Babar and Rizwan's ceiling is 160. That's why you can celebrate the 152-0. If ever, there was a match that proved their ceiling, its that one. Once the required score is 180, they are a liability in T20. And above 200, you can bet 100 percent Pakistan will lose the match. That's how useless they become as the RRR gets higher.
Our 3 highest run chases in the history of our T20I team were all carried by Babar and Rizwan.
Pakistan 208/3 against West Indies.
Pakistan 205/1 against South Africa.
Pakistan 203/0 against England.
Now you will say these came against B and C teams and to that I would agree. However, almost all of Imad’s match winning T20 performances have also come in bilateral T20 series against B and C teams. In T20 WC’s, Imad Wasim has been completely average.
So if yore going to use Imad Wasim’s T20 performances against B and C teams to argue that he is a match winner and X factory, then Babar and Rizwan have won us matches against B and C teams more times than Imad has.
I say this as someone who would like Babar and Rizwan replaced as openers by Saim and someone like Harris.
I am not going to go into why Imad retired as I don't like playing politics on the forums. If he retired, so be it. But he shouldn't have been discarded for a mediocre cricketer like Nawaz.
He was discarded for a short period of time because Nawaz was performing better than him. Then when Nawaz was bad he was dropped and Imad came back. Why should a player that’s not performing well get to hold their spot against someone else who is performing better? When it became clear Nawaz was playing worse he was also dropped - this is how it should work.
Shadab being in the team, regardless is again, exactly what I am arguing about. Babar, Rizwan, Shadab, Shaheen stay in the team regardless of performances or attributes. But the others get sacked based on how they perform series to series. That's pretty damning indictment of how Pakistan team is a hostage to a few cricketers.
Every team has its core of players. Babar and Rizwan keep their spots because they’re the highest run scorers and Shaheen keeps his spot due to being the highest wicket taker. To me it does not make much sense to drop the best performing players on a bad team when you could first start by dropping the players performing really badly - even if the best ones are not playing that good.
I am just arguing stats can't be used to compare players like Babar and Rizwan to players like Fakhar and Imad. It just doesn't work that way. You may agree or disagree, but it’s the truth. No one cares about the stats of Maxwell, yet he remains a part of the team because Australians know he has the X factor.
I don’t agree with this because match winning performances do show up in stats, Maxwell for example averages 47 at a 160 SR in ODI WC’s. That’s ridiculously good!
Fakhar Zaman had Amir are also genuine match winners who have performed in tournaments. Fakhar Zaman averages 46 at a 93 SR which is pretty solid. Amir has good tournament stats.
It’s very rare for a player to have absolutely horrible or mediocre career stats and then still produce match winning performances. Stokes is one rare exception, he has mediocre stats but is a genuine match winner across formats.
The only issue I take with this X factor thing is that yeah maybe there’s players who perform 1/10 matches but they’ll win you that 1 match. But that completely ignores how they may have caused you to lose the other 9.
But if you believe Imad Wasim is an X factor on the same level as Amir and Fakhar then please list the performances in big moments that he has given. It’s okay if Imad Wasim gets selected, but I’m just tired of people pretending like we have been missing out on having Gary Sobers in the team all because of a few matches in PSL.