Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pakistan need atleast a lead of 450
He does not go after short ball in test, but in odi he does that all the time and better than Shezad or Hafeez.
His pull and cut are superior than rest. Hook is variation of pull, most Asian don't go for it, since they don't have too specially in test.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Amir, Riaz, Junaid/Asif/Mir Hamza/Rahat and Shah will win us the series against England if the batting holds up. If Sri Lanka can win a series, I don't see any reason why we can't either.
As for Australia, if they lay out the same flat tracks that India were served, our batsmen will pile on the runs if they can get over the mental pressure of batting in Australia. Riaz will give Australia a whole serving of their own medicine in Perth.
cant disagree moreHe does not go after short ball in test, but in odi he does that all the time and better than Shezad or Hafeez.
His pull and cut are superior than rest. Hook is variation of pull, most Asian don't go for it, since they don't have too specially in test.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"If batting holds" - that's a big if, that's why we did not win in 2010, and never in Australia.
I will not hold my breath !!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
YK and Misbah should get a move on now, too much tuk-tuk is detrimental to health.
It is but with Azhar and Shafiq becoming world-class players and with Younis and Misbah likely having one last good series in them, I wouldn't be too worried. Then we have some good back-up options in Haris, Rizwan and Babar.
YK and Misbah should get a move on now, too much tuk-tuk is detrimental to health.
YK has no idea how play seam bowling, really embarrassing for a veteran of 100+ tests, a gulf of difference between Misbah and him to handle pace.
Misbah and Younis having good series, they cannot play fast bowler even in UAE.
I have a theory, if team plays 5/6 pacers in UAE and no spinners they can win test series against us. All these runs are still coming off of spinners. If you don't give spinners to these two, they cannot score specially Misbah.
But nobody has tried that theory on us, it's hard to play that many pacers in this heat. It's the extra heat of UAE that is keeping our winning streak alive [emoji6][emoji6][emoji6]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So the plan is not to score runs vs. Anderson.
Younis Khan is quite capable against pace. If I was to rate his ability against pace, I'd give him a 7.5 out of 10, compared to a 9.5 out of 10 for his ability against spin. Amla and de Villiers would get 9 against both types of bowling.
Just because Khan has been so good against the spinners, people seem to think that his game against the pacers is weak, which is not the case. Yes, his technique isn't anything to write home about but he looks pretty awkward batting against the spinners too. He's made it work and that is what matters.
A future ATG.
Younis Khan is quite capable against pace. If I was to rate his ability against pace, I'd give him a 7.5 out of 10, compared to a 9.5 out of 10 for his ability against spin. Amla and de Villiers would get 9 against both types of bowling.
Just because Khan has been so good against the spinners, people seem to think that his game against the pacers is weak, which is not the case. Yes, his technique isn't anything to write home about but he looks pretty awkward batting against the spinners too. He's made it work and that is what matters.
A future ATG.
This. Never understand why people say YK can't play against pace. That is not true. Just because he is great against spin, it doesn't mean he is poor against pace. I think he is decent against pace and so is Misbah. It's just that these two are great against spin so people think that they can't play pace which is a total myth.
More like not able to score against him...
Misbah: Yes
YK: No No, he's a massive flop against pace.
But according to some, he is a useless trundler bowling off-cutters, so the great players of pace on show should be able to attack him?
The logic doesn't add up for me.
Misbah: Yes
YK: No No, he's a massive flop against pace.
See YK is dragging every ball with an inside edge toward his pads, he's standing so far out of his crease to avoid getting LBW.
But according to some, he is a useless trundler bowling off-cutters, so the great players of pace on show should be able to attack him?
The logic doesn't add up for me.
YK 7.5 out of 10 against pace
) You've gotta be kidding me!
He can hardly survive and looks very awkward against fast bowlers, he can't even score 10% of his runs against pacers. What makes you rate him so higher?
Rashid bhai is the first leg-spinner who has made the beautiful art of leg-spin bowling look ugly.
Deliberately making him look good, in case they drop him for Samit Patel and a left arm spinner takes Pakistan apart again.
Not in my opinion. I say YK is decent against pace too. He looks awkward because of his technique and the way he bats and not because he can't play against pace.
Deliberately making him look good, in case they drop him for Samit Patel and a left arm spinner takes Pakistan apart again.
I would hardly give him a 3 out of 10 against pace, he is absolutely horrendous against pace bowling, looks in all sorts of mess when handling fast bowlers and can't even defend assertively. Misbah is much better than him in this aspect!
Maybe it's the batting making him out to be as miserly as Joel Garner in ODIs.
I would hardly give him a 3 out of 10 against pace, he is absolutely horrendous against pace bowling, looks in all sorts of mess when handling fast bowlers and can't even defend assertively. Misbah is much better than him in this aspect!
I would give you a 1 out of 10 for your cricket analyzing skills, if you believe what you just said here.
Two average players of pace on show, but Anderson has once again dismissed the Clouderson myth.
afridi? lol
that is where he gets found out, the short ball coz he just pulls off the front foot
Bro someone please explain what clouderson means!!!!
Can someone please explain why anderson is called clouderson
Two average players of pace on show, but Anderson has once again dismissed the Clouderson myth.
He isn't mediocre nor is he brilliant in overseas conditions - he's decent.
Bro someone please explain what clouderson means!!!!
I hope they include samit patel because twice as bad as moeen if thats possible
Younis "looks" ordinary but it must hurt people when Younis makes them question their eyes when he keeps piling on the runs. His record in England, New Zealand and Australia must be scarring for these people, as must his record at #3.
Yet both of them are twice as good as Rashid.
Anderson is criminally underrated in these conditions