Bhaijaan
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Runs
- 60,536
- Post of the Week
- 1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Look at the comments on that post from a certain and expected section of fans
Hahaha it's funny looking at the burn.Look at the comments on that post from a certain and expected section of fans
He kept India in the match big time. A wonderful bowling effort today.
I said this in 2017 18 itself. I knew this fella was special. The way he bowled in SA first series was unreal. I have never seen an Asian bowler bowl that well and look so dangerous. He was really fast between 2017 to 2019 as well. Touching 153. Averaging between 138 to 147 consistently.Just like Wasim Akram, Just like Shane Warne, Just like Glenn McGrath, you sit up and watch Jasprit Bumrah bowl.
A genius. A once in a lifetime player at work.
If that's in order then I disagree.Marshall
Ambrose
McGrath
Lillee
Imran
Wasim
Steyn
Donald
Hadlee
Bumrah
That’s top 10 in my opinion. Cummins would be 11 and Trueman 12. Then rest.
If that's in order then I disagree.
Bumrah above wasim and imran. And donald. And lilee.
3 also don't ball tamperBest strike-rate at test wicket number 200th
Waqar Younis - 38.6
Dale Steyn - 39.2
Kagiso Rabada - 40.7
Jasprit Bumrah - 42.4
3 don't have dodgy actions
Better suited to pace bowling.Over 70% of Bumrah's 202 test wickets have come in SENA countries. That is seriously impressive!
Home umpires and bottle caps also played a part. Their away records are relatively poorer.Better suited to pace bowling.
Yet those same Indians insult the 2Ws for taking hundreds of wickets on Pakistan's roads.
For me it's abbasCummins for me is clear.
Waqar yonis all a ball temperer who took wickets of tailenders of minnnow nation at that time 7-11 didn’t even have idea of basic batting technique just free wickets his stats should be removed a bang average bowler even ashok dinda if played at his place and in that era using ball tempering he could have got same wicket ir more than thatBest strike-rate at test wicket number 200th
Waqar Younis - 38.6
Dale Steyn - 39.2
Kagiso Rabada - 40.7
Jasprit Bumrah - 42.4
3 don't have dodgy actions
If that's in order then I disagree.
Bumrah above wasim and imran. And donald. And lilee.
Imran dont deserved to be there and marshall mcgrath ,hadlee, bumrah ,steynall are equal and comparable top 5 rest all are 1 tier below them while imran is nothing specialMarshall
Ambrose
McGrath
Lillee
Imran
Wasim
Steyn
Donald
Hadlee
Bumrah
That’s top 10 in my opinion. Cummins would be 11 and Trueman 12. Then rest.
Post release his bowling is pure artistry.Any true cricket fan will appreciate and love the way bumrah bowls, the seam position, the impeccable line and length, the subtle changes in pace, the movement off the seam, the movement in air, the bouncers, the yorkers, the traps he set for batsmen. It’s truly a masterclass.
Irrespective of your nationality, if you love cricket you will actually enjoy this once in a generation talent.
The only people who are hating on him are people who don’t care about beauty of cricket but are more interested in hatred in their hearts due to political divide.
Coz cricket is a team game not his fault that others didnt put their hands upImportant moment, again Cummins got the better of him.
Jasprit Bumrah has been nominated for the Sir Garfield Sobers Trophy for ICC Men’s Cricketer of the Year 2024!
With 71 wickets in Tests and 15 in T20Is, including leading India to their second T20 World Cup title, Bumrah has delivered across formats this year.
Does he deserve the crown?
Yes. Can't argue with the achievementsJasprit Bumrah has been nominated for the Sir Garfield Sobers Trophy for ICC Men’s Cricketer of the Year 2024!
With 71 wickets in Tests and 15 in T20Is, including leading India to their second T20 World Cup title, Bumrah has delivered across formats this year.
Does he deserve the crown?
Can't argue with these stats.Bumrah 203 test wickets @Avg 19.4.
Phenomenal bowler!
Imran had 370 wickets at 22 . And he was kryptonite to indian teams in the 80's. Total owned them.
If u compare both bowlers stats, Marshall mauled opposition in 10 innings and picked 55 wickets .In rest all 20 innings he went missing .Bumrah on the hand has contributed more equally across all the matches. Avg is quite low in the era where every bowler is happy to throw their bat like sam with out technique
Goes both ways..Any true cricket fan will appreciate and love the way bumrah bowls, the seam position, the impeccable line and length, the subtle changes in pace, the movement off the seam, the movement in air, the bouncers, the yorkers, the traps he set for batsmen. It’s truly a masterclass.
Irrespective of your nationality, if you love cricket you will actually enjoy this once in a generation talent.
The only people who are hating on him are people who don’t care about beauty of cricket but are more interested in hatred in their hearts due to political divide.
Best strike-rate at test wicket number 200th
Waqar Younis - 38.6
Dale Steyn - 39.2
Kagiso Rabada - 40.7
Jasprit Bumrah - 42.4
3 don't have dodgy actions
For me asif is the greatestMiles better than Wasim and Waqar.
No asif is the greatest by far.more importantly only one relied on bottle caps out of those four. No prizes for guessing the correct answer.
No asif is the greatest by far.
Leaving waqar for obvious reasons, steyn and kg played on sa wickets against minnows too.bumrah played 95% only against elite opponents and on dead Indian tracks .more importantly only one relied on bottle caps out of those four. No prizes for guessing the correct answer.
Street sweeper reckons asifNo way Waqar is the greatest of all time
But am sure in earlier posts , Buffet bro proved comprehensively how skewed sena stats were against waqar and wasim.sweepy may be not good in maths/stats i believeStreet sweeper reckons asif
Then waqar
Imran
Wasim then bumrah.
What he says goes. He is very knowledgeable in fast bowling. Full credit to bdesh for producing so many knowledgeable fast bowling fans.
Can't argue with these stats.
Similar to Mohammed Abbas.
Two champion bowlers let down by their team mates despite some ATG SENA performances.
Comparing abbas to bumrah is like Umar Akmal comparison with Kohli. LolCan't argue with these stats.
Similar to Mohammed Abbas.
Two champion bowlers let down by their team mates despite some ATG SENA performances.
Being a pak gives him the power of mighty hulk what ever he does and divine justice in all his actionsComparing abbas to bumrah is like Umar Akmal comparison with Kohli. Lol
Abbas is just another Pakistani Trundler.
Absolutely no doubt about that. And looks like a humble guy as well.Bumrah is surely the best bowler in the world right now. No doubt
Why don Bradman rated best test batsman of all time when he did not even scored 7000 test runs thats too again only 4 test team .Absolutely no doubt about that. And looks like a humble guy as well.
But if we only stick to Test cricket (the most demanding format for a cricketer) I will still not put him above bowlers like Ambrose, Waqar, Wasim, Anderson, Mcgrath to mention a few. For that he needs to get close 400 wickets and I am sure if he plays close to 90 Test matches he will achieve that, but let's see, he is at his peak now and getting older.
To the indians: This is my personal opinion and that wont change There is a reason I don't rate Shoaib Akhtar in Test cricket either, he took less than 200 wickets and didn't last long (although that is understandable with his express pace and he was the most entertaining bowler to watch running in) but longevity matters a lot, that shows the stamina and fitness of player.
99.94 avg followed by 29 centuries in the least amount of test games played.Why don Bradman rated best test batsman of all time when he did not even scored 7000 test runs thats too again only 4 test team .
To the indians: This is my personal opinion and that wont change There is a reason I don't rate Shoaib Akhtar in Test cricket either, he took less than 200 wickets and didn't last long (although that is understandable with his express pace and he was the most entertaining bowler to watch running in) but longevity matters a lot, that shows the stamina and fitness of player.
Lol. What matters is his record when he retires. Let's see how many wicket he ends up with and at what average. Time will tellNo one in Test cricket history has reached the 200 wickets milestone with a better average than Bumrah, whose average stands at 19.43, going past former West Indies pacer Joel Garner, who got to the landmark with an average of 20.34.
With this stunning bowling average, Bumrah surpassed the career average of legendary West Indian trio of Malcolm Marshall (376 wickets at 20.94), Garner (259 at 20.97), and Curtley Ambrose (405 at 20.99), making him the sole member of this exclusive group ( 200 wickets) with a sub-20 average.
GOAT is at another level .
I have nothing, but respect for Sachins cricket career. To play 200 Test matches and 460+ ODIs is just another level. And his record is excellent as well, so yes longevity matters in this case as well.Yeah we know longevity doesn't matter for Pakistanis only when the player is Tendulkar. In that instance longevity is overrated and an easy thing to do for everyone.
Virat Kohli was averaging 54 after 8 years of Test cricket and now it has dropped to 47. Just to explain you how things can change.
I have nothing, but respect for Sachins cricket career. To play 200 Test matches and 460+ ODIs is just another level. And his record is excellent as well, so yes longevity matters in this case as well.
From 1980 to 1989 Imran Khan played 17 tests vs India.
Took 75 wickets @22.90 thats higher than his career avg.
He played 10 tests in Pakistan and avgd 20 with the ball. He played 7 tests in India and avgd 29.81 with the ball.
More like Pakistani Umpires were kryptonite.
Yeah we know longevity doesn't matter for Pakistanis only when the player is Tendulkar. In that instance longevity is overrated and an easy thing to do for everyone.
No one in Test cricket history has reached the 200 wickets milestone with a better average than Bumrah, whose average stands at 19.43, going past former West Indies pacer Joel Garner, who got to the landmark with an average of 20.34.
With this stunning bowling average, Bumrah surpassed the career average of legendary West Indian trio of Malcolm Marshall (376 wickets at 20.94), Garner (259 at 20.97), and Curtley Ambrose (405 at 20.99), making him the sole member of this exclusive group ( 200 wickets) with a sub-20 average.
GOAT is at another level .
@IAJ why ignore this because it's doesn't suits on your agenda against Bumrah?Why don Bradman rated best test batsman of all time when he did not even scored 7000 test runs thats too again only 4 test team .
Sour grapes for the MENU
That's what happens when you post facts instead of opinions.Rather you have no counter.
If you had you read post no. 2307, you wouldn't need to type this as it has already backfired lol. The guy who mentioned 400 wickets for Bumrah also appreciated SRT longevity.That’s a mic drop statement.
Pakistani posters and their opinions,
On SRT :- He is a nothing batsman outside his longevity. All he had done his life is just play and play.
On Bumrah :- No matter whatever Bumrah does but I cannot rate him until he picks 400 wickets because the longevity is what matters.
For srt, idk about other pakistani posters but I acknowledge him as the top 5 best test and top 5 best odi batters of all time.That’s a mic drop statement.
Pakistani posters and their opinions,
On SRT :- He is a nothing batsman outside his longevity. All he had done his life is just play and play.
On Bumrah :- No matter whatever Bumrah does but I cannot rate him until he picks 400 wickets because the longevity is what matters.
Firstly I have no agenda against Bumrah. You can search for my posts on him here at PP. As I have said before, I see and I commentate, those are my takes.@IAJ why ignore this because it's doesn't suits on your agenda against Bumrah?
Ok so my next question if Bumrah can retire from test cricket now than how you rate him.Firstly I have no agenda against Bumrah. You can search for my posts on him here at PP. As I have said before, I see and I commentate, those are my takes.
And Bradman played only 52 matches but he still made close to 7000 runs with 29 centuries. Had he played more matches he could have easily made 10.000+ runs and still have a high average. The next guy after him averages around 60 (played at least 20 matches), so you see the difference in class clearly. He was a clear exemption. But you can not say that about Bumrah. Yes, Bumrah has probably the best record after 200 wickets, but let's talk when he finishes his career. If he takes 400 wickets and still averages around 20 I would call him one of the very greatest of all time in Test cricket I have not issues against that. But at the the moment, he is not there in my opinion. You can call him The GOAT, that would be your take.