What's new

Pakistan v West Indies | 1st ODI | Abu Dhabi | 12/11/08 | WIndies Innings

Status
Not open for further replies.
Chanders the #1 batsmen in the world currently..things aren't looking good for Pak.
 
Saj said:
Ouch, not watching this, but even so the scorecard makes for painful reading!

Hows it been going guys? Bad bowling or just good batting?

Abdur bowled too short, eco 9.3 something...

We did start off bowling well... but Gale let loose after te 7th over
 
That was given wide, these umpires are way too harsh. I'm almost certain that was a couple of inches under head height. The message they're giving is either bowl a bouncer at shoulder height or forget about it.
 
i hate it when pakistan usually hafto chase like a bangali 150-200 type of score because it's boring but atleast from this high score pakistan will hafto bat more entertaining.
 
Gul has a tendency to try and bang the ball in short when things arent going his way. Poor tactics on wickets such as these.
 
Too much width from Gul. He's been erratic today. Not enough yorkers, misdirected short balls, and far too many length deliveries on a very unresponsive surface.

He'll learn.
 
Sarwan given out ct behind

Not too pleased about it.

I also have my doubts

213-3 off 37.3 overs
 
That appeal from Akmal :)))
 

Attachments

  • 03.JPG
    03.JPG
    40.6 KB · Views: 69
I dont see the deflection nor hear the nick.

Not out for me
 
The Windies will be looking at about 315 here.

We'd do well to keep them to 285.
 
Chanderpaul is difficult to get out but he shouldn't be too difficult to contain in the last 10 overs.
 
Sparhawk said:
Chanderpaul is difficult to get out but he shouldn't be too difficult to contain in the last 10 overs.
This is a guy that scored a blistering 100 against OZ from 67 balls against a genuinely good attack
 
Not much batting to come for the Windies with Bravo outta the side.
 
And Akmal drops a simple catch off Afridi's bowling. Guess that makes it 1-1
 
I am sure all our eyes will be popped out when the winies guys will be bowling at 90+ mph
 
UsmanhailsAfridi said:
Kami does it again...ONE MORE TIME

It was tactical, Marshall's stringing the dots together, great tactical alertness from Kami there!
 
Luton Bad Boy said:
I would bring on Younis Khan....but, I am not captain of Pakistan cricket team, a non-brainer dud called Shoaib Malik is...

Surely Fawad should be considered first?

anyway Rauf is back for some more!
 
Muhammad said:
Surely Fawad should be considered first?

anyway Rauf is back for some more!

Good point, but, you would think someone like Stevie Wonder could see this, but, not our Shoaib Malik....
 
Regardless of what he does with the bat, Afridi already justifies his place on that bowling performance alone - one of our best bowlers today. Really wish Akmal had held on to that drop too!

Of course his bat will also do some "talking".

Good bowling from us so far to pull it back - the West Indies haven't done justice to Gayle's century yet.
 
Malik has 3 ovs each from Tanvir, Rauf and Gul....does that mean he is going leave Fawad Alam to get a spanking in the last over...

Great thinking...
 
amarmak said:
I am sure all our eyes will be popped out when the winies guys will be bowling at 90+ mph
On this pitch, that'll get to the boundary even quicker. It's about mixing your pace, and varying your length. Haven't seen any reverse either, so pace might not be the answer.
 
Fawad should have been brought on earlier. Not sure why he's bowling now when the slog is on.
 
What does Fawad Alam gain from bowling or batting at the death?

He is one hell of an unlucky player!
 
Ghoshtbuster said:
why bring on your most inexperienced bowler at the death. He also happens to be a spinner.

Ridiculous move, he should've perhaps tried Younis?
 
That drop catch by our "only wicket-keeper in the country" is going to cost Pakistan big time...AGAIN!!!
 
Sheikh said:
Fawad should have been brought on earlier. Not sure why he's bowling now when the slog is on.
cause malik doesn't know his a** from his elbow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top