mean bowlers cannot operate there. Plenty in past have been successful there on the same dry flat bouncy pitches because they adapted to the bounce and made full use of it. There just aren't many bowlers around capable of adapting today, your trundlers certainly aren't.
 
Our bowlers would get caned bowling those lengths to the Aussies, as would Starc, the Aussies play pace better than any other country in the world.

they got canned because they weren't bowling fast. Starc will get wickets because of his pace.
 
Every Australian pitch is excellent for batting because you get extreme value for your shots but it does not mean bowlers cannot operate there. Plenty in past have been successful there on the same dry flat bouncy pitches because they adapted to the bounce and made full use of it. There just aren't many bowlers around capable of adapting today, your trundlers certainly aren't.
Nah, only the Aussies and maybe Steyn and Morkel will go okay in Australia.

Rest will get caned, they'll be bowling to the Aussie batsmen (need to remember that).
 
Last edited:
Our batsmen struggling against Starcs pace.

Bowling close to 150kph, testing stuff.
 
Nah, only the Aussies and maybe Steyn and Morkel will go okay in Australia.

Rest will get caned.

Isn't that what I just said? There aren't many quality bowlers around. Eugene, teach this guy some cricket man.
 
It is a boring wicket by WACA standards, but I can't help agreeing with you.

New Zealand, like in England, have come in to a series hopelessly underdone, and have only started to compete at the halfway point.

I don't mind fair, objective criticism of the pitch. And I agree with you also, that this WACA wicket is not as fast or bouncy as we would ideally like to see. But overnight there was a spate of threads and posts, mostly by India fans (oddly), which carried on as though the WACA strip was identical to this one:

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/456670.html

I don't know why certain sections of India fans seem to have such a chip on their shoulders regarding Australia's domination at home. They go to such great lengths to diminish Australian performances in Australia, and have done so consistently throughout my time on this website. I'm sure the same dudes hero-worshipped the likes of Kumble, Laxman, Sachin etc. when India were similarly invincible at home in the '90s. I'm sure these same dudes who today decry Australian home dominance as detrimental to cricket packed out Indian stadiums, faces painted, flags waving; during the '90s, with no complaints at all directed to the Indian pitches for not favouring the skill set of tourists.

Why so salty guys? I suspect it is because some of them want to deflect attention away from the criticism Indian pitches have come in for in this South African series taking place now. Or perhaps it's bitterness that Australia enjoy the kind of home dominance once reserved only for India.
 
Isn't that what I just said? There aren't many quality bowlers around. Eugene, teach this guy some cricket man.
Once again, even if you have a bowler who is capable of bowling 150kph they'll be bowling to the Aussie batsmen who are comfortable against that pace and are capable of taking those types of bowlers to the cleaners.
 
Once again, even if you have a bowler who is capable of bowling 150kph they'll be bowling to the Aussie batsmen who are comfortable against that pace and are capable of taking those types of bowlers to the cleaners.

Irfan, Wahab, Yasir Shah, Rahat Ali, Imran Khan and Mohammad Amir. They all will trouble Australian batsmen.
 
Once again, even if you have a bowler who is capable of bowling 150kph they'll be bowling to the Aussie batsmen who are comfortable against that pace and are capable of taking those types of bowlers to the cleaners.

Lol nobody is comfortable against well directed 150kph.
 
Once again, even if you have a bowler who is capable of bowling 150kph they'll be bowling to the Aussie batsmen who are comfortable against that pace and are capable of taking those types of bowlers to the cleaners.

We dont kow that yet. The only consistent 150 kph bowlers in recent times have been Mitch and mitch. No one else. Steyn bowled a few above 150 in perth last time and he took seven wckets in the match.
 
Good, I look forward to seeing you whitewash Aus next year.

I said they will trouble Australian batsmen, I didn't say they will whitewash Australia. read my post again.

To whitewash Australia our batting has to click too
 
I said they will trouble Australian batsmen, I didn't say they will whitewash Australia. read my post again.

To whitewash Australia our batting has to click too
Unlike Pakistan, we actually have won a Test in Aus recently.

Trust me, pace isn't going to beat them, it's sideways movement.
 
Unlike Pakistan, we actually have won a Test in Aus recently.

Trust me, pace isn't going to beat them, it's sideways movement.

we also won a Test match in Australia, our batsmen just choked the 4th day
 
[MENTION=132954]Aman[/MENTION] Johnson is bowling, look closely now as this 34 year old buddha will show you how to bowl on this pitch :yk2
 
Varun did the same.

I have my doubts on Wahabs ability to get it right though, and when he has the Aussies have shown they can play him at his best (Smith).

Varun isn't a fast bowler. Your're not fast if you only bowl 1-2 fast deliveries every 15-20 deliveries :shrug
 
Varun did the same.

I have my doubts on Wahabs ability to get it right though, and when he has the Aussies have shown they can play him at his best (Smith).

Varun does not extract the same bounce. Wahab is a slinger, Varun has a conventional action and a lot taller with longer arms.

Smith didn't do anything except tuck some balls to fine leg for a single. He barely faced him. Watson bore the brunt of that spell and had Smith gotten the same deliveries Watson got, he'd be jumping around as well.
 
Varun does not extract the same bounce. Wahab is a slinger, Varun has a conventional action and a lot taller with longer arms.

Smith didn't do anything except tuck some balls to fine leg for a single. He barely faced him. Watson bore the brunt of that spell and had Smith gotten the same deliveries Watson got, he'd be jumping around as well.
*Wahab is
 
Varun did the same.

I have my doubts on Wahabs ability to get it right though, and when he has the Aussies have shown they can play him at his best (Smith).

you mean to say how Wahab got Watson and Maxwell but thanks to our fielding couldn't make it official
 
I'm not claiming Wahab will run through Australia but if he catches rhythm, I don't see anyone be comfortable against him except Warner.
 
Varun did the same.

I have my doubts on Wahabs ability to get it right though, and when he has the Aussies have shown they can play him at his best (Smith).

Wahab wont do zilch in Australia. Averages 34 and wont find reverse in Australia. And he has never bowled a spell with consistent 150;s like Starc just did.
 
Gee whiz, I would have like to see Williamson batting.....hate working on weekends
 
I'm not claiming Wahab will run through Australia but if he catches rhythm, I don't see anyone be comfortable against him except Warner.
It's going to take a herculean effort tbh.

These Aussies are brought up playing against pace on pitches with pace and bounce, they're just too good in these conditions (not that our bowlers have tested them - not taking anything away from the Aussies, more disappointed with our bowlers) and we just need to give them props.
 
Last edited:
Gee whiz, I would have like to see Williamson batting.....hate working on weekends
Missed two glorious shots off MJ. He's a technical genius who makes batting look easy.
 
Last edited:
It's going to take a herculean effort tbh.

These Aussies are brought up playing against pace on pitches with pace and bounce, they're just too good in these conditions (not that our bowlers have tested them) and we just need to give them props.

And I'm not denying that. Regardless of where you're brought up, it's very difficult to react 145k+ accurate bowling especially with steep bounce.
 
Last edited:
Pakistan vs. Australia wont be about our bowlers....they will do their best. If our batsmen do well, it will be an even series. I am not going to get in to this guessing game on wahab and the others will do. Collectively we have an attack that can take 20 wickets on any surface. What they need is to find the courage, and the mental strength to keeping Australia on the park for a 150 overs. The rest will take care of itself.
 
Pakistan vs. Australia wont be about our bowlers....they will do their best. If our batsmen do well, it will be an even series. I am not going to get in to this guessing game on wahab and the others will do. Collectively we have an attack that can take 20 wickets on any surface. What they need is to find the courage, and the mental strength to keeping Australia on the park for a 150 overs. The rest will take care of itself.

Our batting will flop in spectacular fashion as usual. Don't have any hope.
 
Missed two glorious shots off MJ. He's a technical genius who makes batting look easy.

Tbh....that's pretty much my only interest in this series. Its not a case of writing off the others....its the only reason to watch for me. Much like for Kohli when India toured.
 
Starc will run through your batsmen.

That spell just before tea was brutal.

Nope. We usually unravel against the Hazelwood types. Johnson, Brett Lee were never an issue for Pakistan: its the McGrath, 'Sarfraz' Clarke, and Hazwelwood type of bowlers that have our number.
 
Well, if we are still carrying Hafeez, Misbah, and Yk (any or all three of these) then it will be a problem.
Msbah and YK will struggle against the pace, they're both around 40 and their reflexes aren't as quick as they use to be.
 
Nope. We usually unravel against the Hazelwood types. Johnson, Brett Lee were never an issue for Pakistan: its the McGrath, 'Sarfraz' Clarke, and Hazwelwood type of bowlers that have our number.
If you saw that spell just before tea, you'd be quivering in your boots :))

Latham lucky to be there after a close lbw shout, thought he was a goner tbh.
 
Congrats Gilly.

Your batsmen are really just out of this world on Australian wickets.

Considering they are the wickets they play on what were you expecting. Aus play on them every year, why would they put their effort into being specialist UAE batsmen where no crowds turn up and they only play once every 4-5 years. You work it out.
 
If you saw that spell just before tea, you'd be quivering in your boots :))

Latham lucky to be there after a close lbw shout, thought he was a goner tbh.

one-off spells not-withstanding: our batsmen's enemies are fundamentals: tight bowling and tight fielding and fragile mental strength outside asia.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top