shan
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Runs
- 8,563
hope this is the start of another colaps
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uzzy said:Well if we win it will be the work of the bowlers. We have to restrict them and make sure they dont have a big lead over us. Then it will be the batsmans job to get the runs. I wont praise Inzamam because him letting the oppoisition recover when you should go for the kill is starting to become a joke now.
But like i said if we win, then credit to the bowlers.
Waqar's inswinging yorker said:im getting sick of this. Ok asif and gul had reduced lankans to a bad position - how did inzi not go for the kill? he had the choice of kaneria,razzaq,afridi and malik as backup in the attack. Gul and asif were tired so needed a rest for an aggressive spell later on( they arent machines who can bowl endless amount of overs). Asif did come back later on and finished them up. Uzzy r u saying he shouldnt have given razzaq a bowl when he did? hindsight is a wonderful thing and it seems like certain ppl solely rely/wait on that. Ok so his fields werent overly aggressive but inzi obv saw the rest of the attack as containers before a concerted final push from the strike bowlers
Uzzy said:A 1 hour rest! He already had a 15 minute break beforehand and then another 30 mins while Kaneria\Gul\Razzaq were bowling. Surely a 15 minute break would have sufficed? Even the commentators were questioning Inzi not bringinig on Asif after the 15 minute break. And what do you know, as soon as Asif was brough on (1 hour late!) he picked up a wicket in his first over. Why didnt Inzi bring on Asif much earlier and just go for the kill then? Instead he opted for Razzaq when even on seaming wickets Razzi was useless.
This is the sole reason why i will blame Inzi if we lose this match. But if we win credit goes to the bowlers.
Uzzy said:Yes which goes to prove that if Inzi had brought on asif 1 hour earlier the Sri lankas innings would have been wrapped up and we would have had a marginal lead over them instead of a measly 176 all out!
Oxy™ said:Eng 142-9![]()
shan said:bowlers are not super men they need rest so inzy done the right thing
Uzzy said:Which makes me ask the question. Why didnt Inzi bring on Asif after the 15 minute break?
Easatheman said:Mohammad Asif into the attack..
pakistani pride said:Only rain can save us !
Weather forecast ?![]()
Oxy™ said:Rain is for wimps.
It will only mask any deficienicies that have appeared in the Pak side.
Whatever the result is - will be the fair result.
Naz said:so reminiscent of the west indies tour last year. They won the odi series, whocares? And when the real stuff comes, they fall to pieces.
Oxy™ said:SL: 203-2 (lead by 212 runs)
Razzak with one of the worst attempts to save a 4!
Oxy™ said:Like against England (2-0) and Ind (1-0)???
Uzzy said:From day 1 this test was reminiscent of the Karachi test but, this time the roles have been reversed.
aggarwald said:Except that SL doesn't have Asif/Shoaib to run through the lineup in the last innings.
Oxy™ said:SL: 203-2 (lead by 212 runs)
Razzak with one of the worst attempts to save a 4!
TaxiDriver said:sorry to go on but I think these bloody indians have 'broken' the CricInfo servers...It's not working for me...
F16 said:This test resembles the karachi Test with Pakistan playing the role of India and SL playing the role of Pakistan .
Saj said:somebody please strangle Ranjith Fernando.
Boundaries coming too easily and SL in control.