Another great example of this posters use of a strawman argument when he throws words in your mouth and has an argument with himself for the sake of it; so pathetic.
The post was directed at one of the more intelligent posters but since you're not all there let me break it down for you:
The purpose of that video was to highlight Bradley's struggle against a fighter with superior footwork. 1/10th are you sure? You must have failed your GCSE in Mathematics. Khan's movement is a trademark of his natural ability along with his hand speed and it has been displayed throughout his amateur and pro careers yet you boast about being a boxing guru more like a fanboy that is clouded by abject hatred and bias which is displayed by your cheerleading off the most overated fighter of this generation in floyd. Maybe you are new to boxing, lets give you a bit of schooling kid......STYLES MAKE FIGHTS. The likes of Thurman, Brook and Maidana have the power to take Khan out of there, he can use his movement and speed against them but he is bound to get caught because they are very good at cutting of the ring even better then bradley who's main attritude is swarming. When Bradley does get to Khan he won't have the KO power to test his chin like those fighters.
Khan has displayed improvents in defence under Hunter, doesn't leave himself open so much goes for the clinch and allows his jab to do all the work whilst not trading as often as he has in the past. Was poor in the algerie fight but they'll work on the weaknesses he displayed, it was the first time under hunter he fought a guy that was applying pressure.
Trust me you're the biggest fanboy here you can't think when it comes to Floyd and your affections for him; there are many of the view that Khan beats Brook etc but am not one of those I judge his chances objectively but no one compares to you when it comes to cheer-leading, useless posts and then running away ha