Eagle_Eye
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2010
- Runs
- 9,954
Brook gets knocked out..... gets shown up by a rookie, albeit an elite rookie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Great win for Spence but Kell was weight drained and coming down from a damaging KO loss to GGG so I expected Spence to win, but full credit to Spence however based on that performance am not convinced he can beat the likes of Thurman, Garcia; maybe he"ll be competitive against Porter and Jessie Vargas though
He'll beat anyone. Great fundamentals, accuracy and too explosive for em. Thurman will get wore down just like Brook. Too long and too fast for him.
Speed is not there? What you smokin brotha? Errol is faster than Thurman and it will show when they fight. Write it down.Spence is decent at cutting off the ring and has decent power + counter punching ability but the speed and footwork are not there, Thurman is a multi-skilled fighter who can box on the inside and outside, excellent speed, power and superior in-ring IQ. Errol Spence will get better with more experience, there is a lot of room for development but based on the number of fights he has had his progress is excellent
Say what you want Khan but you can never accuse him of a lack of heart, Brook threw in the towel there and quit as much as I hate to say it
Say what you want Khan but you can never accuse him of a lack of heart, Brook threw in the towel there and quit as much as I hate to say it
Kell will knock out Spence. You hear do it here first
Only if Khan was coached well man. He doesn't even how to punch. I don't know which idiot taught him at junior level.
Speed is not there? What you smokin brotha? Errol is faster than Thurman and it will show when they fight. Write it down.
Only if Khan was coached well man. He doesn't even how to punch. I don't know which idiot taught him at junior level.
He has an amateur style.
Though Khan is with out a doubt top 10 British ATG this Century.
He did the same previously too.
Feel bad for Kell. I don't agree with Bellow, it wasn't an instictive knee down as he couldn't see. It's also best to take a count and see what happens. Yes he gave up but anyone who watched round 10 knows he aint a quitter.
Spence is an awesome talent, the longer the fight went on the quicker he moved. Great power esp with his body shots. Great chin too.
Kells power was negated by him having been weight drained so Spence could take the punches, he came down from two weight divisions and all Spence needed to do was to be patient and attack the body; inevitably Kell would self destruct. I think it was an instinctive knee, he was hurt with a body shot; sky commies who have a deal with matchroom always twist the narrative although not denying the eye was a problem but it just didn't look that great on kell regardless
Yes it doesn't look good esp to novice boxing fans but we both know in this game you sometimes have to give yourself a chance. Kell thought he'd take the knee, regain his vision and go for the KO. It's not his weight for sure, after round 8 it felt like he was fasting all day , totally drained and yes Spence was smart with his body shots.
Spence v Khan would be a great match up. I think Khan with any sort of form is one of the few in this division who could make him look average. But I think Khan will look for Brook next year now for a big Wembley showdown.
We'll see. I'm not sure we're watching the same fighter. Spence has very good foot and hand speed. Only the likes of Pacman and Amir would out-speed him.His speed doesn't compare to any of the other top names in the division you must be drunk to think otherwise. Thurman would destroy him in this moment and is the more seasoned fighter, I pray Khan takes on Spence next with the two being managed by Al haymon it is possible; Khan even past his prime would out box Spence, stylistically Amir Khan is a south paws nightmare. Khan certainly has achieved a lot based on his raw talent but there's no denying he could have benefited from better coaching but he remains a British all time great.
Look at all these Spence wannabe casual fans come out the moment he wins a world title to jump on the bandwagon and become overnight experts all of a sudden While others have followed his career since the London Olympics
We'll see. I'm not sure we're watching the same fighter. Spence has very good foot and hand speed. Only the likes of Pacman and Amir would out-speed him.
His mistiming was due to Kell's awkward counter-punching style which he later adapted to like all great fighters do. He realized very quickly that he couldn't just charge in and had to measure and calculate what angles would work against him. The earlier rounds were to observe and test if you will. Spence is an explosive fighter but he's not reckless. You will see him calculate, measure and then strike especially in the earlier rounds but once he's used to his opponent's rhythm, you're at his mercy. Even then, he doesn't go all out because he's ever so observant and calculated.Relative to some of the bottom ranked fighters in the top 10 at 147 maybe he does but his foot and hand speed are not his best attributes as we saw how much he struggled against Kell in the first 6, he just couldn't measure distance very well and was missing a lot; I've seen him cut off the ring a lot better in the past as well but Kell's boxing ability was tough to negotiate, it's an area for concern for him. He won't get to face a weight drained fighter who has been scarred by GGG everytime. His strengths include power, decent counter punching and pressure; needs to improve his footwork big time and use his jab more; the speed will remain a disadvantage but that doesn't mean he can't win the lineal titles if he improves in other areas over time. He is still inexperienced as a pro so his development will be exciting, Thurman was quiet one dimensional at a similar stage but evolved into a complete fighter. Porter would be a good opponent for Spence in the near future
His mistiming was due to Kell's awkward counter-punching style which he later adapted to like all great fighters do. He realized very quickly that he couldn't just charge in and had to measure and calculate what angles would work against him. The earlier rounds were to observe and test if you will. Spence is an explosive fighter but he's not reckless. You will see him calculate, measure and then strike especially in the earlier rounds but once he's used to his opponent's rhythm, you're at his mercy. Even then, he doesn't go all out because he's ever so observant and calculated.
I'll admit that Errol wasn't at his absolute best in the earlier rounds but that is not surprising considering this was his first fight on the big stage. It was amazing to see him keep his composure despite losing the first few. Never was he shook throughout the fight, he was always in complete control. You didn't see his trainer say much because they came prepared for anything Kell could throw at them. He kept reading him, adapting, reading him, adapting and by the 6th, he had Kell figured out.
Errol's biggest strength are none of his physical attributes or boxing skills which are elite but his composure which is simply unmatched.
I like Thurman very much myself as a fighter. Like Errol, he's a shrewd fighter. But Errol's just got that length and great fundamentally sound defence. It's extremely difficult to find an opening because he covers all areas so well and his patience only tests you further. If or rather when you go look for an opening, he's waiting for that all the time to counter with a body shot and sneak an uppercut which gets you off balance. His close range game is elite.
RIP [MENTION=133972]shaykh[/MENTION] SpecialK's biggest fan I don't think we'll ever see you in this thread again ) They should change Kell's name to SpecialQ, Q for QUITTER.
10 YEARS OF FIGHTING 30 BUMS, Slams Amir Khan's for his incredible resume but then out of the 3 decent opponents he faces in his career Kell quits against 2 of those ) ; Kelly SpecialQ Brook, the greatest BRITISH BOXING FRAUD of all time [MENTION=396]mani1[/MENTION] a bigger fraud then Audley Harrison
The thing is an I have been saying it for years Brook was one of the most carefully managed fighters around it took him over a decade to fight a puncher with some skill and the first one he fought at welter he quit.
Brook looks real good coming forward bet when he gets it back he doesnt like it.
Carson Jones 1 was the perfect example.Carson is just a journeyman and he had Brook going.
I might be alone thinking this but Brook was real lucky to win that fight.
Hearn then spinned it as he didn't work out properly Carson broke his nose he was out on his feat and showed heart etc
I didnt see Carson get any 10 - 8 rounds etc. Broken noses are standard practice in boxing Khan had his broken against Maidana.
I agree which is why they did the rematch, he was always a big boogeyman for Kell; who knows we may get part 3, casuals may even pay for it. He does have ability but the man as you say doesn't take it so well when he gets it back
Plus he has no where lwft to go other than Khan.
At 154 he would get slaughtered . He would have no size advantage and guys like Lara and Andrade are much mure skilled than him.
I would even favour a guy like Vanes to torture him.
RIP [MENTION=133972]shaykh[/MENTION] SpecialK's biggest fan I don't think we'll ever see you in this thread again ) They should change Kell's name to SpecialQ, Q for QUITTER.
10 YEARS OF FIGHTING 30 BUMS, Slams Amir Khan's for his incredible resume but then out of the 3 decent opponents he faces in his career Kell quits against 2 of those ) ; Kelly SpecialQ Brook, the greatest BRITISH BOXING FRAUD of all time [MENTION=396]mani1[/MENTION] a bigger fraud then Audley Harrison
I had a debate with shaykh in this thread when Brook first came to prominence after winning the title. I watched the fight and thought Shawn Porter looked pretty ordinary for a world champ. Shaykh was one of those who insisted he was a good fighter, but I couldn't see it. Kell's a game fighter with a good chin, but he has no special ability, and a good boxer with a chin was always going to win against him.
I had a debate with shaykh in this thread when Brook first came to prominence after winning the title. I watched the fight and thought Shawn Porter looked pretty ordinary for a world champ. Shaykh was one of those who insisted he was a good fighter, but I couldn't see it. Kell's a game fighter with a good chin, but he has no special ability, and a good boxer with a chin was always going to win against him.
Shawn Porter is decent and better then his performance against Kell but I had that fight a lot closer then the judges cards and many had Porter winning, see Porter/Thurman to see how decent Porter is; problem with Porter was that he never gave Kell any respect and hunted the KO all night but Kell repeatedly held on to him every time he came in close to unleash a flurry; those tactics were crucial in him getting the win but I was surprised the American judges gave it to him. Kell has decent talent but his biggest kryptonite is his lack of heart, I don't think he should fight again due the reservations he has and the fact that he held the IBF world title hostage at home, made excuses and refused to hunt big names explains it all now really.
His promoter has done a terrific job in getting him this far though and no doubt he is financially set for life
The funny thing is after Julio Diaz signed to fight Khan. Eddie Hearn called him a "Shot blown up feather fisted lightweight" This was after I and many others thought he had beaten Porter but officially got a draw.
Then Porter went on to beat a further past it Diaz in a still very competitive fight. Blasted out a shot Paulie whom Khan had stopped years earlier at his prime weight, even then many of Khan's detractors were claiming Paulie had lost his legs and beat Alexander a guy whom was very badly exposed by Kotelnik in his home Town and Khan went on to win every round against him.
Yet Porter is and was being talked about as some elite fighter.
I don't follow boxing as closely as I used to so that was my only sighting of Porter. I just saw a brawler throwing wild punches and getting beaten to the punch by Brook who himself didn't look that special. In my book a good boxer doesn't lose in such a stupid fashion. I thought Brooks was worth the win on the night, but neither looked like world champion material.
The funny thing is after Julio Diaz signed to fight Khan. Eddie Hearn called him a "Shot blown up feather fisted lightweight" This was after I and many others thought he had beaten Porter but officially got a draw.
Then Porter went on to beat a further past it Diaz in a still very competitive fight. Blasted out a shot Paulie whom Khan had stopped years earlier at his prime weight, even then many of Khan's detractors were claiming Paulie had lost his legs and beat Alexander a guy whom was very badly exposed by Kotelnik in his home Town and Khan went on to win every round against him.
Yet Porter is and was being talked about as some elite fighter.
[MENTION=396]mani1[/MENTION] after watching these performances I think in recent times I've been overly critical of Amir Khan, I still believe he is past his peak but I can see him doing a job on the following fighters at 147:
Vargas
Peterson
Garcia
Brook
Spence
Bradley
Manny Pac-Man
Floyd Mayweather
What do you think? and who do you want him to fight next
To be honest with you I think Pac and Floyd would still beat him easy. The others are 50/50 due to Khan's lack of power, chin and boxing IQ
As for whom he should fight next this depends on how active he is going to be if he is only going to fight once a year again then it depends because Garcia could splatter him again, and that would be the end.
If he is to be more active then Peterson, Garcia, Pac if he wins and makes his name relevant the fight could be on the table as the money would be there.
I think mani1 has hit the nail on the head about Khan's boxing IQ. Someone with his speed and reach should be able to mostly avoid getting hit if he was a bit smarter. He gets drawn into too many brawls when he should be able to stay out of range against most guys he fights.
Brook V Khan would still generate plenty of interest.
Khan in any form should be too good for him. Something which I wrote on this thread many pages back.
But he has to prove it in the squared circle. This fight has to take place next year!
To be honest both fighters are pretty much done, so may as well fight each other and retire; otherwise am not really interested in seeing them box again. Where else can Kell go? he would get damaged seriously at 154 and can no longer make weight at 147, where will Amir go? he is under Al Haymon and there are options but he has been inactive for over a year, past his best years and the desire isn't there being someone who made his pro debut at the age of 18 so the chances are another KO loss is possible so what's the point now may as well just carry on with the philanthropy which is where his heart is most of the time
Brook is pretty much finished with big fights unless it's against Khan. Khan used to fight at 140 so doesn't have the same issue of making 147 as Brook does. Khan just hasn't fought enough in the last few years but when he did fight he still looked sharp enough, the hand speed hasn't diminished tbf. Look at Pacman , he's much older but still fighting and making good money. I think Khan needs a fight at 147 against either Danny Garcia, who has come off his first loss or perhaps Peterson, both re-matches would generate good interest and both will bring Khan back up to the bigtime, if he wins which he should.
It depends when they fight bro, if it's the next fight then Wembley is too much but if they both have wins , then O2 and even Wembley is not our of the question. Khan is a massive name in the UK and US even now. One good win and he can headline in Vegas again.
Nevada State Commision has approved Moneyteams application for the August 26 date for a possible Mayweather vs McGregor bout.
Both fighters have been training for a while so camp shouldn't be a problem. The promotion will be more exciting than the actual fight that is the only thing that I am looking forward to.
It's a damn insult to boxing, Floyd set boxing behind 10 years after his disgraceful performance in the Manny fight then AJ/Wlad helped elevate the sport once again and now Floyd is going to tarnish Boxing's reputation once again. Casuals will pay silly money and the fight will be a joke, once these people hold a certain view of the sport it takes a while to get them back again, it also hinders his legacy; why on earth would you face Conor Mcgregor when there are top welters at 147 in the likes of Thurman, Spence, Khan or even a rematch with Manny. He complains about a lack of respect from the boxing world when it comes to his achievements but he doesn't really help himself.
But since it is going to happen no doubt, Floyd has to knock out that punk in the first round hopefully. Boxing's honour is on the line, if Conor is remotely competitive our sport will be berated emphatically and all those who follow it will also have to bare the shame.
I think most rationale people except maybe a few kids or casuals understand that this nothing but a cash grap its almost like a WWE event so I don't think it will have any impact on boxing or MMA. By the time Canelo vs GGG fight approaches all will be forgotten.
Mayweather will feel Conor for the first 3 to 4 rounds to give it a hint of legimacy than will embarass McGregor. There is really no other possible outcome. Anyone who believes Conor can knockout or even land a clean punch to Mayweathers head is drinking some serious kool-aid and clearly has very little idea about boxing.
[MENTION=46929]shaz619[/MENTION]
I haven't watched it yet or read about it. So didn't read past your first line.
I will watch it tonight.
Cool let me know when you have finished watching it
It was a great fight again. Kovalev clearly learnt his reach could be a great advantage and used the jab well. Ward didn't hold back either, he gave back as good as he got.
The stoppage wasn't correct imo. Kovalev wasn't even dropped to the floor, he was hurt for sure but was in a defensive pose waiting for the round to end. Tony Weeks was poor and not for the first time, he should have taken a point off Ward for the low blow after already warning him previously. This would have stopped Ward from going downstairs they way he did. It was difficult to tell from the footage but at least one of those body shots was illegal.
He deserves another re-match. I feel sorry for him but Ward is a great boxer.
Yeah am not sure what to make of the stoppage am in two minds but I can't respect anyone blaming low blows for their defeat, you're a damn warrior man; come on dude! and that right caused most of the damage anyhow, he looked to be out of gas if am honest and in the post match interview was not keen on pushing for a rematch either. It's a damn shame the fight ended that way because there will be ? on Ward when he deserves all the praise in the world imo
Problem for me is that while that stoppge may seem premature, Kovalev kept crouching down overly without defending himself adequately and was not throwing anything back, he had done it more then once and was complaining to the ref who deemed the blows to be illegal so when he went back to the crouching etc and wanting the ref to intervene the ref was in a difficult position and forced to stop the fight because Kovalev was not in a position to continue any further because Ward was relentlessly targeting his
There were some illegal blows and Ward has been a master of concealing a few as well and while I sympathise with Kovalev to an extent he did look out on his feet at times as well especially after that right in the final round
Both were world champions so as a ref you have to let it continue. It's also harder to knocked down by bodyshots and although you are right to say Kovalev wasn't defending himself adequately , he didn't look like falling to the ground. The ref should understand there is a lot on stake here, fans around the world have tuned in many paid a lot of money to watch the fight live. Kovalev was also up on the scorecard by many observers! Dont ruin a good contest by a pre-mature stoppage, ruined it for me.
I don't know if it was premature, I agree that a lot was on the line something more conclusive should have resulted in the stoppage but at the end of the day we're just fans, the ref is always in the best position to decide and see things we can't, going by Kovalev's eyes though personally feel he had enough. He just kept crouching down and the ref was not going to listen to any of his grievances, so to prevent further damage the ref stopped the fight; I seriously think he'd have been KO'd either way had the ref not intervened at that stage.
I wouldn't mind a rematch because I know Ward can beat him conclusively and want to see that but I doubt they will face him again, I had Ward up by a round in the last fight as well and now he got the stopapge although somewhat controversial. Ward indicated he will move up in weight, Stevenson hopefully has grown a pair and fights Kovalev
I think if there was more time on the clock, Kovalev would have been knocked out but with only 30 seconds left, he was trying to hang in there. In between rounds fighters who are physically strong often recover really well.
Having just watched a better angle, the final shot before the ref stopped the fight does look very low. Tony Weeks allowed a previous low blow to go unpunished before the right which did the damage. The more I think about it , the more I feel it was poor referring and a bad stoppage.
https://twitter.com/streetfitebanch/status/876289907655938049/photo/1
You also have to respect fighters who are dirty but also able to remain deceptive (Holyfield) not everything was low, majority were borderline with 1-2 legit illegal shots with Ward concealing those quiet well and potentially towards the end as well. Perhaps you can call it poor refing but I also put it down to Ward's crafty genius as well. 30 seconds is still a lot of time a lot of damage can be caused in that time, it's a case of what if'ts and buts now though
Look it's all subjective.
If you click on the twitter link you will see a good angle of the final shot. Do you feel that was a legitimate shot?
So its Benn v Collins and Mayweather v McGregor in 2017. What a circus.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/40434050
[MENTION=43583]KingKhanWC[/MENTION] another matchroom fighter quits in a big fight, Ohara Davies turned his back during the 7th against the talented and gifted Josh Taylor
Not watched it but just read the BBC report and it says the ref stopped the fight. Why did Davies turn his back, was he injured?
No lol I have no idea what happened, he was just outclassed thoroughly and did a no mass, basically the ref only stepped in and stopped it because Taylor started punching Davies even when he had turned his back, but that was Davies fault because you must protect yourself at all times; no.1 rule in boxing