What's new

Narendra Modi : Mega Discussion Thread

zico10 said:
Lol did my research can't find any reason you'll like please enlighten us.
Click to expand...

Well let me school you. Cuz clearly your RSS funded school didnt do a sincere job

Before Aug 1947, both East and West Wings of Pakistan had a minority population of 15-20%. However immediately after partition a lot of Muslims moved in both sides of Pakistan whereas a sizable number of Hindus also left Pakistan for India. For example, the population of Karachi, Pakistan in 1947 was 450,000, of which 51% was Hindu, and 42% was Muslim. By 1951, Karachi’s population had increased to 1.137 million because of the influx of 600,000 Muslim refugees from India. In 1951, the Muslim population of Karachi was 96% and the Hindu population was 2%. This is a result of the migration which happened which I hope even you have read about.

Now the huge chunk of the minority population left was in East Pakistan. (As far as I know a good 15% of East Pakistan's population was Hindu n 1970.) So when they rebelled and seperated the percentage of population of minorities went even down where you arrive this 1.5% (its actually much closer to 3-4%)

Also for further info, the population growth rate (percentage) of minorities (atleast Hindus I know) is greater than the growth rate of Muslims but the net increase in Muslim population is ofcourse higher on a nominal basis.
 
Slog said:
Well let me school you. Cuz clearly your RSS funded school didnt do a sincere job

Before Aug 1947, both East and West Wings of Pakistan had a minority population of 15-20%. However immediately after partition a lot of Muslims moved in both sides of Pakistan whereas a sizable number of Hindus also left Pakistan for India. For example, the population of Karachi, Pakistan in 1947 was 450,000, of which 51% was Hindu, and 42% was Muslim. By 1951, Karachi’s population had increased to 1.137 million because of the influx of 600,000 Muslim refugees from India. In 1951, the Muslim population of Karachi was 96% and the Hindu population was 2%. This is a result of the migration which happened which I hope even you have read about.

Now the huge chunk of the minority population left was in East Pakistan. (As far as I know a good 15% of East Pakistan's population was Hindu n 1970.) So when they rebelled and seperated the percentage of population of minorities went even down where you arrive this 1.5% (its actually much closer to 3-4%)

Also for further info, the population growth rate (percentage) of minorities (atleast Hindus I know) is greater than the growth rate of Muslims but the net increase in Muslim population is ofcourse higher on a nominal basis.
Click to expand...

Just to add:

Hindu population of the areas that now constitute Pakistan was 15% in 1931 India Census. It declined to 14% in 1941 India Census. Then first Pakistan Census in 1951 showed it was 1.3% after the massive cross-border migration of both Hindus and Muslims in 1947. Since 1951, the Hindu population of what is now Pakistan has grown from 1.3% to 1.9% now. (Census figures)

Pakistan has the fastest growing Hindu population in the world.
 
its a futile exercise to explain the statistics of Hindu Population to the Indians. They keep harping about the 15 % hindu Population in Pakistan coming down to zero but fail to realize that most of the hindu population was based in Bangladesh so after 1971 their population in West Pakistan , current Pakistan went down to 2-3%.
 
Slog said:
Well let me school you. Cuz clearly your RSS funded school didnt do a sincere job

Before Aug 1947, both East and West Wings of Pakistan had a minority population of 15-20%. However immediately after partition a lot of Muslims moved in both sides of Pakistan whereas a sizable number of Hindus also left Pakistan for India. For example, the population of Karachi, Pakistan in 1947 was 450,000, of which 51% was Hindu, and 42% was Muslim. By 1951, Karachi’s population had increased to 1.137 million because of the influx of 600,000 Muslim refugees from India. In 1951, the Muslim population of Karachi was 96% and the Hindu population was 2%. This is a result of the migration which happened which I hope even you have read about.

Now the huge chunk of the minority population left was in East Pakistan. (As far as I know a good 15% of East Pakistan's population was Hindu n 1970.) So when they rebelled and seperated the percentage of population of minorities went even down where you arrive this 1.5% (its actually much closer to 3-4%)

Also for further info, the population growth rate (percentage) of minorities (atleast Hindus I know) is greater than the growth rate of Muslims but the net increase in Muslim population is ofcourse higher on a nominal basis.
Click to expand...
Wow so let me get this straight the drop from 15 to now 1 is all Bangladeshi fault no repsonsbilty to Tikka khan Yahya khan and countless other butchering merry band of murderers that openly joked about changing demographics killing millions and his pincers movements on Hindus among others.

You really pick and and choose when it is convenient.
 
hafeezrocks said:
its a futile exercise to explain the statistics of Hindu Population to the Indians. They keep harping about the 15 % hindu Population in Pakistan coming down to zero but fail to realize that most of the hindu population was based in Bangladesh so after 1971 their population in West Pakistan , current Pakistan went down to 2-3%.
Click to expand...

No point explaining, I suspect most know this but still they like to troll nonsensical figures to help them feel better.
They like to paint their country as secular and free.
It's the biggest joke, who are they trying to fool ??
 
zico10 said:
Wow so let me get this straight the drop from 15 to now 1 is all Bangladeshi fault no repsonsbilty to Tikka khan Yahya khan and countless other butchering merry band of murderers that openly joked about changing demographics killing millions and his pincers movements on Hindus among others.

You really pick and and choose when it is convenient.
Click to expand...
Please don't get emotional and rather you should try to reply with logical posts.

There's no picking and choosing. These are facts. If you can't bring up factual and empirical evidence to support your viewpoint then I'd suggest don't make yourself look foolish and rather give up and accept your mistake
 
ahmedzee said:
Wel the authority calling modi a terrorist are in India... U should ask them this question... People like me are just repeating what Indian authorities post 2002 are saying...
Click to expand...

Huh?No court has said Modi is guilty of anything.And which authority are you talking about?
 
cricketjoshila said:
Huh?No court has said Modi is guilty of anything.And which authority are you talking about?
Click to expand...

LOL Indian Court . Thats like Court is Chor , Police is Chor , then how will they punish Modi and find him guilty ? For that matter , Hafiz Saeed against whom the Indians keep ranting is also innocent according to Pakistan court.
 
boomboomcheema said:
LOL Indian Court . Thats like Court is Chor , Police is Chor , then how will they punish Modi and find him guilty ? For that matter , Hafiz Saeed against whom the Indians keep ranting is also innocent according to Pakistan court.
Click to expand...
Pakistanis dont decide the credibility of Indian courts.You guys dont have any jurisdiction in deciding what should happen and how should courts function and who to be punished in an incident that has nothing to do with Pakistan.Gujarat isnt a Pakistani province nor were victims Pakistanis.So IDK why you guys talk about it.

Hafeez saeed is an internationally banned terrorist.Banned in every major country and by UN.He is wanted for planning funding and execution of Mumbai attacks in which citizens of many countries were killed and he is wanted in all those countries.He has interpol red corner notice againist.So when the whole world is saying he is a terrorist only Pakistani courts are saying he is innocent.Tells you about its credibility.
 
ahmedzee said:
People... Other parties... That authority... Ofcourse ur genocide friendly court give him a clean chit... Which is laughable...
Click to expand...

Modi is PM of India , he is a well respected Man who is welcomes all over the world . A few haters spewing non-sense against him non stop on forums wont change that.
 
ahmedzee said:
People... Other parties... That authority... Ofcourse ur genocide friendly court give him a clean chit... Which is laughable...
Click to expand...
1.Accusations by XYZ and political statements dont make anyone guilty.

2.Some random poster on a forum isnt the judge to decide credibility of Indian courts.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Pakistanis dont decide the credibility of Indian courts.You guys dont have any jurisdiction in deciding what should happen and how should courts function and who to be punished in an incident that has nothing to do with Pakistan.Gujarat isnt a Pakistani province nor were victims Pakistanis.So IDK why you guys talk about it.

Hafeez saeed is an internationally banned terrorist.Banned in every major country and by UN.He is wanted for planning funding and execution of Mumbai attacks in which citizens of many countries were killed and he is wanted in all those countries.He has interpol red corner notice againist.So when the whole world is saying he is a terrorist only Pakistani courts are saying he is innocent.Tells you about its credibility.
Click to expand...


Doesnt matter what India thinks of Modi right now , I am sure one day he will get rightly exposed for his crimes and the world will look at him as no less than a Mass Murderer , it happened with Hitler too.
 
boomboomcheema said:
Doesnt matter what India thinks of Modi right now , I am sure one day he will get rightly exposed for his crimes and the world will look at him as no less than a Mass Murderer , it happened with Hitler too.
Click to expand...
Apparently it is already happening to Hafeez Saeed as well .
 
King Cobra said:
Modi is PM of India , he is a well respected Man who is welcomes all over the world . A few haters spewing non-sense against him non stop on forums wont change that.
Click to expand...

cricketjoshila said:
1.Accusations by XYZ and political statements dont make anyone guilty.

2.Some random poster on a forum isnt the judge to decide credibility of Indian courts.
Click to expand...

For judge of Bombay High Court, Justice Hosbet Suresh, is not a nobody. He was one of the members of concerned citizen tribunal. He was one of the key authority figure to go against Modi and ensuring that indians know Modi is not fit for PM. He openly accused Modi of mass genocide in 2002.

http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/ahmedabad/modi-key-conspirator-of-2002-riots-not-fit-for-pm/

An independant source, BBC, have this article too. BBC is not a "nobody" organization. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-13170914

Even an independant source like this Sri Lankan blogger said the same. Infact it is an interesting read.
http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/39667

Human rights group also filed a case in NY, only to be dismissed because it wasnt within their jurisdiction.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...t-against-indian-prime-minister-narendra-modi

There is no smoke without fire. He played a role in the genocide, if not masterminded it. Pro-Modi indians are generally dismissing all such claims, which is not right. Yes! the courts gave him a clean chit. Why would they go against one of the most powerful RSS member/leader ever.

Out of my busy schedule, i have given few sources. There are many many more if you just use a good old google tool. I know I am a nobody, but others are somebody, whom I have listed,and who are listed in the article.
 
boomboomcheema said:
LOL Indian Court . Thats like Court is Chor , Police is Chor , then how will they punish Modi and find him guilty ? For that matter , Hafiz Saeed against whom the Indians keep ranting is also innocent according to Pakistan court.
Click to expand...

Our supreme court and high courts are among the most incorruptible organizations in the world. Indian public might not trust any party or government or even lower court but we have absolute faith in our supreme court
 
Last edited:
Indiafan said:
Our supreme court and high courts are among the most incorruptible organizations in the world. Indian public might not trust any party or government or even lower court but we have absolute faith in our supreme court
Click to expand...

No bro. Supreme Court is also corrupt. You can just check the properties of the judges. Not possible without getting money from unfair means. You must have seen the video in which a Congress leader was offering the position of judge to a female lawyer. This is fairly common.
 
Indiafan said:
Our supreme court and high courts are among the most incorruptible organizations in the world. Indian public might not trust any party or government or even lower court but we have absolute faith in our supreme court
Click to expand...

The delusion is incredible really. I admire your patriotism but I am glad that in Pakistan we are more self critical, even if we take it too far sometimes.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
The delusion is incredible really. I admire your patriotism but I am glad that in Pakistan we are more self critical, even if we take it too far sometimes.
Click to expand...

Oh please.You have no knowledge about the workings of supreme court of India.Their judgements have brought down powerful politicians ministers and billionaire businessmen.
 
Some people dont even know that the GOI has nor role in appointment or transfer of SC or HC judges.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Some people dont even know that the GOI has nor role in appointment or transfer of SC or HC judges.
Click to expand...

No bro. On paper the President appoints the Judges, but in reality it is the Govt who instructs the President to do so. You should read the blog of Justice Katju on the corruption in Indian Judiciary.
 
No point in giving justifications to outsiders about the efficiency of Indian judiciary.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Oh please.You have no knowledge about the workings of supreme court of India.Their judgements have brought down powerful politicians ministers and billionaire businessmen.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that means Indian judges and juries are above corruption and not prone to any bias or prejudice? Because if you are, I must bring to your attention that Pakistani courts are manned by faithful Muslims and are sworn by the holy Quran to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as witnessed by Almighty Allah and his angels. Therefore the decision to release suspected mastermind of the Mumbai attack Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi must be upheld as the correct and fair one.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
Are you saying that means Indian judges and juries are above corruption and not prone to any bias or prejudice? Because if you are, I must bring to your attention that Pakistani courts are manned by faithful Muslims and are sworn by the holy Quran to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as witnessed by Almighty Allah and his angels. Therefore the decision to release suspected mastermind of the Mumbai attack Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi must be upheld as the correct and fair one.
Click to expand...
First of all in India there are no juries.Indian Supreme Courts and High courts have been unbiased and fair enough to give decisions againist the most powerful in the country.

Pakistani judges have failed to punish terrorists and thats why military courts have been established in Pakistan.Also the likes of Lakhvi and Saeed are banned terrorists across the world not only India.So when some court decides to release them it shows how credible they are.Not to mention that these guys are accused of killing people of various nationalities in a foreign country.

Btw do you know what happened to the judge who gave death sentence to Mumtaz Quadri?And we must believe that some judge will convict a powerful and dreaded terrorist like Saeed or Lakhvi.
 
cricketjoshila said:
First of all in India there are no juries.Indian Supreme Courts and High courts have been unbiased and fair enough to give decisions againist the most powerful in the country.

Pakistani judges have failed to punish terrorists and thats why military courts have been established in Pakistan.Also the likes of Lakhvi and Saeed are banned terrorists across the world not only India.So when some court decides to release them it shows how credible they are.Not to mention that these guys are accused of killing people of various nationalities in a foreign country.

Btw do you know what happened to the judge who gave death sentence to Mumtaz Quadri?And we must believe that some judge will convict a powerful and dreaded terrorist like Saeed or Lakhvi.
Click to expand...

In the Quran we are instructed to take the word of a believer over a non-believer, therefore your slurs against the righteous Muslim judges who fear the wrath of Allah cannot be accepted. I request you to delete your remarks and offer an apology.
 
Indiafan said:
Our supreme court and high courts are among the most incorruptible organizations in the world. Indian public might not trust any party or government or even lower court but we have absolute faith in our supreme court
Click to expand...


So , do you think that Modi was innocent all along and everything against him was just a propaganda ?
 
Romali_rotti said:
:))), :))... Yes Rahul Gandooh and Kon_gress lol...... Can someone educate this chap the most mass murders and riots have occurred when Kon_Gress was in charge
Click to expand...

lol at all ındıans lıke you who try too hard to defend crımınals lıke mudı
 
Romali_rotti said:
:))), :))... Yes Rahul Gandooh and Kon_gress lol...... Can someone educate this chap the most mass murders and riots have occurred when Kon_Gress was in charge
Click to expand...

Why ? Are Rahul and Congres also on Pakistan's payroll that have been accusing Modi of Genocide for the last 10 years ?
 
boomboomcheema said:
Why ? Are Rahul and Congres also on Pakistan's payroll that have been accusing Modi of Genocide for the last 10 years ?
Click to expand...
No they are political rivals and it suited their agenda to portray Modi as such so that he doesnt win.That propoganda failed in Gujurat and nkw has failed in India.
 
cricketjoshila said:
No they are political rivals and it suited their agenda to portray Modi as such so that he doesnt win.That propoganda failed in Gujurat and nkw has failed in India.
Click to expand...

And the various senior police officers who have given testimony against Modi ? Are they Pakistanti too ? Seems like everybody is conspiracing against Modi the saint.
 
boomboomcheema said:
And the various senior police officers who have given testimony against Modi ? Are they Pakistanti too ? Seems like everybody is conspiracing against Modi the saint.
Click to expand...

He said political rivals, not Pakistani. Read again.
 
Indiafan said:
Our supreme court and high courts are among the most incorruptible organizations in the world. Indian public might not trust any party or government or even lower court but we have absolute faith in our supreme court
Click to expand...

This. If the SC convicts Modi of murder and what not I'd be the first one to call for his head. Not that I think he is an innocent angel mind you. However, if not proven in court this is all meaningless.
 
Last edited:
boomboomcheema said:
And the various senior police officers who have given testimony against Modi ? Are they Pakistanti too ? Seems like everybody is conspiracing against Modi the saint.
Click to expand...
The court considered everything before giving its judgement.You can give a statement but you have to back it up with evidence.
 
ahmedzee said:
For judge of Bombay High Court, Justice Hosbet Suresh, is not a nobody. He was one of the members of concerned citizen tribunal. He was one of the key authority figure to go against Modi and ensuring that indians know Modi is not fit for PM. He openly accused Modi of mass genocide in 2002.

http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/ahmedabad/modi-key-conspirator-of-2002-riots-not-fit-for-pm/

An independant source, BBC, have this article too. BBC is not a "nobody" organization. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-13170914

Even an independant source like this Sri Lankan blogger said the same. Infact it is an interesting read.
http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/39667

Human rights group also filed a case in NY, only to be dismissed because it wasnt within their jurisdiction.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...t-against-indian-prime-minister-narendra-modi

There is no smoke without fire. He played a role in the genocide, if not masterminded it. Pro-Modi indians are generally dismissing all such claims, which is not right. Yes! the courts gave him a clean chit. Why would they go against one of the most powerful RSS member/leader ever.

Out of my busy schedule, i have given few sources. There are many many more if you just use a good old google tool. I know I am a nobody, but others are somebody, whom I have listed,and who are listed in the article.
Click to expand...

None of the Indian friend replied to your post. Which proves that deep down they know the reality of Modi
 
cricketjoshila said:
The court considered everything before giving its judgement.You can give a statement but you have to back it up with evidence.
Click to expand...

Look CJ neither I nor another Pakistani have any personal issue with Modi we are just stating the facts and if you are serious about your arguments you should do an independent search about 2002 riots . Arguing on these matters won't do any good unless both parties are serious and willing to accept the reality instead of being stubborn


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Romali_rotti said:
I worry about Pakistani minorities :(
Click to expand...
Your focus should be on Indian minorities, naxals and the North East.

Are these people less Indian to you that you'd rather focus your attention on Pakistani minorities just because these guys might not necessarily be Hindus? :angel:
 
#GreenRoars said:
None of the Indian friend replied to your post. Which proves that deep down they know the reality of Modi
Click to expand...

Their nation, their leader...i personally don't care much what goes in India, as long as someone like Modi keeps all the garbage is spews towards Pakistan to himself....

I was just giving some quotes because I am a nobody as my indian friends mentioned. The articles mentions claim by someone in authoritative position..
 
Last edited:
ahmedzee said:
Their nation, their leader...i personally don't care much what goes in India, as long as someone like Modi keeps all the garbage is spews towards Pakistan to himself....

I was just giving some quotes because I am a nobody as my indian friends mentioned. The articles mentions claim by someone in authoritative position..
Click to expand...

I think you do, you care a lot as evident on PP; Modi is one of the most popular discussions going around :angel:
 
#GreenRoars said:
None of the Indian friend replied to your post. Which proves that deep down they know the reality of Modi
Click to expand...

What a logic sir.. if someone doesn't respond to something, does it automatically prove that he agrees with it ? Ever heard of the term "ignored" ?
 
Romali_rotti said:
He was allegedly responsible for killing muslims, if it was people from any other religion he and Pakpassion wouldnt care......
Click to expand...

I am sure they have sympathy for Sikhs also who were killed in 1984 riots.. the people at PP are real humanitarians caring for humanity across religious lines.
 
tempus123 said:
I am sure they have sympathy for Sikhs also who were killed in 1984 riots.. the people at PP are real humanitarians caring for humanity across religious lines.
Click to expand...

This is the problem with a whole lot of muslims, they will only cry foul if the muslims are affected. They would not give 2 hoots if it was people from other religions, instead of looking at it as a human catastrophe they will only look at it through their muslim eye glasses...
 
Last edited:
tempus123 said:
I am sure they have sympathy for Sikhs also who were killed in 1984 riots.. the people at PP are real humanitarians caring for humanity across religious lines.
Click to expand...

Not many are aware about the Sikhs and most importantly the killer of Sikhs is not the current Indian PM. I suppose ?
 
Romali_rotti said:
This is the problem with a whole lot of muslims, they will only cry foul if the muslims are affected. They would not give 2 hoots if it was people from other religions, instead of looking at it as a human catastrophe they will only look at it through their muslim eye glasses...
Click to expand...

Nice generalizations but Muslims care about everyone . Every single life . But Hindutvas only care about Hindutvas.
 
tempus123 said:
You wanted him to be tried outside India for a crime committed in India ? LOL..
Click to expand...

Read again. Glad you realised it was Indian courts and non Indians may or may not have full trust in them
 
boomboomcheema said:
Nice generalizations but Muslims care about everyone . Every single life . But Hindutvas only care about Hindutvas.
Click to expand...
Muslims care about everyone:is the famous quote by isis, al Qaeda, lashker-e taiba, jhanghavi, taliban, good taliban, bad taliban, tikka khan, TTP, IM, dawood, shakeel, memon, HUJI, Jesh,Somalia , they care ...they care for humanity .
 
Slog said:
Read again. Glad you realised it was Indian courts and non Indians may or may not have full trust in them
Click to expand...

1. Since you highlighted "Indian" in the quote, I assumed you had that as the crux of your argument.

2. Seriously, since when, Indian courts started working for foreigners' approval or trust ?

I don't imply that Indian courts are above questioning, heck, in this case, I feel Modi has been let free, and got away with murder. But Pakistanis not trusting Indian courts would hardly make a valid point, because they are making wild allegations without any basis. If Indian courts had given the judgment against Modi, would you start trusting them ? What's the prerequisite for trust here ?
 
boomboomcheema said:
Not many are aware about the Sikhs and most importantly the killer of Sikhs is not the current Indian PM. I suppose ?
Click to expand...

Well, may I know why you are 'aware' of Gujarat riots then ? What's so special about it, that too of 2002 only ? India has had it's fair share of riots instigated by Muslims (like the one after Babri Mosque demolition), are you interested in them ? Are you interested in the plight of Hindu Kashmiris who had to flee in 90s ?

Why 2002 Gujarat riots only ?
 
tempus123 said:
1. Since you highlighted "Indian" in the quote, I assumed you had that as the crux of your argument.

2. Seriously, since when, Indian courts started working for foreigners' approval or trust ?

I don't imply that Indian courts are above questioning, heck, in this case, I feel Modi has been let free, and got away with murder. But Pakistanis not trusting Indian courts would hardly make a valid point, because they are making wild allegations without any basis. If Indian courts had given the judgment against Modi, would you start trusting them ? What's the prerequisite for trust here ?
Click to expand...

Oh bhai I was explaining to the guy in the inital post.

I dont care much either way in regards to Modi's treatment of Indian citizens (said that in a few threads) and importantly it shouldnt matter a whole lot to an Indian.

All I was doing was giving that guy an explanation that if some non Indian has a doubt over Modi being let go free using the 'Indian courts gave him a clean chit' argument would not satisfy him and doesnt hold much weight in such a debate because the person is likely to not have a whole lot of trust in them to begin with. So my point is that using that argument in this case is futile and doesnt make sense
 
Slog said:
Oh bhai I was explaining to the guy in the inital post.

I dont care much either way in regards to Modi's treatment of Indian citizens (said that in a few threads) and importantly it shouldnt matter a whole lot to an Indian.

All I was doing was giving that guy an explanation that if some non Indian has a doubt over Modi being let go free using the 'Indian courts gave him a clean chit' argument would not satisfy him and doesnt hold much weight in such a debate because the person is likely to not have a whole lot of trust in them to begin with. So my point is that using that argument in this case is futile and doesnt make sense
Click to expand...

Yes, that's what I am asking. Why the lack of trust on Indian courts by non-Indians ? What's the prerequisite for trust here ? We will keep going in circles if you refute any judgment that doesn't suit you by saying the judges are not trustworthy.

By you, I mean the people who care or question.

Again, there are valid arguments why the judgment is wrong and how difficult it is to put powerful people behind the bar in India. But the problem with Pakistanis I have is, they don't care to give those arguments.. they just "believe" Modi as guilty and will refute any judgment which doesn't concur with their view.
 
tempus123 said:
Well, may I know why you are 'aware' of Gujarat riots then ? What's so special about it, that too of 2002 only ? India has had it's fair share of riots instigated by Muslims (like the one after Babri Mosque demolition), are you interested in them ? Are you interested in the plight of Hindu Kashmiris who had to flee in 90s ?

Why 2002 Gujarat riots only ?
Click to expand...

Because Modi is their fav punching bag and also Muslims are involved.
 
tempus123 said:
Well, may I know why you are 'aware' of Gujarat riots then ? What's so special about it, that too of 2002 only ? India has had it's fair share of riots instigated by Muslims (like the one after Babri Mosque demolition), are you interested in them ? Are you interested in the plight of Hindu Kashmiris who had to flee in 90s ?

Why 2002 Gujarat riots only ?
Click to expand...

because all that happened recently and it is more in media . If India failed to punish the killers of Sikhs then it means that India is doublle guilty for both Muslims as well as Sikhs . It only proves that minorities have it hard in India to get justice.
 
Vayuu said:
But they named their missiles on their name and has given them hero like status and modi has been proven innocent by Indian courts.
Click to expand...

Flaws of your courts then and that's why he was summoned by the US court. Such a shame for PM that foreign country court summoned him. :)))
 
#GreenRoars said:
Flaws of your courts then and that's why he was summoned by the US court. Such a shame for PM that foreign country court summoned him. :)))
Click to expand...
Go read what the court said.It said rejecting the case that it has no jurisdiction on this matter.
 
boomboomcheema said:
because all that happened recently and it is more in media . If India failed to punish the killers of Sikhs then it means that India is doublle guilty for both Muslims as well as Sikhs . It only proves that minorities have it hard in India to get justice.
Click to expand...

No. That's not the most recent riot in India. Also it's not related to minorities being unsafe, because you can see that 1992 Babari mosque was demolished and riots were instigated by Muslims then.

Also the 1990 Hindu Kashmiris had to flee their own homes, and Govt. could not save them.. you will not find a similar story in rest of the world where the majority of the country was uprooted from their native places.

Clearly, I don't see the similar outrage against these muslim acts.. where is your humanity gone ?
 
tempus123 said:
No. That's not the most recent riot in India. Also it's not related to minorities being unsafe, because you can see that 1992 Babari mosque was demolished and riots were instigated by Muslims then.

Also the 1990 Hindu Kashmiris had to flee their own homes, and Govt. could not save them.. you will not find a similar story in rest of the world where the majority of the country was uprooted from their native places.

Clearly, I don't see the similar outrage against these muslim acts.. where is your humanity gone ?
Click to expand...

I dont know why you need to keep mentioning Sikhs and Pandit again and again to defend Modi . They are different cases .
 
cricketjoshila said:
What Obama?What will the US court do to someone in India?NOTHING it has no power to do anything in India.
Click to expand...

Many countries were aware of the role played by Modi in riots , hence he was blocked from entering . But after he became he is being allowed , thats because they want to maintain diplomacy with Indian PM otherwise everbody knows to what extent Modi was guilty
 
boomboomcheema said:
Many countries were aware of the role played by Modi in riots , hence he was blocked from entering . But after he became he is being allowed , thats because they want to maintain diplomacy with Indian PM otherwise everbody knows to what extent Modi was guilty
Click to expand...

Modi was simply disallowed because of the ruling Congress pressure. Its own MPs wrote to Obama to deny Visa to Modi. US went with the ruling Congress wishes then, and now welcomes Modi when he is in Power. They care damn about any human right violations.
 
CricketCartoons said:
Modi was simply disallowed because of the ruling Congress pressure. Its own MPs wrote to Obama to deny Visa to Modi. US went with the ruling Congress wishes then, and now welcomes Modi when he is in Power. They care damn about any human right violations.
Click to expand...

Thats why Indians need to stop ranting against Hafiz Saeed who has been declared terrorist by UN, US or whoever. If he was als some PM , then US would be rolling red carpet for him as well .

Modi becoming PM and being free to visit US doesnt mean that he is innocent.
 
boomboomcheema said:
Thats why Indians need to stop ranting against Hafiz Saeed who has been declared terrorist by UN, US or whoever. If he was als some PM , then US would be rolling red carpet for him as well .

Modi becoming PM and being free to visit US doesnt mean that he is innocent.
Click to expand...

Modi being denied visa by US doesnt mean he is guilty. So idiots should stop ranting about this. It was the anti Modi lobby working in the US. There has been no evidence which can link him to human rights violations. He is only guilty of not doing enough, but that is normal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Bald Eagle
[VIDEO/PICTURES] "Hot sindoor runs in my veins": Indian PM Narendra Modi
Replies
37
Views
1K
MP2011
M
Bhaijaan
Narendra Modi: A true global leader - The ultimate statesman and ambassador of peace
6 7 8
Replies
603
Views
56K
Bhaijaan
Bhaijaan
Bhaag Viru Bhaag
Musk’s AI Tool Grok Has Indian Rightwing Propagandists Worried
Replies
3
Views
257
sweep_shot
sweep_shot
The Bald Eagle
  • Poll Poll
[PICTURES] A stunner in Indian elections, for Narendra Modi and BJP its just like chickens came home to roost
5 6 7
Replies
502
Views
14K
FearlessRoar
FearlessRoar
FearlessRoar
"Congress will bulldoze Ram Temple if it comes to power": Narendra Modi
2
Replies
90
Views
3K
Farhan The Man
F
Back
Top