What then, according to you geniuses, explains the massive difference in run rates? Considering India were pretty much bowling with 1 pacer and 2 spinners for most of the 1st innings?
My post above! Think about tactics, because both teams do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What then, according to you geniuses, explains the massive difference in run rates? Considering India were pretty much bowling with 1 pacer and 2 spinners for most of the 1st innings?
In the last 10 years, Australia has dismissed India for an average of 34.7 runs per wicket in India and 39.7 rpw in Australia. That is an average innings score of 347 in India and 397 in Australia (which is the easier batting conditions?). 10 years because that's about the length the bulk of this lineup has been together. http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine...2000;spanval1=span;template=results;type=team
This shows that Australia can not expect to dismiss India cheaply. Playing slow in the first innings was uncharacteristic for the aussies, and was probably part of their strategy to reduce their chance of losing (i.e. NOT playing for a win). Or maybe it was due to the 'excellent' Indian bowling? Take your pick or provide another theory.
^^Its irrelevant. They have the lead and will be pressing to setup a target tomorrow
What then, according to you geniuses, explains the massive difference in run rates? Considering India were pretty much bowling with 1 pacer and 2 spinners for most of the 1st innings?
In the last 10 years, Australia has dismissed India for an average of 34.7 runs per wicket in India and 39.7 rpw in Australia. That is an average innings score of 347 in India and 397 in Australia (which is the easier batting conditions?). 10 years because that's about the length the bulk of this lineup has been together. http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine...2000;spanval1=span;template=results;type=team
This shows that Australia can not expect to dismiss India cheaply. Playing slow in the first innings was uncharacteristic for the aussies, and was probably part of their strategy to reduce their chance of losing (i.e. NOT playing for a win). Or maybe it was due to the 'excellent' Indian bowling? Take your pick or provide another theory.
Me speak slowly.
First innings over.
Us = Lead.
Therefore You = Behind
Me speak slowly.
First innings over.
Us = Lead.
Therefore You = Behind
Mate stop doing that, my monitor nearlly wore my coffee i laughed that hard.
It's funny how they're showing the Watson catch numerous times on super slo-mo yet they only opted to show VVS's similarly dubious catch ONCE in TOTAL
Aussies hammering some1 is a beautiful sight as long as your team is not on the receiving end....
lol
lolDhoni has all the fielders on boundary against katich too. Poor captaincy.
lol
whats good old Katich gonna do? They should try to get Watto's wicket!
In the last 10 years, Australia has dismissed India for an average of 34.7 runs per wicket in India and 39.7 rpw in Australia. That is an average innings score of 347 in India and 397 in Australia (which is the easier batting conditions?). 10 years because that's about the length the bulk of this lineup has been together. http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine...2000;spanval1=span;template=results;type=team
This shows that Australia can not expect to dismiss India cheaply. Playing slow in the first innings was uncharacteristic for the aussies, and was probably part of their strategy to reduce their chance of losing (i.e. NOT playing for a win). Or maybe it was due to the 'excellent' Indian bowling? Take your pick or provide another theory.
no talk of defensive batting today?
Aussie's walloping India all over the park, going for the win as always!
not much.. just that in past 10 matches he has 8 fifties, 2 centuries and averages 60.
Lulz at the twin spin attack with a 5-over old ball.
typical indians. When tendulkar was called back it's all ok.
Clarke's thing as been referred but no it's not allowed
BCCI and ICC giving live join statement now : Billy Bowden has just given the worst decision ever in cricket... That has damaged test cricket a lot. We will have to wait the end of the match to know if test cricket will continue.
They are just being fair to the Aussies{dont want to scare them to much with 120km\h sizzling pace] and giving there mega fast pace bowlers the old ball.
SOmeone has been made to eat humble pies indeed!! Tch tch..
I don't think thats within the rules tbh.
Ishanth could be the next Sami.
Need to get Hussey and North early. Those footmarks could come into play for the spinners now.
Lol. There was never a worse curse spoken!!
And for some poster too.Getting out to Ishant....so embarassing for any decent batsman
Batting is getting extremely difficult here. Even 225 would be very tough to chase.
Score?