What's new

Narendra Modi : Mega Discussion Thread

Lol just for optics sake they could have done it when he died or Atleast after he was done with him PM-ship. Even much maligned Gandhi-Nehrus didn’t do this.

There is no such rule that a person has to be dead to name something after himself. Modi was CM of Gujarat 2 times and people loves him there. He has made it one of the most developed state in India and created the Gujarat model for other states to follow. So there is no harm in naming the stadium after him which also happens to be biggest cricket stadium in the world.

Only fake liberals, anti nationals and tukde tukde gang have problem with it bcoz Modi ji has shut their shop and fake agenda since 2014.

It will be epic to see their reaction during 2023 WC where finals will be played here and he will be personally present to hand the trophy to the winning captain. And if that winning captain is Rohit Sharma, then that burn will be even severe :))

#FingerCrossed
 
And yet you vote for one of them, while I vote for neither of them. Why?

Let me teach you history.

Nehru and Indira were PMs when their cabinets recommended their names for Bharat Ratna. No one else in the country's history has done this.

Modi was Gujarat Cricket Association President when the plans for the new stadium were finalized. He was not the PM then.

Naming a stadium after its President in his lifetime has a long history in India.

M A Chidambaram stadium Chennai

M Chinnaswamy Stadium Bangalore

Wankhede Stadium Mumbai

I AS Bindra Stadium Mohali

Arun Jaitley Stadium Delhi

All named after their Presidents or founders.

Learn the difference.
 
I understand bhakts are short of IQ, so let me break down my post for you:

1. cricketjoshila claims both Congress and BJP are FIGJAMs who name stuff after themselves.
2. I say - true, and I don't vote for either of them. Why do you (cricketjoshila) fall head over heels for the BJP then?
3. No response from cricketjoshila so far. And a typically off-the-wall response from you.

Your name calling shows, you are the only one lacking IQ here.
 
There is no such rule that a person has to be dead to name something after himself. Modi was CM of Gujarat 2 times and people loves him there. He has made it one of the most developed state in India and created the Gujarat model for other states to follow. So there is no harm in naming the stadium after him which also happens to be biggest cricket stadium in the world.

Only fake liberals, anti nationals and tukde tukde gang have problem with it bcoz Modi ji has shut their shop and fake agenda since 2014.

It will be epic to see their reaction during 2023 WC where finals will be played here and he will be personally present to hand the trophy to the winning captain. And if that winning captain is Rohit Sharma, then that burn will be even severe :))

#FingerCrossed

I don't understand the problem our neighbours have if we name a stadium in India.
 
Let me teach you history.

Nehru and Indira were PMs when their cabinets recommended their names for Bharat Ratna. No one else in the country's history has done this.

Modi was Gujarat Cricket Association President when the plans for the new stadium were finalized. He was not the PM then.

Naming a stadium after its President in his lifetime has a long history in India.

M A Chidambaram stadium Chennai

M Chinnaswamy Stadium Bangalore

Wankhede Stadium Mumbai

I AS Bindra Stadium Mohali

Arun Jaitley Stadium Delhi

All named after their Presidents or founders.

Learn the difference.

Just to clarify, the stadium was named after Jaitley after his death though the proposal was mooted before his death.
 
Possibly because you weren't born when Nehru, Indira or even Rajiv were contesting elections?

Now that you have attained the voting age, you can vote for your hero Pappu in the next election.

Pappu is right now begging in UK for foreign intervention in India.

The man has lost it.
 
Pappu is right now begging in UK for foreign intervention in India.

The man has lost it.

Rahul Gandhi and his Congress cronies are desperate. They know they can never win an election as long as he is the party chief. Yet they don't want to remove him.

I wonder what the compulsion is, really.
 
Rahul Gandhi and his Congress cronies are desperate. They know they can never win an election as long as he is the party chief. Yet they don't want to remove him.

I wonder what the compulsion is, really.

What he is doing is treasonous!!!!
 
It doesn’t stick out worse than Gaddafi stadium in Lahore lol.

I don't know what the underlying discussion was but I believe the Gaddafi stadium was originally named Lahore Stadium but was changed to Gaddafi because of his speech in support of Pakistan pursuing nuclear weapons. Should the name be changed to an indigenous leader? yes.... Should it be changed because of west's opinion on the guy? No!


Libya was the most prosperous African country under Gaddafi before they were bombed to the stone ages by the west. So I'll take the west's opinion on him with a barrel of salt
 
There is no such rule that a person has to be dead to name something after himself. Modi was CM of Gujarat 2 times and people loves him there. He has made it one of the most developed state in India and created the Gujarat model for other states to follow. So there is no harm in naming the stadium after him which also happens to be biggest cricket stadium in the world.

Only fake liberals, anti nationals and tukde tukde gang have problem with it bcoz Modi ji has shut their shop and fake agenda since 2014.

It will be epic to see their reaction during 2023 WC where finals will be played here and he will be personally present to hand the trophy to the winning captain. And if that winning captain is Rohit Sharma, then that burn will be even severe :))

#FingerCrossed

I guarantee you that India will not win the WC if Modi is present.

He has that effect :rahat1

Just look at India's record in ICC competitions and the state of the Streak since Modi took over.

I am a true Hindu who believes in things like Raahukaala :)
 
Pappu is right now begging in UK for foreign intervention in India.

The man has lost it.

All his talks in the UK were live streamed. And without a teleprompter too:afridi1

Do you have any video evidence of where he asked for foreign intervention in India or are you relying on what was sent to you via Whatsapp to propagate?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sw9feX2BKOY" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
All his talks in the UK were live streamed. And without a teleprompter too:afridi1

Do you have any video evidence of where he asked for foreign intervention in India or are you relying on what was sent to you via Whatsapp to propagate?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sw9feX2BKOY" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>



What is he trying to say here? Enough evidence?



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">THIS IS BETRAYAL OF BHARAT <br><br>After the drama of Bharat Jodo, Rahul crosses every limit for Bharat Badnami in Britain! Rahul Gandhi in Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav year (75 years of freedom) goes on British soil (ironically) and is seeking foreign intervention & validation on internal… <a href="https://t.co/bw5XagCVfD">https://t.co/bw5XagCVfD</a> <a href="https://t.co/Rsy2OPcGwp">pic.twitter.com/Rsy2OPcGwp</a></p>— Shehzad Jai Hind (@Shehzad_Ind) <a href="https://twitter.com/Shehzad_Ind/status/1632558219792093185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
What is he trying to say here? Enough evidence?



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">THIS IS BETRAYAL OF BHARAT <br><br>After the drama of Bharat Jodo, Rahul crosses every limit for Bharat Badnami in Britain! Rahul Gandhi in Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav year (75 years of freedom) goes on British soil (ironically) and is seeking foreign intervention & validation on internal… <a href="https://t.co/bw5XagCVfD">https://t.co/bw5XagCVfD</a> <a href="https://t.co/Rsy2OPcGwp">pic.twitter.com/Rsy2OPcGwp</a></p>— Shehzad Jai Hind (@Shehzad_Ind) <a href="https://twitter.com/Shehzad_Ind/status/1632558219792093185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Bharat Badnami :))) Who is this guy lol

Still waiting on the evidence where he seeks foreign intervention. Unless mocking the West for their vested monetary-based interests that cause them to ignore the gradual erosion of democratic principles in India is called seeking intervention :apology

You know what is calling for intervention? SC Bose trying to get Hitler and the Japanese to invade India to get rid of the British.
 
Bharat Badnami :))) Who is this guy lol

Still waiting on the evidence where he seeks foreign intervention. Unless mocking the West for their vested monetary-based interests that cause them to ignore the gradual erosion of democratic principles in India is called seeking intervention :apology

You know what is calling for intervention? SC Bose trying to get Hitler and the Japanese to invade India to get rid of the British.

Bro in the last 2 posts you have articulated a lot more better than Rahul Gandhi has ever done. That’s not saying much but still. Why don’t you run for Congress President instead of Pappu,I might move back to India just to vote for you.

Even people getting offended by what he is saying are fools in this instance as all I heard was him constantly blabbering through nonsense and keywords especially while answering questions on the spot.
 
Your name calling shows, you are the only one lacking IQ here.

Have to agree with this ... yet to see any of Modi critics engaging in a mature discussion with anyone who doesn't agree with them. When in a jam getting personal is all they can manage.

IMO its actually a tell tale sign that country is on the right track.
 
I guarantee you that India will not win the WC if Modi is present.

He has that effect :rahat1

Just look at India's record in ICC competitions and the state of the Streak since Modi took over.

I am a true Hindu who believes in things like Raahukaala :)

I know India will not win the world cup bcoz our white ball cricket is crap. But your reasoning of India not winning the world cup is anything but cricket.

Thank you for proving my point. That is why I said that I wish somehow a miracle happens and Rohit lifts the trophy just to see the burn among young guys as you would miss a chance to blame Modi then.

And yea sure you are a true hindu like Janeyudhari Rahul Ghandhi :))
 
Bharat Badnami :))) Who is this guy lol

Still waiting on the evidence where he seeks foreign intervention. Unless mocking the West for their vested monetary-based interests that cause them to ignore the gradual erosion of democratic principles in India is called seeking intervention :apology

You know what is calling for intervention? SC Bose trying to get Hitler and the Japanese to invade India to get rid of the British.


Yes he is asking US and Europe to react to events in India and telling them they are not reacting enough.


What reaction is he seeking from foreigners?

And why is he seeking it?

Erosion of democratic values? If congress and their Ilk cannot win elections it is erosion of democratic values? :))


British imperalists had ensalved India, what is the similarity with a democratically elected government?
 
Have to agree with this ... yet to see any of Modi critics engaging in a mature discussion with anyone who doesn't agree with them. When in a jam getting personal is all they can manage.

IMO its actually a tell tale sign that country is on the right track.

Because they have no answer for the fact that people are voting and electing BJP and Modi.

So while RaGa goes and asks US and Europe to intervene, his followers are rallying around Pakistanis.
 
Yes he is asking US and Europe to react to events in India and telling them they are not reacting enough.


What reaction is he seeking from foreigners?

And why is he seeking it?

Erosion of democratic values? If congress and their Ilk cannot win elections it is erosion of democratic values? :))


British imperalists had ensalved India, what is the similarity with a democratically elected government?

Jokes aside, I have a feeling BJP and Congress are working together, Raul Puppu is gathering BJP votes in big numbers.

His Cambridge speech may have gotten BJP an even more landslide majority in parliament than last election. Surely my ammayi Sonya would not send someone as mentally handicapped as Puppu on behalf of Congress on purpose. I feel this is all a setup, has to be, I do not see any logical explanation.

Every time you see Puppu's face or when Puppu opens his mouth BJP's vote bank increases instantly..
 
I have not watched the game live but just checked the video of respective PMs meeting players.

From their facial expression, I can safely say follwing Indian players support Modi and probably votes for BJP (secrerly) - Axar Patel, Ishan Kishan, M.Shami, Kuldeep Yadav, Ravi Jadeja, Pujara. All had big smiles and almost in awe meeting him.

But following players looked unhappy and probably dosen't support him - Ashwin, Siraj and Subhman Gill.

This is just my guess though but I can be wrong.

BTW, I tried to figure out KL Rahul's facial expression for an hour but was unsuccessful.
 
I just watched that Rahul Gandhi Chatham House interview and was cringing the whole way through. Not only were his responses daft and irrelevant to the questions posed by the host, he comes of as a very poor public speaker and even worse communicator. Even the people in audience were asking vague harmless questions, almost like they were a handpicked audience. No specific policy questions either.

Is it any wonder Congress keeps losing election after elections ? Embrassing that this is the state of opposition in India.
 
Last edited:
I have not watched the game live but just checked the video of respective PMs meeting players.

From their facial expression, I can safely say follwing Indian players support Modi and probably votes for BJP (secrerly) - Axar Patel, Ishan Kishan, M.Shami, Kuldeep Yadav, Ravi Jadeja, Pujara. All had big smiles and almost in awe meeting him.

But following players looked unhappy and probably dosen't support him - Ashwin, Siraj and Subhman Gill.

This is just my guess though but I can be wrong.

BTW, I tried to figure out KL Rahul's facial expression for an hour but was unsuccessful.

You are once again wrong. Terribly. But that's something you're used to, right? :afridi1

Gill being smart here. He opposed the farm laws publicly but being friendly to the PM of the country as you should be. Even I would smile if Modi asked me for the honour of shaking my hand :apology

del2.jpg

Both Modi and Kohli looked awkward though.

del3.jpg

Modi continues to be cringe as hell. When will he stop grabbing people for photo ops. Here he grabbed the Australian PM :rahat1

del1.jpg
 
Also, just heard the Indian commentators while Modi was doing his rath yatra around the stadium :)))

Sanju Manju was definitely one of them. He was shouting "Such a warm person, Modiji..."
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] This is what I mean by democratic principles being eroded. When Indians feel compelled to hyperventilate and profess their adoration of someone who is essentially a public servant. Rahulg is exaggerating massively when he says democracy is dead in India. But he's right as far as the direction we are heading in is concerned. Indira Gandhi was the last time we saw this kind of fawning, misuse of the instituions and media blackout. And she did it only for a short while. This guy has been doing it for 8 years now and increasing the intensity.
 
Also, just heard the Indian commentators while Modi was doing his rath yatra around the stadium :)))

Sanju Manju was definitely one of them. He was shouting "Such a warm person, Modiji..."
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] This is what I mean by democratic principles being eroded. When Indians feel compelled to hyperventilate and profess their adoration of someone who is essentially a public servant. Rahulg is exaggerating massively when he says democracy is dead in India. But he's right as far as the direction we are heading in is concerned. Indira Gandhi was the last time we saw this kind of fawning, misuse of the instituions and media blackout. And she did it only for a short while. This guy has been doing it for 8 years now and increasing the intensity.


Just because you don't like the elected PM, people should not praise him? Its an individual choice.

People are voting BJP and Modi. And only the people of India can remove them.

RaGa and his attempt for foreign intervention isn't going to work.
 
I just watched that Rahul Gandhi Chatham House interview and was cringing the whole way through. Not only were his responses daft and irrelevant to the questions posed by the host, he comes of as a very poor public speaker and even worse communicator. Even the people in audience were asking vague harmless questions, almost like they were a handpicked audience. No specific policy questions either.

Is it any wonder Congress keeps losing election after elections ? Embrassing that this is the state of opposition in India.

You should watch this interview of RaGa. It happened nine years ago when the Congress was still in power. Any hope I had in him evaporated after seeing this.

He comes across as a nice guy, but I wouldn't want him anywhere near the PM's chair.

 
You should watch this interview of RaGa. It happened nine years ago when the Congress was still in power. Any hope I had in him evaporated after seeing this.

He comes across as a nice guy, but I wouldn't want him anywhere near the PM's chair.



That's an old 2014 interview. I've seen it and it was awful. But atleast with Rahul Gandhi he gives the odd interview here and there.

Modi since he became PM 9 years ago hasn't given a single unscripted interview or press conference or town hall. The man is unable to spontaneously interact with people which reveals a shady side of him. Yet you seem to be an unabashed Modi fan.
 
Last edited:
That's an old 2014 interview. I've seen it and it was awful. But atleast with Rahul Gandhi he gives the odd interview here and there.

Modi since he became PM 9 years ago hasn't given a single unscripted interview or press conference or town hall. The man is unable to spontaneously interact with people which reveals a shady side of him. Yet you seem to be an unabashed Modi fan.

Modi’s job is administration. That’s what a prime minister does: As long as he can get his point across to the masses and have right people who can articulate on subjects they are experts in on his behalf, that’s good enough.

His time is not wasted on media interactions that create sensationalist headlines. Our media does a stellar job with what they already have anyways.

In fact lesson for Rahul Gandhi as well, instead of being a career politician by inheritance, he should first work as an administrator. Maybe a cabinet minister in Kerala to start with. All those years under Manmohan Singh were a real waste. Regardless of the quality of work at least he can show people he can actually work.

He can atleast learn from Bilawal Bhutto. He is atleast trying to learn on the job.
 
Last edited:
Modi’s job is administration. That’s what a prime minister does: As long as he can get his point across to the masses and have right people who can articulate on subjects they are experts in on his behalf, that’s good enough

Maybe you should travel the world and see how mature democracies like UK and US function where the leaders are very responsive to the people who elected them by having a constant media presence. It's amazing that people like you are opposed to transparency and don't want to put questions to people who ultimately decide the quality of your life. Such subservience is reminiscent of pre-Indepedence british sepoys.
 
You should watch this interview of RaGa. It happened nine years ago when the Congress was still in power. Any hope I had in him evaporated after seeing this.

He comes across as a nice guy, but I wouldn't want him anywhere near the PM's chair.


Well atleast that interview was in 2014, when his brain was starting to form.

In 2008 when him and ammayi sonya signed the shady deal with China which no one still knows the details of, he would have had zero brain.

The agreement may have been more like;

Ammayi Sonya & Puppu: Take as much Indian land as you want, we wont rake up any fuss, just put the dollars into our Swiss/Indian accounts..

Xing Pong: Done.

lol
 

Attachments

  • Puppu Chinese.jpg
    Puppu Chinese.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 144
Maybe you should travel the world and see how mature democracies like UK and US function where the leaders are very responsive to the people who elected them by having a constant media presence. It's amazing that people like you are opposed to transparency and don't want to put questions to people who ultimately decide the quality of your life. Such subservience is reminiscent of pre-Indepedence british sepoys.

Why should a country of 1.4bn and huge economy copy others? They have their system we have ours.

We have votes to decide who we elect.
 
I just watched that Rahul Gandhi Chatham House interview and was cringing the whole way through. Not only were his responses daft and irrelevant to the questions posed by the host, he comes of as a very poor public speaker and even worse communicator. Even the people in audience were asking vague harmless questions, almost like they were a handpicked audience. No specific policy questions either.

Is it any wonder Congress keeps losing election after elections ? Embrassing that this is the state of opposition in India.
This is the classic case of the other side being so dumb that even Rahul looks intelligent as far as carrying yourself in public forums is concerned.
 
As for Congress losing elections is concerned, that's more due to a blatantly false narrative being created by the spin doctors that the regime means development which can't be further from truth.
 
As for Congress losing elections is concerned, that's more due to a blatantly false narrative being created by the spin doctors that the regime means development which can't be further from truth.

Yeap Agreed.

It has nothing to do with the mahan leader Raul Puppu and his lack of brain that is putting the majority of general public OFF...

Well at this rate, BJP may very well take the 2028 elections also.
 
Yeap Agreed.

It has nothing to do with the mahan leader Raul Puppu and his lack of brain that is putting the majority of general public OFF...

Well at this rate, BJP may very well take the 2028 elections also.

It's much more convenient to believe that those who don't want to vote for Rahul as PM are right wingers, Hindutwawadis, RSS cadres and Modi Bhakt. The simplified narrative by so called intellectuals and Congress leaders have helped create a wonderful bubble to cope with failures.
 
Yeap Agreed.

It has nothing to do with the mahan leader Raul Puppu and his lack of brain that is putting the majority of general public OFF...

Well at this rate, BJP may very well take the 2028 elections also.
So going by this logic, feku must be a scholar then!
 
So going by this logic, feku must be a scholar then!

10 years CM, almost 10 years PM. That’s Modi’s quick resume

In fact what exactly is Rahul Gandhi’s credentials? What does he do in day to day life to earn money?
 
10 years CM, almost 10 years PM. That’s Modi’s quick resume

In fact what exactly is Rahul Gandhi’s credentials? What does he do in day to day life to earn money?

His surname is enough for his credentials. Isn't that enough. So many Congress leaders feel it that way regardless of the fact they have started at grassroots and state administrations through 40 yrs of politics and governance. How dare then the common man and middle class question the credentials?
 
So going by this logic, feku must be a scholar then!

I asked the question first and you gave me a question back instead of an answer.

Let me ask the question in a different manner;

Do you believe Raul Puppu is capable of being the PM of India ?
 
Because they have no answer for the fact that people are voting and electing BJP and Modi.

So while RaGa goes and asks US and Europe to intervene, his followers are rallying around Pakistanis.



What? You do realise where you are right? Go rally around Switzerland or Mexico if it suits you better bhai. Get lost by all means.
 
What? You do realise where you are right? Go rally around Switzerland or Mexico if it suits you better bhai. Get lost by all means.

I don't cry here all day about political parties and leaders of my country.

What is Pakistanis's stake in political India? ZERO.

But since pakistanis don't like Modi, let's use a pakistani platform to abuse him.
 
Last edited:
10 years CM, almost 10 years PM. That’s Modi’s quick resume

In fact what exactly is Rahul Gandhi’s credentials? What does he do in day to day life to earn money?
Quoting these tenures is like saying Lalu, Mayavati, Chauhan, and Mulayam ruled for a decade or more.

Does those long tenures make them any more qualified?
 
Besides, I'm not an apologist for Rahul who'll take up cudgels on his behalf, never have, never will unlike you guys who come running and defending everytime someone dares to question feku.
 
His surname is enough for his credentials. Isn't that enough. So many Congress leaders feel it that way regardless of the fact they have started at grassroots and state administrations through 40 yrs of politics and governance. How dare then the common man and middle class question the credentials?
Lo, it's same in sanghi ranks, that is if you think objectively. Previously, it was Atal and Advani, now feku and motabhai.
 
That's an old 2014 interview. I've seen it and it was awful. But atleast with Rahul Gandhi he gives the odd interview here and there.

Modi since he became PM 9 years ago hasn't given a single unscripted interview or press conference or town hall. The man is unable to spontaneously interact with people which reveals a shady side of him. Yet you seem to be an unabashed Modi fan.

Don't worry, when and if Rahul becomes PM, he will also not give any interviews. He hardly interacts with his own party carders, you think he would give time to television channels?

Modi has been vilified by left leaning media for years. The likes of NDTV, Rajdeep, Barkha and Dr Roy had made a career out of it. After becoming the PM, he made a conscious effort to not give air time to any of these biased journalists. He gave few interviews to various other channels like Times Now, Republic, Aaj Tak, ABP, Zee, India TV etc but not to these leftist qabal. He created his own 'Mann ki baat' episodes instead from where he speaks directly to the people instead of going via media.

Also, not sure how old you are but Modi speaking spontaneously in public or tv channels is not an issue. Infact, his oratory and debating skills is the reason where he is today. In mid-late 90s, when he was a small spokesperson of BJP, he used to appear tv debates daily. That time only NDTV (then called Star India) was the only news channel where prime time debates used to take place. It was hosted by Arnab & Rajdeep together and Modi was regular. It was only in later years he stopped interacting with media bcoz of their biased nature, not only against him but for his party.

Basically for years these channels thought congress would never go away. Go and check the 2009 election footage of NDTV, check what likes of Vinod Dua had to say about likes of Advani and how they were mocking him. That arrogance and smug totally disappeared in 2014 when Modi became the biggest superstar of the country. His 1 episode in App Ki Adalat became the biggest hit interview in India of all time. Such was his popularity and craze. Every channel wanted him for their TRP but Modi ji ensured these biased channels who harassed him for years won't get a dime from him. The funniest of all is, he finally called a PC before 2019 elections and didn't say a word :91:

Otherwise he is well capable of speaking spontaneously in media:

 
He is talking about Rahul Gandhi, so he is not saying PM Modi has blood on his hands. :inti:

Nah, he was asking exactly the same thing I replied.

When Local.Dada asked what is Rahul's credentials to become PM which is a perfectly legit question, he replied 'he don't have blood in his hands' meaning current PM has blood in his hands.

He of course cant say it openly living in India since no law has proven him guilty. Kagaz dikhana par gaya to? Hence cryptic response ;-)
 
Besides, I'm not an apologist for Rahul who'll take up cudgels on his behalf, never have, never will unlike you guys who come running and defending everytime someone dares to question feku.

Again you are running away from the question, drifting tactics.

Ans the question: Would you be OK with Raul Puppu as the PM of India ?
 
Nah, he was asking exactly the same thing I replied.

When Local.Dada asked what is Rahul's credentials to become PM which is a perfectly legit question, he replied 'he don't have blood in his hands' meaning current PM has blood in his hands.

He of course cant say it openly living in India since no law has proven him guilty. Kagaz dikhana par gaya to? Hence cryptic response ;-)

I know.

I am trolling our pseudo secular :inti:
 
Quoting these tenures is like saying Lalu, Mayavati, Chauhan, and Mulayam ruled for a decade or more.

Does those long tenures make them any more qualified?

All those names are definitely more qualified than Rahul Gandhi. They might be corrupt or personal likes or dislikes aside you must be really naive to compare some of those names you mentioned to Raga. Those people have more political acumen in their pinky finger than Rahul.
 
I don't cry here all day about political parties and leaders of my country.

What is Pakistanis's stake in political India? ZERO.

But since pakistanis don't like Modi, let's use a pakistani platform to abuse him.

This is a thread about Modi, not Pakistan. Just be mindful otherwise we can discuss the (sub)continent as a whole in any thread you wish.
 
Some NRIs here are trying too hard to prove their loyalty for India by blindly worshipping feku. India aake raho na bhai. :91: :inti
 
I don't cry here all day about political parties and leaders of my country.

What is Pakistanis's stake in political India? ZERO.

But since pakistanis don't like Modi, let's use a pakistani platform to abuse him.

Then why do you and your highly-paid employees come rushing here all day and night to defend Modi, if it is irrelevant :apology

All you can do is keep complaining about what Nehru or Indira or Rajiv allegedly did. What's so special about Modi then, if you need to invoke history to legitimize the inescapable fact that Modi is a chota man. A really small man who needs to award himself a portrait of Modi after doing a lap of honour on a cricket ground that he named after himself, discarding Patel who was for years claimed by him and the BJP as their representative from the freedom struggle, and also where tickets were not sold to the public but instead reserved for his bhakts to come and chant his name.

That's the kind of chotu he is :))

Nah, he was asking exactly the same thing I replied.

When Local.Dada asked what is Rahul's credentials to become PM which is a perfectly legit question, he replied 'he don't have blood in his hands' meaning current PM has blood in his hands.

He of course cant say it openly living in India since no law has proven him guilty. Kagaz dikhana par gaya to? Hence cryptic response ;-)

Just because you are a coward like your partymen who are only fit for bullying the weak, don't assume too much. I've abused Modi, his policies and his fans on multiple occasions. My crowning moment was doing this in a pub to a drunk bunch of bhakts. If you want to experience this first hand, just send location :vk2
 
How do you even say that with a straight face?

Assuming you have a straight face that is :apology

Please don't bother quoting me as i will not respond ... there is a day and night difference between our maturity levels. For starters I don't come here to construct posts littered with juvenile smileys , insults and putdowns aimed at those who have opposing views.
 
Then why do you and your highly-paid employees come rushing here all day and night to defend Modi, if it is irrelevant :apology

All you can do is keep complaining about what Nehru or Indira or Rajiv allegedly did. What's so special about Modi then, if you need to invoke history to legitimize the inescapable fact that Modi is a chota man. A really small man who needs to award himself a portrait of Modi after doing a lap of honour on a cricket ground that he named after himself, discarding Patel who was for years claimed by him and the BJP as their representative from the freedom struggle, and also where tickets were not sold to the public but instead reserved for his bhakts to come and chant his name.

That's the kind of chotu he is :))



Just because you are a coward like your partymen who are only fit for bullying the weak, don't assume too much. I've abused Modi, his policies and his fans on multiple occasions. My crowning moment was doing this in a pub to a drunk bunch of bhakts. If you want to experience this first hand, just send location :vk2

Because i love to watch the likes of you froth in frustration and throw toys out of the pram and vent out on a Pakistani forum.

Its really enjoyable you see.

You abuse Modi on PP. Yet Modi wins elections after elections.
 
Please don't bother quoting me as i will not respond ... there is a day and night difference between our maturity levels. For starters I don't come here to construct posts littered with juvenile smileys , insults and putdowns aimed at those who have opposing views.

Because i love to watch the likes of you froth in frustration and throw toys out of the pram and vent out on a Pakistani forum.

Its really enjoyable you see.

You abuse Modi on PP. Yet Modi wins elections after elections.

LK Advani on the Emergency - "You were asked only to bend, but you crawled."
 
Then why do you and your highly-paid employees come rushing here all day and night to defend Modi, if it is irrelevant :apology

All you can do is keep complaining about what Nehru or Indira or Rajiv allegedly did. What's so special about Modi then, if you need to invoke history to legitimize the inescapable fact that Modi is a chota man. A really small man who needs to award himself a portrait of Modi after doing a lap of honour on a cricket ground that he named after himself, discarding Patel who was for years claimed by him and the BJP as their representative from the freedom struggle, and also where tickets were not sold to the public but instead reserved for his bhakts to come and chant his name.

That's the kind of chotu he is :))



Just because you are a coward like your partymen who are only fit for bullying the weak, don't assume too much. I've abused Modi, his policies and his fans on multiple occasions. My crowning moment was doing this in a pub to a drunk bunch of bhakts. If you want to experience this first hand, just send location :vk2

The other day you said these things don't affect your personal life but now you are saying abusing Modi in a pub was your crowning moment. So which was it?

:ehh
 
Don't worry, when and if Rahul becomes PM, he will also not give any interviews. He hardly interacts with his own party carders, you think he would give time to television channels?

Modi has been vilified by left leaning media for years. The likes of NDTV, Rajdeep, Barkha and Dr Roy had made a career out of it. After becoming the PM, he made a conscious effort to not give air time to any of these biased journalists. He gave few interviews to various other channels like Times Now, Republic, Aaj Tak, ABP, Zee, India TV etc but not to these leftist qabal. He created his own 'Mann ki baat' episodes instead from where he speaks directly to the people instead of going via media.

Also, not sure how old you are but Modi speaking spontaneously in public or tv channels is not an issue. Infact, his oratory and debating skills is the reason where he is today. In mid-late 90s, when he was a small spokesperson of BJP, he used to appear tv debates daily. That time only NDTV (then called Star India) was the only news channel where prime time debates used to take place. It was hosted by Arnab & Rajdeep together and Modi was regular. It was only in later years he stopped interacting with media bcoz of their biased nature, not only against him but for his party.

Basically for years these channels thought congress would never go away. Go and check the 2009 election footage of NDTV, check what likes of Vinod Dua had to say about likes of Advani and how they were mocking him. That arrogance and smug totally disappeared in 2014 when Modi became the biggest superstar of the country. His 1 episode in App Ki Adalat became the biggest hit interview in India of all time. Such was his popularity and craze. Every channel wanted him for their TRP but Modi ji ensured these biased channels who harassed him for years won't get a dime from him. The funniest of all is, he finally called a PC before 2019 elections and didn't say a word :91:



Nobody cares what he did before 2014. His time as PM is what affects most Indians. The leaders of US, UK, Aus and other mature democracies take unscripted questions from the media and their voters. They have the personality to engage with people, not blindly read from a teleprompter or speak on a radio while safely in his den. What Modi is showing right now is extreme cowardice by refusing to defend himself from criticism.

So, thats three bhakts - joshilla, localDada and Rajdeep - that are opposed to transparency from the Indian government. As I mentioned before, the three of you remind me of pre-independence sepoys who were slavishly subservient to their British masters. Replace British here with Modi cult.
 
Last edited:
You should watch this interview of RaGa. It happened nine years ago when the Congress was still in power. Any hope I had in him evaporated after seeing this.
The joke's on you, if in 2014 you thought he was PM material. Back then, I didn't even know where he was an MP from. Were you a Congressi in 2014 :apology
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Under the great leadership of our visionary vishwaguru, RRR's Naatu Naatu won <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Oscars?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Oscars</a> award for best original song. <a href="https://t.co/6GUX8jkQwe">pic.twitter.com/6GUX8jkQwe</a></p>— Baba MaChuvera &#55357;&#56491; Parody of Parody (@indian_armada) <a href="https://twitter.com/indian_armada/status/1635167905892687873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 13, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Nobody cares what he did before 2014. His time as PM is what affects most Indians. The leaders of US, UK, Aus and other mature democracies take unscripted questions from the media and their voters. They have the personality to engage with people, not blindly read from a teleprompter or speak on a radio while safely in his den. What Modi is showing right now is extreme cowardice by refusing to defend himself from criticism.

So, thats three bhakts - joshilla, localDada and Rajdeep - that are opposed to transparency from the Indian government. As I mentioned before, the three of you remind me of pre-independence sepoys who were slavishly subservient to their British masters. Replace British here with Modi cult.

So everyone voting for Modi are subservient sepoys?

The only sepoy here is you who wants Indians to do what the whites do. Let US UK or Australia do what they want. We are not here to follow them.
 
The joke's on you, if in 2014 you thought he was PM material. Back then, I didn't even know where he was an MP from. Were you a Congressi in 2014 :apology

I never believed RaGa to be PM material, either in 2014 or before. I had very little hope that he would be able to survive in front of someone like Modi.

And if you did not know who RaGa was in 2014 and are a proud supporter of him now, it only shows how easily the gullible are swayed by the Congressi and Leftist propaganda. :))) :)))

The joke is on you, my friend.
 
That's an old 2014 interview. I've seen it and it was awful. But atleast with Rahul Gandhi he gives the odd interview here and there.

Modi since he became PM 9 years ago hasn't given a single unscripted interview or press conference or town hall. The man is unable to spontaneously interact with people which reveals a shady side of him. Yet you seem to be an unabashed Modi fan.

I am neither a Modi nor a RaGa fan. It may be difficult for people who have a 'if you are not with us , you are with them' attitude towards these things to understand.

Being an OCI , I can vote for neither, but as a person of India origin with strong family ties to India, I would like the country to have a strong leadership and a fully functional democracy.

Now Modi, whatever he may or may not be, has proven himself to be a strong leader who puts the country in front of all else. Modi is a product of the Indian political system that has been shaped by years of misrule and the prioritization of self-interest by the Congress and the Leftists, so he cannot be perfect. But there is no denying that under him, India does have a new found sense of confidence internationally. Just look at how Dr. Jaishankar talks to the Europeans and the West, and openly he espouses Russia for India's economic interests. No foreign minister has been able to do that in India's history.

And Jaishankar is able to do this because of Modi.

There have been failures on the economic front by the Modi government, with COVID playing a significant role in India as everywhere else. But India has had it better than many others, thanks largely to Modi's economic polices. Just look at the inflation in India's neighbourhood to compare. India is doing much better than even the advanced European economies on the inflation front. It may not be perfect and to everyone's liking but at least there's a policy and a roadmap in place.

What does the opposition have as a reply? Nothing other than blaming India's democracy (which they themselves have benefited from in the past), kissing up to George Soros and calling for foreign intervention against India. They have no alternative, no constructive criticism, and no plan of action. Just Modi bashing and spouting hypocrisy at every available opportunity.

It would be naiive to assume that the Indian voters won't see through this.

As someone said, let the opposition come up with someone with half of Modi's charisma and caliber, and that will be the end of the BJP government. It is the same for the likes of me. Unfortunately, all they can come up with are jokers who look for foreign approval instead of gaining the support of the Indian voters.

Modi's biggest blessing is an incompetent opposition headed by the likes of RaGa. As long as the likes of RaGa remain, Modi and the BJP will keep winning election after election.

Let the so-called 'Lutyens Delhi liberals' come up with a smart alternative instead of indulging in pointless name calling. Only then will things change.
 
I am neither a Modi nor a RaGa fan. It may be difficult for people who have a 'if you are not with us , you are with them' attitude towards these things to understand.

Being an OCI , I can vote for neither, but as a person of India origin with strong family ties to India, I would like the country to have a strong leadership and a fully functional democracy.

Now Modi, whatever he may or may not be, has proven himself to be a strong leader who puts the country in front of all else. Modi is a product of the Indian political system that has been shaped by years of misrule and the prioritization of self-interest by the Congress and the Leftists, so he cannot be perfect. But there is no denying that under him, India does have a new found sense of confidence internationally. Just look at how Dr. Jaishankar talks to the Europeans and the West, and openly he espouses Russia for India's economic interests. No foreign minister has been able to do that in India's history.

And Jaishankar is able to do this because of Modi.

There have been failures on the economic front by the Modi government, with COVID playing a significant role in India as everywhere else. But India has had it better than many others, thanks largely to Modi's economic polices. Just look at the inflation in India's neighbourhood to compare. India is doing much better than even the advanced European economies on the inflation front. It may not be perfect and to everyone's liking but at least there's a policy and a roadmap in place.

What does the opposition have as a reply? Nothing other than blaming India's democracy (which they themselves have benefited from in the past), kissing up to George Soros and calling for foreign intervention against India. They have no alternative, no constructive criticism, and no plan of action. Just Modi bashing and spouting hypocrisy at every available opportunity.

It would be naiive to assume that the Indian voters won't see through this.

As someone said, let the opposition come up with someone with half of Modi's charisma and caliber, and that will be the end of the BJP government. It is the same for the likes of me. Unfortunately, all they can come up with are jokers who look for foreign approval instead of gaining the support of the Indian voters.

Modi's biggest blessing is an incompetent opposition headed by the likes of RaGa. As long as the likes of RaGa remain, Modi and the BJP will keep winning election after election.

Let the so-called 'Lutyens Delhi liberals' come up with a smart alternative instead of indulging in pointless name calling. Only then will things change.

I bet, you beat the following Google search result with that post:

synonyms for cliche

Please don't bother quoting me as i will not respond ... there is a day and night difference between our maturity levels. For starters I don't come here to construct posts littered with juvenile smileys , insults and putdowns aimed at those who have opposing views.

Please stop trying to act like a very serious and scholarly gentleman.

You're a bhakt. That's your level :apology
 
Modi's biggest blessing is an incompetent opposition headed by the likes of RaGa. As long as the likes of RaGa remain, Modi and the BJP will keep winning election after election.

.

Ive repeated this many times, BJP will take the 2024 elections without much trouble, they have no opposition.

Every time that clown in diapers opens his mouth or shows his face BJP's vote bank increases...

Good thing is my ammayi Sonya will most likely never see her son become the PM while she is alive, heard she is not well and most likely don't have long to go.

:angel:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All those names are definitely more qualified than Rahul Gandhi. They might be corrupt or personal likes or dislikes aside you must be really naive to compare some of those names you mentioned to Raga. Those people have more political acumen in their pinky finger than Rahul.
lol, so I have read it all. Just because these incompetent guys ruled their respective states for a few years makes them qualified for the top job.

Well done. Now I know why you rate feku so highly.
 
Again you are running away from the question, drifting tactics.

Ans the question: Would you be OK with Raul Puppu as the PM of India ?
Rahul is a saint compared to feku. If feku can reach where he has on the basis of lies and lies only, any Tom, Dick and Harry can and that includes Rahul Gandhi.
 
Nobody cares what he did before 2014. His time as PM is what affects most Indians. The leaders of US, UK, Aus and other mature democracies take unscripted questions from the media and their voters. They have the personality to engage with people, not blindly read from a teleprompter or speak on a radio while safely in his den. What Modi is showing right now is extreme cowardice by refusing to defend himself from criticism.

So, thats three bhakts - joshilla, localDada and Rajdeep - that are opposed to transparency from the Indian government. As I mentioned before, the three of you remind me of pre-independence sepoys who were slavishly subservient to their British masters. Replace British here with Modi cult.
This! Well said.

No one else defends Indian politicos but these bhakts defend feku as if they'll run out of oxygen if they don't do that.
 
lol some bhakt mentioned feku's caliber!

Does this thing even exist? Oh yes, his caliber exists in lying shamelessly at every opportunity, gross incompetence on everything under the sun, bungling everything he touches, making everything about him and him only, the list is long.

Yeah, he does have caliber.
 
Back
Top