Only logical reason, in that case SA 400 is secured.maybe khurram is injured
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only logical reason, in that case SA 400 is secured.maybe khurram is injured
Why only Pakistani bowlers regressed after injury ?
It’s a ploy. Mind games that Pakistani bowlers have mastered now. The batsman thinks they will bowl off stump line because there are 4 slip fielders but they actually bowl short on leg stump to encourage a 6 where the field is vacant. Have to admire the genius
Both Rauf and Shaheen could have been highly effective here, as shown during the recent Australia ODI series in similar conditions.
Shaheen, even at 17 on his first tour, performed admirably. He’s also inform - he and dominated South Africa during that white-ball series for the most part. His new reverse-swing skills would have been invaluable, and his height and extra bounce would have made a significant impact in these conditions. My opinion.
Huge misses
at least we beat them at home hahaPakistan are going to tour England in 2026. The wickets are now flat and the dukes don't swing. Shudder to think what the Bazballers will do with this lot.
They lack the ability to hit the right areas consistently. The one guy who does possess that ability hasn't even bowled today.So the least they should do is keep it top of off stump. Even at 125kph that’s challenging for batsmen but they are just spraying it around.
That’s an extreme statement. Performance in tests is a good predictor of ODIs and vice versa, if done wisely.Performance in one format is not indicative of anything in another . Shaheen did well in Australia ODIs but he was awful in Australia Tests.
Rauf just won't last a test match. He is 31 and has played a mere 9 FC matches. The last of which was 2 years ago. One full test will kill his white ball career.Both Rauf and Shaheen could have been highly effective here, as shown during the recent Australia ODI series in similar conditions.
Shaheen, even at 17 on his first tour, performed admirably. He’s also inform - he and dominated South Africa during that white-ball series for the most part. His new reverse-swing skills would have been invaluable, and his height and extra bounce would have made a significant impact in these conditions. My opinion.
Huge misses
That’s an extreme statement. Performance in tests is a good predictor of ODIs and vice versa, if done wisely.
Shaheen averaged 26 with 9 wickets in 2018. That was a much better SA batting team on better batting tracks.
Shaheen may have caused mayhem here
That’s ridiculous extremes. Express press bowlers can be fast tracked.Rauf just won't last a test match. He is 31 and has played a mere 9 FC matches. The last of which was 2 years ago. One full test will kill his white ball career.
you are being Mr Obvious today ... Abbas bowling his 17th !SA is in good position atm... Taking game away from Pakistan here
In general, Shaheen has lacked test match fitness in recent times. Maybe he would have snared a couple of key wickets but I question how successful he would have been spell-by-spell. Still should have been playing though. His replacements haven't exactly set a high bar.Performance in one format is not indicative of anything in another . Shaheen did well in Australia ODIs but he was awful in Australia Tests.
South Africa is a notoriously difficult place to bat but it's a little tough to bowl there as well for visiting teams. The South Africans quicks are tall and get so much more out of the surface.They lack the ability to hit the right areas consistently. The one guy who does possess that ability hasn't even bowled today.
We need to accept Shaheen was destroyed by being rushed for T20I tournament. He needs more time to get that verve backIn general, Shaheen has lacked test match fitness in recent times. Maybe he would have snared a couple of key wickets but I question how successful he would have been spell-by-spell. Still should have been playing though. His replacements haven't exactly set a high bar.
Probably should have played ahead of Abbas. Don't see the logic in bringing him back.In general, Shaheen has lacked test match fitness in recent times. Maybe he would have snared a couple of key wickets but I question how successful he would have been spell-by-spell. Still should have been playing though. His replacements haven't exactly set a high bar.
Did you even see the recent SA and Aus ODI series? If anything, this is the deadliest Shaheen I’ve seen. He’s now added the one that goes away, and he’s also added reverse swing. The pace is also back to where it used to be.You have to go back all the way to 2018 to prove your point. It's almost like Shaheen's injury and subsequent decline didn't happen
No it is not. He has no test fitness.That’s ridiculous extremes. Express press bowlers can be fast tracked.
The lengths Rauf bowled in Aus ODI tour were test match lengths. He can be a much better test bowler and he does better in helpful conditions. His worse days come on flat tracks where he loses it
Jahandad would've been perfect. Alas.South Africa is a notoriously difficult place to bat but it's a little tough to bowl there as well for visiting teams. The South Africans quicks are tall and get so much more out of the surface.
The lengths you need to bowl there is vastly different from the rest of the world.
Did you even see the recent SA and Aus ODI series? If anything, this is the deadliest Shaheen I’ve seen. He’s now added the one that goes away, and he’s also added reverse swing. The pace is also back to where it used to be.
Some of the commentary I see here is delusional. Shaheen was never express. He has always been high 130s bowler and he never saw a decline in ODIs. He bowled 145+ for brief 6 month period in T20Is at max, but that now feels like an aberration.
In test cricket, he’s been used on the worse pitches in the world
They won at home in suitable conditions. Give em a chance!Proper thrashing loading, stamping that Eng series win was a fluke
Test cricket isn’t one-dimensional—it requires variety in the bowling attack. While players like Mir Hamza and Abbas have their roles, there’s also a need for an enforcer who can consistently bowl 145+ in short bursts of 3-4 overs, especially in SENA conditions.No it is not. He has no test fitness.
He has barely bowled with the red ball in his life and is now 30+. Even the great fast bowlers start to wind down at this stage. A bloke with NINE FC matches will not set the international stage on fire. Come on.
No idea but he was the most penetrative bowler and often takes wickets. So mystery why he is not bowling,.Khurram is injured ?
that wide execially was ridicjamal has the knack of producing a jaffa after bowling 10-20 rubbish bowls
did the comms say that he picked up a niggle? I didn't quite catch it because i was on a phone callWhy isn't Shehzad bowling?
I don't know just tuned in. May be he is injured again. He is made up of glassdid the comms say that he picked up a niggle? I didn't quite catch it because i was on a phone call
You’re living in extremes if you think that success in ODIs is not a good predictor of success in tests. The formats are similar enough. If anything bowling in ODIs is harder. These same bowlers Bosch, Jansen and Rabada look more threatening with red ball because conditions are more favorable. It’s like saying Jaiswal wouldn’t do well in ODIs.I reiterate . It has no bearing on how he may go in Test matches.
He won't hit the same speeds while bowling 18 overs a day.
Commies saying he has a niggle. Made of glassWhy isn't Shehzad bowling?
Well they dropped him because they felt he lacked pace. Then they saw the pace of the other bowlers and figured might as well bring him back so he can replicate some of the old magic, since the others aren't exactly quick either. But he seems to be past it at this point. He actually hasn't been that bad but when you are that low on pace, the margin for error is even lower.Probably should have played ahead of Abbas. Don't see the logic in bringing him back.
But I don't Shaheen was able to take that 3 format workload . And a given a choice, fast bowlers will always quit Tests first.
If a bowler does well in Test cricket, you can assume that they will do well in Odi's as well. There are exceptions like Philander, Robinson etc but the larger point is true.Did you even see the recent SA and Aus ODI series? If anything, this is the deadliest Shaheen I’ve seen. He’s now added the one that goes away, and he’s also added reverse swing. The pace is also back to where it used to be.
Some of the commentary I see here is delusional. Shaheen was never express. He has always been high 130s bowler and he never saw a decline in ODIs. He bowled 145+ for brief 6 month period in T20Is at max, but that now feels like an aberration.
In test cricket, he’s been used on the worse pitches in the world
He will never agree to it and for good reason. He is 31 years old and the risk of injury is too big. One injury and he is done.Test cricket isn’t one-dimensional—it requires variety in the bowling attack. While players like Mir Hamza and Abbas have their roles, there’s also a need for an enforcer who can consistently bowl 145+ in short bursts of 3-4 overs, especially in SENA conditions.
There don’t seem to be many such options in domestic cricket, but from what I’ve seen of Rauf, his Test-match lengths during the Australia ODI tour suggest he could thrive in similar conditions. If he replicates that form, he’d be a real handful.
To make it work, though, someone needs to guide him properly: compensate him for league sacrifices, rest him during T20s, get him into the academy, give him FC opportunities, and introduce him to Test cricket carefully and strategically.
Because in Odi even a bad ball can get you wickets and there is a massive difference bowling 10 overs and bowling 20 in a day. In Odi going at 4 rpo is ok. In tests 4rpo is rubbish. You are just handing the initiative to opposition.You’re living in extremes if you think that success in ODIs is not a good predictor of success in tests. The formats are similar enough. If anything bowling in ODIs is harder. These same bowlers Bosch, Jansen and Rabada look more threatening with red ball because conditions are more favorable. It’s like saying Jaiswal wouldn’t do well in ODIs.
Well they dropped him because they felt he lacked pace. Then they saw the pace of the other bowlers and figured might as well bring him back so he can replicate some of the old magic, since the others aren't exactly quick either. But he seems to be past it at this point. He actually hasn't been that bad but when you are that low on pace, the margin for error is even lower.
Yeah, alot of the blame lies on playing him in meaningless bilateral T20s against England C and New Zealand Z. There is zero amount of planning and thinking behind how our fast-bowlers should be used. The prevailing theme still very much seems to be that every game for Pakistan is important, which it is not.
He's a seam bowler, differenceAbbas is an embarassment to all budding fast bowlers
This wicket is really fun to watch cricket on. Not much bounce but the pitch is always doing something. Bowlers are always in the game should they pitch it in the right areas.
Perfect balance between bat and bowl.
The idea that success in ODIs doesn’t translate to Tests is an oversimplification. ODI bowling, in particular, shares many similarities with Test cricket. Countless players have started in ODIs, impressed, and gone on to have great Test careers.If a bowler does well in Test cricket, you can assume that they will do well in Odi's as well. There are exceptions like Philander, Robinson etc but the larger point is true.
Success in LOI is not indicative of anything.
He will never agree to it and for good reason. He is 31 years old and the risk of injury is too big. One injury and he is done.
He is an asset for Pakistan in White ball cricket and should stay there.
Last question, is there any example of a 31 year with no FC experience doing well in International cricket? Teach him. Cannot do it at his age. Age is the issue here.
If that is the strategy then someone needs to remind them that they don't have 300+ on the board.Maybe the strategy was to get Jamal to bang it into the pitch and damage one side of the ball so that Khurram can get reverse ?
Benign captaincy from passengerBowling looks toothless