You have come up with the weakest argument I have ever heard
in support of IPL here lol.
I never said I 'supported IPL'. You missed the main premise of my argument. I will reiterate it once again - I said the IPL is not the cause of your team's latest position on the rankings table or the position of your cricketers on the top 10 whatever rankings. I meant that the IPL is the most convenient coat hanger/umbrella stand to blame for whatever reason catches your fancy. There is a massive difference between 'supporting IPL' and not blaming it.
You say that you have watched cricket before internet came. There are people here who have been watching cricket before you even started watching it as well, little champ. Now coming back to your weak argument. You are expecting teams other than Australia to fill stadiums in Australia? Well most of the India and Pakistan matches had decent crowds there.
Once again you jumped the gun. The triangular series was played in aus from the start of the 80's till 2008. I had mentioned before, IF the cricketing world was so perfect before the IPL came into existence, why did they have empty stadiums in matches not involving Aus? Surely, there was enough intrest inthe game itself for the paying public to watch a day of cricket yet be neutral. In your perfect pre IPL world, and cricket being the most loved viewing spectacle, ENG playing NZ or WI playing Saf should be drawing full houses , wouldnt it? Why did the Aus triangular series flop and then stop? its also not that they decided one fine day in 2008 to stop, its a gradual trend they obseverd over the years that it was not financially viable before pulling the plug - whats IPL got to do with that?
When we talk about cricket being better before IPL came then we talk it as a whole. Here are some of the reasons, for more browse and search around this forum I have been posting here for quite sometime now :
1.) Scheduling was better, most of the teams used to play against each other. Now a days whole schedule is built around indian pyjama league. As a true cricket fan, that is what makes me dislike IPL more.
- You might have a point here. As i also mentioned earlier, i'd take viewing test matches any day than viewing any league cricket. The truth of the matter is, there is NO window to slot IPL. Where ever u slot this, some country or the other's domestic/test season is bound to be disrupted. no easy fix for this.
But again - the IPL, your convenient one stop shop to groan gets more than it deserves by way of the collective common narrative.
2.) Players had passion to play for their country. I don't have to say too much here. If you are really following cricket then you know how many players choose to skip matches to keep themselves fit for pyjama leagues.
3.) Teams were stronger before. Most of the teams now are pretty weak these days. Aus, SA, SL, West Indies and even Pakistan are nowhere near their teams from 2000s.
So why did aus not be of the level of 1948 invincibles in the late 50's or 60's? WI started loosing at home and regularly from about mid 90's - what did IPL have to do with that?
- As per u If IPL did not come along, most teams mentioned above would be on peak strength, fitness ,ability, talent and skills to match each legendary side or be their finest sides every produced?
From these, One of the teams does not play IPL - can u co-relate with metrics exactly how its strength dwindled?
Kindly tell your reasons why cricket is better after IPL came into existence.