Madplayer
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Runs
- 28,686
- Post of the Week
- 1
I think people need to appreciate more how well Babar and Rizwan batted. These are horrendous conditions to bat in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still better than many of our so called proper batsman. He is giving his all
Okay then. But loved his game awareness in this match. He has all the qualities of a world class keeper batsmen, ala, BJ Watling level.
1)Game awareness
2)Astute
3)Excellent behind gloves
He is 29 now so given that Pakistan don't have any option apart from Babar for captaincy, it shouldn't be a bad call IMO. Pak need to move on from Azhar.
What's your take, [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION]?
Even with limited time, Pakistan would have been a strong position if they had picked Amir and Shadab instead of Fawad and Yasir.
Imagine Amir in these conditions!
Shows how well Pakistan did in these conditions, that are alien to many of them, against Broad and Anderson to get to 236
Shows how well Pakistan did in these conditions, that are alien to many of them, against Broad and Anderson to get to 236
Still better than many of our so called proper batsman. He is giving his all
We manged an hour but now the players are off again.
Absolutely disgusted with Holding’s biased commentary
Absolutely disgusted with Holding’s biased commentary
Still better than many of our so called proper batsman. He is giving his all
if ever there was pitch and weather for fourth pacer, this was it, soahail or even Fahim for fawad was need of the hour, this single decision alone will and can cost us any chance we have of winning. Man how can you screw that misbah. [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] i think playing with jis is a three pacers is criminal here and yasir will be completely useless atleast in first three innings.
Absolutely disgusted with Holding’s biased commentary
Heis bit boring but hardly biased.Absolutely disgusted with Holding’s biased commentary
What did I miss?
inexperience is shown in shaheens bowling , too eager. Needs to stick to a length.
You mean if amir had not RETIRED. You cannot pick a retired player who doesn't want to playEven with limited time, Pakistan would have been a strong position if they had picked Amir and Shadab instead of Fawad and Yasir.
Imagine Amir in these conditions!
True. No mention of unplayable conditions when the pak tail was batting
You cant drop Yasir after his performance last match. I beloeve both teams thought conditions may improve in the match , so a spinner would have a role,but of course now we know that is not the case.I definitely would have played Sohail here; twice after the weather forecast. I think, Misbah himself is under tremendous pressure- didn’t have the guts to drop Yasir, who’ll struggle to grip the ball here. Fawad probably was picked to fail, otherwise they would have played him at home series last winter.
I’ll give you one example...
He says Shaheen could be bowling even fuller.
He then does ball a lot fuller and Holding says something like “that’s it just play late and straight”...
Earlier they show montage of English bowlers and how ball is moving and holding says ideal conditions... but even Knight says English bowlers were bowling wider...
Lots of little things like that
Yes I also heard the first part regarding Shaheen should be bowling a little fuller, I dont think he was wrong though. When he did bowl bit fuller Sibley played it decently and then I think he shifted his commentary from bowler’s perspective to batsman’s.
You cant drop Yasir after his performance last match. I beloeve both teams thought conditions may improve in the match , so a spinner would have a role,but of course now we know that is not the case.
Absolutely disgusted with Holding’s biased commentary
That was not fair on England batsman. Good they came off. Abbas was about to torture them.
5 plays and misses in first 7 balls ( when Abbas was just getting into his work)
37 ao was on
Atherton, Ward and Akram talking about how England owe an overseas tour to Pakistan, and how big a boost that Test cricket would get should a Pakistan-India series take place.
Atherton, Ward and Akram talking about how England owe an overseas tour to Pakistan, and how big a boost that Test cricket would get should a Pakistan-India series take place.
Just spoke to some friends who live In Southampton— absolutely chucking it down.
That’s it for the day.....
No one owes Pakistan cricket anything. They are talking nonsense as usual.
Amir is not in Siberia or Timbuktu.You mean if amir had not RETIRED. You cannot pick a retired player who doesn't want to play
Misbah and Waqar are at the ground. It’s seaming and swinging as much on Day 4 as Day 1.I definitely would have played Sohail here; twice after the weather forecast. I think, Misbah himself is under tremendous pressure- didn’t have the guts to drop Yasir, who’ll struggle to grip the ball here. Fawad probably was picked to fail, otherwise they would have played him at home series last winter.
Amir is not in Siberia or Timbuktu.
He’s sitting in the pavilion. He’s practising in the nets with the team every day.
I’m sure if he was asked nicely he’d help out his country.
If Mohammed Amir was dropped from the Test team, you could do that. He retired. He does not want to play Test cricket for Pakistan. He is entirely uncommitted to it. Are we really going to start begging players to play who have no desire to do so? Unless he comes out of his retirement, he is over in Tests. Time to move on.
How many times did Imran Khan make himself unavailable or retire?
And he was never as good as Amir in these conditions.
I just checked the weather there is no rain after 3 means Atleast 4 hours of play may be 3.30 hours and tomorrow there won't be any rain interruptions if some how pakistan all out england today and come to bat tomorrow and go all blazing and give the target of Atleast 200 or 180 to England and with Atleast 50 overs with such conditions may be there is a chance then if not win Atleast the match will be mouth watering and it will give some belief that with such interruptions still there is a chance to win and with this no captain will take these interruptions lightly
I just checked the weather there is no rain after 3 means Atleast 4 hours of play may be 3.30 hours and tomorrow there won't be any rain interruptions if some how pakistan all out england today and come to bat tomorrow and go all blazing and give the target of Atleast 200 or 180 to England and with Atleast 50 overs with such conditions may be there is a chance then if not win Atleast the match will be mouth watering and it will give some belief that with such interruptions still there is a chance to win and with this no captain will take these interruptions lightly
No one owes Pakistan cricket anything. They are talking nonsense as usual.
Well we all know that 99 percent chances are drawYou're overthinking.
This is a draw.
All i can say with the weather playing spoiler that i am gutted to have lost the first match as out of 7 days so far we have been the better team just few bad sessions
Actually this is incorrect. The ECB was facing financial ruin. The Hundred had been cancelled, several counties were about to declare bankruptcy. TV rights for international cricket pay for the entire ECB infrastructure (from school development to counties). Sky made it clear — no international cricket, no money.
The ECB made a significant request to WI and Pakistan to tour.
This, for any rationale mind, does create an expectation of reciprocity.
Actually this is incorrect. The ECB was facing financial ruin. The Hundred had been cancelled, several counties were about to declare bankruptcy. TV rights for international cricket pay for the entire ECB infrastructure (from school development to counties). Sky made it clear — no international cricket, no money.
The ECB made a significant request to WI and Pakistan to tour.
This, for any rationale mind, does create an expectation of reciprocity.
Actually this is incorrect. The ECB was facing financial ruin. The Hundred had been cancelled, several counties were about to declare bankruptcy. TV rights for international cricket pay for the entire ECB infrastructure (from school development to counties). Sky made it clear — no international cricket, no money.
The ECB made a significant request to WI and Pakistan to tour.
This, for any rationale mind, does create an expectation of reciprocity.
That is not correct.
Pakistan and West Indies were scheduled to tour long before COVID. Their tours simply coincided with the pandemic.
Let’s not give the impression that we volunteered to tour during the pandemic. All we and West Indies did was honor a predetermined commitment.
And both Pakistan and West Indies are not in a position to say no to a big 3 tour because we already get to play very little cricket again the big 3.
India is not interested in playing us, Australia have downgraded us from 3 Tests to 2 Tests, and that leaves ECB as the only big 3 board who is keen to play regularly with us.
In the last 4 years, we have played 9 Tests in England. Are we really in a position to say no to England and **** off the only big board that gives a toss about us these days?
It would have been a favor and ECB would have owed us something if Pakistan were not scheduled to tour this summer and would have volunteered to do so because the scheduled team would have refused to play.
So this whole narrative of PCB doing a favor and now ECB is bound to reciprocate is just nonsense.
But common man you too know this england will not tour to Pakistan
And we have so soft people that they will not even say a second word to England about why they won't come there answers to media will be same as wasim khan
We toured England just for the sake of resuming cricket not for any leverage and all will be normal till the next tour date
Play has been abandoned for the day. It will take 2.5 - 3 hours to get the field fit to play and the outfield longer as it is extremely wet.