Its almost impossible to prove directly that it was Sammy or Babar calling the deal in the actual match.
When you have no direct evidence of the masterstroke or brainwave decision of bowling Saim, you look at the inferential and deductive logic.
Just like you have aptly deduced that the PSL title won under Imads reign was all because of Babar because Imad was unable to win when Babar left we use the same reasoning.
Babar was unable to offer any innovative thought or masterstrokes during his national team captaincy reigns. His captaincy was predictable, boring and often lacked plan B or Plan C even when the team was losing.
He was dumped unceremoniously for the same reason. Inability to offer anything different or unique and not able to command his troops to wins.
And now you are telling me Babar suddenly found new insight and started using Saim as a bowler?
Fine.
I will accept it.
But you also have to then accept that Imad won the PSL because of his captaincy and not because of Babar only.
You seem quick to credit Babar for these odd quirks but seem just as eager to discredit Imad using the same logic you use to credit Babar.
How do you even live with such deliberate dishonest reasoning?
You had no qualms about stating with confidence that Sammy is calling the shots but you don’t want to transfer the blame from Babar to Sammy when it comes to the decisions that did not work.
Why? Because it doesn’t support the position that you are holding in this debate. You are not a neutral - you have made up your mind that Babar is a bad captain and can never improve his captaincy so you are only looking for examples and situations that support your claim.
It is fine though - it is better to be opinionated than to be a fence sitting neutral.
Because of your bias and agenda, you also don’t want to open yourself up to the possibility that Babar reflected back on his time as captain of Pakistan and recognized that he did a few things wrong.
You don’t want to open up yourself to the possibility that Babar looked at the Zalmi bowling attack and thought that well, it is a weak attack and his usual captaincy style doesn’t work, so why not do something different and see if it works out.
You don’t want to look at any of that because it doesn’t support your opinion so you are comfortable believing that whatever did good that Babar did as captain this season was due to Sammy because he captained Pakistan for 4 years and didn’t exhibit any innovative decision-making.
I will give you another example: Babar had the highest SR in the PP in the league stage among all openers, higher than the openers who have been used as examples by you and others as the type of T20 opener that Pakistan needs instead of Babar.
But you and others didn’t say a word about his impressive SR in PP this season because it doesn’t support your opinion.
If he had his usual PP SR, you and others would have been all over him like a rash. His SR wasn’t great in the Qualifier and Eliminator 2, and I saw you mention this numerous times but I didn’t see a single post from you (correct me if I am wrong) where you acknowledged and praised his fantastic SR in the PP overs in the league stage.
The answer to this is again, very simple. The first situation doesn’t support your opinion and the second situation does.
As far as crediting Imad’s captaincy for Karachi’s win in 2020 is concerned, my answer to that is very simple: Imad has only captained one PSL edition without Babar in his team and his captaincy - and the results that came with it - were rubbish.
Had Imad delivered as captain last season and proved that he didn’t need Babar carrying him, I would have no issues acknowledging that he is a good captain.