The Times UK
Friday, October 20 2023
By Simon Wilde:-
A definitive verdict must wait for the end of the tournament, but India’s hosting of the Cricket World Cup is looking like an enormous missed opportunity. The greatest cricketing territory in the world could have used the sport’s biggest global tournament to showcase the country as one of the most advanced societies of the 21st century and a market leader in event organising.
In fact, it has appeared anything but. Many of us who have been coming here for more than 30 years think it feels like the same old, same old. What is delivered is delivered late (late schedule, late tickets, you name it), and as ever the little people — in this instance those who dare to come and watch a match in person rather than on television, which really is the only prism through which the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) can see the world — are treated with contempt.
The most alarming thing is that those who are running the tournament — the BCCI rather than the International Cricket Council, even though it is officially an ICC event — genuinely do not seem to care. Given that the BCCI has close links to the government here, and India is planning a bid to stage the 2036 Olympic Games, it really should be taking a broader view.
To make matters worse, as chance would have it, cricket is holding its oldest global event at the same time as rugby union is staging its World Cup. India may not care much about rugby, but several of the other leading cricketing nations do — among them, England, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.
So sports fans in those places have been offered a stark contrast on their TVs: the sold-out stadiums in France, full of multinational audiences passionately supporting their teams, versus the soulless swathes of empty seats in cavernous concrete bowls around India. Which one looks better; which sport looks healthier? The cricket grounds here are not without their qualities, but their most impressive characteristic is their size, which in the minds of the Ozymandiases who run the state associations is of course all that matters. But look closer and you cannot escape the dirty seats and lack of basic amenities, such as food and drink outlets, that might be regarded as unacceptable to a 1990s audience, let alone one in the 2020s.
It would not cost much to address these issues and, let’s be frank, the BCCI is the wealthiest cricket body in the world. It could easily make things better if it wanted to. It could also have released tickets earlier, or digitised the whole ticketing process, but holding on to tickets and distributing them as an instrument of patronage is the oldest trick in the Indian bureaucratic book.
The contrast in recent weeks between the Rugby World Cup and Cricket World Cup, with full stadiums and supporters from the world over at one and empty seats and mostly home supporters at the other, has been stark The contrast in recent weeks between the Rugby World Cup and Cricket World Cup, with full stadiums and supporters from the world over at one and empty seats and mostly home supporters at the other, has been stark
Of course, it would be a mistake to try to impose Western attitudes on subcontinental ways, but World Cups are only supposed to be awarded to those willing to meet certain criteria. It’s not just an issue of comfort, there’s also the safety aspect. A few days ago scaffolding and advertising fell off the top of a stand when high winds struck the stadium at Lucknow during the Australia-Sri Lanka match. Anecdotal evidence suggests the stadium in Guwahati that hosted England’s two warm-ups was not without its risks. Any tournament host should be willing to accept the citizens of a participating country. The hostility towards Pakistan fans and journalists has been well documented. At the last count about a dozen Pakistan journalists had finally been granted visas and allowed in; that figure is expected to rise, but for heaven’s sake we are entering the third week of the tournament.
Mickey Arthur’s comments after the India-Pakistan match in Ahmedabad, that it felt like a BCCI event rather than an ICC event, was a stinging rebuke of the shamefully lopsided nature of the experience. Has any sporting event watched by 100,000-plus people seen such a disparity in numbers between the supporters of one side and the other?
Less documented is the dearth of any foreign support at what should be a celebration of global cricketing excellence. The England team are now here in Mumbai, which is among the most attractive Indian cities to visit, yet their travelling support barely totals 200-250. ITC is one of three companies that has brought supporters, along with Gullivers and the Barmy Army. Gary Millis, its spokesman, has accompanied most England tours for the past eight years and says this has probably been the worst.
There is still time for the BCCI to improve experiences and attendances at the World Cup, after some fans have complained about their trips to the various Indian cricket grounds There is still time for the BCCI to improve experiences and attendances at the World Cup, after some fans have complained about their trips to the various Indian cricket grounds
“The organisation hasn’t been brilliant,” he said. “We weren’t given the locations until July, when February would have been better, and didn’t get the ticket prices until August. That’s had a major impact. We were already further down the line on sales for the Test matches in India early next year than we were with this World Cup, because the Test dates came out earlier.“We’ve got 26 people here and that will go down after this next ODI in Mumbai before coming back up again. “On the whole we’ve enjoyed the experience. The locals are really friendly. But the biggest let-down has been the grounds and not being allowed to take things in with us, except phones and wallets. We can’t take in phone chargers, water, food or suntan lotion, and many of the seats are not in the shade, so things like water and suntan lotion are important.
“They confiscate all sorts of items like sprays, sanitisers and gels. There’s a whole list of things you’re not allowed to take in. We were also told we could buy suntan lotion in the ground but couldn’t. “There wasn’t any bottled water available in Delhi and we didn’t feel we could trust the water they provided because we were unsure where it had come from. That was poor. At one of the venues we were asked to show our tickets six times after we entered the ground.“I’ve been on plenty of England tours and none have been as strict as this. It’s terribly frustrating. I think they need to get in line with the rest of the world.”
Millis says that his company will be taking many more supporters to the Caribbean for England’s white-ball tour in December: “We will have 200 in Barbados and 150 in Antigua. There are lots of friends we can call on among former West Indies players. We will have lots of functions, cricket matches and barbecues.” Little wonder the fans have made the choices they have.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cricket-world-cup-india-stadiums-attendance-kx58fwkwq