Momo ......do you really think that ? I am surprised.........pleasantly ofcourseMomo said:I'd say SA > Ind > Aus at the moment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Momo ......do you really think that ? I am surprised.........pleasantly ofcourseMomo said:I'd say SA > Ind > Aus at the moment.
We just played Australia and if it was India or SA, they would have thrashed Australia. Just imagine that Hauritz is their best spinner.bantu said:Momo ......do you really think that ? I am surprised.........pleasantly ofcourse
Momo said:I'd say SA > Ind > Aus at the moment.
Robert said:Very well done SA - you are the true champions in tests at present.
OfcourseRandom Aussie said:Yep. SA are a long way in front of us.
Nice to see expose India here, we are all looking forward to a sporting track for the next match.![]()
Random Aussie said:Yep. SA are a long way in front of us.
Nice to see expose India here, we are all looking forward to a sporting track for the next match.![]()
Muhammad said:Remeber it was only a few weeks ago that England almost thrashed SA in their own backyard.
I honestly believe England have a great chance of doing well in the subcontinent in the coming weeks.
Random Aussie said:Yep. SA are a long way in front of us.
Nice to see expose India here, we are all looking forward to a sporting track for the next match.![]()
Asok Chaktra said:Indians were unlucky with their team selection. A proper batsman in place of saha could have helped indian cause a lot. Sad to miss 3 of your best batsmen due to injuries + rohit sharma. It was india's fate to lose this match, wait and see what happens at eden.
Asok Chaktra said:Indians were unlucky with their team selection. A proper batsman in place of saha could have helped indian cause a lot. Sad to miss 3 of your best batsmen due to injuries + rohit sharma. It was india's fate to lose this match, wait and see what happens at eden.
Asok Chaktra said:Indians were unlucky with their team selection. A proper batsman in place of saha could have helped indian cause a lot. Sad to miss 3 of your best batsmen due to injuries + rohit sharma. It was india's fate to lose this match, wait and see what happens at eden.
How did they thrash SA at home? They desperately held on for a draw with their last wicket remaining in two matches, they won a match and SA won a match. SA could have won that series 3-1, and you'd be fooling yourself if you think that the 1-1 result was a fair reflection of both teams performances.Muhammad said:Remeber it was only a few weeks ago that England thrashed SA in their own backyard.
I honestly believe England have a great chance of doing well in the subcontinent in the coming weeks.
Jo_Don said:How did they thrash SA at home? They desperately held on for a draw with their last wicket remaining in two matches, they won a match and SA won a match. SA could have won that series 3-1, and you'd be fooling yourself if you think that the 1-1 result was a fair reflection of both teams performances.
India may have made that mistake by judging SA to be about equal to England, and now they've paid the price for it.
Anyway it appears as if SA really is India's bogey team. I hope they lift themselves and deliver a better performance in the next test.
Yeah it was a shocking defeat lol, but the poms got thrashed in the last test too.Muhammad said:I should've perhaps been clearer, I meant they thrashed them in a test match ie. second test.
It was quite some beating too, seems light years ago now.
Rickz said:Congrats to South Africa for a comprehensive win. They outplayed us in all departments. I am hoping for a better performance by India in the next test.
It was a 500+ pitch...Uncle Sam said:319 in the second innings against such an intensified bowling attack? I say, India still didn't do as bad as Pakistan batting would have done against an in form steyn, Harris and Parnell.
Pakistan would have been "dhair" under 200 I bet.
Inswinger said:It was a 500+ pitch...
Inswinger said:It was a 500+ pitch...
Muhammad said:Remeber it was only a few weeks ago that England thrashed SA in their own backyard.
I honestly believe England have a great chance of doing well in the subcontinent in the coming weeks.
srg said:This is a real good batting track. Steyn, imo, should be the MoM, not Amla. Amla and Kallis played the most boring cricket I've seen in recent times. Although their contribution are worthy of contending for the award, steyn made all the difference on this track.
Actually I'm not so sure. Amla and Kallis set it up for South Africa. They enabled Steyn to be able to bowl without worry of runs, which is when an attacking fast bowler is at his best. If South Africa had been bowled out for under 300 or 250, which was looking very likely at 6/2, Steyn wouldn't have had the luxury of just plugging away at that driving length and leaking runs.Sledger said:Was absolutely retarded to give Amla the award over Steyn.
Muhammad said:Remeber it was only a few weeks ago that England thrashed SA in their own backyard.
I honestly believe England have a great chance of doing well in the subcontinent in the coming weeks.
Momo said:I have no doubt that Australia is at their weakest in years
saffer said:Um...dude....we drew the series 1 -1. The othr two games they were more than 100 runs behind and 9 wickets down when time saved them.
It was 2 balls away from 3- 1 thrashing.
Robert said:![]()
When we saved ourselves, actually.
Oh, the way you lot were bowling, England could have blocked out another hour in each match.![]()
Dunno, a Protea hardly ever gets a 250+ score. The day Kallis gets a double century it will snow.Sledger said:Was absolutely retarded to give Amla the award over Steyn.
JustAnotherFan said:Dunno, a Protea hardly ever gets a 250+ score. The day Kallis gets a double century it will snow.)
Steyn has had 10 wickets in a match 4 times. Yes, he had a special bowling performance on day 1, his best in an innings, but I still think Kallis and Amla (more so) initially laid the foundation for the win.
saffer said:That's why you were 9 down undreds of runs behind after collapsing despite very flat tracks ? Don't kid yourself. 1-1 was a totally bizare reflection of that series. Englan probably won 1 session the whole 4 games.
Robert said:But that one was in the right place at the right time.
And we beat the Aussies in a series even though they won 50 of the 75 sessions.
Don't kid yourself - SA just didn't have enough to beat us, and that's with KP out of sorts for the whole series.
Amla was the grafter who sweated it out for 2 days ... Steyn walked through the tail in a few overs. Big difference. Amla is the guy who I'll buy a coke for anyway. (Excuse the pun).Sledger said:Who actually won the game? Steyn. Even if Amla hadn't scored a 200, South Africa would be well on top by the end of today (all other things being equal). I don't think having achieved something before should take away from someone doing it again. Should Lara not have got MOM after scoring 400, breaking his own highest score record?
Steyn was the player who'll be remembered more for this game and he definately deserved it imo.
dani2k said:Naah mate. We intend to return the same favor that SA gave Engexpect a rank turner.
dani2k said:^^ All is fair in love and war. And we don't expect conditions to suit us when we tour SA or Aus so why should SA do so? Boming the #1 is not kids play. So let SA face the "test" that they dread most to become what they "deserve to". SA shouldnt be complaining. They were the one who threw "caution to the wind" and asked for a pacy pitch when faced with a similar situation against England.
Having said that, there are already reports that Eden gardens might not be a rank turner anway. So let us wait and see.
itduzz said:They beat you right in your back yard finishing Vaughan career
Robert said:And before that we beat them in their backyard. What's your point?
Keith said:I suppose that after the recent test series (both home and away - Eng vs SA) SA have emerged the stonger of the 2 nations? Certainly would appear to be so with an SA away win and a home drawn series!!
Robert said:Since readmission, SA and England have been roughly par with each other. I think SA won two series, England won two, and three were shared. SA are currently the better side, no argument from me there.
So one pitch at a time is fine?!Random Aussie said:Wow that one pitch in South Africa has given all the pitch doctoring cheerleaders a new lease of life eh?
Keith said:Agreed. England need to sort out a few things. A decent number 3 would be good and a consistent upper / middle order would go along way in making it a formidable side. I think your current attack is not bad at all!
Having a look at "old series" is wonderful for nostalgic reasons and to see the way certain players have performed over an extended period of time and also to see how the game has changed in that period.