What is the burden of proof here? Or you just imagined it?
How sweet. All of sudden you want proof? How come that wasn't an issue with Afzal Guru?
But I have circumstantial evidence.
All communal riots in India are engineered for political reasons. Gujarat 2002 is a case in point. Once they begin, political masters have two choices - control it immediately or allow it to continue. During the Bodo-Muslim clashes in Assam last year, once the state government assessed the police is unable to control the violence, they picked up the phone and called in the army. Peace was restored within 72 hours.
But in Gujarat, when it was pretty effing clear the state police was unable to control the riots, all Mr. Vikaspurush had to do was pick up the phone and call in the army. The sight of a platoon of Gurkhas on flag march is all it takes for the lumpen elements of society to disappear. But he didn't.
One can draw two conclusions out of this act of omission. Modi was paralyzed into inaction by the brutality of the gang rapes and mass killings.
Or he deliberately let the killings continue because it served his agenda.
Since we are in the realm of circumstantial evidence, the first option - that Modi was shocked into numbness - is unlikely, because if his PR machine is to be believed, he is a 'man of action.'
This leaves with the second conclusion. He deliberately refused to stop the riots by calling in the army. What could have been his agenda? Pretty obvious, considering he is just another run-of-the-mill politician hungering for power. He sniffed an opportunity to consolidate his vote bank ahead of state elections.
Such a man is now being projected as a next PM of the country, while a poor man from a marginalized community is hanged in our name to satisfy some imaginary societal 'conscience.' Conscience. Don't make me laugh. Mukesh Ambani can buy the nation's conscience right now if he wants to. If Afzal Guru had a 100 cr PR machine backing him, he would have become CM of J&K at the least.