Ponting actually was not that great against good home teams in general when playing away. You can give a very wide leeway to Ponting and include top 6 home homes teams during his career. I don't think going till top 6 is warranted, but that allows a very large sample size and enough chance to make up weak performance against Ind.
View attachment 146813
Ponting has 50 plus tests so really a huge sample size. Aus was also by far the best home team during his playing days with W/L of over 5 when second best was in 2.x. Ponting avoided facing the best home team as well.
And yet he avearges 40 collectively against the top 6 home sides when playing in their dens. It's not horrble. 40 is still good, but it's highlights the fact that Ponting was not that great against good home sides. He has 9 tons so not bad but it came in 50 plus tests. 1 ton every 10 innings.
View attachment 146814
That's why I just shake my head when anyone makes a case for Ponting coming ahead of Smith in all time Aus Test XI. Smith is comfortably ahead of Ponting in the test format and it's not even close. I had the same impression watching both of them live and data shows the same thing. Anyone rating Ponting ahead is getting influenced by how often Aus used to win those days.
I always find it puzzling the hate Kohli gets from some posters. He had 2 ATG away series in Aus and Eng. Couple more great away series in Aus and SA. Averages around 60 on tough pitches at home. Not to derail the thread but recency bias have made people forget how great his career has been.
Coming back to Ponting, I think he was a very good all format player, but just below the likes SRT, Lara and Kohli. Just in test, it's harder to rank because his dominating runs have come at home. A great player to watch in full flow, but had his own shortcomings.