India (101/4) defeat New Zealand (99/8) by 6 wickets in the 2nd T20I to level the series

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,577
Purely going by recent numbers, it's a no brainer to have Prithvi Shaw opening the innings for India in T20Is. But Ishan Kishan's contributions in the shortest format last year in the matches at home and Shubman Gill's meteoric rise in ODI cricket over the last 12 months have forced the management to give these two youngsters a chance after sidelining Rohit Sharma and KL Rahul. However, they haven't been able to grab the opportunity so far in the four games India have played in T20I cricket in 2023.

Kishan made a scratchy 37 at the Wankhede against Sri Lanka and Gill came up with a not-so-fluent 46 against the same opposition in Rajkot. Apart from that, both the batters have failed to get going in the other three games, including the one on Friday (January 27) against New Zealand in Ranchi in the same game where the New Zealand openers contributed a combined 87 off 58. While it's safe to say that India's new-look T20I side is slowly taking shape, their opening conundrum is far from settled.

While the futures of Rohit, Rahul and Virat Kohli in this format is up in the air, the calls for Shaw's inclusion continues to grow louder especially with Kishan and Gill finding it hard to nail down their spots. Ruturaj Gaikwad getting ruled out of the series at the last minute should make things easier for the management in terms of handing Shaw a chance. But will it come on Sunday in Lucknow? If it doesn't, then it's fair to say that it might come at least in the final game of the series if Gill and Kishan fail to make an impact again in the second T20I.

India will also hope for a better performance with the ball in the second game if they are to level the series. While the spinners did their job, every single pacer was taken apart in Ranchi. New Zealand on the other hand would be buoyed with their performance especially after failing to win a single ODI on the tour. Daryl Mitchell, who struggled for runs so far, came up with a vital knock and Mitchell Santner appeared to be unplayable on that surface. If they do manage to put up a repeat performance, it will go down as a terrific result given India rarely fail to collect trophies at home.

When: India vs New Zealand, January 29, 7 PM local time

Where: Bharat Ratna Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow

What to expect: Temperatures are expected to be cooler during the game. Both captains were surprised by the amount of turn that was on offer in Ranchi but things could be different in Lucknow. The last time this venue hosted a T20I was around 11 months ago in a contest where India smashed 199/2. India and South Africa also played out a 40-over contest last October that saw both teams score over six an over.

Team News

India: The hosts will hardly contemplate making changes. Shivam Mavi and Umran Malik combined to send down just three overs and Kuldeep Yadav was impressive again. Prithvi Shaw may have to wait for his turn.

Predicted XI - Ishan Kishan (wk), Shubman Gill, Rahul Tripathi, Suryakumar Yadav, Hardik Pandya (c), Deepak Hooda, Washington Sundar, Shivam Mavi, Kuldeep Yadav, Umran Malik, Arshdeep Singh

New Zealand: The visitors are expected to go in with an unchanged XI as well.

Predicted XI - Finn Allen, Devon Conway (wk), Mark Chapman, Daryl Mitchell, Glenn Phillips, Mitchell Santner (c), Michael Bracewell, Jacob Duffy, Ish Sodhi, Lockie Ferguson, Blair Tickner

Squads:

India Squad: Shubman Gill, Ishan Kishan(w), Rahul Tripathi, Suryakumar Yadav, Hardik Pandya(c), Deepak Hooda, Washington Sundar, Shivam Mavi, Kuldeep Yadav, Arshdeep Singh, Umran Malik, Prithvi Shaw, Yuzvendra Chahal, Jitesh Sharma, Mukesh Kumar

New Zealand Squad: Finn Allen, Devon Conway(w), Mark Chapman, Glenn Phillips, Daryl Mitchell, Michael Bracewell, Mitchell Santner(c), Ish Sodhi, Jacob Duffy, Lockie Ferguson, Blair Tickner, Henry Shipley, Michael Rippon, Dane Cleaver, Ben Lister
 
New Zealand have won the toss and have opted to bat

Mitchell Santner: We are gonna have a bat. The stats say that it's challenging to chase. Had a tough ODI series, nice to bounce back. The key is to take wickets through the middle. Same team.

New Zealand (Playing XI): Finn Allen, Devon Conway(w), Mark Chapman, Glenn Phillips, Daryl Mitchell, Michael Bracewell, Mitchell Santner(c), Ish Sodhi, Jacob Duffy, Lockie Ferguson, Blair Tickner

Hardik Pandya: We were also thinking about batting first.

India (Playing XI): Shubman Gill, Ishan Kishan(w), Rahul Tripathi, Suryakumar Yadav, Hardik Pandya(c), Deepak Hooda, Washington Sundar, Shivam Mavi, Kuldeep Yadav, Yuzvendra Chahal, Arshdeep Singh
 
Last edited:
huzGvbc.png
 
Gill lost his wicket due to Ishan's tuk tuk.
 
Poor Sundar who was batting far better than Sky, had to pay price for pig headedness of Sky.
 
STAT: Most balls in a T20I where no sixes was hit (FM teams)

239 Ind vs NZ Lucknow 2023 *
238 Ban vs NZ Mirpur 2021
223 Eng vs Pak Cardiff 2010
207 SL vs Ind Colombo RPS 2021
 
werweeew.jpg

Today ground was much bigger. With ball that was turning right across the pitch even for part timers it was a hard ask to hit a six.
 
Suryakumar Yadav and Hardik Pandya kept their cool to guide India to a hard-fought win over New Zealand in the second T20I encounter in Lucknow.

Chasing 100, India were unable to accelerate and it took another gritty known from Suryakumar to get them over the line.

Arshdeep Singh scalped two wickets as India restricted New Zealand at 99/8 in the second T20I match on Sunday at the Ekana Cricket Stadium in Lucknow.

Opting to bat first, the visitors kept on losing the wickets at regular intervals and could manage only 99 runs in 20 overs.

Apart from Arshdeep, Yuzvendra Chahal, Kuldeep Yadav, Hardik Pandya, Deep Hooda, and Washington Sundar scalped one wicket each.

For New Zealand, Mitchell Santner remained unbeaten at 19 off 23 balls. New Zealand skipper Mitchell Santner won the toss and opted to bat first against India.
 
Proves that hacks need a perfect road to be 360°

I very much doubt any team in the world could have survived on this treacherous track. But as Sunar said in the interview it offers a different challenge to batsmen. On one hand you pick T20 players for common scenario where the pitch is true where you can score quickly. You can sure pick a side toplay well on a turning wicket. But that side will be found wanting on flat wickets. You have to strike a balance somewhere. Couple of technically good players have to be slotted in between.
 
I very much doubt any team in the world could have survived on this treacherous track. But as Sunar said in the interview it offers a different challenge to batsmen. On one hand you pick T20 players for common scenario where the pitch is true where you can score quickly. You can sure pick a side toplay well on a turning wicket. But that side will be found wanting on flat wickets. You have to strike a balance somewhere. Couple of technically good players have to be slotted in between.

I was alluding to their selection in ODIs and tests. I dont have any interest in what they do in T20s. I only watch T20s to see new talent ( in case of IPL ) or if there is nothing else on TV.
 
chasing 100 in such a way with 6 wickets in the bank, absolutely shameful. no matter how much ever the ball has turned, this was a poor poor performance. shame.
 
Good to see Indian fans criticising their team’s approach.
 
Gill lost his wicket due to Ishan's tuk tuk.

Kishan needs a perfect road to score runs. He is the best we have in the absence of Pant(who is not that much better than Kishan in LOI).
Samson is a choker.
 
One thing is certain. Washington Sundar is a must along with Jaddu in the LOI format for India. The confidence shown in Sundar's ability to send hm ahead of Pandya is heartening. Sundar is a gem with both bat and ball.

India should play Jaddu/Sundar/Kuldeep/Bumrah/Siraj in the WC. Umran and Arshdeep must be in the reserves. This will be a very potent bowling unit and one of the best in the world.
 
Indian batting in absence of the great Rishabh Pant is looking really shambolic. They need to bring him back, other options are simply not international class.
 
Can we have such pitches in the World Cup. I would love it if the World Cup has matches where 230 is considered a good score and anything 250 becomes a winning score. Any contribution on 70-80 is a match winning contribution and a 100+ is really on another level.

And you need at least 30 overs of spin.
 
Can we have such pitches in the World Cup. I would love it if the World Cup has matches where 230 is considered a good score and anything 250 becomes a winning score. Any contribution on 70-80 is a match winning contribution and a 100+ is really on another level.

And you need at least 30 overs of spin.

In short a dream for Babar and Rizwan.

No pressure.

Dont take risks.

Strike at 70-80 and take the team home.
 
India skipper Hardik Pandya on Sunday slammed the standard of pitches used in the ongoing series against New Zealand and called the track prepared for the second T20I a "shocker". The ball turned in the first T20I in Ranchi and it was no different on Sunday when New Zealand were restricted to 99 for eight. India chased down the target with only one ball to spare. "To be honest, it was a shocker of a wicket. Both the games we have played on so far. I don't mind difficult wickets," said Hardik after the series-leveling win over New Zealand.

"I am all up for that, but these wo wickets were not made for T20. Somewhere down the line the curators or the grounds that we are going to play in should make sure they prepare the pitches earlier. Other than that, happy. Even 120 would have been a winning total," he said.

The series decider will be played in Ahmedabad on Wednesday. "I always believed that we'll be able to finish the game, but it went quite late. All these games are important with the moments. You don't need to panic because it was about rotating the strike rather than taking the pressure. That's exactly what we did. We followed our basics," he said about the tense finish.

On the bowlers' impressive performance, he added: "They stuck to their plans and ensured they (New Zealand) did not rotate the strike. We kept rotating the spinners. Dew didn't play much part in this. They were able to spin the ball more than us. It was carrying through well." New Zealand skipper Mitchell Santer said 120 could have been a winning total on the surface.

"It was a great game of cricket. To get it so close was a great effort from the bowlers. If we would have got an extra 10 or 15, could have been the difference. The calmness of Surya and Hardik to get them over the line was pretty good.

"We bowled 16 or 17 overs of spin, definitely something different. With the bounce out there, it looked challenging. You are not sure what a good total is. 120 might have been a good score," said Santner.

NDTV
 
In short a dream for Babar and Rizwan.

No pressure.

Dont take risks.

Strike at 70-80 and take the team home.

Nothing to do with Babar. I want a wc where bowlers are not just passengers. At least go back to WC11 levels where a score of 260 could be defended by good bowling.
 
Kishan needs a perfect road to score runs. He is the best we have in the absence of Pant(who is not that much better than Kishan in LOI).
But he won't always get roads! I shudder at seeing him in our test XI!
 
One thing is certain. Washington Sundar is a must along with Jaddu in the LOI format for India. The confidence shown in Sundar's ability to send hm ahead of Pandya is heartening. Sundar is a gem with both bat and ball.
Have been saying this since long. Sundar is a such a talented cricketer to have in your XI.

Even in tests, he should have been a regular by now. Has got such a great technique for tests.
 
Can we have such pitches in the World Cup. I would love it if the World Cup has matches where 230 is considered a good score and anything 250 becomes a winning score. Any contribution on 70-80 is a match winning contribution and a 100+ is really on another level.

And you need at least 30 overs of spin.
Pandya is not liking these pitches,

"Shocker Of A Wicket...": Hardik Pandya Lambasts Pitches Used In New Zealand T20I Series

India skipper Hardik Pandya on Sunday slammed the standard of pitches used in the ongoing series against New Zealand and called the track prepared for the second T20I a "shocker". The ball turned in the first T20I in Ranchi and it was no different on Sunday when New Zealand were restricted to 99 for eight. India chased down the target with only one ball to spare. "To be honest, it was a shocker of a wicket. Both the games we have played on so far. I don't mind difficult wickets," said Hardik after the series-leveling win over New Zealand.

https://sports.ndtv.com/india-vs-ne...ller-vs-nz-3734634#pfrom=home-ndtv_topstories
 
Indian batting in absence of the great Rishabh Pant is looking really shambolic. They need to bring him back, other options are simply not international class.

Are you serious? Pant is in hospital recovering after a life threatening accident and you want him back in the team? :facepalm
 
Pandya 21(20) in the first match and 15*(20) in the second match. Is he taking too much pressure of captaincy? :inti
 
Are you serious? Pant is in hospital recovering after a life threatening accident and you want him back in the team? :facepalm

I mean once he is fit..Thought it is self understood but then I checked who is the one quoting me and got the idea :viru :inti
 
Pandya 21(20) in the first match and 15*(20) in the second match. Is he taking too much pressure of captaincy? :inti

Nowadays i am sick of his fake swag. "Everyone be cool, dont worry, main hoo na " type of calm facade that he puts on while batting. Then goes on to bat like a noob.
 
the act of forcing the players into a format because of their good performances in other formats never seems to stop.

gill has a good list A record and shown that skill in his short ODI career too. citing his red hot form you want to use him to open in T20Is disregarding his mediocre T20 record. ok, but how long is the rope?

after playing 26 T20Is ishan has a s/r of 123. wow.

why are we living in stone age? let alone the advanced in-depth data analysis, the team can't even take a look at basic data? horses for courses, pick intent merchants with 135+ s/r only.
 
the act of forcing the players into a format because of their good performances in other formats never seems to stop.

gill has a good list A record and shown that skill in his short ODI career too. citing his red hot form you want to use him to open in T20Is disregarding his mediocre T20 record. ok, but how long is the rope?

after playing 26 T20Is ishan has a s/r of 123. wow.

why are we living in stone age? let alone the advanced in-depth data analysis, the team can't even take a look at basic data? horses for courses, pick intent merchants with 135+ s/r only.

You are right. Good example of this are players like Pant, Surya, Gill and Kishan. Pant is good in tests, Surya in T20s and Gill in ODIs currently but all of them are playing/played in all the formats. :inti
 
the act of forcing the players into a format because of their good performances in other formats never seems to stop.

gill has a good list A record and shown that skill in his short ODI career too. citing his red hot form you want to use him to open in T20Is disregarding his mediocre T20 record. ok, but how long is the rope?

after playing 26 T20Is ishan has a s/r of 123. wow.

why are we living in stone age? let alone the advanced in-depth data analysis, the team can't even take a look at basic data? horses for courses, pick intent merchants with 135+ s/r only.

Gill has played 5 T20Is, those numbers are of Kishan who has shown ability in IPL
 
Gill has played 5 T20Is, those numbers are of Kishan who has shown ability in IPL

Gill's ALL T20 s/r is 129. IPL s/r is 125. T20I (yes only 5 matches) s/r is 129. has poor s/r in all the T20s he has played till today. must be running out of rope in T20Is.

ishan's ALL T20 s/r is 130. IPL s/r is 132. T20I (26 matches) s/r is 123. I used to think ishan should be tried in international but he hasn't performed. he has poor numbers in all kinds of T20s. 'ishan kishan is aggressive' is a massive myth.

pant played 66 T20Is with 126 s/r. poor from selectors. we moved on eventually, at least.

anyone with < 135 s/r can't be given a long rope and needs to be dropped. infact selecting the players in first place should be based on s/r.
 
Indian batting in absence of the great Rishabh Pant is looking really shambolic. They need to bring him back, other options are simply not international class.

Yes becouse he has been world class in t20s.
 
And now this,

Lucknow pitch curator sacked for 'shocker of a wicket'

Lucknow's Ekana Cricket Stadium's pitch curator Surender Kumar has been removed from his job after preparing a "shocker of a pitch" for the second T20 International against New Zealand.

Though India won the game on Sunday with a ball to spare, skipper Hardik Pandya did not mince his words, calling the Lucknow wicket a "shocker".

"The curator has been removed and replaced by Sanjeev Kumar Agarwal who is a very experienced curator. We will turn things around in a month.

https://www.rediff.com/cricket/repo...ker-of-a-wicket-new-zealand-tour/20230131.htm
 
Back
Top